Gale
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #15,194 · #6,446 for boys in 2025, 13 births
Given to girls 61.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1957 · 1,210 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 19,906since 1893
Gale over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #6,446 | 13 | |
| 2024 | — | #6,469 | 13 | |
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 | #5,927 | 15 |
| 2022 | — | #10,863 | 6 | |
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | #9,554 | 7 | |
| 2019 | #12,448 | 7 | #9,756 | 7 |
| 2018 | — | #6,036 | 14 | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | #7,546 | 10 |
| 2016 | — | #8,816 | 8 | |
| 2015 | — | #8,744 | 8 | |
| 2014 | — | #8,130 | 9 | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | — | |
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | #12,553 | 5 | |
| 2007 | — | #9,788 | 7 | |
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | #11,834 | 8 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | #8,643 | 7 | |
| 2002 | — | #10,667 | 5 | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | — | |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | — | |
| 1997 | — | #8,110 | 6 | |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | — | |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #5,452 | 10 |
| 1993 | — | #4,447 | 13 | |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | #6,128 | 8 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #5,823 | 8 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | #4,017 | 13 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #4,786 | 9 |
| 1987 | #5,312 | 14 | #4,573 | 9 |
| 1986 | #4,347 | 18 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #3,852 | 21 | #3,805 | 11 |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #2,956 | 15 |
| 1983 | #3,242 | 25 | #3,630 | 11 |
| 1982 | #2,645 | 35 | #3,282 | 13 |
| 1981 | #4,005 | 19 | #1,996 | 27 |
| 1980 | #2,866 | 31 | #2,536 | 19 |
| 1979 | #3,078 | 27 | #2,465 | 19 |
| 1978 | #2,572 | 33 | #2,473 | 18 |
| 1977 | #2,423 | 36 | #2,270 | 20 |
| 1976 | #2,099 | 41 | #2,054 | 23 |
| 1975 | #1,689 | 56 | #1,630 | 31 |
| 1974 | #1,499 | 65 | #1,198 | 48 |
| 1973 | #1,388 | 71 | #1,186 | 48 |
| 1972 | #1,141 | 96 | #1,364 | 38 |
| 1971 | #1,176 | 97 | #1,026 | 63 |
| 1970 | #979 | 128 | #1,132 | 53 |
| 1969 | #826 | 155 | #920 | 68 |
| 1968 | #791 | 160 | #1,006 | 54 |
| 1967 | #669 | 206 | #893 | 65 |
| 1966 | #621 | 234 | #895 | 65 |
| 1965 | #640 | 234 | #820 | 81 |
| 1964 | #581 | 290 | #799 | 89 |
| 1963 | #538 | 324 | #795 | 91 |
| 1962 | #539 | 329 | #786 | 94 |
| 1961 | #446 | 478 | #769 | 101 |
| 1960 | #393 | 587 | #691 | 129 |
| 1959 | #319 | 852 | #730 | 110 |
| 1958 | #272 | 1,052 | #660 | 136 |
| 1957 | #244 | 1,210 | #619 | 154 |
| 1956 | #255 | 1,077 | #543 | 193 |
| 1955 | #260 | 1,030 | #517 | 199 |
| 1954 | #259 | 1,015 | #453 | 254 |
| 1953 | #264 | 947 | #438 | 263 |
| 1952 | #283 | 820 | #381 | 324 |
| 1951 | #275 | 814 | #375 | 329 |
| 1950 | #301 | 662 | #372 | 333 |
| 1949 | #319 | 591 | #380 | 314 |
| 1948 | #314 | 601 | #361 | 349 |
| 1947 | #271 | 796 | #352 | 377 |
| 1946 | #310 | 566 | #370 | 305 |
| 1945 | #321 | 447 | #351 | 287 |
| 1944 | #353 | 382 | #354 | 283 |
| 1943 | #348 | 425 | #351 | 302 |
| 1942 | #369 | 365 | #351 | 298 |
| 1941 | #365 | 338 | #341 | 287 |
| 1940 | #323 | 389 | #323 | 307 |
| 1939 | #392 | 288 | #321 | 291 |
| 1938 | #552 | 152 | #324 | 292 |
| 1937 | #556 | 147 | #322 | 284 |
| 1936 | #597 | 122 | #344 | 250 |
| 1935 | #587 | 122 | #351 | 244 |
| 1934 | #756 | 78 | #336 | 262 |
| 1933 | #1,102 | 40 | #372 | 213 |
| 1932 | #1,097 | 42 | #372 | 224 |
| 1931 | #1,750 | 20 | #435 | 169 |
| 1930 | #1,434 | 29 | #418 | 199 |
| 1929 | #1,419 | 29 | #456 | 168 |
| 1928 | #1,271 | 36 | #445 | 181 |
| 1927 | #1,278 | 38 | #380 | 241 |
| 1926 | #1,262 | 38 | #436 | 192 |
| 1925 | #1,535 | 29 | #433 | 190 |
| 1924 | #1,643 | 27 | #384 | 243 |
| 1923 | #1,428 | 32 | #390 | 232 |
| 1922 | #1,646 | 26 | #461 | 180 |
| 1921 | #1,205 | 41 | #422 | 205 |
| 1920 | #1,312 | 35 | #457 | 176 |
| 1919 | #1,604 | 25 | #494 | 145 |
| 1918 | #1,754 | 22 | #474 | 155 |
| 1917 | #1,773 | 20 | #521 | 123 |
| 1916 | #1,445 | 26 | #537 | 114 |
| 1915 | #1,523 | 23 | #550 | 104 |
| 1914 | #1,603 | 17 | #520 | 89 |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 | #564 | 59 |
| 1912 | #1,981 | 9 | #649 | 42 |
| 1911 | #1,450 | 11 | #667 | 22 |
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | #928 | 12 |
| 1909 | #1,607 | 8 | #558 | 22 |
| 1908 | #1,439 | 9 | #585 | 19 |
| 1907 | — | #664 | 15 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | #1,538 | 7 | #741 | 11 |
| 1904 | — | #1,064 | 6 | |
| 1903 | — | #656 | 12 | |
| 1902 | — | #794 | 9 | |
| 1901 | — | #637 | 11 | |
| 1900 | #1,231 | 10 | #836 | 10 |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | #1,002 | 6 | |
| 1897 | #1,385 | 6 | #584 | 13 |
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 | — | |
| 1895 | — | #978 | 6 | |
| 1894 | — | #594 | 12 | |
| 1893 | #1,437 | 5 | #615 | 11 |
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | #994 | 5 | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | #1,031 | 5 | |
| 1887 | — | #819 | 6 | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #892 | 5 | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1893
The first year at least five girls were named Gale! It came in at #1,437, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1893–1896, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Gale is popular in 1957
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Hawaii#131 · 1 in 467
- New Hampshire#143 · 1 in 688
- Maryland#157 · 1 in 869
- Maine#174 · 1 in 892
- Virginia#175 · 1 in 1,036
Best ever in a state: #114 in Rhode Island, 1940.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #131 | 13 | 1 in 467 |
| New Hampshire | #143 | 8 | 1 in 688 |
| Maryland | #157 | 35 | 1 in 869 |
| Maine | #174 | 11 | 1 in 892 |
| Virginia | #175 | 40 | 1 in 1,036 |
| Wisconsin | #178 | 38 | 1 in 1,156 |
| New Jersey | #186 | 52 | 1 in 1,108 |
| Massachusetts | #193 | 36 | 1 in 1,495 |
| Michigan | #205 | 75 | 1 in 1,268 |
| Pennsylvania | #207 | 80 | 1 in 1,476 |
| Minnesota | #212 | 28 | 1 in 1,374 |
| Illinois | #215 | 83 | 1 in 1,307 |
| Connecticut | #216 | 17 | 1 in 1,463 |
| Missouri | #223 | 27 | 1 in 1,673 |
| Ohio | #230 | 68 | 1 in 1,634 |
| Florida | #232 | 34 | 1 in 1,350 |
| Indiana | #237 | 33 | 1 in 1,573 |
| North Dakota | #237 | 5 | 1 in 1,335 |
| New York | #240 | 108 | 1 in 1,569 |
| District of Columbia | #243 | 9 | 1 in 1,515 |
| South Carolina | #243 | 20 | 1 in 1,420 |
| Iowa | #246 | 16 | 1 in 1,785 |
| Kansas | #246 | 13 | 1 in 1,676 |
| Kentucky | #246 | 18 | 1 in 1,874 |
| Colorado | #249 | 14 | 1 in 1,334 |
| Tennessee | #260 | 18 | 1 in 2,092 |
| Oregon | #275 | 9 | 1 in 1,772 |
| California | #276 | 98 | 1 in 1,673 |
| Oklahoma | #279 | 11 | 1 in 1,986 |
| Arkansas | #288 | 10 | 1 in 1,855 |
| Nebraska | #291 | 6 | 1 in 2,362 |
| North Carolina | #295 | 24 | 1 in 2,109 |
| Texas | #328 | 52 | 1 in 2,220 |
| Georgia | #339 | 17 | 1 in 2,706 |
| Alabama | #355 | 13 | 1 in 2,820 |
| West Virginia | #363 | 6 | 1 in 3,293 |
| Louisiana | #377 | 15 | 1 in 2,654 |
| Mississippi | #394 | 8 | 1 in 3,259 |
| Arizona | #410 | 5 | 1 in 2,730 |
| Washington | #429 | 7 | 1 in 4,112 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Gale
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2023
- Biggest jump: 346 spots in 1934 (#1,102 → #756)
- Biggest drop: 197 spots in 1971 (#979 → #1,176)
Rise & fade · girls
64 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1893
- Peaked 1957 at #244 (1,210 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 37 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 37 yrs · run 1934–1970
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,690
- Highest: 1 in 1,690 girls born in 1957 were named Gale (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 320,916 girls born in 2023 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
- 47.6% of all girls named Gale (9,479) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2020
- Mostly girls until 2019, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 16 | #1,385 (1897) | #1,468 |
| 1900s | 34 | #1,231 (1900) | #1,454 |
| 1910s | 168 | #1,445 (1916) | #1,740 |
| 1920s | 331 | #1,205 (1921) | #1,400 |
| 1930s | 1,040 | #392 (1939) | #882 |
| 1940s | 4,900 | #271 (1947) | #329 |
| 1950s | 9,479 | #244 (1957) | #273 |
| 1960s | 2,997 | #393 (1960) | #604 |
| 1970s | 650 | #979 (1970) | #1,804 |
| 1980s | 191 | #2,645 (1982) | #4,829 |
| 1990s | 58 | #7,303 (1990) | #10,830 |
| 2000s | 13 | #11,834 (2005) | #13,433 |
| 2010s | 24 | #12,448 (2019) | #14,439 |
| 2020s | 5 | #15,194 (2023) | #15,194 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Gale in 1957
girls
#244
1,210 births · 1 in 1,690 girls
boys
#619
154 births · 1 in 14,008 boys
Top girls' names in 1957
Top boys' names in 1957
More about 1957
girls
2,044,851 girls got a published name in 1957; 1 in 1,690 of them was named Gale, which outranked 96.5% of the 7,015 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
2,157,236 boys got a published name in 1957; 1 in 14,008 of them was named Gale, which outranked 86.4% of the 4,552 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).