Sue

#8,860 for girls in 2025, 11 births · Last seen for boys in 1996 at #5,187
Given to girls 99.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1946 · 5,144 births
Debut · girls
65 births
In top 100 · girls
12 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
144,536
since 1880

Sue over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201916peak #61, 1946girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#8,86011—
2024#7,96713—
2023#10,3129—
2022#15,3065—
2021#15,2515—
2020——
2019#13,7996—
2018#7,10016—
2017#9,94310—
2016#8,87512—
2015#8,44713—
2014#7,63615—
2013#5,14326—
2012#8,63213—
2011#6,56419—
2010#7,21717—
2009#5,53725—
2008#7,40817—
2007#5,89523—
2006#5,90622—
2005#5,80021—
2004#7,82814—
2003#5,23523—
2002#4,76725—
2001#3,94032—
2000#3,59136—
1999#3,97029—
1998#3,64832—
1997#2,82043—
1996#3,09338#5,18711
1995#2,62347—
1994#2,58548#5,8689
1993#2,11264#5,36010
1992#2,01068#6,6707
1991#1,80779#5,09610
1990#1,89274#4,67311
1989#1,61586#3,80914
1988#1,42797#2,96118
1987#1,349101#4,9688
1986#1,254108#4,8538
1985#1,056140#3,80511
1984#979147#4,5528
1983#886171#4,4998
1982#776211#3,69211
1981#655270#4,9617
1980#543347—
1979#639272#6,0565
1978#679235—
1977#605280—
1976#642241—
1975#566293—
1974#495355#5,2275
1973#463396—
1972#428453—
1971#371632#4,9075
1970#367666—
1969#318810—
1968#276979—
1967#2311,258—
1966#2271,316#2,9868
1965#1901,775—
1964#1762,173#2,66510
1963#1552,591#3,6466
1962#1353,184—
1961#1303,506#2,9009
1960#1204,009#3,6656
1959#1074,387#2,53011
1958#1024,673#2,09315
1957#1044,490#2,63110
1956#1183,755—
1955#1163,729#2,9648
1954#1063,975—
1953#1063,648#2,9058
1952#1133,335—
1951#1063,357#2,05514
1950#1003,503#2,5809
1949#883,926#2,33711
1948#784,675#2,44310
1947#695,306#2,25112
1946#615,144#1,75917
1945#663,914#1,69716
1944#624,034#1,81015
1943#723,850#1,63619
1942#733,631#1,86715
1941#753,359#1,75916
1940#813,104#2,6718
1939#922,623—
1938#1042,589#2,32610
1937#1012,504#2,08812
1936#1092,222#2,4529
1935#1152,024#2,02913
1934#1191,933#1,93214
1933#1311,670#3,0047
1932#1391,509#3,0927
1931#1531,220#3,3906
1930#1671,213#4,0015
1929#198944—
1928#224780#4,1515
1927#251678#4,2105
1926#248697—
1925#255673—
1924#258644—
1923#262598—
1922#250684—
1921#256668—
1920#246707—
1919#242693—
1918#226785—
1917#218778#3,2177
1916#203868—
1915#203812—
1914#205634—
1913#215483—
1912#215431—
1911#214330—
1910#231277—
1909#230243—
1908#236206—
1907#233201—
1906#242178—
1905#225191—
1904#243163—
1903#251146—
1902#248154—
1901#247135—
1900#259157—
1899#257122—
1898#248143—
1897#227145—
1896#258121—
1895#217157—
1894#270105—
1893#236123—
1892#196163—
1891#209127—
1890#222120—
1889#219112—
1888#212117—
1887#180123—
1886#20196—
1885#19494—
1884#19392—
1883#21468—
1882#17284—
1881#18567—
1880#18665—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Sue was already there! It came in at #186, and was given to 65 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2020–2022, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Sue is popular in 1916

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedNHWashington: #201 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,198 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedMNIllinois: #189 for girls · 44 births · 1 in 1,316 girlsILWisconsin: #249 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,139 girlsWIMichigan: #281 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,689 girlsMINew York: #199 for girls · 70 births · 1 in 1,343 girlsNYMassachusetts: #335 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,753 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedSDIowa: #387 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,139 girlsIAIndiana: #229 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,824 girlsINOhio: #151 for girls · 52 births · 1 in 923 girlsOHPennsylvania: #126 for girls · 121 births · 1 in 738 girlsPANew Jersey: #145 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 820 girlsNJConnecticut: #169 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,090 girlsCTCalifornia: #249 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,778 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedNEMissouri: #184 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 1,109 girlsMOKentucky: #142 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 633 girlsKYWest Virginia: #182 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 949 girlsWVVirginia: #148 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 809 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Sue, so not publishedNMKansas: #259 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,850 girlsKSArkansas: #166 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 713 girlsARTennessee: #127 for girls · 47 births · 1 in 492 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #151 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 763 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #173 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 961 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #98 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 461 girlsDCOklahoma: #193 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 965 girlsOKLouisiana: #321 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,217 girlsLAMississippi: #158 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 693 girlsMSAlabama: #175 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 958 girlsALGeorgia: #150 for girls · 44 births · 1 in 712 girlsGAHawaii: #135 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 454 girlsHITexas: #195 for girls · 50 births · 1 in 901 girlsTXFlorida: #248 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,447 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. District of Columbia#98 · 1 in 461
  2. Pennsylvania#126 · 1 in 738
  3. Tennessee#127 · 1 in 492
  4. Hawaii#135 · 1 in 454
  5. Kentucky#142 · 1 in 633

Best ever in a state: #29 in Indiana, 1941.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#9851 in 461
Pennsylvania#1261211 in 738
Tennessee#127471 in 492
Hawaii#13551 in 454
Kentucky#142381 in 633
New Jersey#145351 in 820
Virginia#148301 in 809
Georgia#150441 in 712
North Carolina#151401 in 763
Ohio#151521 in 923
Mississippi#158261 in 693
Arkansas#166231 in 713
Connecticut#169121 in 1,090
South Carolina#173201 in 961
Alabama#175271 in 958
West Virginia#182161 in 949
Missouri#184261 in 1,109
Illinois#189441 in 1,316
Oklahoma#193191 in 965
Texas#195501 in 901
New York#199701 in 1,343
Washington#20171 in 1,198
Indiana#229131 in 1,824
Florida#24861 in 1,447
California#249111 in 1,778
Wisconsin#249111 in 2,139
Kansas#25981 in 1,850
Michigan#281121 in 2,689
Louisiana#32181 in 2,217
Massachusetts#33571 in 4,753
Iowa#38751 in 4,139
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Delaware———
Idaho———
Maine———
Maryland———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Sue
Momentum · girls
Brand new
  • 893 spots since 2024 (#7,967 → #8,860)
  • 413 spots since 2015 (#8,447 → #8,860)
  • Biggest jump: 96 spots in 1980 (#639 → #543)
  • Biggest drop: 121 spots in 1982 (#655 → #776)
Rise & fade · girls
66 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1946 at #61 (5,144 births)
  • Births halved by 1964, 18 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 12 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 12 yrs · run 1939–1950
  • Top 1,000: 105 yrs · run 1880–1984
Share of babies · girls
1 in 305
  • Highest: 1 in 305 girls born in 1946 were named Sue (0.33%)
  • Latest: 1 in 146,115 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 28.3% of all girls named Sue (40,943) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s918#172 (1882)#196
1890s1,326#196 (1892)#234
1900s1,774#225 (1905)#241
1910s6,091#203 (1916)#217
1920s7,073#198 (1929)#245
1930s19,507#92 (1939)#123
1940s40,943#61 (1946)#73
1950s38,852#100 (1950)#108
1960s21,601#120 (1960)#196
1970s3,823#367 (1970)#526
1980s1,678#543 (1980)#1,054
1990s522#1,807 (1991)#2,656
2000s238#3,591 (2000)#5,591
2010s147#5,143 (2013)#8,336
2020s43#7,967 (2024)#11,539

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Sue in 1916

girls
#203
868 births · 1 in 1,203 girls

Top girls' names in 1916

  1. #1Mary61,438
  2. #2Helen32,661
  3. #3Dorothy27,418
  4. #4Margaret24,953
  5. #5Ruth23,189
  6. #6Mildred15,633
  7. #7Anna15,228
  8. #8Elizabeth14,940
  9. #9Frances13,746
  10. #10Virginia12,487
  11. #203Sue868
More about 1916

girls

1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 1,203 of them was named Sue, which outranked 96.1% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Sue
  1. #200Cecelia883
  2. #201Effie878
  3. #202Angelina871
  4. #203Sue868
  5. #204Faye865
  6. #205Ora857
  7. #206Iva844
Biggest movers since 1915
Risers
  1. ↑ 567Trinidad#1,317 → #750
  2. ↑ 388Coral#1,367 → #979
  3. ↑ 377Coletta#1,317 → #940
  4. ↑ 370Clifford#1,285 → #915
  5. ↑ 327Maida#1,231 → #904
Fallers
  1. ↓ 364Louis#934 → #1,298
  2. ↓ 354Herminia#944 → #1,298
  3. ↓ 346Gertha#900 → #1,246
  4. ↓ 344Lahoma#934 → #1,278
  5. ↓ 310Hassie#900 → #1,210

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1916 →