Jacob
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #10,271 · #43 for boys in 2025, 6,152 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1999 · 35,371 births
- Debut · boys
- 404 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 76 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 988,227since 1880
Jacob over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #43 | 6,152 | |
| 2024 | #10,271 | 9 | #40 | 6,541 |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #35 | 7,015 |
| 2022 | #9,680 | 10 | #32 | 7,667 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #24 | 8,494 |
| 2020 | #10,250 | 9 | #15 | 9,309 |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | #12 | 10,797 |
| 2018 | #10,545 | 9 | #13 | 11,897 |
| 2017 | #7,092 | 16 | #9 | 13,269 |
| 2016 | #7,230 | 16 | #7 | 14,559 |
| 2015 | #5,653 | 23 | #4 | 16,005 |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 | #4 | 16,923 |
| 2013 | #5,644 | 23 | #2 | 18,201 |
| 2012 | #5,253 | 26 | #1 | 19,110 |
| 2011 | #5,728 | 23 | #1 | 20,403 |
| 2010 | #4,860 | 29 | #1 | 22,157 |
| 2009 | #5,226 | 27 | #1 | 21,204 |
| 2008 | #5,013 | 29 | #1 | 22,621 |
| 2007 | #4,380 | 34 | #1 | 24,310 |
| 2006 | #3,992 | 37 | #1 | 24,871 |
| 2005 | #3,646 | 40 | #1 | 25,851 |
| 2004 | #1,262 | 171 | #1 | 27,911 |
| 2003 | #3,131 | 47 | #1 | 29,658 |
| 2002 | #3,334 | 41 | #1 | 30,586 |
| 2001 | #3,486 | 38 | #1 | 32,573 |
| 2000 | #2,545 | 59 | #1 | 34,492 |
| 1999 | #2,343 | 63 | #1 | 35,371 |
| 1998 | #2,338 | 60 | #2 | 36,031 |
| 1997 | #2,229 | 61 | #2 | 34,163 |
| 1996 | #2,423 | 53 | #3 | 31,925 |
| 1995 | #2,052 | 66 | #4 | 31,134 |
| 1994 | #2,503 | 50 | #7 | 29,417 |
| 1993 | #2,045 | 67 | #9 | 27,487 |
| 1992 | #2,459 | 52 | #15 | 25,665 |
| 1991 | #2,163 | 61 | #17 | 25,200 |
| 1990 | #2,174 | 59 | #20 | 22,022 |
| 1989 | #1,804 | 74 | #26 | 17,831 |
| 1988 | #1,660 | 78 | #28 | 15,883 |
| 1987 | #1,446 | 90 | #31 | 14,326 |
| 1986 | #1,552 | 78 | #31 | 13,652 |
| 1985 | #1,562 | 77 | #35 | 12,284 |
| 1984 | #2,050 | 49 | #37 | 11,358 |
| 1983 | #1,665 | 66 | #36 | 10,999 |
| 1982 | #1,641 | 70 | #41 | 10,059 |
| 1981 | #1,830 | 60 | #43 | 9,342 |
| 1980 | #2,014 | 52 | #43 | 8,520 |
| 1979 | #2,304 | 41 | #45 | 7,545 |
| 1978 | #2,237 | 41 | #50 | 6,161 |
| 1977 | #2,463 | 35 | #56 | 5,788 |
| 1976 | #3,188 | 22 | #63 | 4,509 |
| 1975 | #2,969 | 24 | #75 | 3,618 |
| 1974 | #3,212 | 21 | #88 | 2,957 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #122 | 2,123 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #155 | 1,683 |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #223 | 1,057 |
| 1970 | — | #255 | 910 | |
| 1969 | — | #296 | 656 | |
| 1968 | — | #324 | 553 | |
| 1967 | — | #354 | 445 | |
| 1966 | — | #351 | 454 | |
| 1965 | — | #346 | 487 | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #344 | 522 |
| 1963 | — | #353 | 487 | |
| 1962 | — | #369 | 474 | |
| 1961 | — | #354 | 504 | |
| 1960 | — | #351 | 493 | |
| 1959 | — | #328 | 558 | |
| 1958 | — | #341 | 506 | |
| 1957 | — | #331 | 540 | |
| 1956 | — | #322 | 538 | |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #303 | 577 |
| 1954 | — | #306 | 563 | |
| 1953 | — | #289 | 590 | |
| 1952 | — | #298 | 561 | |
| 1951 | — | #311 | 502 | |
| 1950 | — | #318 | 465 | |
| 1949 | — | #308 | 490 | |
| 1948 | — | #289 | 550 | |
| 1947 | — | #301 | 522 | |
| 1946 | — | #304 | 457 | |
| 1945 | — | #292 | 417 | |
| 1944 | — | #283 | 437 | |
| 1943 | — | #281 | 476 | |
| 1942 | — | #252 | 524 | |
| 1941 | — | #257 | 466 | |
| 1940 | — | #234 | 514 | |
| 1939 | — | #261 | 427 | |
| 1938 | — | #240 | 488 | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | #223 | 536 |
| 1936 | — | #229 | 500 | |
| 1935 | — | #242 | 475 | |
| 1934 | — | #219 | 547 | |
| 1933 | — | #213 | 539 | |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 | #218 | 558 |
| 1931 | — | #217 | 572 | |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | #212 | 622 |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #203 | 647 |
| 1928 | — | #196 | 718 | |
| 1927 | — | #173 | 855 | |
| 1926 | — | #177 | 810 | |
| 1925 | — | #166 | 901 | |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #163 | 970 |
| 1923 | — | #160 | 975 | |
| 1922 | — | #148 | 1,027 | |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | #143 | 1,094 |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | #143 | 1,050 |
| 1919 | — | #137 | 1,082 | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | #133 | 1,198 |
| 1917 | #4,594 | 5 | #130 | 1,122 |
| 1916 | — | #123 | 1,132 | |
| 1915 | — | #121 | 1,122 | |
| 1914 | — | #113 | 997 | |
| 1913 | — | #117 | 744 | |
| 1912 | — | #110 | 691 | |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 | #116 | 323 |
| 1910 | — | #117 | 273 | |
| 1909 | — | #102 | 262 | |
| 1908 | — | #107 | 235 | |
| 1907 | — | #101 | 243 | |
| 1906 | — | #114 | 187 | |
| 1905 | — | #98 | 220 | |
| 1904 | — | #89 | 243 | |
| 1903 | — | #103 | 189 | |
| 1902 | — | #95 | 207 | |
| 1901 | — | #98 | 172 | |
| 1900 | — | #101 | 233 | |
| 1899 | — | #92 | 189 | |
| 1898 | — | #81 | 256 | |
| 1897 | — | #88 | 204 | |
| 1896 | — | #82 | 241 | |
| 1895 | — | #74 | 266 | |
| 1894 | — | #68 | 292 | |
| 1893 | — | #65 | 292 | |
| 1892 | — | #73 | 283 | |
| 1891 | — | #69 | 238 | |
| 1890 | — | #66 | 290 | |
| 1889 | — | #67 | 295 | |
| 1888 | — | #57 | 353 | |
| 1887 | — | #56 | 317 | |
| 1886 | — | #54 | 346 | |
| 1885 | — | #52 | 343 | |
| 1884 | — | #50 | 381 | |
| 1883 | — | #49 | 356 | |
| 1882 | — | #46 | 390 | |
| 1881 | — | #39 | 381 | |
| 1880 | — | #39 | 404 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jacob was already there! It came in at #39, and was given to 404 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1896–1908, when fewer than 260 boys a year got the name.
Where Jacob is popular in 1910
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- South Dakota#32 · 1 in 86
- North Dakota#59 · 1 in 164
- New York#60 · 1 in 238
- Maryland#64 · 1 in 319
- South Carolina#70 · 1 in 351
Best ever in a state: #1 in Iowa, 1991.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #32 | 7 | 1 in 86 |
| North Dakota | #59 | 5 | 1 in 164 |
| New York | #60 | 66 | 1 in 238 |
| Maryland | #64 | 7 | 1 in 319 |
| South Carolina | #70 | 16 | 1 in 351 |
| Nebraska | #72 | 6 | 1 in 239 |
| New Jersey | #73 | 10 | 1 in 367 |
| Iowa | #75 | 7 | 1 in 311 |
| Pennsylvania | #78 | 29 | 1 in 469 |
| Ohio | #116 | 9 | 1 in 684 |
| Massachusetts | #120 | 5 | 1 in 946 |
| Virginia | #123 | 7 | 1 in 726 |
| Missouri | #130 | 7 | 1 in 711 |
| Michigan | #131 | 5 | 1 in 679 |
| Illinois | #138 | 9 | 1 in 918 |
| North Carolina | #144 | 8 | 1 in 809 |
| Louisiana | #145 | 7 | 1 in 692 |
| Georgia | #150 | 10 | 1 in 899 |
| Texas | #314 | 5 | 1 in 1,815 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jacob
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 3 spots since 2024 (#40 → #43)
- 28 spots since 2020 (#15 → #43)
- 39 spots since 2015 (#4 → #43)
- Biggest jump: 68 spots in 1972 (#223 → #155)
- Biggest drop: 29 spots in 1943 (#252 → #281)
Rise & fade · boys
119 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1999 at #1 (35,371 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 15 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 10 for 25 yrs
- Top 10: 25 yrs · run 1993–2017
- Top 100: 76 yrs · run 1974–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 53
- Highest: 1 in 53 boys born in 1998 were named Jacob (1.9%)
- Latest: 1 in 278 boys born in 2025 (0.36%)
- Its best rank, #1 in 1999, was only 1 in 54 (1.8%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 30.2% of all boys named Jacob (298,415) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #39 (1880) → #369 (1962) → #1 (1999)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,566 | #39 (1880) | #51 |
| 1890s | 2,551 | #65 (1893) | #76 |
| 1900s | 2,191 | #89 (1904) | #101 |
| 1910s | 8,684 | #110 (1912) | #122 |
| 1920s | 9,047 | #143 (1921) | #167 |
| 1930s | 5,264 | #212 (1930) | #227 |
| 1940s | 4,853 | #234 (1940) | #280 |
| 1950s | 5,400 | #289 (1953) | #315 |
| 1960s | 5,075 | #296 (1969) | #344 |
| 1970s | 36,351 | #45 (1979) | #113 |
| 1980s | 124,254 | #26 (1989) | #35 |
| 1990s | 298,415 | #1 (1999) | #8 |
| 2000s | 274,077 | #1 (2000) | #1 |
| 2010s | 163,321 | #1 (2010) | #5 |
| 2020s | 45,178 | #15 (2020) | #32 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jacob in 1910
boys
#117
273 births · 1 in 711 boys
Top boys' names in 1910
More about 1910
boys
194,208 boys got a published name in 1910; 1 in 711 of them was named Jacob, which outranked 93.6% of the 1,839 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jacob
Biggest movers since 1909
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.