Frieda

#3,975 for girls in 2025, 36 births

Peak · girls
1896 · 339 births
Debut · girls
26 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
25,506
since 1880

Frieda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Frieda has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201914peak #141, 1896girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirls
rankbirths
2025#3,97536
2024#3,96337
2023#4,11435
2022#3,65342
2021#4,01436
2020#4,26332
2019#3,55243
2018#4,07635
2017#4,06636
2016#3,37947
2015#5,28825
2014#4,00337
2013#4,54331
2012#4,38733
2011#5,20726
2010#4,49432
2009#4,48233
2008#5,27927
2007#7,09218
2006#7,14217
2005#4,95826
2004#4,17233
2003#5,41922
2002#4,90624
2001#4,56426
2000#7,15814
1999#5,03921
1998#4,95521
1997#4,37024
1996#4,18425
1995#4,09925
1994#4,52122
1993#5,20618
1992#5,71816
1991#5,39917
1990#3,81327
1989#4,67019
1988#3,22530
1987#3,52425
1986#4,53917
1985#3,00830
1984#2,99229
1983#4,10918
1982#3,26026
1981#2,84731
1980#3,00229
1979#2,72432
1978#3,77719
1977#3,00226
1976#3,09523
1975#2,41133
1974#2,25435
1973#1,73251
1972#2,27633
1971#2,54229
1970#2,30733
1969#1,80946
1968#1,53955
1967#1,52454
1966#1,40361
1965#1,39462
1964#1,24678
1963#1,24178
1962#1,20384
1961#1,10898
1960#1,070101
1959#1,023107
1958#870137
1957#881134
1956#782159
1955#842133
1954#789141
1953#747150
1952#757138
1951#719148
1950#633181
1949#598189
1948#603192
1947#648165
1946#606171
1945#593151
1944#558170
1943#572175
1942#574165
1941#530174
1940#477200
1939#474197
1938#460213
1937#452209
1936#415241
1935#460193
1934#397267
1933#419233
1932#396270
1931#423234
1930#383318
1929#360337
1928#350372
1927#331417
1926#329405
1925#323428
1924#283541
1923#278538
1922#274566
1921#260639
1920#253674
1919#228746
1918#222804
1917#220766
1916#208838
1915#208792
1914#204639
1913#206506
1912#211445
1911#212335
1910#201319
1909#189315
1908#180317
1907#195267
1906#195244
1905#181275
1904#175280
1903#167294
1902#169282
1901#154323
1900#179300
1899#150307
1898#151335
1897#162278
1896#141339
1895#149299
1894#143299
1893#154256
1892#150265
1891#160207
1890#173195
1889#179162
1888#179154
1887#180123
1886#20791
1885#19990
1884#20585
1883#23657
1882#24450
1881#31725
1880#30926
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Frieda was already there! It came in at #309, and was given to 26 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1998–2000, when fewer than 22 girls a year got the name.

Where Frieda is popular in 1914

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedNHWashington: #195 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,123 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedIDMontana: #124 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 562 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #48 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 150 girlsNDMinnesota: #151 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 880 girlsMNIllinois: #125 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 631 girlsILWisconsin: #120 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 554 girlsWIMichigan: #152 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 798 girlsMINew York: #103 for girls · 153 births · 1 in 479 girlsNYMassachusetts: #207 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,850 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #100 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 391 girlsSDIowa: #159 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 870 girlsIAIndiana: #125 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 658 girlsINOhio: #143 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 827 girlsOHPennsylvania: #205 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 1,887 girlsPANew Jersey: #133 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 772 girlsNJConnecticut: #217 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,925 girlsCTCalifornia: #231 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,535 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedCONebraska: #95 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 388 girlsNEMissouri: #133 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 620 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedVAMaryland: #133 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 709 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedNMKansas: #123 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 577 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #240 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,340 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedHITexas: #367 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,210 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Frieda, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#48 · 1 in 150
  2. Nebraska#95 · 1 in 388
  3. South Dakota#100 · 1 in 391
  4. New York#103 · 1 in 479
  5. Wisconsin#120 · 1 in 554

Best ever in a state: #48 in North Dakota, 1914.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Dakota#48291 in 150
Nebraska#95191 in 388
South Dakota#10091 in 391
New York#1031531 in 479
Wisconsin#120261 in 554
Kansas#123161 in 577
Montana#12451 in 562
Illinois#125621 in 631
Indiana#125241 in 658
Maryland#133131 in 709
Missouri#133311 in 620
New Jersey#133261 in 772
Ohio#143401 in 827
Minnesota#151151 in 880
Michigan#152231 in 798
Iowa#159151 in 870
Washington#19551 in 1,123
Pennsylvania#205351 in 1,887
Massachusetts#207151 in 1,850
Connecticut#21751 in 1,925
California#23191 in 1,535
Oklahoma#240101 in 1,340
Texas#367161 in 2,210
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Mississippi———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Frieda
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 12 spots since 2024 (#3,963 → #3,975)
  • 288 spots since 2020 (#4,263 → #3,975)
  • 1,313 spots since 2015 (#5,288 → #3,975)
  • Biggest jump: 73 spots in 1882 (#317 → #244)
  • Biggest drop: 153 spots in 1959 (#870 → #1,023)
Rise & fade · girls
16 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1896 at #141 (339 births)
  • Births halved by 1942, 46 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 79 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 79 yrs · run 1880–1958
Share of babies · girls
1 in 702
  • Highest: 1 in 702 girls born in 1896 were named Frieda (0.14%)
  • Latest: 1 in 44,646 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1910s
  • 24.3% of all girls named Frieda (6,190) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s863#179 (1889)#226
1890s2,780#141 (1896)#153
1900s2,897#154 (1901)#178
1910s6,190#201 (1910)#212
1920s4,917#253 (1920)#304
1930s2,375#383 (1930)#428
1940s1,752#477 (1940)#576
1950s1,428#633 (1950)#804
1960s717#1,070 (1960)#1,354
1970s314#1,732 (1973)#2,612
1980s254#2,847 (1981)#3,518
1990s216#3,813 (1990)#4,730
2000s240#4,172 (2004)#5,517
2010s345#3,379 (2016)#4,300
2020s218#3,653 (2022)#3,997

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Frieda in 1914

girls
#204
639 births · 1 in 1,192 girls

Top girls' names in 1914

  1. #1Mary45,346
  2. #2Helen23,221
  3. #3Dorothy18,782
  4. #4Margaret17,763
  5. #5Ruth15,839
  6. #6Anna11,865
  7. #7Mildred11,649
  8. #8Elizabeth11,367
  9. #9Frances9,677
  10. #10Marie8,829
  11. #204Frieda639
More about 1914

girls

761,581 girls got a published name in 1914; 1 in 1,192 of them was named Frieda, which outranked 95.1% of the 4,206 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Frieda
  1. #201Patricia656
  2. #202Lela647
  3. #203Mollie644
  4. #204Frieda639
  5. #205Sue634
  6. #206Angeline632
  7. #207Iva618
Biggest movers since 1913
Risers
  1. ↑ 589Rilla#1,358 → #769
  2. ↑ 587Venita#1,465 → #878
  3. ↑ 509Orene#1,465 → #956
  4. ↑ 486Vonnie#1,405 → #919
  5. ↑ 463Kathlyn#1,020 → #557
Fallers
  1. ↓ 837Christena#981 → #1,818
  2. ↓ 642Tiny#961 → #1,603
  3. ↓ 504Dominga#881 → #1,385
  4. ↓ 504Florrie#881 → #1,385
  5. ↓ 419Veola#925 → #1,344

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1914 →