Huxley
#3,975 for girls in 2025, 36 births · #736 for boys in 2025, 357 births
Given to boys 90.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2020 · 526 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,734since 2002
Huxley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,975 | 36 | #736 | 357 |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | #743 | 346 |
| 2023 | #3,329 | 48 | #619 | 453 |
| 2022 | #3,365 | 47 | #611 | 457 |
| 2021 | #2,818 | 60 | #586 | 476 |
| 2020 | #3,338 | 46 | #537 | 526 |
| 2019 | #2,856 | 58 | #588 | 471 |
| 2018 | #3,293 | 48 | #666 | 379 |
| 2017 | #4,384 | 32 | #792 | 291 |
| 2016 | #5,130 | 26 | #867 | 259 |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 | #958 | 215 |
| 2014 | #6,713 | 18 | #1,355 | 126 |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | #1,763 | 82 |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #1,711 | 88 |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #2,105 | 63 |
| 2010 | — | #2,826 | 42 | |
| 2009 | — | #3,721 | 28 | |
| 2008 | — | #3,744 | 28 | |
| 2007 | — | #5,661 | 15 | |
| 2006 | — | #8,732 | 8 | |
| 2005 | — | #6,226 | 12 | |
| 2004 | — | #11,356 | 5 | |
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | #8,456 | 7 | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Huxley! It came in at #8,456, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2003–2004, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Huxley is popular in 2015
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#293 · 1 in 1,213
- Nebraska#387 · 1 in 1,684
- Arkansas#429 · 1 in 2,091
- Wisconsin#454 · 1 in 2,474
- Oregon#457 · 1 in 2,267
Best ever in a state: #104 in South Dakota, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #293 | 13 | 1 in 1,213 |
| Nebraska | #387 | 6 | 1 in 1,684 |
| Arkansas | #429 | 7 | 1 in 2,091 |
| Wisconsin | #454 | 11 | 1 in 2,474 |
| Oregon | #457 | 8 | 1 in 2,267 |
| Kansas | #513 | 6 | 1 in 2,638 |
| Minnesota | #537 | 9 | 1 in 3,154 |
| Missouri | #610 | 8 | 1 in 3,950 |
| Washington | #636 | 9 | 1 in 4,086 |
| Colorado | #685 | 6 | 1 in 4,613 |
| Illinois | #834 | 10 | 1 in 6,639 |
| California | #934 | 24 | 1 in 9,429 |
| North Carolina | #986 | 6 | 1 in 8,668 |
| Ohio | #987 | 7 | 1 in 8,613 |
| Georgia | #1,213 | 5 | 1 in 10,989 |
| Texas | #1,284 | 13 | 1 in 14,468 |
| New York | #1,348 | 8 | 1 in 12,856 |
| Florida | #1,684 | 5 | 1 in 19,670 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Huxley
- 7 spots since 2024 (#743 → #736)
- 199 spots since 2020 (#537 → #736)
- 222 spots since 2015 (#958 → #736)
- Biggest jump: 397 spots in 2015 (#1,355 → #958)
- Biggest drop: 124 spots in 2024 (#619 → #743)
- Debuted 2002
- Peaked 2020 at #537 (526 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 11 yrs · run 2015–2025
- Highest: 1 in 3,282 boys born in 2020 were named Huxley (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,785 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 55.2% of all boys named Huxley (2,615) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103 | #3,721 (2009) | #6,842 |
| 2010s | 2,016 | #588 (2019) | #1,363 |
| 2020s | 2,615 | #537 (2020) | #639 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Huxley in 2015
Top girls' names in 2015
Top boys' names in 2015
More about 2015
girls
1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 85,005 of them was named Huxley, which outranked 68.4% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #5,833Zoila22
- #5,833Zuly22
- #5,833Zunaira22
- #6,036Huxley21
- #6,036Ahmiyah21
- #6,036Aissata21
- #6,036Aizlynn21
- #6,236Aaron20
- #6,236Aasiya20
- #6,236Aasiyah20
Tied with 199 names at #6,036; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,916,743 boys got a published name in 2015; 1 in 8,915 of them was named Huxley, which outranked 93.2% of the 14,059 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #955Davin216
- #955Ernest216
- #955Kamren216
- #958Huxley215
- #958Bodie215
- #958Cristopher215
- #958Jovani215
- #966Achilles214
- #966Anton214
- #966Aydan214
Tied with 7 names at #958; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.