Jamia
#3,780 for girls in 2025, 39 births · Last seen for boys in 2003 at #9,581
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2003 · 221 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,498since 1954
Jamia over time
Rank among girls' names. Jamia has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,780 | 39 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,207 | 34 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,047 | 54 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,928 | 57 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,784 | 61 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,779 | 59 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,561 | 68 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,457 | 72 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,432 | 74 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,129 | 91 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,431 | 75 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,114 | 91 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,533 | 70 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,132 | 89 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,190 | 86 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,059 | 96 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,710 | 129 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,453 | 162 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,431 | 165 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,314 | 178 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,297 | 172 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,228 | 180 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,035 | 221 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #1,084 | 196 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,187 | 172 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,171 | 171 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,143 | 171 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,272 | 142 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,442 | 115 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,343 | 126 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,850 | 76 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,026 | 69 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,942 | 72 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,830 | 78 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,136 | 62 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,068 | 64 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,572 | 44 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,093 | 55 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,493 | 41 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,344 | 43 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,137 | 49 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,730 | 33 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,310 | 41 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,830 | 32 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,529 | 37 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,486 | 38 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,671 | 33 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,637 | 20 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,267 | 23 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,678 | 18 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,854 | 12 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,714 | 16 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,534 | 12 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,198 | 12 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,222 | 11 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,053 | 11 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | — | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | — | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #5,309 | 7 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | — | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | — | |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | — | |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | — | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jamia! It came in at #5,753, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1954–1955, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jamia is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#156 · 1 in 498
- Mississippi#167 · 1 in 707
- Kentucky#353 · 1 in 1,928
- Alabama#461 · 1 in 2,437
- Tennessee#479 · 1 in 2,729
Best ever in a state: #95 in District of Columbia, 1998.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #156 | 7 | 1 in 498 |
| Mississippi | #167 | 16 | 1 in 707 |
| Kentucky | #353 | 10 | 1 in 1,928 |
| Alabama | #461 | 8 | 1 in 2,437 |
| Tennessee | #479 | 11 | 1 in 2,729 |
| Georgia | #486 | 19 | 1 in 2,548 |
| Louisiana | #518 | 8 | 1 in 2,565 |
| Maryland | #530 | 8 | 1 in 2,969 |
| Virginia | #544 | 11 | 1 in 3,242 |
| North Carolina | #816 | 8 | 1 in 5,430 |
| Florida | #856 | 13 | 1 in 5,925 |
| Texas | #982 | 23 | 1 in 6,780 |
| New York | #1,246 | 10 | 1 in 9,688 |
| Illinois | #1,377 | 6 | 1 in 11,446 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jamia
- 427 spots since 2024 (#4,207 → #3,780)
- 1,001 spots since 2020 (#2,779 → #3,780)
- 1,349 spots since 2015 (#2,431 → #3,780)
- Debuted 1954
- Peaked 2003 at #1,035 (221 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 8,268 girls born in 2003 were named Jamia (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 41,212 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 38.8% of all girls named Jamia (1,746) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 26 | #5,325 (1956) | #5,902 |
| 1960s | 58 | #4,053 (1967) | #5,194 |
| 1970s | 164 | #2,671 (1979) | #4,206 |
| 1980s | 413 | #2,093 (1988) | #2,452 |
| 1990s | 975 | #1,143 (1999) | #1,705 |
| 2000s | 1,746 | #1,035 (2003) | #1,291 |
| 2010s | 812 | #2,059 (2010) | #2,304 |
| 2020s | 304 | #2,779 (2020) | #3,254 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jamia in 2002
Top girls' names in 2002
More about 2002
girls
1,796,882 girls got a published name in 2002; 1 in 9,168 of them was named Jamia, which outranked 94.0% of the 18,086 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,077Kaylen197
- #1,077Kirstin197
- #1,077Roxanne197
- #1,084Jamia196
- #1,084Alexi196
- #1,084Isha196
- #1,084Jazlynn196
- #1,090Anabelle195
- #1,090Annamarie195
- #1,090Laisha195
Tied with 5 names at #1,084; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.