Huxley
#3,975 for girls in 2025, 36 births · #736 for boys in 2025, 357 births
Given to boys 90.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2020 · 526 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,734since 2002
Huxley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,975 | 36 | #736 | 357 |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | #743 | 346 |
| 2023 | #3,329 | 48 | #619 | 453 |
| 2022 | #3,365 | 47 | #611 | 457 |
| 2021 | #2,818 | 60 | #586 | 476 |
| 2020 | #3,338 | 46 | #537 | 526 |
| 2019 | #2,856 | 58 | #588 | 471 |
| 2018 | #3,293 | 48 | #666 | 379 |
| 2017 | #4,384 | 32 | #792 | 291 |
| 2016 | #5,130 | 26 | #867 | 259 |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 | #958 | 215 |
| 2014 | #6,713 | 18 | #1,355 | 126 |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | #1,763 | 82 |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #1,711 | 88 |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #2,105 | 63 |
| 2010 | — | #2,826 | 42 | |
| 2009 | — | #3,721 | 28 | |
| 2008 | — | #3,744 | 28 | |
| 2007 | — | #5,661 | 15 | |
| 2006 | — | #8,732 | 8 | |
| 2005 | — | #6,226 | 12 | |
| 2004 | — | #11,356 | 5 | |
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | #8,456 | 7 | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Huxley! It came in at #8,456, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2003–2004, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Huxley is popular in 2022
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#157 · 1 in 458
- Iowa#160 · 1 in 582
- North Dakota#167 · 1 in 491
- Alaska#173 · 1 in 489
- Montana#199 · 1 in 566
Best ever in a state: #104 in South Dakota, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #157 | 8 | 1 in 458 |
| Iowa | #160 | 24 | 1 in 582 |
| North Dakota | #167 | 7 | 1 in 491 |
| Alaska | #173 | 5 | 1 in 489 |
| Montana | #199 | 6 | 1 in 566 |
| Nebraska | #203 | 13 | 1 in 666 |
| Wisconsin | #241 | 24 | 1 in 986 |
| Minnesota | #255 | 24 | 1 in 1,039 |
| Indiana | #283 | 28 | 1 in 1,151 |
| Oregon | #288 | 14 | 1 in 1,092 |
| West Virginia | #336 | 5 | 1 in 1,339 |
| Kansas | #385 | 9 | 1 in 1,518 |
| Kentucky | #416 | 10 | 1 in 1,978 |
| Arkansas | #424 | 7 | 1 in 1,801 |
| Oklahoma | #429 | 10 | 1 in 1,774 |
| Utah | #432 | 10 | 1 in 1,894 |
| Colorado | #477 | 11 | 1 in 2,314 |
| Tennessee | #487 | 15 | 1 in 2,394 |
| Louisiana | #491 | 10 | 1 in 2,132 |
| Missouri | #532 | 10 | 1 in 2,797 |
| Washington | #538 | 13 | 1 in 2,557 |
| Massachusetts | #551 | 8 | 1 in 3,456 |
| Ohio | #615 | 15 | 1 in 3,540 |
| Michigan | #659 | 11 | 1 in 3,773 |
| Pennsylvania | #667 | 13 | 1 in 4,118 |
| North Carolina | #686 | 13 | 1 in 3,920 |
| Florida | #757 | 19 | 1 in 5,018 |
| Alabama | #781 | 5 | 1 in 4,407 |
| Illinois | #816 | 10 | 1 in 5,176 |
| New York | #840 | 15 | 1 in 5,812 |
| Georgia | #857 | 10 | 1 in 5,123 |
| Texas | #941 | 25 | 1 in 7,148 |
| California | #960 | 23 | 1 in 8,223 |
| New Jersey | #1,034 | 5 | 1 in 8,141 |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Huxley
- 7 spots since 2024 (#743 → #736)
- 199 spots since 2020 (#537 → #736)
- 222 spots since 2015 (#958 → #736)
- Biggest jump: 397 spots in 2015 (#1,355 → #958)
- Biggest drop: 124 spots in 2024 (#619 → #743)
- Debuted 2002
- Peaked 2020 at #537 (526 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 11 yrs · run 2015–2025
- Highest: 1 in 3,282 boys born in 2020 were named Huxley (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,785 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 55.2% of all boys named Huxley (2,615) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103 | #3,721 (2009) | #6,842 |
| 2010s | 2,016 | #588 (2019) | #1,363 |
| 2020s | 2,615 | #537 (2020) | #639 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Huxley in 2022
Top girls' names in 2022
Top boys' names in 2022
More about 2022
girls
1,640,131 girls got a published name in 2022; 1 in 34,896 of them was named Huxley, which outranked 81.1% of the 17,760 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,313Valarie48
- #3,313Veera48
- #3,313Zaia48
- #3,365Huxley47
- #3,365Aarohi47
- #3,365Ahsoka47
- #3,365Aisling47
- #3,416Alany46
- #3,416Alayia46
- #3,416Aleksandra46
Tied with 50 names at #3,365; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,746,008 boys got a published name in 2022; 1 in 3,821 of them was named Huxley, which outranked 95.7% of the 14,333 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).