Faye
#514 for girls in 2025, 579 births · Last seen for boys in 1964 at #3,601
Given to girls 99.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1934 · 1,420 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 72,142since 1880
Faye over time
Rank among girls' names. Faye has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #514 | 579 | — | |
| 2024 | #539 | 563 | — | |
| 2023 | #500 | 612 | — | |
| 2022 | #564 | 537 | — | |
| 2021 | #603 | 496 | — | |
| 2020 | #687 | 414 | — | |
| 2019 | #694 | 416 | — | |
| 2018 | #700 | 415 | — | |
| 2017 | #709 | 405 | — | |
| 2016 | #822 | 349 | — | |
| 2015 | #930 | 292 | — | |
| 2014 | #911 | 297 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,008 | 247 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,069 | 234 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,469 | 152 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,414 | 162 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,629 | 137 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,620 | 140 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,770 | 121 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,833 | 111 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,533 | 134 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,734 | 111 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,125 | 82 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,771 | 102 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,995 | 85 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,998 | 83 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,368 | 62 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,498 | 55 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,328 | 57 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,558 | 49 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,687 | 45 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,255 | 58 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,267 | 57 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,713 | 87 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,894 | 74 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,892 | 74 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,701 | 80 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,891 | 65 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,446 | 90 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,249 | 109 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,249 | 109 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,126 | 122 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,303 | 93 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,107 | 127 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,017 | 142 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,125 | 121 | — | |
| 1979 | #905 | 164 | — | |
| 1978 | #919 | 154 | — | |
| 1977 | #952 | 145 | — | |
| 1976 | #992 | 128 | — | |
| 1975 | #917 | 141 | — | |
| 1974 | #871 | 149 | — | |
| 1973 | #958 | 125 | — | |
| 1972 | #848 | 153 | — | |
| 1971 | #750 | 195 | — | |
| 1970 | #729 | 204 | — | |
| 1969 | #653 | 234 | — | |
| 1968 | #614 | 245 | — | |
| 1967 | #602 | 248 | — | |
| 1966 | #573 | 270 | — | |
| 1965 | #519 | 338 | — | |
| 1964 | #464 | 437 | #3,601 | 6 |
| 1963 | #445 | 477 | — | |
| 1962 | #414 | 556 | — | |
| 1961 | #377 | 657 | — | |
| 1960 | #337 | 782 | — | |
| 1959 | #341 | 772 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #311 | 856 | #3,033 | 8 |
| 1957 | #298 | 941 | #3,257 | 7 |
| 1956 | #279 | 974 | #2,798 | 9 |
| 1955 | #262 | 1,029 | — | |
| 1954 | #245 | 1,097 | #2,942 | 8 |
| 1953 | #253 | 1,029 | #3,798 | 5 |
| 1952 | #226 | 1,221 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1951 | #219 | 1,237 | #2,844 | 8 |
| 1950 | #210 | 1,271 | #2,770 | 8 |
| 1949 | #207 | 1,292 | — | |
| 1948 | #200 | 1,345 | #2,788 | 8 |
| 1947 | #193 | 1,383 | #2,356 | 11 |
| 1946 | #182 | 1,422 | — | |
| 1945 | #169 | 1,376 | #2,574 | 8 |
| 1944 | #165 | 1,353 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | #163 | 1,468 | #2,405 | 10 |
| 1942 | #175 | 1,304 | #2,386 | 10 |
| 1941 | #160 | 1,377 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #153 | 1,391 | #1,680 | 17 |
| 1939 | #161 | 1,328 | #2,609 | 8 |
| 1938 | #162 | 1,323 | #1,976 | 13 |
| 1937 | #160 | 1,300 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #162 | 1,215 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | #161 | 1,257 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #146 | 1,420 | #2,742 | 8 |
| 1933 | #153 | 1,202 | #1,905 | 14 |
| 1932 | #159 | 1,223 | #1,651 | 19 |
| 1931 | #158 | 1,188 | #2,471 | 10 |
| 1930 | #177 | 1,099 | #2,178 | 13 |
| 1929 | #182 | 1,080 | #2,980 | 8 |
| 1928 | #192 | 1,078 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #187 | 1,093 | #2,034 | 16 |
| 1926 | #173 | 1,219 | #2,186 | 14 |
| 1925 | #201 | 1,011 | #2,755 | 10 |
| 1924 | #212 | 920 | #2,043 | 16 |
| 1923 | #203 | 984 | #2,224 | 14 |
| 1922 | #210 | 924 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1921 | #202 | 989 | #2,265 | 14 |
| 1920 | #208 | 935 | #2,231 | 14 |
| 1919 | #202 | 925 | #2,063 | 15 |
| 1918 | #206 | 932 | #1,998 | 16 |
| 1917 | #197 | 931 | #2,091 | 14 |
| 1916 | #204 | 865 | #1,849 | 16 |
| 1915 | #209 | 790 | #1,553 | 20 |
| 1914 | #198 | 663 | #2,651 | 7 |
| 1913 | #194 | 561 | #1,497 | 13 |
| 1912 | #207 | 459 | #1,885 | 8 |
| 1911 | #183 | 388 | #1,537 | 6 |
| 1910 | #208 | 312 | — | |
| 1909 | #217 | 261 | #1,440 | 5 |
| 1908 | #184 | 311 | — | |
| 1907 | #194 | 268 | — | |
| 1906 | #199 | 239 | — | |
| 1905 | #227 | 189 | — | |
| 1904 | #205 | 214 | — | |
| 1903 | #219 | 190 | #1,130 | 5 |
| 1902 | #220 | 183 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #226 | 161 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #229 | 194 | — | |
| 1899 | #251 | 125 | — | |
| 1898 | #238 | 153 | — | |
| 1897 | #225 | 148 | — | |
| 1896 | #240 | 132 | — | |
| 1895 | #259 | 118 | — | |
| 1894 | #245 | 121 | — | |
| 1893 | #256 | 107 | — | |
| 1892 | #269 | 97 | — | |
| 1891 | #298 | 70 | — | |
| 1890 | #329 | 59 | — | |
| 1889 | #334 | 55 | — | |
| 1888 | #320 | 56 | — | |
| 1887 | #328 | 42 | — | |
| 1886 | #356 | 36 | — | |
| 1885 | #373 | 30 | — | |
| 1884 | #416 | 23 | — | |
| 1883 | #517 | 14 | — | |
| 1882 | #407 | 20 | — | |
| 1881 | #491 | 12 | — | |
| 1880 | #628 | 8 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Faye was already there! It came in at #628, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 13 girls a year got the name.
Where Faye is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#62 · 1 in 212
- Oklahoma#74 · 1 in 282
- Texas#98 · 1 in 433
- Iowa#102 · 1 in 460
- Arkansas#108 · 1 in 381
Best ever in a state: #35 in Utah, 1914.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #62 | 21 | 1 in 212 |
| Oklahoma | #74 | 65 | 1 in 282 |
| Texas | #98 | 104 | 1 in 433 |
| Iowa | #102 | 45 | 1 in 460 |
| Arkansas | #108 | 43 | 1 in 381 |
| Missouri | #115 | 55 | 1 in 524 |
| Nebraska | #115 | 22 | 1 in 512 |
| Oregon | #116 | 10 | 1 in 486 |
| Idaho | #126 | 8 | 1 in 450 |
| West Virginia | #145 | 21 | 1 in 723 |
| North Carolina | #147 | 42 | 1 in 727 |
| Kansas | #153 | 20 | 1 in 740 |
| Colorado | #164 | 8 | 1 in 849 |
| New Mexico | #166 | 5 | 1 in 599 |
| Montana | #169 | 6 | 1 in 853 |
| Indiana | #175 | 20 | 1 in 1,185 |
| Illinois | #176 | 50 | 1 in 1,158 |
| Ohio | #179 | 43 | 1 in 1,116 |
| Wisconsin | #190 | 18 | 1 in 1,307 |
| Washington | #201 | 7 | 1 in 1,198 |
| Connecticut | #205 | 8 | 1 in 1,634 |
| South Dakota | #209 | 5 | 1 in 1,168 |
| Minnesota | #214 | 14 | 1 in 1,546 |
| California | #224 | 13 | 1 in 1,504 |
| Florida | #224 | 7 | 1 in 1,240 |
| Georgia | #232 | 19 | 1 in 1,650 |
| Michigan | #238 | 17 | 1 in 1,898 |
| Tennessee | #246 | 14 | 1 in 1,650 |
| Pennsylvania | #247 | 31 | 1 in 2,879 |
| Kentucky | #248 | 15 | 1 in 1,603 |
| New York | #249 | 38 | 1 in 2,473 |
| Mississippi | #260 | 11 | 1 in 1,637 |
| South Carolina | #269 | 9 | 1 in 2,136 |
| Louisiana | #274 | 11 | 1 in 1,612 |
| Virginia | #281 | 9 | 1 in 2,697 |
| Alabama | #287 | 13 | 1 in 1,989 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Faye
- 25 spots since 2024 (#539 → #514)
- 173 spots since 2020 (#687 → #514)
- 416 spots since 2015 (#930 → #514)
- Biggest jump: 137 spots in 1881 (#628 → #491)
- Biggest drop: 220 spots in 1980 (#905 → #1,125)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1934 at #146 (1,420 births)
- Births halved by 1961, 27 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 112 yrs · run 1880–1979
- Highest: 1 in 735 girls born in 1934 were named Faye (0.14%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,776 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 19.0% of all girls named Faye (13,711) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 296 | #320 (1888) | #417 |
| 1890s | 1,130 | #225 (1897) | #261 |
| 1900s | 2,210 | #184 (1908) | #212 |
| 1910s | 6,826 | #183 (1911) | #201 |
| 1920s | 10,233 | #173 (1926) | #197 |
| 1930s | 12,555 | #146 (1934) | #160 |
| 1940s | 13,711 | #153 (1940) | #177 |
| 1950s | 10,427 | #210 (1950) | #264 |
| 1960s | 4,244 | #337 (1960) | #500 |
| 1970s | 1,558 | #729 (1970) | #884 |
| 1980s | 1,058 | #1,017 (1981) | #1,321 |
| 1990s | 618 | #1,713 (1992) | #2,246 |
| 2000s | 1,106 | #1,533 (2005) | #1,801 |
| 2010s | 2,969 | #694 (2019) | #973 |
| 2020s | 3,201 | #500 (2023) | #568 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Faye in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 1,207 of them was named Faye, which outranked 96.0% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 55,630 of them was named Faye, which outranked 59.2% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,771Willaim17
- #1,771Wilmar17
- #1,771Zachary17
- #1,849Faye16
- #1,849Abbott16
- #1,849Addie16
- #1,849Akira16
- #1,949Aden15
- #1,949Aime15
- #1,949Albertus15
Tied with 99 names at #1,849; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.