Jamie

#857 for girls in 2025, 316 births · #577 for boys in 2025, 508 births
Given to girls 75.3% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1977 · 12,895 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
23 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
270,936
since 1884

Jamie over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201918peak #18, 1977peak #62, 1976girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#857316#577508
2024#718392#622455
2023#782360#600473
2022#733397#623449
2021#696414#624443
2020#707396#714351
2019#569534#739326
2018#615489#721332
2017#608498#767306
2016#497629#816281
2015#498639#812279
2014#493635#780296
2013#491610#762296
2012#434719#843254
2011#438715#796278
2010#377841#686342
2009#3071,067#668367
2008#2631,308#664365
2007#2491,397#662362
2006#2411,413#582422
2005#2181,598#550435
2004#1991,726#534442
2003#1701,924#546412
2002#1641,970#529426
2001#1671,945#496463
2000#1552,156#502455
1999#1292,537#444519
1998#1123,066#403607
1997#1033,241#373656
1996#963,599#354686
1995#933,770#328791
1994#873,982#284954
1993#794,254#2591,111
1992#754,702#2491,159
1991#605,781#2321,286
1990#556,509#2271,321
1989#526,845#1971,474
1988#457,187#1881,470
1987#397,916#1781,541
1986#349,234#1821,468
1985#2711,038#1671,630
1984#319,761#1541,764
1983#2811,025#1531,773
1982#2911,039#1312,091
1981#2810,982#1182,356
1980#2411,529#1052,845
1979#1912,156#883,240
1978#2010,982#952,864
1977#1812,895#823,447
1976#1812,539#624,621
1975#684,233#624,573
1974#973,020#684,086
1973#1032,954#703,913
1972#1142,810#723,680
1971#1183,054#963,231
1970#1203,202#1252,641
1969#1212,902#1791,568
1968#1202,688#1931,223
1967#1402,511#2171,031
1966#1382,656#225961
1965#1402,748#242944
1964#1692,314#2251,115
1963#1602,550#255897
1962#1522,786#266820
1961#1712,337#285733
1960#1802,202#289738
1959#1961,824#284774
1958#2311,312#296644
1957#2381,276#363442
1956#2671,029#444288
1955#2411,145#460259
1954#266987#456253
1953#277897#492204
1952#306691#603137
1951#340545#74587
1950#371468#73687
1949#398401#68998
1948#404386#666103
1947#451327#77179
1946#418337#81964
1945#479226#67180
1944#674122#78264
1943#605154#73278
1942#679120#87656
1941#80281#97143
1940#82774#99442
1939#89162#97642
1938#83072#99241
1937#90458#1,11934
1936#97949#87349
1935#98449#84455
1934#95552#95644
1933#98549#93745
1932#83068#1,00443
1931#83068#98345
1930#98356#1,15137
1929#1,06447#1,07841
1928#97458#1,05743
1927#1,02356#1,14539
1926#83677#93153
1925#97658#1,22534
1924#1,05854#1,22335
1923#87171#1,10142
1922#93263#1,10741
1921#95560#1,19936
1920#90864#1,34829
1919#82373#1,13937
1918#89464#1,17235
1917#1,05445#1,29128
1916#91555#1,09635
1915#85059#1,08235
1914#1,03433#1,15325
1913#88136#1,14620
1912#86034#1,41712
1911#1,17115#98212
1910#1,11016#1,1938
1909#77327#89311
1908#1,04415—
1907#99015—
1906#91716#1,2535
1905#76123#8369
1904#1,09211#8109
1903#1,2049—
1902#90315—
1901#72320—
1900#83320#1,1626
1899#87814—
1898#1,04711—
1897#1,0949#1,0575
1896#1,2138#9826
1895#1,05310—
1894#1,0619—
1893#1,0239—
1892#95810—
1891#83911—
1890#79112—
1889——
1888#1,2765—
1887#1,1475—
1886——
1885——
1884#1,0245—
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1884

The first year at least five girls were named Jamie! It came in at #1,024, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1884–1889, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Jamie is popular in 1918

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedKSArkansas: #358 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,438 girlsARTennessee: #297 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,337 girlsTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedLAMississippi: #317 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,411 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedALGeorgia: #394 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,814 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedHITexas: #868 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,905 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Tennessee#297 · 1 in 2,337
  2. Mississippi#317 · 1 in 2,411
  3. Arkansas#358 · 1 in 2,438
  4. Georgia#394 · 1 in 3,814
  5. Texas#868 · 1 in 9,905

Best ever in a state: #2 in Wyoming, 1977.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Tennessee#297111 in 2,337
Mississippi#31781 in 2,411
Arkansas#35881 in 2,438
Georgia#39491 in 3,814
Texas#86851 in 9,905
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Jamie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 139 spots since 2024 (#718 → #857)
  • 150 spots since 2020 (#707 → #857)
  • 359 spots since 2015 (#498 → #857)
  • Biggest jump: 331 spots in 1905 (#1,092 → #761)
  • Biggest drop: 337 spots in 1910 (#773 → #1,110)
Rise & fade · girls
93 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1884
  • Peaked 1977 at #18 (12,895 births)
  • Births halved by 1991, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 23 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 23 yrs · run 1974–1996
  • Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1930–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 117
  • Highest: 1 in 117 girls born in 1976 were named Jamie (0.86%)
  • Latest: 1 in 5,086 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
  • Its best rank, #18 in 1977, was only 1 in 119 (0.84%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1980s
  • 35.6% of all girls named Jamie (96,556) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2021
  • Mostly girls until 2020, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s15#1,024 (1884)#1,149
1890s103#791 (1890)#996
1900s171#723 (1901)#924
1910s430#823 (1919)#959
1920s608#836 (1926)#960
1930s583#830 (1938)#917
1940s2,228#398 (1949)#574
1950s10,174#196 (1959)#273
1960s25,694#120 (1968)#149
1970s67,845#18 (1977)#70
1980s96,556#24 (1980)#34
1990s41,441#55 (1990)#89
2000s16,504#155 (2000)#213
2010s6,309#377 (2010)#502
2020s2,275#696 (2021)#749

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Jamie in 1918

girls
#894
64 births · 1 in 18,088 girls
boys
#1,172
35 births · 1 in 28,957 boys

Top girls' names in 1918

  1. #1Mary67,365
  2. #2Helen36,148
  3. #3Dorothy32,030
  4. #4Margaret27,139
  5. #5Ruth25,535
  6. #6Mildred17,258
  7. #7Virginia16,421
  8. #8Frances16,132
  9. #9Elizabeth15,853
  10. #10Anna15,666
  11. #894Jamie64

Top boys' names in 1918

  1. #1John56,558
  2. #2William45,291
  3. #3James42,115
  4. #4Robert40,619
  5. #5Charles26,921
  6. #6George26,318
  7. #7Joseph26,261
  8. #8Edward19,489
  9. #9Frank17,018
  10. #10Thomas13,910
  11. #1,172Jamie35
More about 1918

girls

1,157,631 girls got a published name in 1918; 1 in 18,088 of them was named Jamie, which outranked 84.0% of the 5,585 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jamie
  1. #885Mariam65
  2. #885Santina65
  3. #885Zita65
  4. #894Jamie64
  5. #894Concepcion64
  6. #894Emmie64
  7. #894Euna64
  8. #900Aida63
  9. #900Aldona63
  10. #900Carroll63

Tied with 5 names at #894; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1917
Risers
  1. ↑ 547Jesse#1,507 → #960
  2. ↑ 494Liberty#1,079 → #585
  3. ↑ 389Marilynn#1,337 → #948
  4. ↑ 312Margueritte#1,281 → #969
  5. ↑ 306Syble#807 → #501
Fallers
  1. ↓ 447Valentine#964 → #1,411
  2. ↓ 428Ottie#952 → #1,380
  3. ↓ 354Delora#923 → #1,277
  4. ↓ 318Georgene#896 → #1,214
  5. ↓ 299Clifford#904 → #1,203

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,013,480 boys got a published name in 1918; 1 in 28,957 of them was named Jamie, which outranked 75.6% of the 4,813 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jamie
  1. #1,152Sampson36
  2. #1,152Selmer36
  3. #1,152Virgel36
  4. #1,172Jamie35
  5. #1,172Allyn35
  6. #1,172Archer35
  7. #1,172Benjaman35
  8. #1,192Alice34
  9. #1,192Brice34
  10. #1,192Buel34

Tied with 19 names at #1,172; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1917
Risers
  1. ↑ 600Quinton#1,092 → #492
  2. ↑ 542Pershing#876 → #334
  3. ↑ 480Quentin#723 → #243
  4. ↑ 440Issac#1,264 → #824
  5. ↑ 339Furman#1,092 → #753
Fallers
  1. ↓ 473Bernhard#900 → #1,373
  2. ↓ 424Edson#919 → #1,343
  3. ↓ 394Gasper#919 → #1,313
  4. ↓ 352Berton#934 → #1,286
  5. ↓ 346Ishmael#997 → #1,343

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1918 →