Eduardo
Last seen for girls in 2010 at #13,448 · #410 for boys in 2025, 778 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2001 · 3,418 births
- Debut · boys
- 10 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 110,257since 1890
Eduardo over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Eduardo has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #410 | 778 | |
| 2024 | — | #377 | 869 | |
| 2023 | — | #357 | 921 | |
| 2022 | — | #341 | 981 | |
| 2021 | — | #334 | 975 | |
| 2020 | — | #328 | 1,001 | |
| 2019 | — | #315 | 1,065 | |
| 2018 | — | #316 | 1,071 | |
| 2017 | — | #291 | 1,229 | |
| 2016 | — | #275 | 1,324 | |
| 2015 | — | #251 | 1,448 | |
| 2014 | — | #262 | 1,431 | |
| 2013 | — | #221 | 1,691 | |
| 2012 | — | #205 | 1,860 | |
| 2011 | — | #185 | 2,083 | |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #154 | 2,546 |
| 2009 | #12,429 | 8 | #128 | 3,336 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #142 | 2,871 |
| 2007 | #12,676 | 8 | #143 | 2,846 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #126 | 3,317 |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | #129 | 3,180 |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | #126 | 3,202 |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | #129 | 3,121 |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | #133 | 2,957 |
| 2001 | #6,322 | 17 | #112 | 3,418 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #124 | 3,161 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 | #145 | 2,630 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #145 | 2,487 |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | #140 | 2,624 |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | #123 | 3,017 |
| 1995 | #6,257 | 14 | #117 | 3,151 |
| 1994 | #4,687 | 21 | #113 | 3,276 |
| 1993 | #4,671 | 21 | #125 | 2,794 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | #132 | 2,561 |
| 1991 | #4,497 | 22 | #129 | 2,522 |
| 1990 | #4,523 | 21 | #149 | 2,159 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 | #156 | 1,938 |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 | #198 | 1,385 |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 | #220 | 1,079 |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | #229 | 1,022 |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | #223 | 1,051 |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #224 | 1,003 |
| 1983 | #6,705 | 9 | #230 | 973 |
| 1982 | #4,945 | 14 | #234 | 996 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #238 | 946 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #227 | 1,050 |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | #232 | 967 |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | #216 | 1,002 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #225 | 960 |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | #211 | 996 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #243 | 846 |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | #247 | 811 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #238 | 891 |
| 1972 | — | #273 | 711 | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #281 | 736 |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #277 | 759 |
| 1969 | — | #291 | 669 | |
| 1968 | — | #310 | 594 | |
| 1967 | — | #326 | 527 | |
| 1966 | — | #326 | 526 | |
| 1965 | — | #330 | 523 | |
| 1964 | — | #361 | 470 | |
| 1963 | — | #378 | 447 | |
| 1962 | — | #369 | 474 | |
| 1961 | — | #411 | 371 | |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | #414 | 368 |
| 1959 | — | #449 | 318 | |
| 1958 | — | #444 | 314 | |
| 1957 | — | #482 | 261 | |
| 1956 | — | #494 | 234 | |
| 1955 | — | #473 | 242 | |
| 1954 | — | #516 | 197 | |
| 1953 | — | #527 | 182 | |
| 1952 | — | #532 | 174 | |
| 1951 | — | #519 | 173 | |
| 1950 | — | #555 | 148 | |
| 1949 | — | #569 | 139 | |
| 1948 | — | #602 | 126 | |
| 1947 | — | #647 | 113 | |
| 1946 | — | #581 | 121 | |
| 1945 | — | #624 | 94 | |
| 1944 | — | #651 | 91 | |
| 1943 | — | #673 | 91 | |
| 1942 | — | #812 | 63 | |
| 1941 | — | #708 | 76 | |
| 1940 | — | #770 | 64 | |
| 1939 | — | #715 | 70 | |
| 1938 | — | #710 | 74 | |
| 1937 | — | #675 | 78 | |
| 1936 | — | #679 | 76 | |
| 1935 | — | #693 | 76 | |
| 1934 | — | #623 | 92 | |
| 1933 | — | #762 | 64 | |
| 1932 | — | #677 | 81 | |
| 1931 | — | #624 | 91 | |
| 1930 | — | #610 | 101 | |
| 1929 | — | #620 | 96 | |
| 1928 | — | #533 | 129 | |
| 1927 | — | #702 | 85 | |
| 1926 | — | #737 | 75 | |
| 1925 | — | #786 | 70 | |
| 1924 | — | #778 | 75 | |
| 1923 | — | #711 | 83 | |
| 1922 | — | #648 | 98 | |
| 1921 | — | #913 | 59 | |
| 1920 | — | #929 | 55 | |
| 1919 | — | #927 | 52 | |
| 1918 | — | #986 | 46 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,132 | 35 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,072 | 36 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,015 | 39 | |
| 1914 | — | #967 | 33 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,049 | 23 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,137 | 17 | |
| 1911 | — | #856 | 15 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,193 | 8 | |
| 1909 | — | #840 | 12 | |
| 1908 | — | #825 | 11 | |
| 1907 | — | #930 | 9 | |
| 1906 | — | #927 | 8 | |
| 1905 | — | #1,091 | 6 | |
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | #683 | 10 | |
| 1900 | — | #785 | 11 | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | #900 | 7 | |
| 1895 | — | #978 | 6 | |
| 1894 | — | #567 | 13 | |
| 1893 | — | #836 | 7 | |
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | #629 | 10 | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1890
The first year at least five boys were named Eduardo! It came in at #629, and was given to 10 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1891–1892, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Eduardo is popular in 2015
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Texas#113 · 1 in 487
- California#133 · 1 in 560
- Nevada#161 · 1 in 566
- Arizona#162 · 1 in 616
- New Mexico#218 · 1 in 805
Best ever in a state: #38 in California, 1994.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #113 | 386 | 1 in 487 |
| California | #133 | 404 | 1 in 560 |
| Nevada | #161 | 24 | 1 in 566 |
| Arizona | #162 | 60 | 1 in 616 |
| New Mexico | #218 | 11 | 1 in 805 |
| Illinois | #219 | 68 | 1 in 976 |
| Oklahoma | #249 | 21 | 1 in 989 |
| Oregon | #253 | 19 | 1 in 954 |
| Washington | #263 | 32 | 1 in 1,149 |
| Florida | #267 | 73 | 1 in 1,347 |
| North Carolina | #293 | 36 | 1 in 1,445 |
| Georgia | #304 | 37 | 1 in 1,485 |
| Kansas | #311 | 12 | 1 in 1,319 |
| Nebraska | #316 | 8 | 1 in 1,263 |
| New Jersey | #330 | 23 | 1 in 1,808 |
| Colorado | #337 | 19 | 1 in 1,457 |
| Arkansas | #357 | 9 | 1 in 1,626 |
| Maryland | #362 | 15 | 1 in 1,854 |
| Wisconsin | #376 | 14 | 1 in 1,944 |
| Alabama | #384 | 12 | 1 in 1,932 |
| Indiana | #389 | 18 | 1 in 2,008 |
| Tennessee | #400 | 17 | 1 in 2,150 |
| Utah | #420 | 11 | 1 in 1,932 |
| New York | #467 | 34 | 1 in 3,025 |
| Louisiana | #535 | 9 | 1 in 2,831 |
| Kentucky | #536 | 6 | 1 in 3,667 |
| Virginia | #539 | 12 | 1 in 3,535 |
| Massachusetts | #561 | 7 | 1 in 4,223 |
| Minnesota | #717 | 6 | 1 in 4,731 |
| Michigan | #758 | 9 | 1 in 5,307 |
| Missouri | #818 | 5 | 1 in 6,320 |
| Ohio | #837 | 9 | 1 in 6,699 |
| Pennsylvania | #931 | 7 | 1 in 8,547 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eduardo
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 33 spots since 2024 (#377 → #410)
- 82 spots since 2020 (#328 → #410)
- 159 spots since 2015 (#251 → #410)
- Biggest jump: 337 spots in 1911 (#1,193 → #856)
- Biggest drop: 411 spots in 1895 (#567 → #978)
Rise & fade · boys
111 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1890
- Peaked 2001 at #112 (3,418 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 121 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 121 yrs · run 1918–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 568
- Highest: 1 in 568 boys born in 2001 were named Eduardo (0.18%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,195 boys born in 2025 (0.05%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 28.5% of all boys named Eduardo (31,409) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 43 | #567 (1894) | #782 |
| 1900s | 67 | #683 (1901) | #869 |
| 1910s | 304 | #856 (1911) | #1,033 |
| 1920s | 825 | #533 (1928) | #736 |
| 1930s | 803 | #610 (1930) | #677 |
| 1940s | 978 | #569 (1949) | #664 |
| 1950s | 2,243 | #444 (1958) | #499 |
| 1960s | 4,969 | #291 (1969) | #352 |
| 1970s | 8,679 | #211 (1976) | #244 |
| 1980s | 11,443 | #156 (1989) | #218 |
| 1990s | 27,221 | #113 (1994) | #132 |
| 2000s | 31,409 | #112 (2001) | #129 |
| 2010s | 15,748 | #154 (2010) | #248 |
| 2020s | 5,525 | #328 (2020) | #358 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eduardo in 2015
boys
#251
1,448 births · 1 in 1,324 boys
Top boys' names in 2015
More about 2015
boys
1,916,743 boys got a published name in 2015; 1 in 1,324 of them was named Eduardo, which outranked 98.2% of the 14,059 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Eduardo
Biggest movers since 2014
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.