Robert
#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · #92 for boys in 2025, 3,772 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1953 · 86,243 births
- Debut · boys
- 2,415 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 146 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,849,730since 1880
Robert over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | #92 | 3,772 |
| 2024 | — | #90 | 3,806 | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #88 | 3,827 |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | #84 | 4,082 |
| 2021 | — | #79 | 4,436 | |
| 2020 | — | #80 | 4,402 | |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | #76 | 4,853 |
| 2018 | — | #71 | 5,191 | |
| 2017 | — | #65 | 5,566 | |
| 2016 | — | #62 | 6,010 | |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | #63 | 6,137 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #60 | 6,660 |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 | #62 | 6,721 |
| 2012 | #13,483 | 7 | #60 | 6,963 |
| 2011 | #11,181 | 9 | #62 | 6,984 |
| 2010 | #9,231 | 12 | #54 | 7,569 |
| 2009 | #9,975 | 11 | #55 | 7,842 |
| 2008 | #13,832 | 7 | #49 | 8,841 |
| 2007 | #11,630 | 9 | #47 | 9,388 |
| 2006 | #9,901 | 11 | #47 | 9,911 |
| 2005 | #6,820 | 17 | #37 | 10,166 |
| 2004 | #3,989 | 35 | #36 | 10,684 |
| 2003 | #6,885 | 16 | #35 | 11,399 |
| 2002 | #7,444 | 14 | #34 | 12,031 |
| 2001 | #5,364 | 21 | #30 | 12,665 |
| 2000 | #4,981 | 23 | #29 | 13,739 |
| 1999 | #4,576 | 24 | #26 | 14,540 |
| 1998 | #4,023 | 28 | #23 | 15,527 |
| 1997 | #3,224 | 36 | #23 | 16,304 |
| 1996 | #3,149 | 37 | #23 | 17,676 |
| 1995 | #2,735 | 44 | #22 | 18,586 |
| 1994 | #2,432 | 52 | #21 | 20,560 |
| 1993 | #1,985 | 70 | #17 | 22,447 |
| 1992 | #2,220 | 60 | #17 | 24,094 |
| 1991 | #1,832 | 77 | #13 | 26,839 |
| 1990 | #1,439 | 109 | #13 | 28,886 |
| 1989 | #1,250 | 126 | #10 | 30,072 |
| 1988 | #930 | 182 | #10 | 30,319 |
| 1987 | #798 | 219 | #10 | 30,237 |
| 1986 | #738 | 241 | #9 | 31,350 |
| 1985 | #723 | 238 | #8 | 32,094 |
| 1984 | #718 | 230 | #9 | 31,768 |
| 1983 | #671 | 255 | #10 | 32,745 |
| 1982 | #731 | 233 | #9 | 34,409 |
| 1981 | #722 | 228 | #9 | 34,395 |
| 1980 | #682 | 254 | #9 | 34,266 |
| 1979 | #680 | 252 | #8 | 34,015 |
| 1978 | #642 | 254 | #8 | 33,374 |
| 1977 | #664 | 238 | #6 | 34,214 |
| 1976 | #654 | 236 | #7 | 33,789 |
| 1975 | #635 | 245 | #6 | 35,306 |
| 1974 | #635 | 241 | #7 | 37,005 |
| 1973 | #618 | 249 | #7 | 38,698 |
| 1972 | #573 | 288 | #6 | 43,013 |
| 1971 | #585 | 298 | #5 | 50,634 |
| 1970 | #560 | 327 | #5 | 57,177 |
| 1969 | #538 | 335 | #5 | 58,300 |
| 1968 | #589 | 265 | #5 | 58,174 |
| 1967 | #598 | 254 | #5 | 56,369 |
| 1966 | #595 | 251 | #5 | 59,317 |
| 1965 | #606 | 255 | #5 | 63,106 |
| 1964 | #594 | 279 | #5 | 69,980 |
| 1963 | #633 | 255 | #5 | 70,007 |
| 1962 | #680 | 229 | #5 | 70,199 |
| 1961 | #592 | 289 | #5 | 72,977 |
| 1960 | #610 | 268 | #5 | 72,357 |
| 1959 | #653 | 235 | #5 | 74,542 |
| 1958 | #639 | 237 | #4 | 77,338 |
| 1957 | #611 | 255 | #4 | 81,765 |
| 1956 | #655 | 214 | #3 | 83,924 |
| 1955 | #607 | 232 | #4 | 83,758 |
| 1954 | #671 | 192 | #2 | 86,331 |
| 1953 | #586 | 228 | #1 | 86,243 |
| 1952 | #639 | 193 | #2 | 86,588 |
| 1951 | #595 | 210 | #2 | 86,353 |
| 1950 | #594 | 203 | #2 | 83,553 |
| 1949 | #584 | 202 | #2 | 83,873 |
| 1948 | #581 | 209 | #2 | 85,478 |
| 1947 | #549 | 237 | #2 | 91,655 |
| 1946 | #540 | 214 | #2 | 84,136 |
| 1945 | #515 | 198 | #2 | 69,947 |
| 1944 | #518 | 194 | #2 | 70,855 |
| 1943 | #468 | 250 | #2 | 74,892 |
| 1942 | #514 | 208 | #2 | 71,845 |
| 1941 | #498 | 196 | #2 | 64,247 |
| 1940 | #465 | 206 | #2 | 61,198 |
| 1939 | #465 | 208 | #1 | 59,666 |
| 1938 | #454 | 219 | #1 | 62,271 |
| 1937 | #441 | 223 | #1 | 61,842 |
| 1936 | #433 | 221 | #1 | 58,500 |
| 1935 | #426 | 231 | #1 | 56,527 |
| 1934 | #398 | 266 | #1 | 55,843 |
| 1933 | #391 | 273 | #1 | 54,221 |
| 1932 | #352 | 326 | #1 | 59,268 |
| 1931 | #345 | 343 | #1 | 60,519 |
| 1930 | #320 | 426 | #1 | 62,153 |
| 1929 | #314 | 441 | #1 | 59,807 |
| 1928 | #315 | 434 | #1 | 60,701 |
| 1927 | #332 | 411 | #1 | 61,674 |
| 1926 | #347 | 369 | #1 | 61,130 |
| 1925 | #364 | 350 | #1 | 60,895 |
| 1924 | #398 | 299 | #1 | 60,802 |
| 1923 | #424 | 250 | #2 | 56,111 |
| 1922 | #436 | 237 | #2 | 53,796 |
| 1921 | #437 | 244 | #2 | 52,779 |
| 1920 | #474 | 205 | #3 | 48,679 |
| 1919 | #494 | 184 | #4 | 41,025 |
| 1918 | #516 | 178 | #4 | 40,619 |
| 1917 | #512 | 168 | #4 | 35,220 |
| 1916 | #612 | 122 | #4 | 31,741 |
| 1915 | #607 | 116 | #4 | 28,737 |
| 1914 | #647 | 80 | #4 | 21,188 |
| 1913 | #612 | 72 | #4 | 15,684 |
| 1912 | #615 | 64 | #4 | 12,836 |
| 1911 | #698 | 39 | #5 | 6,526 |
| 1910 | #794 | 29 | #4 | 5,609 |
| 1909 | #813 | 25 | #5 | 4,563 |
| 1908 | #755 | 26 | #5 | 4,219 |
| 1907 | #790 | 22 | #5 | 4,020 |
| 1906 | #917 | 16 | #5 | 3,635 |
| 1905 | #797 | 21 | #6 | 3,410 |
| 1904 | #1,001 | 13 | #5 | 3,414 |
| 1903 | #969 | 13 | #7 | 3,044 |
| 1902 | #756 | 21 | #6 | 3,180 |
| 1901 | #829 | 16 | #7 | 2,543 |
| 1900 | #742 | 24 | #6 | 3,821 |
| 1899 | #756 | 18 | #7 | 2,609 |
| 1898 | #1,009 | 12 | #7 | 2,932 |
| 1897 | #735 | 18 | #8 | 2,701 |
| 1896 | #576 | 28 | #8 | 2,719 |
| 1895 | #703 | 20 | #8 | 2,635 |
| 1894 | #643 | 21 | #8 | 2,497 |
| 1893 | #713 | 17 | #8 | 2,563 |
| 1892 | #706 | 17 | #8 | 2,710 |
| 1891 | #943 | 9 | #8 | 2,240 |
| 1890 | #791 | 12 | #8 | 2,541 |
| 1889 | #687 | 14 | #9 | 2,513 |
| 1888 | #572 | 19 | #8 | 2,814 |
| 1887 | #860 | 8 | #10 | 2,125 |
| 1886 | #556 | 16 | #8 | 2,443 |
| 1885 | #658 | 11 | #9 | 2,322 |
| 1884 | #851 | 7 | #10 | 2,468 |
| 1883 | #579 | 11 | #9 | 2,334 |
| 1882 | #530 | 12 | #10 | 2,500 |
| 1881 | #582 | 9 | #11 | 2,140 |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | #10 | 2,415 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Robert was already there! It came in at #10, and was given to 2,415 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1899, when fewer than 3,000 boys a year got the name.
Where Robert is popular in 1956
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Rhode Island#1 · 1 in 16
- New Jersey#1 · 1 in 17
- Connecticut#1 · 1 in 18
- Wyoming#1 · 1 in 19
- Montana#1 · 1 in 24
Best ever in a state: #1 in Oregon, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | #1 | 1,378 | 1 in 18 |
| Montana | #1 | 335 | 1 in 24 |
| New Jersey | #1 | 3,464 | 1 in 17 |
| Rhode Island | #1 | 577 | 1 in 16 |
| Wyoming | #1 | 187 | 1 in 19 |
| Arizona | #2 | 563 | 1 in 25 |
| Delaware | #2 | 250 | 1 in 20 |
| Florida | #2 | 1,962 | 1 in 24 |
| Hawaii | #2 | 235 | 1 in 31 |
| Massachusetts | #2 | 3,231 | 1 in 17 |
| Mississippi | #2 | 1,146 | 1 in 25 |
| Nevada | #2 | 135 | 1 in 20 |
| New Mexico | #2 | 461 | 1 in 26 |
| Pennsylvania | #2 | 6,256 | 1 in 20 |
| Alaska | #3 | 152 | 1 in 21 |
| California | #3 | 7,098 | 1 in 24 |
| Colorado | #3 | 846 | 1 in 24 |
| Idaho | #3 | 236 | 1 in 31 |
| Maine | #3 | 451 | 1 in 23 |
| Maryland | #3 | 1,471 | 1 in 21 |
| Michigan | #3 | 4,138 | 1 in 24 |
| Missouri | #3 | 1,912 | 1 in 25 |
| New Hampshire | #3 | 280 | 1 in 21 |
| New York | #3 | 8,585 | 1 in 21 |
| Texas | #3 | 4,092 | 1 in 30 |
| Vermont | #3 | 190 | 1 in 21 |
| Washington | #3 | 1,259 | 1 in 25 |
| West Virginia | #3 | 832 | 1 in 26 |
| Alabama | #4 | 1,296 | 1 in 31 |
| Arkansas | #4 | 629 | 1 in 32 |
| District of Columbia | #4 | 674 | 1 in 22 |
| Georgia | #4 | 1,665 | 1 in 30 |
| Illinois | #4 | 4,679 | 1 in 24 |
| Indiana | #4 | 2,089 | 1 in 26 |
| Kansas | #4 | 874 | 1 in 28 |
| Ohio | #4 | 4,943 | 1 in 23 |
| Oklahoma | #4 | 846 | 1 in 29 |
| Oregon | #4 | 647 | 1 in 28 |
| South Carolina | #4 | 1,058 | 1 in 29 |
| South Dakota | #4 | 282 | 1 in 29 |
| Utah | #4 | 364 | 1 in 33 |
| Virginia | #4 | 1,817 | 1 in 24 |
| Kentucky | #5 | 1,177 | 1 in 31 |
| Louisiana | #5 | 1,217 | 1 in 35 |
| North Carolina | #5 | 1,764 | 1 in 31 |
| North Dakota | #5 | 214 | 1 in 35 |
| Tennessee | #5 | 1,391 | 1 in 29 |
| Nebraska | #6 | 554 | 1 in 29 |
| Wisconsin | #6 | 1,690 | 1 in 27 |
| Iowa | #7 | 1,003 | 1 in 31 |
| Minnesota | #7 | 1,329 | 1 in 30 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Robert
- 2 spots since 2024 (#90 → #92)
- 12 spots since 2020 (#80 → #92)
- 29 spots since 2015 (#63 → #92)
- Biggest jump: 2 spots in 1888 (#10 → #8)
- Biggest drop: 10 spots in 2006 (#37 → #47)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1953 at #1 (86,243 births)
- Births halved by 1972, 19 yrs later
- Top 10: 109 yrs · run 1882–1989
- Top 100: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 17 boys born in 1931 were named Robert (5.8%)
- Latest: 1 in 453 boys born in 2025 (0.22%)
- Its best rank, #1 in 1953, was only 1 in 23 (4.4%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 17.1% of all boys named Robert (830,395) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 24,074 | #8 (1888) | #9 |
| 1890s | 26,147 | #7 (1898) | #8 |
| 1900s | 35,849 | #5 (1909) | #6 |
| 1910s | 239,185 | #4 (1919) | #4 |
| 1920s | 576,374 | #1 (1927) | #2 |
| 1930s | 590,810 | #1 (1938) | #1 |
| 1940s | 758,126 | #2 (1947) | #2 |
| 1950s | 830,395 | #1 (1953) | #3 |
| 1960s | 650,786 | #5 (1961) | #5 |
| 1970s | 397,225 | #5 (1970) | #7 |
| 1980s | 321,655 | #8 (1985) | #9 |
| 1990s | 205,459 | #13 (1990) | #20 |
| 2000s | 106,666 | #29 (2000) | #40 |
| 2010s | 62,654 | #54 (2010) | #64 |
| 2020s | 24,325 | #79 (2021) | #86 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Robert in 1956
Top girls' names in 1956
Top boys' names in 1956
More about 1956
girls
2,007,703 girls got a published name in 1956; 1 in 9,382 of them was named Robert, which outranked 90.5% of the 6,891 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
2,115,302 boys got a published name in 1956; 1 in 25 of them was named Robert, which outranked 99.9% of the 4,455 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.