Jamiah
#5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 87.4% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2003 · 164 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,460since 1982
Jamiah over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,554 | 22 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,984 | 37 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,470 | 45 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #3,157 | 51 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,338 | 46 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #3,388 | 46 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #2,928 | 56 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #2,432 | 74 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #2,426 | 76 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #2,590 | 69 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #2,497 | 72 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #2,385 | 76 | #5,923 | 14 |
| 2012 | #2,356 | 79 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,943 | 102 | #7,009 | 11 |
| 2010 | #1,783 | 115 | #6,036 | 14 |
| 2009 | #1,521 | 149 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #1,704 | 131 | #6,070 | 14 |
| 2007 | #1,517 | 152 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #1,581 | 136 | #6,460 | 12 |
| 2005 | #1,451 | 146 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #1,516 | 133 | #6,138 | 12 |
| 2003 | #1,272 | 164 | #4,815 | 16 |
| 2002 | #1,934 | 91 | #7,055 | 9 |
| 2001 | #2,331 | 68 | #4,890 | 15 |
| 2000 | #2,593 | 57 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #2,640 | 53 | #5,656 | 11 |
| 1998 | #3,116 | 40 | #5,840 | 10 |
| 1997 | #2,776 | 44 | #4,451 | 14 |
| 1996 | #4,739 | 21 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #5,868 | 9 |
| 1993 | #6,264 | 14 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #6,314 | 14 | #4,564 | 12 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 | #3,813 | 15 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | — | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | #6,089 | 6 | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | #5,785 | 6 | |
| 1984 | — | #5,561 | 6 | |
| 1983 | — | #4,907 | 7 | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | — | #4,961 | 7 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jamiah! It came in at #9,237, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1983–1989, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jamiah is popular in 2003
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#277 · 1 in 1,154
- Alabama#365 · 1 in 1,786
- Tennessee#421 · 1 in 2,172
- Arkansas#506 · 1 in 2,383
- Georgia#561 · 1 in 3,109
Best ever in a state: #225 in Mississippi, 2004.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #277 | 10 | 1 in 1,154 |
| Alabama | #365 | 11 | 1 in 1,786 |
| Tennessee | #421 | 14 | 1 in 2,172 |
| Arkansas | #506 | 5 | 1 in 2,383 |
| Georgia | #561 | 16 | 1 in 3,109 |
| Virginia | #792 | 7 | 1 in 5,148 |
| Florida | #816 | 15 | 1 in 5,321 |
| Missouri | #834 | 5 | 1 in 5,693 |
| North Carolina | #836 | 8 | 1 in 5,437 |
| Illinois | #932 | 11 | 1 in 6,299 |
| Ohio | #934 | 8 | 1 in 7,285 |
| Michigan | #1,237 | 5 | 1 in 9,818 |
| New York | #1,837 | 6 | 1 in 16,351 |
| Texas | #2,034 | 8 | 1 in 19,760 |
| California | #3,359 | 5 | 1 in 45,332 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jamiah
- 1,081 spots since 2024 (#4,473 → #5,554)
- 2,216 spots since 2020 (#3,338 → #5,554)
- 2,964 spots since 2015 (#2,590 → #5,554)
- Debuted 1982
- Peaked 2003 at #1,272 (164 births)
- Births halved by 2012, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 11,141 girls born in 2003 were named Jamiah (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 73,058 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 49.9% of all girls named Jamiah (1,227) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1991, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 6 | #9,237 (1982) | #9,237 |
| 1990s | 230 | #2,640 (1999) | #5,640 |
| 2000s | 1,227 | #1,272 (2003) | #1,742 |
| 2010s | 765 | #1,783 (2010) | #2,473 |
| 2020s | 232 | #3,157 (2021) | #3,996 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jamiah in 2003
Top girls' names in 2003
Top boys' names in 2003
More about 2003
girls
1,827,145 girls got a published name in 2003; 1 in 11,141 of them was named Jamiah, which outranked 93.1% of the 18,439 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,267Octavia165
- #1,267Shamya165
- #1,267Suzanne165
- #1,272Jamiah164
- #1,272Amia164
- #1,272Ariella164
- #1,272Cailin164
- #1,279Bree163
- #1,279Corina163
- #1,279Ivette163
Tied with 6 names at #1,272; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,975,349 boys got a published name in 2003; 1 in 123,459 of them was named Jamiah, which outranked 62.3% of the 12,761 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #4,616Yisrael17
- #4,616Zakir17
- #4,616Zohaib17
- #4,815Jamiah16
- #4,815Alam16
- #4,815Aleck16
- #4,815Aleksei16
- #5,035Adain15
- #5,035Adams15
- #5,035Adrik15
Tied with 219 names at #4,815; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.