Hazel
#21 for girls in 2025, 6,318 births · #4,249 for boys in 2025, 24 births
Given to girls 99.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 6,193 births
- Debut · girls
- 21 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 62 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 302,580since 1880
Hazel over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #21 | 6,318 | #4,249 | 24 |
| 2024 | #19 | 6,432 | #2,835 | 45 |
| 2023 | #18 | 6,193 | #4,343 | 24 |
| 2022 | #27 | 6,161 | #3,879 | 28 |
| 2021 | #28 | 6,015 | #3,582 | 31 |
| 2020 | #31 | 5,519 | #4,855 | 19 |
| 2019 | #33 | 5,464 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #42 | 4,951 | #5,540 | 16 |
| 2017 | #43 | 5,047 | #5,788 | 15 |
| 2016 | #52 | 4,682 | #5,318 | 17 |
| 2015 | #63 | 4,302 | #6,676 | 12 |
| 2014 | #105 | 2,909 | #8,781 | 8 |
| 2013 | #157 | 2,057 | #10,728 | 6 |
| 2012 | #173 | 1,785 | — | |
| 2011 | #211 | 1,481 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #264 | 1,241 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #293 | 1,126 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #345 | 967 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #357 | 909 | #7,094 | 11 |
| 2006 | #465 | 682 | — | |
| 2005 | #514 | 578 | — | |
| 2004 | #682 | 404 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #680 | 385 | — | |
| 2002 | #767 | 314 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #750 | 319 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #893 | 246 | — | |
| 1999 | #914 | 231 | — | |
| 1998 | #941 | 219 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,007 | 192 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,079 | 171 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,096 | 162 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #1,204 | 146 | #6,968 | 7 |
| 1993 | #1,180 | 147 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,216 | 143 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,306 | 127 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,180 | 145 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,088 | 154 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,300 | 111 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,081 | 141 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,171 | 121 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,185 | 119 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #1,157 | 117 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,328 | 90 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,160 | 120 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,074 | 131 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,068 | 132 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,178 | 112 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,031 | 132 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,042 | 127 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,066 | 115 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #943 | 134 | — | |
| 1974 | #924 | 136 | #5,227 | 5 |
| 1973 | #890 | 141 | — | |
| 1972 | #800 | 169 | #3,963 | 7 |
| 1971 | #772 | 188 | — | |
| 1970 | #675 | 235 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #684 | 212 | #4,404 | 5 |
| 1968 | #619 | 241 | #3,673 | 6 |
| 1967 | #594 | 256 | #3,231 | 7 |
| 1966 | #542 | 301 | — | |
| 1965 | #515 | 343 | — | |
| 1964 | #512 | 363 | #2,040 | 16 |
| 1963 | #472 | 420 | #3,044 | 8 |
| 1962 | #457 | 447 | #1,962 | 17 |
| 1961 | #433 | 514 | #3,097 | 8 |
| 1960 | #397 | 577 | #2,685 | 10 |
| 1959 | #391 | 585 | #2,295 | 13 |
| 1958 | #360 | 658 | — | |
| 1957 | #334 | 746 | #2,190 | 14 |
| 1956 | #315 | 771 | #1,945 | 17 |
| 1955 | #286 | 910 | #1,845 | 18 |
| 1954 | #256 | 1,036 | #2,207 | 13 |
| 1953 | #251 | 1,041 | #1,836 | 18 |
| 1952 | #243 | 1,058 | #1,665 | 21 |
| 1951 | #226 | 1,148 | #1,838 | 17 |
| 1950 | #219 | 1,182 | #1,815 | 17 |
| 1949 | #205 | 1,320 | #1,754 | 18 |
| 1948 | #199 | 1,348 | #1,611 | 21 |
| 1947 | #183 | 1,558 | #1,425 | 27 |
| 1946 | #175 | 1,521 | #1,236 | 32 |
| 1945 | #164 | 1,439 | #1,349 | 24 |
| 1944 | #147 | 1,659 | #1,212 | 30 |
| 1943 | #144 | 1,852 | #1,018 | 43 |
| 1942 | #139 | 1,911 | #1,228 | 32 |
| 1941 | #131 | 1,981 | #1,209 | 30 |
| 1940 | #123 | 2,068 | #967 | 44 |
| 1939 | #118 | 2,101 | #1,033 | 38 |
| 1938 | #111 | 2,337 | #912 | 48 |
| 1937 | #106 | 2,346 | #1,000 | 40 |
| 1936 | #96 | 2,512 | #1,010 | 39 |
| 1935 | #92 | 2,694 | #822 | 57 |
| 1934 | #87 | 2,811 | #982 | 42 |
| 1933 | #82 | 3,030 | #937 | 45 |
| 1932 | #75 | 3,340 | #874 | 53 |
| 1931 | #74 | 3,508 | #841 | 56 |
| 1930 | #71 | 3,888 | #915 | 53 |
| 1929 | #64 | 4,164 | #788 | 67 |
| 1928 | #59 | 4,649 | #1,003 | 47 |
| 1927 | #53 | 5,096 | #982 | 51 |
| 1926 | #48 | 5,303 | #855 | 60 |
| 1925 | #45 | 5,778 | #871 | 59 |
| 1924 | #42 | 6,342 | #797 | 71 |
| 1923 | #40 | 6,246 | #835 | 66 |
| 1922 | #37 | 6,757 | #809 | 69 |
| 1921 | #34 | 7,341 | #780 | 74 |
| 1920 | #34 | 7,308 | #732 | 79 |
| 1919 | #32 | 7,430 | #704 | 79 |
| 1918 | #33 | 7,615 | #809 | 65 |
| 1917 | #31 | 7,285 | #744 | 70 |
| 1916 | #31 | 7,214 | #662 | 79 |
| 1915 | #26 | 7,092 | #715 | 68 |
| 1914 | #29 | 5,324 | #645 | 61 |
| 1913 | #27 | 4,589 | #759 | 38 |
| 1912 | #25 | 4,197 | #599 | 46 |
| 1911 | #25 | 3,290 | #584 | 27 |
| 1910 | #24 | 3,032 | #537 | 28 |
| 1909 | #24 | 2,708 | #519 | 25 |
| 1908 | #24 | 2,698 | #452 | 29 |
| 1907 | #23 | 2,530 | #559 | 19 |
| 1906 | #23 | 2,315 | #752 | 11 |
| 1905 | #25 | 2,351 | #592 | 16 |
| 1904 | #23 | 2,301 | #431 | 24 |
| 1903 | #26 | 2,139 | #550 | 16 |
| 1902 | #25 | 2,238 | #556 | 15 |
| 1901 | #23 | 2,097 | #433 | 19 |
| 1900 | #29 | 2,425 | #649 | 15 |
| 1899 | #26 | 2,033 | #583 | 12 |
| 1898 | #19 | 2,439 | #635 | 12 |
| 1897 | #18 | 2,339 | #515 | 15 |
| 1896 | #22 | 2,226 | #674 | 11 |
| 1895 | #22 | 2,252 | #579 | 13 |
| 1894 | #23 | 2,103 | #668 | 10 |
| 1893 | #22 | 2,052 | #538 | 13 |
| 1892 | #25 | 1,897 | #597 | 12 |
| 1891 | #32 | 1,447 | #497 | 13 |
| 1890 | #37 | 1,366 | #739 | 8 |
| 1889 | #48 | 1,056 | #722 | 8 |
| 1888 | #54 | 898 | #554 | 13 |
| 1887 | #72 | 504 | #921 | 5 |
| 1886 | #81 | 429 | #845 | 6 |
| 1885 | #105 | 281 | — | |
| 1884 | #122 | 209 | — | |
| 1883 | #149 | 123 | — | |
| 1882 | #190 | 73 | — | |
| 1881 | #216 | 50 | — | |
| 1880 | #352 | 21 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Hazel was already there! It came in at #352, and was given to 21 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 22 girls a year got the name.
Where Hazel is popular in 1929
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- North Carolina#19 · 1 in 108
- Louisiana#21 · 1 in 118
- Florida#23 · 1 in 125
- Georgia#23 · 1 in 128
- Kentucky#24 · 1 in 125
Best ever in a state: #1 in North Dakota, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #19 | 331 | 1 in 108 |
| Louisiana | #21 | 182 | 1 in 118 |
| Florida | #23 | 98 | 1 in 125 |
| Georgia | #23 | 235 | 1 in 128 |
| Kentucky | #24 | 211 | 1 in 125 |
| Tennessee | #24 | 200 | 1 in 129 |
| Virginia | #25 | 201 | 1 in 118 |
| Alabama | #28 | 198 | 1 in 152 |
| Arkansas | #28 | 125 | 1 in 146 |
| West Virginia | #31 | 124 | 1 in 147 |
| Oklahoma | #32 | 126 | 1 in 181 |
| Mississippi | #33 | 142 | 1 in 151 |
| Hawaii | #35 | 22 | 1 in 160 |
| Texas | #43 | 257 | 1 in 235 |
| Arizona | #44 | 23 | 1 in 186 |
| Montana | #45 | 23 | 1 in 165 |
| Idaho | #47 | 16 | 1 in 206 |
| South Carolina | #48 | 100 | 1 in 194 |
| Kansas | #51 | 54 | 1 in 259 |
| Missouri | #54 | 110 | 1 in 252 |
| Oregon | #60 | 22 | 1 in 235 |
| Maryland | #69 | 46 | 1 in 273 |
| South Dakota | #69 | 19 | 1 in 283 |
| Colorado | #71 | 30 | 1 in 277 |
| North Dakota | #74 | 25 | 1 in 245 |
| Maine | #77 | 22 | 1 in 287 |
| Ohio | #79 | 158 | 1 in 325 |
| Indiana | #83 | 64 | 1 in 386 |
| Vermont | #83 | 8 | 1 in 317 |
| New Hampshire | #87 | 10 | 1 in 312 |
| Iowa | #88 | 50 | 1 in 371 |
| New Mexico | #88 | 13 | 1 in 317 |
| District of Columbia | #89 | 10 | 1 in 342 |
| Wyoming | #89 | 5 | 1 in 293 |
| Wisconsin | #90 | 57 | 1 in 416 |
| Pennsylvania | #91 | 204 | 1 in 406 |
| Michigan | #93 | 99 | 1 in 425 |
| Minnesota | #99 | 43 | 1 in 447 |
| Illinois | #104 | 111 | 1 in 514 |
| Washington | #107 | 19 | 1 in 480 |
| Nebraska | #109 | 23 | 1 in 461 |
| California | #111 | 73 | 1 in 489 |
| Connecticut | #113 | 20 | 1 in 557 |
| New Jersey | #114 | 53 | 1 in 550 |
| Massachusetts | #117 | 47 | 1 in 671 |
| Rhode Island | #127 | 8 | 1 in 613 |
| Utah | #136 | 9 | 1 in 504 |
| New York | #141 | 131 | 1 in 737 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hazel
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 2 spots since 2024 (#19 → #21)
- 10 spots since 2020 (#31 → #21)
- 42 spots since 2015 (#63 → #21)
- Biggest jump: 168 spots in 2005 (#682 → #514)
- Biggest drop: 123 spots in 1976 (#943 → #1,066)
Rise & fade · girls
143 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2023 at #18 (6,193 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 62 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 62 yrs · run 1886–1936
- Top 1,000: 124 yrs · run 1880–1975
Share of babies · girls
1 in 100
- Highest: 1 in 100 girls born in 1897 were named Hazel (1.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 254 girls born in 2025 (0.39%)
- Its best rank, #18 in 2023, was only 1 in 259 (0.39%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 19.5% of all girls named Hazel (58,984) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #18 (1897) → #1,328 (1983) → #18 (2023)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,644 | #48 (1889) | #139 |
| 1890s | 20,154 | #18 (1897) | #25 |
| 1900s | 23,802 | #23 (1907) | #25 |
| 1910s | 57,068 | #24 (1910) | #28 |
| 1920s | 58,984 | #34 (1921) | #46 |
| 1930s | 28,567 | #71 (1930) | #91 |
| 1940s | 16,657 | #123 (1940) | #161 |
| 1950s | 9,135 | #219 (1950) | #288 |
| 1960s | 3,674 | #397 (1960) | #523 |
| 1970s | 1,489 | #675 (1970) | #932 |
| 1980s | 1,236 | #1,068 (1980) | #1,161 |
| 1990s | 1,683 | #914 (1999) | #1,112 |
| 2000s | 5,930 | #293 (2009) | #575 |
| 2010s | 33,919 | #33 (2019) | #114 |
| 2020s | 36,638 | #18 (2023) | #24 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Hazel in 1929
girls
#64
4,164 births · 1 in 268 girls
boys
#788
67 births · 1 in 16,054 boys
Top girls' names in 1929
Top boys' names in 1929
More about 1929
girls
1,116,561 girls got a published name in 1929; 1 in 268 of them was named Hazel, which outranked 98.8% of the 5,277 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Hazel
Biggest movers since 1928
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,075,615 boys got a published name in 1929; 1 in 16,054 of them was named Hazel, which outranked 82.7% of the 4,545 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).