Foy

Last seen for girls in 1950 at #5,301 · Last seen for boys in 2005 at #10,151
Given to boys 83.4% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1905 · 14 births
Debut · boys
6 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
2,112
since 1889

Foy over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201914peak #1,252, 1912peak #636, 1905girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013——
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006——
2005—#10,1516
2004——
2003——
2002——
2001——
2000——
1999——
1998——
1997——
1996——
1995——
1994——
1993—#8,7005
1992——
1991——
1990——
1989——
1988——
1987——
1986—#6,7215
1985——
1984—#4,9737
1983—#6,2385
1982—#6,3855
1981——
1980—#5,5256
1979——
1978—#3,61410
1977—#5,8455
1976—#4,9356
1975—#2,90213
1974—#3,8378
1973——
1972—#4,9865
1971—#4,3756
1970—#2,89111
1969—#2,13016
1968—#2,73510
1967—#2,47011
1966—#2,46511
1965—#2,27013
1964—#4,0395
1963—#2,20014
1962—#2,18614
1961—#2,40912
1960—#1,97317
1959—#1,86519
1958—#2,09315
1957—#1,71522
1956—#1,94517
1955—#1,97916
1954—#1,43528
1953—#1,48026
1952—#1,61522
1951—#1,59822
1950#5,3015#1,53823
1949—#1,58322
1948—#1,34629
1947—#1,39428
1946—#1,09440
1945#4,5565#1,29626
1944#4,0546#1,13534
1943#3,2499#1,07440
1942#4,1246#1,16735
1941#4,4205#1,06637
1940—#1,13534
1939#3,7826#90447
1938#3,1818#1,14932
1937#4,2555#1,23329
1936#2,68910#92444
1935#2,9269#1,09835
1934#3,8026#1,21330
1933#3,1098#1,18131
1932#3,2748#1,00443
1931#2,42712#93948
1930#2,30614#1,15137
1929#2,92110#1,09440
1928#2,95410#96350
1927#2,25616#1,00149
1926#2,56913#95551
1925#3,11610#1,05343
1924#2,51414#87262
1923#2,58713#95452
1922#2,61213#87162
1921#2,63313#83468
1920#2,35715#1,03545
1919#2,26415#99946
1918#2,20916#90953
1917#2,31614#91948
1916#3,0319#93946
1915#1,88317#79158
1914#1,89613#83641
1913#1,46516#75938
1912#1,25218#89225
1911#1,6569#1,11710
1910#1,9357#1,04510
1909#1,7637#1,2776
1908#1,35710#9469
1907#1,5128—
1906—#1,2535
1905—#63614
1904#1,8775—
1903——
1902#1,3208—
1901—#7279
1900—#83610
1899——
1898——
1897—#9426
1896—#8268
1895——
1894—#1,0745
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889—#8786
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1889

The first year at least five boys were named Foy! It came in at #878, and was given to 6 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1890–1895, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Foy is popular in 1914

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #345 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,190 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #284 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 2,140 boysOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedMSAlabama: #331 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 2,618 boysALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedHITexas: #420 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 3,239 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Foy, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Oklahoma#284 · 1 in 2,140
  2. Alabama#331 · 1 in 2,618
  3. North Carolina#345 · 1 in 3,190
  4. Texas#420 · 1 in 3,239

Best ever in a state: #206 in Alabama, 1933.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Oklahoma#28451 in 2,140
Alabama#33161 in 2,618
North Carolina#34561 in 3,190
Texas#42091 in 3,239
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Foy
Momentum · boys
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 2005
  • Biggest jump: 245 spots in 1939 (#1,149 → #904)
  • Biggest drop: 617 spots in 1906 (#636 → #1,253)
Rise & fade · boys
16 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1889
  • Peaked 1905 at #636 (14 births)
  • Births halved by 1906, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 24 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 24 yrs · run 1912–1919
Share of babies · boys
1 in 9,450
  • Highest: 1 in 9,450 boys born in 1905 were named Foy (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 332,884 boys born in 2005 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 24.7% of all boys named Foy (522) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1910
  • Mostly girls until 1909, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s6#878 (1889)#878
1890s19#826 (1896)#947
1900s53#636 (1905)#946
1910s375#759 (1913)#921
1920s522#834 (1921)#963
1930s376#904 (1939)#1,080
1940s325#1,066 (1941)#1,229
1950s210#1,435 (1954)#1,726
1960s123#1,973 (1960)#2,488
1970s64#2,891 (1970)#4,173
1980s28#4,973 (1984)#5,968
1990s5#8,700 (1993)#8,700
2000s6#10,151 (2005)#10,151

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Foy in 1914

girls
#1,896
13 births · 1 in 58,583 girls
boys
#836
41 births · 1 in 15,970 boys

Top girls' names in 1914

  1. #1Mary45,346
  2. #2Helen23,221
  3. #3Dorothy18,782
  4. #4Margaret17,763
  5. #5Ruth15,839
  6. #6Anna11,865
  7. #7Mildred11,649
  8. #8Elizabeth11,367
  9. #9Frances9,677
  10. #10Marie8,829
  11. #1,896Foy13

Top boys' names in 1914

  1. #1John37,947
  2. #2William29,753
  3. #3James26,262
  4. #4Robert21,188
  5. #5Joseph18,829
  6. #6George17,602
  7. #7Charles16,937
  8. #8Edward12,319
  9. #9Frank12,002
  10. #10Walter8,962
  11. #836Foy41
More about 1914

girls

761,581 girls got a published name in 1914; 1 in 58,583 of them was named Foy, which outranked 54.9% of the 4,206 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Foy
  1. #1,818Vinita14
  2. #1,818Virgina14
  3. #1,818Voncile14
  4. #1,896Foy13
  5. #1,896Adelyn13
  6. #1,896Adriana13
  7. #1,896Alena13
  8. #2,009Agustina12
  9. #2,009Allyne12
  10. #2,009Amparo12

Tied with 112 names at #1,896; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1913
Risers
  1. ↑ 589Rilla#1,358 → #769
  2. ↑ 587Venita#1,465 → #878
  3. ↑ 509Orene#1,465 → #956
  4. ↑ 486Vonnie#1,405 → #919
  5. ↑ 463Kathlyn#1,020 → #557
Fallers
  1. ↓ 837Christena#981 → #1,818
  2. ↓ 642Tiny#961 → #1,603
  3. ↓ 504Dominga#881 → #1,385
  4. ↓ 504Florrie#881 → #1,385
  5. ↓ 419Veola#925 → #1,344

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

654,762 boys got a published name in 1914; 1 in 15,970 of them was named Foy, which outranked 77.8% of the 3,759 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Foy
  1. #819Nat42
  2. #819Newman42
  3. #819Vernie42
  4. #836Foy41
  5. #836Attilio41
  6. #836Berry41
  7. #836Beryl41
  8. #855Anna40
  9. #855Baxter40
  10. #855Denzil40

Tied with 18 names at #836; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1913
Risers
  1. ↑ 817Gilmore#1,803 → #986
  2. ↑ 647Santos#1,580 → #933
  3. ↑ 546Lorenza#1,365 → #819
  4. ↑ 534Bobby#1,441 → #907
  5. ↑ 534Gino#1,441 → #907
Fallers
  1. ↓ 918Bernardo#950 → #1,868
  2. ↓ 692Eston#995 → #1,687
  3. ↓ 692Rolf#995 → #1,687
  4. ↓ 613Orson#995 → #1,608
  5. ↓ 458West#930 → #1,388

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1914 →