Jack
#13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births · #15 for boys in 2025, 8,748 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2021 · 9,568 births
- Debut · boys
- 204 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 114 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 756,943since 1880
Jack over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 | #15 | 8,748 |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | #15 | 8,472 |
| 2023 | #8,055 | 13 | #14 | 8,715 |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #15 | 8,936 |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 | #11 | 9,568 |
| 2020 | #7,559 | 14 | #21 | 8,945 |
| 2019 | #7,716 | 14 | #19 | 9,404 |
| 2018 | #11,427 | 8 | #28 | 8,894 |
| 2017 | #10,689 | 9 | #36 | 8,477 |
| 2016 | #9,411 | 11 | #38 | 8,430 |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | #40 | 8,514 |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | #41 | 8,753 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #40 | 8,577 |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | #46 | 7,941 |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #45 | 8,185 |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #45 | 8,520 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #42 | 9,029 |
| 2008 | #8,109 | 15 | #39 | 9,897 |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | #38 | 10,671 |
| 2006 | #6,125 | 21 | #36 | 10,837 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | #34 | 10,906 |
| 2004 | #4,816 | 27 | #42 | 9,580 |
| 2003 | #7,580 | 14 | #45 | 9,318 |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | #44 | 9,000 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | #48 | 8,149 |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #46 | 8,125 |
| 1999 | #9,479 | 9 | #52 | 7,385 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #61 | 6,376 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #76 | 4,984 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #89 | 4,245 |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #110 | 3,448 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #127 | 2,781 |
| 1993 | — | #143 | 2,425 | |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #154 | 2,070 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #166 | 1,949 |
| 1990 | — | #166 | 1,838 | |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #178 | 1,716 |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | #171 | 1,655 |
| 1987 | #4,660 | 17 | #164 | 1,656 |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | #175 | 1,522 |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | #176 | 1,523 |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | #173 | 1,483 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #172 | 1,526 |
| 1982 | #4,945 | 14 | #166 | 1,620 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #166 | 1,616 |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 | #158 | 1,627 |
| 1979 | #4,231 | 17 | #161 | 1,582 |
| 1978 | #4,079 | 17 | #156 | 1,579 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #149 | 1,672 |
| 1976 | #4,363 | 14 | #149 | 1,662 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #142 | 1,742 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #149 | 1,648 |
| 1973 | #5,191 | 10 | #138 | 1,850 |
| 1972 | #3,543 | 17 | #142 | 1,899 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #132 | 2,364 |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | #129 | 2,564 |
| 1969 | #3,318 | 17 | #122 | 2,606 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | #110 | 2,692 |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | #112 | 2,782 |
| 1966 | #4,493 | 9 | #107 | 2,964 |
| 1965 | #2,605 | 22 | #104 | 3,199 |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | #99 | 3,809 |
| 1963 | #3,458 | 14 | #102 | 3,814 |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | #99 | 4,170 |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | #90 | 4,639 |
| 1960 | #3,212 | 15 | #85 | 4,918 |
| 1959 | #2,980 | 16 | #85 | 5,015 |
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 | #80 | 5,301 |
| 1957 | #3,150 | 14 | #67 | 6,024 |
| 1956 | #3,186 | 14 | #66 | 6,051 |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | #60 | 6,200 |
| 1954 | #2,519 | 19 | #57 | 6,475 |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 | #57 | 6,540 |
| 1952 | #3,796 | 9 | #52 | 6,937 |
| 1951 | #2,391 | 18 | #48 | 7,004 |
| 1950 | #2,652 | 15 | #48 | 6,840 |
| 1949 | #2,134 | 21 | #47 | 7,128 |
| 1948 | #2,701 | 14 | #43 | 7,612 |
| 1947 | #2,045 | 23 | #37 | 8,507 |
| 1946 | #2,024 | 21 | #35 | 7,801 |
| 1945 | #1,993 | 18 | #32 | 6,857 |
| 1944 | #1,867 | 21 | #30 | 7,253 |
| 1943 | #1,703 | 25 | #34 | 7,398 |
| 1942 | #1,760 | 23 | #34 | 7,365 |
| 1941 | #1,610 | 24 | #32 | 6,950 |
| 1940 | #1,792 | 20 | #29 | 7,048 |
| 1939 | #1,308 | 32 | #26 | 7,306 |
| 1938 | #1,182 | 38 | #25 | 8,144 |
| 1937 | #1,451 | 26 | #23 | 8,194 |
| 1936 | #1,640 | 21 | #20 | 8,857 |
| 1935 | #1,101 | 40 | #18 | 9,438 |
| 1934 | #1,062 | 43 | #17 | 9,985 |
| 1933 | #937 | 53 | #17 | 9,838 |
| 1932 | #989 | 51 | #17 | 10,716 |
| 1931 | #728 | 85 | #15 | 11,488 |
| 1930 | #744 | 88 | #14 | 12,430 |
| 1929 | #777 | 81 | #14 | 12,167 |
| 1928 | #721 | 96 | #15 | 12,494 |
| 1927 | #800 | 82 | #16 | 12,802 |
| 1926 | #790 | 84 | #16 | 12,195 |
| 1925 | #758 | 95 | #17 | 12,011 |
| 1924 | #864 | 75 | #17 | 11,921 |
| 1923 | #941 | 61 | #17 | 11,190 |
| 1922 | #906 | 65 | #18 | 10,847 |
| 1921 | #964 | 59 | #18 | 10,757 |
| 1920 | #939 | 60 | #20 | 9,599 |
| 1919 | #954 | 55 | #21 | 8,263 |
| 1918 | #1,184 | 40 | #21 | 8,341 |
| 1917 | #986 | 50 | #22 | 6,875 |
| 1916 | #1,059 | 43 | #26 | 6,161 |
| 1915 | #1,115 | 37 | #27 | 5,749 |
| 1914 | #1,344 | 22 | #27 | 4,485 |
| 1913 | #1,308 | 19 | #28 | 3,538 |
| 1912 | #1,178 | 20 | #28 | 2,870 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #25 | 1,668 |
| 1910 | #1,171 | 15 | #23 | 1,576 |
| 1909 | — | #27 | 1,150 | |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 | #27 | 1,086 |
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 | #26 | 1,019 |
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | #30 | 880 |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | #28 | 907 |
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | #27 | 908 |
| 1903 | — | #28 | 831 | |
| 1902 | #1,133 | 10 | #32 | 743 |
| 1901 | — | #32 | 645 | |
| 1900 | #1,932 | 5 | #27 | 1,053 |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | #35 | 582 |
| 1898 | — | #37 | 633 | |
| 1897 | — | #42 | 497 | |
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 | #40 | 539 |
| 1895 | #1,426 | 6 | #46 | 479 |
| 1894 | — | #47 | 441 | |
| 1893 | — | #50 | 405 | |
| 1892 | — | #54 | 401 | |
| 1891 | — | #62 | 290 | |
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | #53 | 368 |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | #60 | 322 |
| 1888 | — | #64 | 329 | |
| 1887 | — | #68 | 251 | |
| 1886 | — | #64 | 299 | |
| 1885 | — | #61 | 295 | |
| 1884 | — | #68 | 274 | |
| 1883 | — | #65 | 242 | |
| 1882 | — | #66 | 271 | |
| 1881 | — | #73 | 197 | |
| 1880 | — | #77 | 204 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jack was already there! It came in at #77, and was given to 204 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 300 boys a year got the name.
Where Jack is popular in 1922
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#5 · 1 in 32
- Utah#7 · 1 in 50
- Wyoming#8 · 1 in 37
- Washington#8 · 1 in 38
- Idaho#8 · 1 in 47
Best ever in a state: #1 in Wyoming, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #5 | 683 | 1 in 32 |
| Utah | #7 | 92 | 1 in 50 |
| Idaho | #8 | 80 | 1 in 47 |
| Texas | #8 | 708 | 1 in 74 |
| Washington | #8 | 253 | 1 in 38 |
| Wyoming | #8 | 47 | 1 in 37 |
| California | #9 | 674 | 1 in 45 |
| Montana | #9 | 91 | 1 in 49 |
| Oregon | #9 | 144 | 1 in 40 |
| Nevada | #10 | 12 | 1 in 22 |
| Colorado | #11 | 148 | 1 in 59 |
| Kansas | #11 | 256 | 1 in 62 |
| Arizona | #12 | 50 | 1 in 65 |
| Arkansas | #13 | 187 | 1 in 95 |
| Iowa | #13 | 264 | 1 in 79 |
| Michigan | #13 | 519 | 1 in 67 |
| Nebraska | #13 | 169 | 1 in 71 |
| West Virginia | #13 | 211 | 1 in 79 |
| Georgia | #14 | 345 | 1 in 89 |
| Indiana | #14 | 356 | 1 in 70 |
| Ohio | #14 | 707 | 1 in 71 |
| Missouri | #15 | 333 | 1 in 85 |
| Alabama | #16 | 253 | 1 in 106 |
| Tennessee | #17 | 242 | 1 in 102 |
| Florida | #18 | 104 | 1 in 100 |
| Alaska | #20 | 5 | 1 in 51 |
| Illinois | #20 | 589 | 1 in 94 |
| New Mexico | #20 | 40 | 1 in 101 |
| North Carolina | #21 | 284 | 1 in 120 |
| Kentucky | #22 | 213 | 1 in 122 |
| District of Columbia | #25 | 27 | 1 in 118 |
| Mississippi | #26 | 129 | 1 in 149 |
| Pennsylvania | #27 | 678 | 1 in 128 |
| New York | #28 | 809 | 1 in 115 |
| South Carolina | #28 | 144 | 1 in 145 |
| Louisiana | #31 | 119 | 1 in 166 |
| Virginia | #33 | 148 | 1 in 163 |
| Wisconsin | #38 | 151 | 1 in 154 |
| New Jersey | #39 | 167 | 1 in 173 |
| South Dakota | #42 | 39 | 1 in 159 |
| Maryland | #43 | 63 | 1 in 200 |
| Minnesota | #46 | 145 | 1 in 155 |
| Connecticut | #51 | 56 | 1 in 214 |
| Hawaii | #61 | 13 | 1 in 212 |
| North Dakota | #63 | 32 | 1 in 195 |
| Massachusetts | #95 | 46 | 1 in 723 |
| Rhode Island | #108 | 7 | 1 in 743 |
| Maine | #137 | 9 | 1 in 690 |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jack
- Held #15 since 2024
- 6 spots since 2020 (#21 → #15)
- 25 spots since 2015 (#40 → #15)
- Biggest jump: 21 spots in 1996 (#110 → #89)
- Biggest drop: 13 spots in 1958 (#67 → #80)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2021 at #11 (9,568 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 114 yrs · run 1880–1962
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 88 boys born in 1927 were named Jack (1.1%)
- Latest: 1 in 195 boys born in 2025 (0.51%)
- Its best rank, #11 in 2021, was only 1 in 183 (0.55%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 15.3% of all boys named Jack (115,983) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #14 (1930) → #178 (1989) → #11 (2021)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,684 | #60 (1889) | #67 |
| 1890s | 4,635 | #35 (1899) | #47 |
| 1900s | 9,222 | #26 (1907) | #28 |
| 1910s | 49,526 | #21 (1918) | #25 |
| 1920s | 115,983 | #14 (1929) | #17 |
| 1930s | 96,396 | #14 (1930) | #19 |
| 1940s | 73,919 | #29 (1940) | #35 |
| 1950s | 62,387 | #48 (1951) | #62 |
| 1960s | 35,593 | #85 (1960) | #103 |
| 1970s | 18,562 | #129 (1970) | #145 |
| 1980s | 15,944 | #158 (1980) | #170 |
| 1990s | 37,501 | #52 (1999) | #114 |
| 2000s | 95,512 | #34 (2005) | #41 |
| 2010s | 85,695 | #19 (2019) | #38 |
| 2020s | 53,384 | #11 (2021) | #15 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jack in 1922
Top girls' names in 1922
Top boys' names in 1922
More about 1922
girls
1,201,003 girls got a published name in 1922; 1 in 18,477 of them was named Jack, which outranked 84.3% of the 5,789 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,088,154 boys got a published name in 1922; 1 in 100 of them was named Jack, which outranked 99.6% of the 4,967 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.