Emma

#3 for girls in 2025, 12,754 births · #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2014 · 20,970 births
Debut · girls
2,003 births
In top 100 · girls
95 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
776,439
since 1880

Emma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201957peak #1, 2014girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#312,754#6,14314
2024#213,524#5,44317
2023#213,590#5,47017
2022#214,512#5,87415
2021#215,549#6,03214
2020#215,723#4,85519
2019#217,226#7,17311
2018#118,824#8,1549
2017#119,873#6,06014
2016#119,550#5,12418
2015#120,487#7,49110
2014#120,970#6,63212
2013#220,973#4,98118
2012#220,976#4,68620
2011#318,825#3,30633
2010#317,366#5,25117
2009#217,910#4,74820
2008#118,830#5,76715
2007#318,390#4,49321
2006#219,133#4,22322
2005#220,362#2,90236
2004#221,625#1,394102
2003#222,719#2,67437
2002#416,558#4,91915
2001#1313,327#5,14214
2000#1712,560#4,78515
1999#1711,751#4,16217
1998#2210,451#5,46611
1997#367,749#6,1009
1996#536,151#7,9716
1995#675,050#8,8685
1994#744,765#8,8005
1993#804,108#6,2288
1992#1043,212—
1991#1232,595—
1990#1302,420#5,3829
1989#1491,938#3,20518
1988#1601,795#4,16211
1987#1751,589#4,5739
1986#2091,259#6,7215
1985#263947—
1984#341678#4,9737
1983#398551#4,9077
1982#410560#6,3855
1981#412534—
1980#416530—
1979#428488#6,0565
1978#450442—
1977#423479—
1976#463414—
1975#422477—
1974#408490—
1973#447419#4,5056
1972#428453—
1971#442474#4,9075
1970#421529—
1969#426516—
1968#426494#4,1365
1967#385564—
1966#364619—
1965#359640—
1964#343770—
1963#352724#4,0485
1962#331798#3,0418
1961#307892—
1960#297976—
1959#2701,056#3,9885
1958#2661,084—
1957#2431,217#3,9935
1956#2261,340#3,2167
1955#2111,460#3,8865
1954#2021,530#3,1767
1953#1951,590#2,53110
1952#1801,709—
1951#1741,731—
1950#1541,896#3,6815
1949#1471,999#2,6069
1948#1382,099#3,3166
1947#1412,141#2,35611
1946#1312,070#2,40310
1945#1232,052#2,9966
1944#1182,247#1,98813
1943#1142,422#3,5385
1942#1082,606#1,73017
1941#992,546#1,90314
1940#942,606#1,43322
1939#892,685#1,71216
1938#962,670#1,61318
1937#892,750#1,62718
1936#852,831#1,80115
1935#892,802#1,53820
1934#852,940#1,29327
1933#753,152#1,23029
1932#763,330#1,65119
1931#763,307#1,42724
1930#733,555#1,55922
1929#693,803#1,52323
1928#674,017#1,70720
1927#644,327#1,51625
1926#594,480#1,56523
1925#574,714#1,80619
1924#574,897#1,62823
1923#534,977#1,69621
1922#505,013#2,04016
1921#525,072#2,50212
1920#465,238#2,76510
1919#455,087#2,38512
1918#465,324#1,76719
1917#465,121#1,98615
1916#415,217#1,77117
1915#405,044#1,37224
1914#393,972#1,97511
1913#383,474#1,67611
1912#353,357#1,61910
1911#352,616#1,2908
1910#342,607#72917
1909#342,338#1,4405
1908#302,357—
1907#272,356#81511
1906#282,224#9278
1905#262,298#1,0916
1904#222,312#68612
1903#232,308#73410
1902#182,514#68711
1901#172,374#7798
1900#133,095#51821
1899#132,445#66110
1898#132,788#8048
1897#102,698—
1896#102,872#67411
1895#102,952#60912
1894#92,937#52115
1893#92,968#50914
1892#73,128#59712
1891#52,884#49713
1890#52,980#45816
1889#52,884#62810
1888#43,087#46417
1887#42,647#46114
1886#32,764#57811
1885#32,728#49814
1884#32,587#6639
1883#32,367#7207
1882#32,303#7547
1881#32,034#5959
1880#32,003#60010
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Emma was already there! It came in at #3, and was given to 2,003 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1966–1983, when fewer than 620 girls a year got the name.

Where Emma is popular in 1957

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: #137 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 459 girlsAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #315 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 2,781 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWIMichigan: #384 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 3,963 girlsMINew York: #337 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 2,733 girlsNYMassachusetts: #465 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 8,968 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedIAIndiana: #426 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,719 girlsINOhio: #300 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 2,583 girlsOHPennsylvania: #372 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 4,073 girlsPANew Jersey: #357 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 3,601 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #406 for girls · 47 births · 1 in 3,489 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedUTColorado: #433 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,734 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedNEMissouri: #273 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 2,259 girlsMOKentucky: #160 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 912 girlsKYWest Virginia: #157 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 898 girlsWVVirginia: #170 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 1,011 girlsVAMaryland: #240 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,600 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedDEArizona: #210 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 910 girlsAZNew Mexico: #157 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 604 girlsNMKansas: #313 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,421 girlsKSArkansas: #101 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 464 girlsARTennessee: #143 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 769 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #187 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 1,033 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #106 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 458 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #226 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,363 girlsDCOklahoma: #245 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,561 girlsOKLouisiana: #141 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 642 girlsLAMississippi: #61 for girls · 105 births · 1 in 248 girlsMSAlabama: #97 for girls · 80 births · 1 in 458 girlsALGeorgia: #132 for girls · 74 births · 1 in 622 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Emma, so not publishedHITexas: #199 for girls · 117 births · 1 in 987 girlsTXFlorida: #209 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 1,177 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#61 · 1 in 248
  2. Alabama#97 · 1 in 458
  3. Arkansas#101 · 1 in 464
  4. South Carolina#106 · 1 in 458
  5. Georgia#132 · 1 in 622

Best ever in a state: #1 in Vermont, 2002.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#611051 in 248
Alabama#97801 in 458
Arkansas#101401 in 464
South Carolina#106621 in 458
Georgia#132741 in 622
Alaska#13761 in 459
Louisiana#141621 in 642
Tennessee#143491 in 769
New Mexico#157191 in 604
West Virginia#157221 in 898
Kentucky#160371 in 912
Virginia#170411 in 1,011
North Carolina#187491 in 1,033
Texas#1991171 in 987
Florida#209391 in 1,177
Arizona#210151 in 910
District of Columbia#226101 in 1,363
Maryland#240191 in 1,600
Oklahoma#245141 in 1,561
Missouri#273201 in 2,259
Ohio#300431 in 2,583
Kansas#31391 in 2,421
Illinois#315391 in 2,781
New York#337621 in 2,733
New Jersey#357161 in 3,601
Pennsylvania#372291 in 4,073
Michigan#384241 in 3,963
California#406471 in 3,489
Indiana#426111 in 4,719
Colorado#43351 in 3,734
Massachusetts#46561 in 8,968
Connecticut———
Delaware———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Maine———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Emma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#2 → #3)
  • 1 spot since 2020 (#2 → #3)
  • 2 spots since 2015 (#1 → #3)
  • Biggest jump: 78 spots in 1985 (#341 → #263)
  • Biggest drop: 41 spots in 1968 (#385 → #426)
Rise & fade · girls
134 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2014 at #1 (20,970 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 42 yrs
  • Top 10: 42 yrs · run 2002–2025
  • Top 100: 95 yrs · run 1880–1941
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 45
  • Highest: 1 in 45 girls born in 1881 were named Emma (2.2%)
  • Latest: 1 in 126 girls born in 2025 (0.79%)
  • Its best rank, #1 in 2014, was only 1 in 85 (1.2%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 25.1% of all girls named Emma (195,070) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #3 (1886) → #463 (1976) → #1 (2014)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s25,404#3 (1886)#3
1890s28,652#5 (1890)#9
1900s24,176#13 (1900)#24
1910s41,819#34 (1910)#40
1920s46,538#46 (1920)#57
1930s30,022#73 (1930)#83
1940s22,788#94 (1940)#121
1950s14,613#154 (1950)#212
1960s6,993#297 (1960)#359
1970s4,665#408 (1974)#433
1980s10,381#149 (1989)#293
1990s58,252#17 (1999)#71
2000s181,414#1 (2008)#5
2010s195,070#1 (2014)#2
2020s85,652#2 (2020)#2

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Emma in 1957

girls
#243
1,217 births · 1 in 1,680 girls
boys
#3,993
5 births · 1 in 431,447 boys

Top girls' names in 1957

  1. #1Mary61,102
  2. #2Susan45,954
  3. #3Linda44,517
  4. #4Debra42,728
  5. #5Karen40,591
  6. #6Deborah40,096
  7. #7Cynthia39,340
  8. #8Patricia39,283
  9. #9Barbara29,692
  10. #10Donna28,042
  11. #243Emma1,217

Top boys' names in 1957

  1. #1Michael92,781
  2. #2James84,337
  3. #3David82,403
  4. #4Robert81,765
  5. #5John79,033
  6. #6William56,852
  7. #7Mark52,841
  8. #8Richard52,446
  9. #9Thomas44,625
  10. #10Steven36,842
  11. #3,993Emma5
More about 1957

girls

2,044,851 girls got a published name in 1957; 1 in 1,680 of them was named Emma, which outranked 96.5% of the 7,015 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Emma
  1. #240Susie1,245
  2. #241Edna1,240
  3. #242Mona1,231
  4. #243Emma1,217
  5. #244Gale1,210
  6. #244Shelly1,210
  7. #246Emily1,207
Biggest movers since 1956
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,944Tammi#3,696 → #752
  2. ↑ 1,310Tamela#2,151 → #841
  3. ↑ 1,298Tammie#1,662 → #364
  4. ↑ 993Tia#1,968 → #975
  5. ↑ 676Tamera#1,287 → #611
Fallers
  1. ↓ 423Corliss#878 → #1,301
  2. ↓ 399Glynis#977 → #1,376
  3. ↓ 367Merrie#977 → #1,344
  4. ↓ 303Taryn#935 → #1,238
  5. ↓ 291Glendora#963 → #1,254

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

2,157,236 boys got a published name in 1957; 1 in 431,447 of them was named Emma, which outranked 12.3% of the 4,552 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Emma
  1. #3,552York6
  2. #3,552Yosef6
  3. #3,552Zigmund6
  4. #3,993Emma5
  5. #3,993Able5
  6. #3,993Albaro5
  7. #3,993Alcides5

Tied with 559 names at #3,993; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1956
Risers
  1. ↑ 714Dion#1,642 → #928
  2. ↑ 404Wes#1,317 → #913
  3. ↑ 371Antoine#1,232 → #861
  4. ↑ 340Domenick#1,335 → #995
  5. ↑ 329Mitch#868 → #539
Fallers
  1. ↓ 458Lannie#999 → #1,457
  2. ↓ 402Desi#986 → #1,388
  3. ↓ 354Gavin#924 → #1,278
  4. ↓ 317Murphy#917 → #1,234
  5. ↓ 288Eliot#897 → #1,185

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1957 →