Everleigh
#194 for girls in 2025, 1,615 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #12,239
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2020 · 2,827 births
- Debut · girls
- 10 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 3 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 20,924since 2008
Everleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #194 | 1,615 | — | |
| 2024 | #164 | 1,858 | — | |
| 2023 | #149 | 1,930 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #100 | 2,722 | — | |
| 2021 | #99 | 2,699 | — | |
| 2020 | #94 | 2,827 | — | |
| 2019 | #108 | 2,620 | — | |
| 2018 | #197 | 1,559 | — | |
| 2017 | #387 | 807 | — | |
| 2016 | #568 | 548 | — | |
| 2015 | #609 | 478 | — | |
| 2014 | #710 | 396 | — | |
| 2013 | #866 | 297 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,405 | 164 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,497 | 149 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,278 | 186 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,940 | 59 | — | |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | — | |
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Everleigh! It came in at #10,807, and was given to 10 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2008, when fewer than 11 girls a year got the name.
Where Everleigh is popular in 2016
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wyoming#94 · 1 in 231
- Idaho#213 · 1 in 715
- Alabama#291 · 1 in 1,140
- Nebraska#316 · 1 in 1,156
- Tennessee#316 · 1 in 1,411
Best ever in a state: #15 in West Virginia, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #94 | 5 | 1 in 231 |
| Idaho | #213 | 9 | 1 in 715 |
| Alabama | #291 | 17 | 1 in 1,140 |
| Nebraska | #316 | 7 | 1 in 1,156 |
| Tennessee | #316 | 22 | 1 in 1,411 |
| Virginia | #335 | 25 | 1 in 1,486 |
| Wisconsin | #368 | 15 | 1 in 1,553 |
| Mississippi | #378 | 8 | 1 in 1,387 |
| Kentucky | #385 | 11 | 1 in 1,660 |
| South Carolina | #395 | 11 | 1 in 1,623 |
| Iowa | #400 | 8 | 1 in 1,625 |
| North Carolina | #404 | 25 | 1 in 1,812 |
| Ohio | #409 | 27 | 1 in 1,928 |
| Michigan | #449 | 20 | 1 in 2,103 |
| Kansas | #450 | 7 | 1 in 1,801 |
| Nevada | #470 | 6 | 1 in 1,860 |
| Colorado | #488 | 11 | 1 in 2,142 |
| Georgia | #489 | 21 | 1 in 2,288 |
| Missouri | #495 | 12 | 1 in 2,261 |
| Connecticut | #527 | 5 | 1 in 2,465 |
| Washington | #554 | 12 | 1 in 2,679 |
| Oregon | #572 | 6 | 1 in 2,534 |
| Indiana | #574 | 11 | 1 in 2,754 |
| Minnesota | #584 | 9 | 1 in 2,727 |
| Texas | #595 | 55 | 1 in 3,042 |
| Pennsylvania | #597 | 17 | 1 in 3,050 |
| Maryland | #617 | 8 | 1 in 3,005 |
| Arizona | #637 | 10 | 1 in 3,094 |
| Massachusetts | #670 | 7 | 1 in 3,640 |
| Utah | #724 | 5 | 1 in 3,609 |
| Illinois | #760 | 14 | 1 in 4,116 |
| California | #772 | 45 | 1 in 4,527 |
| Oklahoma | #784 | 5 | 1 in 3,358 |
| Florida | #789 | 20 | 1 in 4,335 |
| New Jersey | #838 | 8 | 1 in 4,572 |
| New York | #873 | 18 | 1 in 4,991 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Everleigh
- 30 spots since 2024 (#164 → #194)
- 100 spots since 2020 (#94 → #194)
- 415 spots since 2015 (#609 → #194)
- Biggest jump: 539 spots in 2013 (#1,405 → #866)
- Biggest drop: 49 spots in 2023 (#100 → #149)
- Debuted 2008
- Peaked 2020 at #94 (2,827 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 3 yrs · run 2020–2022
- Top 1,000: 13 yrs · run 2013–2025
- Highest: 1 in 572 girls born in 2020 were named Everleigh (0.17%)
- Latest: 1 in 995 girls born in 2025 (0.10%)
- 65.2% of all girls named Everleigh (13,651) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69 | #2,940 (2009) | #6,874 |
| 2010s | 7,204 | #108 (2019) | #763 |
| 2020s | 13,651 | #94 (2020) | #133 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Everleigh in 2016
Top girls' names in 2016
More about 2016
girls
1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 3,234 of them was named Everleigh, which outranked 97.0% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.