Dymond
#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 95.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1999 · 127 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,876since 1987
Dymond over time
Rank among girls' names. Dymond has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 | — | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | — | |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | — | |
| 2020 | #10,250 | 9 | — | |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | — | |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 | — | |
| 2017 | #7,442 | 15 | — | |
| 2016 | #10,113 | 10 | — | |
| 2015 | #8,447 | 13 | #12,086 | 5 |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,644 | 23 | — | |
| 2012 | #5,895 | 22 | — | |
| 2011 | #6,148 | 21 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,735 | 30 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,189 | 52 | — | |
| 2008 | #3,017 | 57 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,568 | 72 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,419 | 77 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,014 | 93 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,100 | 86 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,187 | 79 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,720 | 106 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,533 | 121 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,491 | 123 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,390 | 127 | #6,530 | 9 |
| 1998 | #1,438 | 119 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #1,638 | 96 | #6,100 | 9 |
| 1996 | #1,656 | 92 | #5,187 | 11 |
| 1995 | #1,837 | 77 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #1,663 | 90 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,942 | 72 | #4,697 | 12 |
| 1992 | #2,459 | 52 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | #3,159 | 35 | #5,942 | 8 |
| 1990 | #5,060 | 18 | — | |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | — | |
| 1988 | #5,895 | 13 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Dymond! It came in at #7,987, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2022–2025, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Dymond is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Louisiana#724 · 1 in 4,104
- Virginia#770 · 1 in 5,094
- Georgia#774 · 1 in 4,841
- Ohio#775 · 1 in 5,820
- North Carolina#816 · 1 in 5,430
Best ever in a state: #453 in Virginia, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #724 | 5 | 1 in 4,104 |
| Virginia | #770 | 7 | 1 in 5,094 |
| Georgia | #774 | 10 | 1 in 4,841 |
| Ohio | #775 | 10 | 1 in 5,820 |
| North Carolina | #816 | 8 | 1 in 5,430 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,079 | 6 | 1 in 9,210 |
| Illinois | #1,377 | 6 | 1 in 11,446 |
| Texas | #1,745 | 10 | 1 in 15,595 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dymond
- 351 spots since 2024 (#15,293 → #14,942)
- 4,692 spots since 2020 (#10,250 → #14,942)
- 6,495 spots since 2015 (#8,447 → #14,942)
- Debuted 1987
- Peaked 1999 at #1,390 (127 births)
- Births halved by 2008, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 13,967 girls born in 1999 were named Dymond (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 321,453 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 46.2% of all girls named Dymond (866) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 32 | #5,895 (1988) | #6,946 |
| 1990s | 778 | #1,390 (1999) | #2,224 |
| 2000s | 866 | #1,491 (2000) | #2,224 |
| 2010s | 162 | #4,735 (2010) | #8,073 |
| 2020s | 38 | #10,250 (2020) | #13,400 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Dymond in 2002
Top girls' names in 2002
More about 2002
girls
1,796,882 girls got a published name in 2002; 1 in 16,952 of them was named Dymond, which outranked 90.5% of the 18,086 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,708Laniya107
- #1,708Marta107
- #1,708Rosalyn107
- #1,720Dymond106
- #1,720Amberly106
- #1,720Brissa106
- #1,720Christie106
- #1,732Adina105
- #1,732Annalee105
- #1,732Ariyana105
Tied with 11 names at #1,720; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.