Easton
#5,917 for girls in 2025, 20 births · #110 for boys in 2025, 3,198 births
Given to boys 98.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2016 · 5,643 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 12 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 79,440since 1907
Easton over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,917 | 20 | #110 | 3,198 |
| 2024 | #4,772 | 28 | #103 | 3,349 |
| 2023 | #4,565 | 30 | #98 | 3,647 |
| 2022 | #3,536 | 44 | #80 | 4,161 |
| 2021 | #3,069 | 53 | #72 | 4,625 |
| 2020 | #3,607 | 41 | #73 | 4,654 |
| 2019 | #3,085 | 52 | #74 | 4,897 |
| 2018 | #3,158 | 51 | #66 | 5,463 |
| 2017 | #3,145 | 51 | #66 | 5,520 |
| 2016 | #2,798 | 61 | #66 | 5,643 |
| 2015 | #2,501 | 72 | #78 | 5,230 |
| 2014 | #2,648 | 66 | #83 | 4,988 |
| 2013 | #3,005 | 55 | #88 | 4,649 |
| 2012 | #3,169 | 52 | #96 | 3,943 |
| 2011 | #3,603 | 43 | #103 | 3,762 |
| 2010 | #4,023 | 37 | #145 | 2,710 |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 | #254 | 1,369 |
| 2008 | #4,882 | 30 | #300 | 1,105 |
| 2007 | #8,520 | 14 | #352 | 904 |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | #357 | 844 |
| 2005 | #6,528 | 18 | #390 | 735 |
| 2004 | #5,969 | 20 | #420 | 619 |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | #490 | 504 |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | #540 | 413 |
| 2001 | #11,020 | 8 | #578 | 355 |
| 2000 | #8,027 | 12 | #580 | 344 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #644 | 269 |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | #670 | 254 |
| 1997 | #7,283 | 12 | #767 | 194 |
| 1996 | #6,064 | 15 | #841 | 168 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #921 | 144 |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | #1,013 | 120 |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #1,228 | 85 |
| 1992 | — | #1,510 | 59 | |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #1,573 | 54 |
| 1990 | — | #1,464 | 59 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,705 | 45 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,367 | 25 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,468 | 22 | |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | #1,873 | 32 |
| 1985 | — | #2,504 | 20 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,979 | 27 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,577 | 18 | |
| 1982 | — | #3,966 | 10 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,153 | 9 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | #4,582 | 7 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | #4,797 | 6 | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | #4,054 | 7 | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | #3,948 | 5 | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #3,601 | 6 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,318 | 7 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #3,505 | 6 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | #3,010 | 7 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,733 | 5 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,951 | 7 | |
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | #3,361 | 6 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,864 | 8 | |
| 1930 | — | #4,001 | 5 | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | #3,505 | 7 | |
| 1923 | — | #3,467 | 7 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,252 | 8 | |
| 1921 | — | #3,869 | 6 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,967 | 9 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,115 | 8 | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #3,981 | 5 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,392 | 6 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,651 | 7 | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | #1,345 | 5 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Easton! It came in at #1,345, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1907–1913, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Easton is popular in 1999
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#161 · 1 in 687
- Idaho#227 · 1 in 955
- Nebraska#258 · 1 in 1,434
- Arkansas#341 · 1 in 2,051
- Iowa#362 · 1 in 2,767
Best ever in a state: #3 in North Dakota, 2016.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #161 | 30 | 1 in 687 |
| Idaho | #227 | 8 | 1 in 955 |
| Nebraska | #258 | 7 | 1 in 1,434 |
| Arkansas | #341 | 7 | 1 in 2,051 |
| Iowa | #362 | 6 | 1 in 2,767 |
| Washington | #384 | 13 | 1 in 2,658 |
| Oklahoma | #392 | 8 | 1 in 2,529 |
| Kentucky | #405 | 6 | 1 in 3,909 |
| Minnesota | #425 | 7 | 1 in 4,153 |
| Indiana | #447 | 10 | 1 in 3,842 |
| Wisconsin | #499 | 6 | 1 in 4,881 |
| Missouri | #513 | 7 | 1 in 4,877 |
| Arizona | #525 | 8 | 1 in 4,523 |
| Tennessee | #541 | 7 | 1 in 5,166 |
| Michigan | #596 | 10 | 1 in 5,885 |
| Ohio | #675 | 8 | 1 in 8,672 |
| Illinois | #712 | 11 | 1 in 7,254 |
| Louisiana | #712 | 5 | 1 in 5,466 |
| Texas | #729 | 20 | 1 in 8,232 |
| Georgia | #889 | 6 | 1 in 8,967 |
| California | #956 | 16 | 1 in 15,113 |
| Florida | #1,023 | 7 | 1 in 12,405 |
| New York | #1,561 | 5 | 1 in 22,747 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Easton
- 7 spots since 2024 (#103 → #110)
- 37 spots since 2020 (#73 → #110)
- 32 spots since 2015 (#78 → #110)
- Biggest jump: 109 spots in 2010 (#254 → #145)
- Biggest drop: 18 spots in 2023 (#80 → #98)
- Debuted 1907
- Peaked 2016 at #66 (5,643 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 12 yrs · run 2012–2023
- Top 1,000: 31 yrs · run 1995–2025
- Highest: 1 in 332 boys born in 2018 were named Easton (0.30%)
- Latest: 1 in 534 boys born in 2025 (0.19%)
- Its best rank, #66 in 2016, was only 1 in 336 (0.30%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 58.9% of all boys named Easton (46,805) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | #1,345 (1907) | #1,345 |
| 1910s | 41 | #2,543 (1916) | #3,038 |
| 1920s | 37 | #2,967 (1920) | #3,412 |
| 1930s | 36 | #2,864 (1931) | #3,401 |
| 1940s | 27 | #3,010 (1948) | #3,427 |
| 1950s | 6 | #3,505 (1955) | #3,505 |
| 1960s | 18 | #3,318 (1963) | #3,622 |
| 1970s | 25 | #4,054 (1973) | #4,801 |
| 1980s | 208 | #1,705 (1989) | #2,621 |
| 1990s | 1,406 | #644 (1999) | #1,063 |
| 2000s | 7,192 | #254 (2009) | #426 |
| 2010s | 46,805 | #66 (2016) | #87 |
| 2020s | 23,634 | #72 (2021) | #89 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Easton in 1999
Top girls' names in 1999
Top boys' names in 1999
More about 1999
girls
1,773,823 girls got a published name in 1999; 1 in 147,819 of them was named Easton, which outranked 54.5% of the 16,947 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #7,239Zully13
- #7,239Zyonna13
- #7,239Zyria13
- #7,716Easton12
- #7,716Aalyah12
- #7,716Aalyiah12
- #7,716Aashna12
- #8,223Aakilah11
- #8,223Aamna11
- #8,223Aariana11
Tied with 506 names at #7,716; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,920,150 boys got a published name in 1999; 1 in 7,138 of them was named Easton, which outranked 94.5% of the 11,614 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 14.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.