Jamiah
- #5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births
- #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
- Given to girls 87.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2003 · 164 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,460since 1982
Jamiah over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,554 | 22 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,984 | 37 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,470 | 45 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #3,157 | 51 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,338 | 46 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #3,388 | 46 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #2,928 | 56 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #2,432 | 74 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #2,426 | 76 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #2,590 | 69 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #2,497 | 72 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #2,385 | 76 | #5,923 | 14 |
| 2012 | #2,356 | 79 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,943 | 102 | #7,009 | 11 |
| 2010 | #1,783 | 115 | #6,036 | 14 |
| 2009 | #1,521 | 149 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #1,704 | 131 | #6,070 | 14 |
| 2007 | #1,517 | 152 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #1,581 | 136 | #6,460 | 12 |
| 2005 | #1,451 | 146 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #1,516 | 133 | #6,138 | 12 |
| 2003 | #1,272 | 164 | #4,815 | 16 |
| 2002 | #1,934 | 91 | #7,055 | 9 |
| 2001 | #2,331 | 68 | #4,890 | 15 |
| 2000 | #2,593 | 57 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #2,640 | 53 | #5,656 | 11 |
| 1998 | #3,116 | 40 | #5,840 | 10 |
| 1997 | #2,776 | 44 | #4,451 | 14 |
| 1996 | #4,739 | 21 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #5,868 | 9 |
| 1993 | #6,264 | 14 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #6,314 | 14 | #4,564 | 12 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 | #3,813 | 15 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | — | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | #6,089 | 6 | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | #5,785 | 6 | |
| 1984 | — | #5,561 | 6 | |
| 1983 | — | #4,907 | 7 | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | — | #4,961 | 7 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1982
The first year at least five girls were named Jamiah! It came in at #9,237, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1983–1989, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jamiah is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Jamiah in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Jamiah
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 2,216 spots since 2020 (#3,338 → #5,554)
Rise & fade · girls
21 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1982
- Peaked 2003 at #1,272 (164 births)
- Births halved by 2012, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 11,141
- Highest: 1 in 11,141 girls born in 2003 were named Jamiah (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 73,058 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 49.9% of all girls named Jamiah (1,227) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1992
- Mostly boys until 1991, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 6 | #9,237 (1982) | #9,237 |
| 1990s | 230 | #2,640 (1999) | #5,640 |
| 2000s | 1,227 | #1,272 (2003) | #1,742 |
| 2010s | 765 | #1,783 (2010) | #2,473 |
| 2020s | 232 | #3,157 (2021) | #3,996 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jamiah ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: