Heath
Last seen for girls in 2004 at #16,099 · #929 for boys in 2025, 253 births
Given to boys 99.4% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1974 · 1,249 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 29,523since 1913
Heath over time
Rank among boys' names. Heath has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #929 | 253 | |
| 2024 | — | #852 | 285 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,053 | 206 | |
| 2022 | — | #862 | 280 | |
| 2021 | — | #957 | 234 | |
| 2020 | — | #992 | 215 | |
| 2019 | — | #945 | 227 | |
| 2018 | — | #936 | 224 | |
| 2017 | — | #890 | 242 | |
| 2016 | — | #874 | 251 | |
| 2015 | — | #831 | 270 | |
| 2014 | — | #923 | 231 | |
| 2013 | — | #858 | 249 | |
| 2012 | — | #863 | 244 | |
| 2011 | — | #853 | 250 | |
| 2010 | — | #761 | 295 | |
| 2009 | — | #681 | 356 | |
| 2008 | — | #716 | 324 | |
| 2007 | — | #903 | 221 | |
| 2006 | — | #776 | 267 | |
| 2005 | — | #797 | 242 | |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #690 | 288 |
| 2003 | — | #721 | 255 | |
| 2002 | — | #673 | 275 | |
| 2001 | — | #782 | 216 | |
| 2000 | — | #853 | 187 | |
| 1999 | — | #771 | 206 | |
| 1998 | — | #651 | 268 | |
| 1997 | — | #642 | 259 | |
| 1996 | — | #642 | 261 | |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #600 | 293 |
| 1994 | — | #527 | 372 | |
| 1993 | — | #537 | 363 | |
| 1992 | — | #545 | 350 | |
| 1991 | — | #503 | 390 | |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #461 | 457 |
| 1989 | — | #402 | 535 | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #364 | 552 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #345 | 576 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #338 | 566 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #331 | 593 |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | #305 | 640 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #302 | 652 |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #289 | 709 |
| 1981 | #6,323 | 10 | #271 | 790 |
| 1980 | #6,789 | 9 | #247 | 906 |
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | #228 | 998 |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | #211 | 1,021 |
| 1977 | #5,888 | 10 | #207 | 1,076 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #195 | 1,151 |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | #188 | 1,204 |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | #181 | 1,249 |
| 1973 | #5,191 | 10 | #202 | 1,072 |
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | #190 | 1,234 |
| 1971 | #5,136 | 10 | #225 | 1,053 |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | #278 | 756 |
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | #345 | 524 |
| 1968 | — | #326 | 548 | |
| 1967 | — | #329 | 516 | |
| 1966 | — | #361 | 433 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,254 | 37 | |
| 1964 | — | #2,665 | 10 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,646 | 6 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,673 | 10 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,652 | 6 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,535 | 11 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,290 | 7 | |
| 1958 | — | #3,275 | 7 | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #2,558 | 10 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,425 | 6 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,514 | 10 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,066 | 7 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | #3,019 | 7 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,443 | 10 | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | #3,525 | 5 | |
| 1945 | — | #3,338 | 5 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,633 | 8 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,964 | 7 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,523 | 9 | |
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,871 | 7 | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | #3,518 | 5 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,854 | 7 | |
| 1935 | — | #3,645 | 5 | |
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | #3,642 | 5 | |
| 1932 | — | #3,776 | 5 | |
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | #3,022 | 8 | |
| 1929 | — | #3,959 | 5 | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | #3,451 | 7 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,385 | 7 | |
| 1925 | — | #3,741 | 6 | |
| 1924 | — | #3,505 | 7 | |
| 1923 | — | #3,822 | 6 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,347 | 13 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,376 | 13 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,820 | 19 | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | #3,096 | 8 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,091 | 14 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,926 | 8 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,392 | 6 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | #1,945 | 9 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Heath! It came in at #1,945, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1914, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Heath is popular in 1995
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arkansas#227 · 1 in 1,262
- Tennessee#243 · 1 in 1,644
- Alabama#245 · 1 in 1,452
- Iowa#245 · 1 in 1,817
- Oklahoma#274 · 1 in 1,767
Best ever in a state: #55 in South Dakota, 1974.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | #227 | 11 | 1 in 1,262 |
| Tennessee | #243 | 21 | 1 in 1,644 |
| Alabama | #245 | 17 | 1 in 1,452 |
| Iowa | #245 | 9 | 1 in 1,817 |
| Oklahoma | #274 | 11 | 1 in 1,767 |
| Nebraska | #279 | 5 | 1 in 2,008 |
| Kansas | #293 | 8 | 1 in 1,901 |
| Ohio | #326 | 24 | 1 in 2,996 |
| Indiana | #328 | 13 | 1 in 2,931 |
| Kentucky | #376 | 6 | 1 in 3,866 |
| North Carolina | #396 | 14 | 1 in 3,201 |
| Missouri | #401 | 9 | 1 in 3,810 |
| Wisconsin | #522 | 5 | 1 in 5,885 |
| Louisiana | #541 | 7 | 1 in 3,889 |
| Texas | #570 | 28 | 1 in 5,468 |
| Virginia | #574 | 7 | 1 in 5,695 |
| Georgia | #578 | 10 | 1 in 4,842 |
| Illinois | #662 | 12 | 1 in 6,885 |
| Florida | #666 | 12 | 1 in 7,075 |
| Pennsylvania | #690 | 7 | 1 in 10,127 |
| Michigan | #836 | 5 | 1 in 12,102 |
| California | #1,309 | 10 | 1 in 26,008 |
| New York | #1,487 | 5 | 1 in 24,468 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Heath
- 77 spots since 2024 (#852 → #929)
- 63 spots since 2020 (#992 → #929)
- 98 spots since 2015 (#831 → #929)
- Biggest jump: 893 spots in 1966 (#1,254 → #361)
- Biggest drop: 191 spots in 2023 (#862 → #1,053)
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 1974 at #181 (1,249 births)
- Births halved by 1985, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 59 yrs · run 1966–2022
- Highest: 1 in 1,259 boys born in 1974 were named Heath (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 6,751 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 36.6% of all boys named Heath (10,814) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 45 | #1,945 (1913) | #2,690 |
| 1920s | 83 | #1,820 (1920) | #3,156 |
| 1930s | 40 | #2,854 (1936) | #3,448 |
| 1940s | 63 | #2,443 (1948) | #2,980 |
| 1950s | 52 | #2,514 (1952) | #3,116 |
| 1960s | 2,101 | #326 (1968) | #1,779 |
| 1970s | 10,814 | #181 (1974) | #211 |
| 1980s | 6,519 | #247 (1980) | #319 |
| 1990s | 3,219 | #461 (1990) | #588 |
| 2000s | 2,631 | #673 (2002) | #759 |
| 2010s | 2,483 | #761 (2010) | #873 |
| 2020s | 1,473 | #852 (2024) | #941 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Heath in 1995
Top girls' names in 1995
Top boys' names in 1995
More about 1995
girls
1,758,548 girls got a published name in 1995; 1 in 351,710 of them was named Heath, which outranked 15.0% of the 15,753 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 2,367 names at #13,386; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,903,701 boys got a published name in 1995; 1 in 6,497 of them was named Heath, which outranked 94.2% of the 10,330 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.