Dominick
Last seen for girls in 2012 at #14,962 · #622 for boys in 2025, 448 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1914 · 424 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 67,180since 1881
Dominick over time
Rank among boys' names. Dominick has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #622 | 448 | |
| 2024 | — | #550 | 541 | |
| 2023 | — | #553 | 529 | |
| 2022 | — | #523 | 567 | |
| 2021 | — | #484 | 616 | |
| 2020 | — | #446 | 670 | |
| 2019 | — | #430 | 714 | |
| 2018 | — | #410 | 779 | |
| 2017 | — | #362 | 908 | |
| 2016 | — | #337 | 1,033 | |
| 2015 | — | #318 | 1,113 | |
| 2014 | — | #309 | 1,129 | |
| 2013 | — | #275 | 1,286 | |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #262 | 1,364 |
| 2011 | — | #268 | 1,296 | |
| 2010 | — | #261 | 1,325 | |
| 2009 | — | #246 | 1,440 | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #239 | 1,542 |
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | #226 | 1,631 |
| 2006 | — | #215 | 1,734 | |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #214 | 1,689 |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | #217 | 1,605 |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | #205 | 1,780 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #224 | 1,556 |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #276 | 1,110 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #271 | 1,190 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #265 | 1,134 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #264 | 1,096 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #258 | 1,097 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 | #289 | 933 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #302 | 882 |
| 1994 | #5,984 | 15 | #303 | 884 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #302 | 905 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #317 | 821 |
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | #366 | 643 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #393 | 590 |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | #395 | 551 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #412 | 480 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #427 | 423 |
| 1986 | #4,724 | 16 | #419 | 419 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #413 | 423 |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | #430 | 376 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #478 | 311 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #461 | 342 |
| 1981 | — | #459 | 326 | |
| 1980 | — | #467 | 322 | |
| 1979 | — | #451 | 322 | |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | #443 | 320 |
| 1977 | — | #448 | 319 | |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #477 | 275 |
| 1975 | — | #472 | 291 | |
| 1974 | — | #499 | 253 | |
| 1973 | — | #483 | 266 | |
| 1972 | — | #472 | 277 | |
| 1971 | — | #513 | 253 | |
| 1970 | — | #467 | 301 | |
| 1969 | — | #432 | 335 | |
| 1968 | — | #456 | 282 | |
| 1967 | — | #472 | 256 | |
| 1966 | — | #430 | 315 | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #439 | 307 |
| 1964 | — | #451 | 313 | |
| 1963 | — | #434 | 337 | |
| 1962 | — | #461 | 299 | |
| 1961 | — | #455 | 313 | |
| 1960 | — | #431 | 346 | |
| 1959 | — | #439 | 329 | |
| 1958 | — | #426 | 340 | |
| 1957 | — | #436 | 313 | |
| 1956 | — | #415 | 337 | |
| 1955 | — | #398 | 332 | |
| 1954 | — | #403 | 315 | |
| 1953 | — | #389 | 324 | |
| 1952 | — | #376 | 329 | |
| 1951 | — | #385 | 311 | |
| 1950 | — | #419 | 257 | |
| 1949 | — | #425 | 256 | |
| 1948 | — | #413 | 267 | |
| 1947 | — | #404 | 288 | |
| 1946 | — | #409 | 242 | |
| 1945 | — | #390 | 235 | |
| 1944 | — | #373 | 257 | |
| 1943 | — | #365 | 282 | |
| 1942 | — | #340 | 320 | |
| 1941 | — | #353 | 273 | |
| 1940 | — | #372 | 236 | |
| 1939 | — | #375 | 231 | |
| 1938 | — | #367 | 234 | |
| 1937 | — | #342 | 250 | |
| 1936 | — | #351 | 237 | |
| 1935 | — | #331 | 271 | |
| 1934 | — | #343 | 254 | |
| 1933 | — | #306 | 308 | |
| 1932 | — | #284 | 366 | |
| 1931 | — | #280 | 390 | |
| 1930 | — | #277 | 423 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #259 | 465 |
| 1928 | — | #260 | 474 | |
| 1927 | — | #255 | 501 | |
| 1926 | — | #261 | 465 | |
| 1925 | — | #244 | 538 | |
| 1924 | — | #235 | 579 | |
| 1923 | — | #227 | 580 | |
| 1922 | — | #239 | 548 | |
| 1921 | — | #232 | 575 | |
| 1920 | — | #225 | 564 | |
| 1919 | — | #238 | 489 | |
| 1918 | — | #210 | 594 | |
| 1917 | — | #218 | 508 | |
| 1916 | — | #201 | 567 | |
| 1915 | — | #208 | 521 | |
| 1914 | — | #197 | 424 | |
| 1913 | — | #204 | 325 | |
| 1912 | — | #203 | 275 | |
| 1911 | — | #235 | 119 | |
| 1910 | — | #249 | 93 | |
| 1909 | — | #226 | 91 | |
| 1908 | — | #272 | 62 | |
| 1907 | — | #266 | 62 | |
| 1906 | — | #309 | 44 | |
| 1905 | — | #370 | 31 | |
| 1904 | — | #390 | 28 | |
| 1903 | — | #322 | 34 | |
| 1902 | — | #490 | 19 | |
| 1901 | — | #334 | 29 | |
| 1900 | — | #455 | 25 | |
| 1899 | — | #315 | 31 | |
| 1898 | — | #505 | 17 | |
| 1897 | — | #392 | 23 | |
| 1896 | — | #534 | 15 | |
| 1895 | — | #529 | 15 | |
| 1894 | — | #464 | 18 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #635 | 9 | |
| 1890 | — | #566 | 12 | |
| 1889 | — | #498 | 14 | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | #752 | 7 | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | #836 | 6 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #720 | 7 | |
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | #781 | 6 | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Dominick! It came in at #781, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1884, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Dominick is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maine#99 · 1 in 348
- Wyoming#105 · 1 in 295
- Delaware#113 · 1 in 452
- West Virginia#117 · 1 in 473
- New York#124 · 1 in 637
Best ever in a state: #44 in New Jersey, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #99 | 16 | 1 in 348 |
| Wyoming | #105 | 7 | 1 in 295 |
| Delaware | #113 | 9 | 1 in 452 |
| West Virginia | #117 | 19 | 1 in 473 |
| New York | #124 | 170 | 1 in 637 |
| Pennsylvania | #132 | 102 | 1 in 625 |
| Montana | #134 | 9 | 1 in 438 |
| New Jersey | #134 | 63 | 1 in 745 |
| New Hampshire | #151 | 8 | 1 in 699 |
| Minnesota | #171 | 37 | 1 in 810 |
| Michigan | #175 | 65 | 1 in 842 |
| Florida | #177 | 117 | 1 in 846 |
| Arizona | #184 | 58 | 1 in 732 |
| New Mexico | #184 | 15 | 1 in 727 |
| Alaska | #185 | 5 | 1 in 664 |
| Maryland | #186 | 31 | 1 in 928 |
| Nevada | #186 | 20 | 1 in 733 |
| Rhode Island | #190 | 5 | 1 in 991 |
| Wisconsin | #194 | 31 | 1 in 946 |
| Ohio | #199 | 61 | 1 in 1,074 |
| Missouri | #201 | 34 | 1 in 1,001 |
| South Dakota | #210 | 5 | 1 in 835 |
| Colorado | #212 | 34 | 1 in 882 |
| Louisiana | #218 | 23 | 1 in 1,049 |
| South Carolina | #221 | 19 | 1 in 1,116 |
| Indiana | #222 | 36 | 1 in 1,063 |
| Nebraska | #226 | 11 | 1 in 937 |
| Illinois | #235 | 64 | 1 in 1,205 |
| Oregon | #235 | 20 | 1 in 972 |
| California | #238 | 199 | 1 in 1,277 |
| Utah | #239 | 20 | 1 in 1,119 |
| Massachusetts | #240 | 21 | 1 in 1,564 |
| Virginia | #241 | 31 | 1 in 1,389 |
| Iowa | #245 | 14 | 1 in 1,173 |
| Connecticut | #256 | 10 | 1 in 1,678 |
| Washington | #258 | 29 | 1 in 1,197 |
| Kansas | #259 | 14 | 1 in 1,173 |
| Idaho | #261 | 8 | 1 in 1,075 |
| North Carolina | #278 | 34 | 1 in 1,539 |
| Texas | #287 | 117 | 1 in 1,548 |
| Oklahoma | #326 | 12 | 1 in 1,718 |
| Kentucky | #334 | 11 | 1 in 2,133 |
| Mississippi | #347 | 8 | 1 in 1,844 |
| Georgia | #364 | 29 | 1 in 2,059 |
| Alabama | #374 | 11 | 1 in 2,156 |
| Tennessee | #385 | 15 | 1 in 2,456 |
| Arkansas | #432 | 6 | 1 in 2,510 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dominick
- 72 spots since 2024 (#550 → #622)
- 176 spots since 2020 (#446 → #622)
- 304 spots since 2015 (#318 → #622)
- Biggest jump: 223 spots in 1883 (#943 → #720)
- Biggest drop: 162 spots in 1882 (#781 → #943)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1914 at #197 (424 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 142 yrs · run 1889–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,110 boys born in 2003 were named Dominick (0.09%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,813 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #197 in 1914, was only 1 in 1,544 (0.06%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 22.7% of all boys named Dominick (15,277) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 45 | #498 (1889) | #755 |
| 1890s | 166 | #315 (1899) | #506 |
| 1900s | 425 | #226 (1909) | #343 |
| 1910s | 3,915 | #197 (1914) | #216 |
| 1920s | 5,289 | #225 (1920) | #244 |
| 1930s | 2,964 | #277 (1930) | #326 |
| 1940s | 2,656 | #340 (1942) | #384 |
| 1950s | 3,187 | #376 (1952) | #409 |
| 1960s | 3,103 | #430 (1966) | #446 |
| 1970s | 2,877 | #443 (1978) | #473 |
| 1980s | 3,973 | #395 (1989) | #436 |
| 1990s | 8,985 | #258 (1997) | #306 |
| 2000s | 15,277 | #205 (2003) | #233 |
| 2010s | 10,947 | #261 (2010) | #323 |
| 2020s | 3,371 | #446 (2020) | #530 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Dominick in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 115,490 of them was named Dominick, which outranked 62.8% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #6,820Zeynep17
- #6,820Zissy17
- #6,820Ziza17
- #7,138Dominick16
- #7,138Aashi16
- #7,138Abeni16
- #7,138Abi16
- #7,500Aalayah15
- #7,500Aariah15
- #7,500Abbe15
Tied with 361 names at #7,138; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 1,183 of them was named Dominick, which outranked 98.4% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.