Gene
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #15,293 · #2,230 for boys in 2025, 63 births
Given to boys 94.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1937 · 3,165 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 21 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 126,877since 1880
Gene over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,230 | 63 | |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 | #1,902 | 83 |
| 2023 | — | #1,999 | 76 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,039 | 74 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,884 | 81 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,655 | 96 | |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | #1,868 | 80 |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 | #2,167 | 64 |
| 2017 | — | #1,746 | 88 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,875 | 79 | |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | #2,086 | 67 |
| 2014 | — | #2,402 | 53 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,021 | 67 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,983 | 71 | |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #2,145 | 61 |
| 2010 | — | #2,069 | 65 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,825 | 81 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,838 | 79 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,741 | 85 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,551 | 95 | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #1,525 | 93 |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #1,343 | 109 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #1,310 | 106 |
| 2002 | — | #1,332 | 99 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #1,100 | 129 |
| 2000 | — | #1,128 | 123 | |
| 1999 | — | #922 | 160 | |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #1,005 | 136 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #859 | 164 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #838 | 170 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #809 | 174 |
| 1994 | — | #722 | 209 | |
| 1993 | #8,052 | 10 | #696 | 221 |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | #651 | 252 |
| 1991 | #9,336 | 8 | #580 | 305 |
| 1990 | #7,880 | 10 | #617 | 267 |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | #569 | 291 |
| 1988 | #5,895 | 13 | #523 | 303 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #494 | 324 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #481 | 328 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #464 | 344 |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | #432 | 375 |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | #423 | 374 |
| 1982 | #5,911 | 11 | #409 | 413 |
| 1981 | #4,005 | 19 | #398 | 418 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #380 | 451 |
| 1979 | #5,751 | 11 | #361 | 488 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #361 | 453 |
| 1977 | #4,942 | 13 | #342 | 523 |
| 1976 | #4,363 | 14 | #355 | 464 |
| 1975 | #3,774 | 17 | #322 | 556 |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 | #316 | 570 |
| 1973 | #4,155 | 14 | #291 | 625 |
| 1972 | #2,820 | 24 | #264 | 742 |
| 1971 | #2,801 | 25 | #253 | 878 |
| 1970 | #2,705 | 26 | #250 | 934 |
| 1969 | #4,198 | 12 | #225 | 1,038 |
| 1968 | #2,164 | 31 | #216 | 1,072 |
| 1967 | #2,492 | 24 | #209 | 1,068 |
| 1966 | #3,740 | 12 | #205 | 1,145 |
| 1965 | #2,684 | 21 | #193 | 1,307 |
| 1964 | #2,348 | 27 | #180 | 1,530 |
| 1963 | #2,704 | 21 | #191 | 1,564 |
| 1962 | #2,113 | 31 | #201 | 1,514 |
| 1961 | #2,608 | 22 | #186 | 1,667 |
| 1960 | #1,953 | 34 | #174 | 1,796 |
| 1959 | #1,852 | 36 | #163 | 1,934 |
| 1958 | #1,557 | 47 | #168 | 1,815 |
| 1957 | #1,784 | 37 | #169 | 1,839 |
| 1956 | #1,533 | 48 | #170 | 1,754 |
| 1955 | #1,309 | 59 | #152 | 1,892 |
| 1954 | #1,249 | 63 | #151 | 1,900 |
| 1953 | #1,225 | 62 | #143 | 2,006 |
| 1952 | #1,216 | 61 | #138 | 2,073 |
| 1951 | #1,078 | 74 | #126 | 2,231 |
| 1950 | #1,026 | 79 | #122 | 2,250 |
| 1949 | #909 | 95 | #119 | 2,444 |
| 1948 | #914 | 90 | #111 | 2,542 |
| 1947 | #820 | 114 | #103 | 2,894 |
| 1946 | #686 | 135 | #98 | 2,759 |
| 1945 | #722 | 106 | #100 | 2,373 |
| 1944 | #732 | 107 | #95 | 2,602 |
| 1943 | #768 | 102 | #89 | 2,865 |
| 1942 | #668 | 126 | #82 | 3,127 |
| 1941 | #821 | 77 | #72 | 3,073 |
| 1940 | #935 | 59 | #70 | 3,060 |
| 1939 | #818 | 71 | #69 | 3,014 |
| 1938 | #811 | 75 | #65 | 3,149 |
| 1937 | #788 | 75 | #61 | 3,165 |
| 1936 | #785 | 74 | #66 | 2,909 |
| 1935 | #823 | 69 | #66 | 2,937 |
| 1934 | #746 | 80 | #67 | 2,854 |
| 1933 | #698 | 87 | #66 | 2,780 |
| 1932 | #606 | 117 | #64 | 2,952 |
| 1931 | #600 | 122 | #64 | 2,766 |
| 1930 | #521 | 168 | #70 | 2,787 |
| 1929 | #534 | 161 | #68 | 2,810 |
| 1928 | #462 | 223 | #62 | 3,088 |
| 1927 | #437 | 246 | #72 | 2,802 |
| 1926 | #408 | 278 | #91 | 2,083 |
| 1925 | #352 | 374 | #112 | 1,579 |
| 1924 | #436 | 257 | #135 | 1,275 |
| 1923 | #466 | 217 | #140 | 1,170 |
| 1922 | #468 | 214 | #143 | 1,089 |
| 1921 | #523 | 183 | #169 | 873 |
| 1920 | #477 | 204 | #173 | 810 |
| 1919 | #543 | 160 | #191 | 676 |
| 1918 | #583 | 151 | #192 | 662 |
| 1917 | #500 | 174 | #207 | 542 |
| 1916 | #619 | 119 | #212 | 517 |
| 1915 | #533 | 140 | #212 | 493 |
| 1914 | #532 | 109 | #226 | 352 |
| 1913 | #587 | 76 | #237 | 248 |
| 1912 | #678 | 54 | #256 | 187 |
| 1911 | #641 | 45 | #254 | 102 |
| 1910 | #753 | 32 | #253 | 91 |
| 1909 | #624 | 39 | #244 | 81 |
| 1908 | #882 | 20 | #238 | 78 |
| 1907 | #760 | 24 | #260 | 65 |
| 1906 | #731 | 25 | #249 | 63 |
| 1905 | #734 | 24 | #303 | 44 |
| 1904 | #727 | 23 | #249 | 58 |
| 1903 | #574 | 32 | #278 | 45 |
| 1902 | #667 | 25 | #299 | 41 |
| 1901 | #659 | 23 | #318 | 31 |
| 1900 | #705 | 26 | #301 | 48 |
| 1899 | #835 | 15 | #394 | 22 |
| 1898 | #768 | 19 | #394 | 25 |
| 1897 | #982 | 11 | #438 | 19 |
| 1896 | #728 | 19 | #357 | 29 |
| 1895 | #858 | 14 | #347 | 28 |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 | #439 | 19 |
| 1893 | #865 | 12 | #383 | 22 |
| 1892 | #762 | 15 | #394 | 23 |
| 1891 | #669 | 16 | #456 | 15 |
| 1890 | #825 | 11 | #434 | 17 |
| 1889 | #902 | 9 | #581 | 11 |
| 1888 | #753 | 12 | #580 | 12 |
| 1887 | #937 | 7 | #377 | 19 |
| 1886 | — | #512 | 13 | |
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | #399 | 20 |
| 1884 | — | #570 | 11 | |
| 1883 | — | #597 | 10 | |
| 1882 | #740 | 7 | #489 | 14 |
| 1881 | — | #503 | 12 | |
| 1880 | — | #745 | 7 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Gene was already there! It came in at #745, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Gene is popular in 1956
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Minnesota#90 · 1 in 579
- Wyoming#95 · 1 in 438
- North Dakota#101 · 1 in 530
- South Dakota#110 · 1 in 632
- Nebraska#110 · 1 in 668
Best ever in a state: #15 in Idaho, 1927.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | #90 | 69 | 1 in 579 |
| Wyoming | #95 | 8 | 1 in 438 |
| North Dakota | #101 | 14 | 1 in 530 |
| Nebraska | #110 | 24 | 1 in 668 |
| South Dakota | #110 | 13 | 1 in 632 |
| Iowa | #112 | 41 | 1 in 749 |
| Wisconsin | #113 | 55 | 1 in 832 |
| Washington | #124 | 45 | 1 in 706 |
| Delaware | #128 | 6 | 1 in 833 |
| Oregon | #132 | 22 | 1 in 813 |
| West Virginia | #135 | 23 | 1 in 938 |
| Kentucky | #137 | 38 | 1 in 956 |
| Indiana | #139 | 55 | 1 in 1,005 |
| Montana | #140 | 11 | 1 in 718 |
| Rhode Island | #140 | 5 | 1 in 1,842 |
| Connecticut | #142 | 16 | 1 in 1,545 |
| New Jersey | #142 | 43 | 1 in 1,371 |
| Maine | #146 | 9 | 1 in 1,153 |
| Missouri | #147 | 52 | 1 in 926 |
| Massachusetts | #148 | 25 | 1 in 2,226 |
| Pennsylvania | #148 | 84 | 1 in 1,466 |
| Colorado | #157 | 21 | 1 in 970 |
| Kansas | #160 | 25 | 1 in 991 |
| Arkansas | #161 | 22 | 1 in 924 |
| Florida | #161 | 46 | 1 in 1,026 |
| Ohio | #162 | 92 | 1 in 1,257 |
| Oklahoma | #162 | 26 | 1 in 955 |
| California | #166 | 154 | 1 in 1,089 |
| North Carolina | #166 | 53 | 1 in 1,047 |
| New Mexico | #167 | 14 | 1 in 868 |
| Georgia | #168 | 47 | 1 in 1,067 |
| Louisiana | #170 | 46 | 1 in 918 |
| South Carolina | #172 | 30 | 1 in 1,026 |
| Virginia | #172 | 37 | 1 in 1,201 |
| Illinois | #178 | 77 | 1 in 1,459 |
| Michigan | #178 | 70 | 1 in 1,430 |
| Idaho | #191 | 6 | 1 in 1,208 |
| Tennessee | #192 | 28 | 1 in 1,463 |
| Texas | #192 | 111 | 1 in 1,116 |
| Maryland | #196 | 17 | 1 in 1,857 |
| Arizona | #203 | 12 | 1 in 1,180 |
| Alabama | #211 | 28 | 1 in 1,428 |
| New York | #211 | 88 | 1 in 2,003 |
| Mississippi | #231 | 17 | 1 in 1,679 |
| Hawaii | #240 | 5 | 1 in 1,475 |
| District of Columbia | #274 | 5 | 1 in 2,993 |
| Utah | #278 | 5 | 1 in 2,403 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Gene
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 328 spots since 2024 (#1,902 → #2,230)
- 575 spots since 2020 (#1,655 → #2,230)
- 144 spots since 2015 (#2,086 → #2,230)
- Biggest jump: 242 spots in 1881 (#745 → #503)
- Biggest drop: 206 spots in 2000 (#922 → #1,128)
Rise & fade · boys
57 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1937 at #61 (3,165 births)
- Births halved by 1962, 25 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 21 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 21 yrs · run 1926–1946
- Top 1,000: 119 yrs · run 1880–1997
Share of babies · boys
1 in 337
- Highest: 1 in 337 boys born in 1937 were named Gene (0.30%)
- Latest: 1 in 27,112 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1930s
- 23.1% of all boys named Gene (29,313) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1892
- Mostly girls until 1891, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 129 | #377 (1887) | #535 |
| 1890s | 219 | #347 (1895) | #404 |
| 1900s | 554 | #238 (1908) | #274 |
| 1910s | 3,870 | #191 (1919) | #224 |
| 1920s | 17,579 | #62 (1928) | #117 |
| 1930s | 29,313 | #61 (1937) | #66 |
| 1940s | 27,739 | #70 (1940) | #94 |
| 1950s | 19,694 | #122 (1950) | #150 |
| 1960s | 13,701 | #174 (1960) | #198 |
| 1970s | 6,233 | #250 (1970) | #312 |
| 1980s | 3,621 | #380 (1980) | #457 |
| 1990s | 2,058 | #580 (1991) | #770 |
| 2000s | 999 | #1,100 (2001) | #1,469 |
| 2010s | 695 | #1,746 (2017) | #2,036 |
| 2020s | 473 | #1,655 (2020) | #1,952 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Gene in 1956
girls
#1,533
48 births · 1 in 41,827 girls
boys
#170
1,754 births · 1 in 1,206 boys
Top girls' names in 1956
Top boys' names in 1956
More about 1956
girls
2,007,703 girls got a published name in 1956; 1 in 41,827 of them was named Gene, which outranked 77.8% of the 6,891 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Gene
- #1,520Thresa49
- #1,520Verlene49
- #1,520Vernessa49
- #1,533Gene48
- #1,533Allene48
- #1,533Augusta48
- #1,533Chiquita48
- #1,548Albertha47
- #1,548Arlette47
- #1,548Bobbye47
Tied with 14 names at #1,533; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Biggest movers since 1955
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,115,302 boys got a published name in 1956; 1 in 1,206 of them was named Gene, which outranked 96.2% of the 4,455 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Gene
Biggest movers since 1955
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.