Emerald
#741 for girls in 2025, 367 births · #3,513 for boys in 2025, 32 births
Given to girls 94.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 397 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,518since 1904
Emerald over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #741 | 367 | #3,513 | 32 |
| 2024 | #708 | 397 | #4,072 | 26 |
| 2023 | #745 | 377 | #4,886 | 20 |
| 2022 | #767 | 373 | #5,445 | 17 |
| 2021 | #904 | 299 | #4,936 | 19 |
| 2020 | #953 | 268 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #967 | 271 | #4,337 | 23 |
| 2018 | #1,026 | 252 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #975 | 269 | #6,060 | 14 |
| 2016 | #1,125 | 225 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #1,247 | 196 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #1,139 | 220 | #5,997 | 14 |
| 2013 | #1,281 | 184 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #1,523 | 145 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #1,671 | 126 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,696 | 124 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,444 | 161 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,589 | 143 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #1,489 | 155 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,335 | 174 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #1,265 | 177 | #9,115 | 7 |
| 2004 | #1,249 | 174 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #1,160 | 186 | — | |
| 2002 | #995 | 221 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #961 | 226 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #966 | 219 | — | |
| 1999 | #905 | 233 | — | |
| 1998 | #812 | 262 | — | |
| 1997 | #930 | 213 | — | |
| 1996 | #843 | 236 | — | |
| 1995 | #853 | 229 | — | |
| 1994 | #766 | 268 | — | |
| 1993 | #943 | 200 | — | |
| 1992 | #917 | 213 | — | |
| 1991 | #962 | 196 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,088 | 162 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,057 | 161 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | #1,118 | 137 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #1,257 | 112 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,304 | 102 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #1,439 | 87 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,368 | 86 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,665 | 66 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,531 | 77 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,674 | 68 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,440 | 39 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,304 | 41 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,009 | 26 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,267 | 23 | — | |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,854 | 12 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | — | |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | — | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | — | |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | — | |
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | #4,065 | 5 |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #3,493 | 12 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | — | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #3,370 | 6 |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | — | |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 | — | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | — | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #2,609 | 8 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,646 | 8 | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,951 | 7 | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | — | #3,763 | 5 | |
| 1930 | — | #4,001 | 5 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,589 | 10 | |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | #2,048 | 15 |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | #1,871 | 18 |
| 1926 | #3,873 | 7 | #2,074 | 15 |
| 1925 | #3,362 | 9 | #3,408 | 7 |
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #3,822 | 6 |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1921 | #2,762 | 12 | #2,804 | 10 |
| 1920 | #2,731 | 12 | #2,459 | 12 |
| 1919 | #2,264 | 15 | #2,152 | 14 |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | #2,882 | 9 |
| 1917 | #2,693 | 11 | #2,423 | 11 |
| 1916 | #2,368 | 13 | #2,259 | 12 |
| 1915 | #2,255 | 13 | #3,082 | 7 |
| 1914 | — | #3,264 | 5 | |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | #2,544 | 5 |
| 1911 | #2,191 | 6 | #1,740 | 5 |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | — | |
| 1908 | — | #1,217 | 6 | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Emerald! It came in at #1,877, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1904–1908, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Emerald is popular in 2020
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#473 · 1 in 1,690
- Washington#513 · 1 in 2,241
- South Carolina#538 · 1 in 2,163
- Alabama#568 · 1 in 2,339
- Maryland#582 · 1 in 2,479
Best ever in a state: #274 in New Mexico, 2015.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #473 | 6 | 1 in 1,690 |
| Washington | #513 | 13 | 1 in 2,241 |
| South Carolina | #538 | 8 | 1 in 2,163 |
| Alabama | #568 | 8 | 1 in 2,339 |
| Maryland | #582 | 9 | 1 in 2,479 |
| Oregon | #607 | 5 | 1 in 2,618 |
| Kentucky | #638 | 6 | 1 in 2,816 |
| Tennessee | #779 | 8 | 1 in 3,796 |
| Massachusetts | #841 | 5 | 1 in 4,772 |
| Pennsylvania | #866 | 10 | 1 in 4,835 |
| Georgia | #882 | 10 | 1 in 4,449 |
| North Carolina | #897 | 9 | 1 in 4,848 |
| New York | #911 | 16 | 1 in 4,974 |
| Arizona | #933 | 6 | 1 in 4,610 |
| Missouri | #937 | 5 | 1 in 4,896 |
| California | #940 | 31 | 1 in 5,620 |
| Florida | #954 | 15 | 1 in 5,364 |
| Michigan | #962 | 7 | 1 in 5,407 |
| Illinois | #987 | 9 | 1 in 5,417 |
| Virginia | #1,014 | 6 | 1 in 5,690 |
| Texas | #1,068 | 25 | 1 in 6,118 |
| Ohio | #1,443 | 5 | 1 in 9,580 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emerald
- 33 spots since 2024 (#708 → #741)
- 212 spots since 2020 (#953 → #741)
- 506 spots since 2015 (#1,247 → #741)
- Biggest jump: 177 spots in 1994 (#943 → #766)
- Biggest drop: 165 spots in 2003 (#995 → #1,160)
- Debuted 1904
- Peaked 2024 at #708 (397 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 20 yrs · run 1991–2002
- Highest: 1 in 4,081 girls born in 2024 were named Emerald (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,379 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 23.2% of all girls named Emerald (2,212) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1960, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 17 | #1,763 (1909) | #1,857 |
| 1910s | 82 | #2,144 (1912) | #2,470 |
| 1920s | 78 | #2,731 (1920) | #3,536 |
| 1930s | 11 | #3,901 (1932) | #4,060 |
| 1940s | 29 | #4,007 (1947) | #4,497 |
| 1950s | 31 | #3,493 (1956) | #4,704 |
| 1960s | 42 | #4,539 (1963) | #5,580 |
| 1970s | 152 | #2,304 (1979) | #5,253 |
| 1980s | 935 | #1,057 (1989) | #1,485 |
| 1990s | 2,212 | #766 (1994) | #902 |
| 2000s | 1,836 | #961 (2001) | #1,245 |
| 2010s | 2,012 | #967 (2019) | #1,265 |
| 2020s | 2,081 | #708 (2024) | #803 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Emerald in 2020
Top girls' names in 2020
Top boys' names in 2020
More about 2020
girls
1,616,549 girls got a published name in 2020; 1 in 6,032 of them was named Emerald, which outranked 94.6% of the 17,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,726,076 boys got a published name in 2020; 1 in 172,608 of them was named Emerald, which outranked 46.6% of the 14,060 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #7,034Zylon11
- #7,034Zymier11
- #7,034Zyron11
- #7,502Emerald10
- #7,502Aadhyan10
- #7,502Aalijah10
- #7,502Aamari10
- #8,067Aadarsh9
- #8,067Aadhi9
- #8,067Aadish9
Tied with 564 names at #7,502; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 380Vivaan#875 → #1,255
- ↓ 282Alexzander#890 → #1,172
- ↓ 268Reyansh#806 → #1,074
- ↓ 266Javion#949 → #1,215
- ↓ 224Kenny#862 → #1,086
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.