Jamie

#857 for girls in 2025, 316 births · #577 for boys in 2025, 508 births
Given to girls 75.3% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1977 · 12,895 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
23 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
270,936
since 1884

Jamie over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201948peak #18, 1977peak #62, 1976girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#857316#577508
2024#718392#622455
2023#782360#600473
2022#733397#623449
2021#696414#624443
2020#707396#714351
2019#569534#739326
2018#615489#721332
2017#608498#767306
2016#497629#816281
2015#498639#812279
2014#493635#780296
2013#491610#762296
2012#434719#843254
2011#438715#796278
2010#377841#686342
2009#3071,067#668367
2008#2631,308#664365
2007#2491,397#662362
2006#2411,413#582422
2005#2181,598#550435
2004#1991,726#534442
2003#1701,924#546412
2002#1641,970#529426
2001#1671,945#496463
2000#1552,156#502455
1999#1292,537#444519
1998#1123,066#403607
1997#1033,241#373656
1996#963,599#354686
1995#933,770#328791
1994#873,982#284954
1993#794,254#2591,111
1992#754,702#2491,159
1991#605,781#2321,286
1990#556,509#2271,321
1989#526,845#1971,474
1988#457,187#1881,470
1987#397,916#1781,541
1986#349,234#1821,468
1985#2711,038#1671,630
1984#319,761#1541,764
1983#2811,025#1531,773
1982#2911,039#1312,091
1981#2810,982#1182,356
1980#2411,529#1052,845
1979#1912,156#883,240
1978#2010,982#952,864
1977#1812,895#823,447
1976#1812,539#624,621
1975#684,233#624,573
1974#973,020#684,086
1973#1032,954#703,913
1972#1142,810#723,680
1971#1183,054#963,231
1970#1203,202#1252,641
1969#1212,902#1791,568
1968#1202,688#1931,223
1967#1402,511#2171,031
1966#1382,656#225961
1965#1402,748#242944
1964#1692,314#2251,115
1963#1602,550#255897
1962#1522,786#266820
1961#1712,337#285733
1960#1802,202#289738
1959#1961,824#284774
1958#2311,312#296644
1957#2381,276#363442
1956#2671,029#444288
1955#2411,145#460259
1954#266987#456253
1953#277897#492204
1952#306691#603137
1951#340545#74587
1950#371468#73687
1949#398401#68998
1948#404386#666103
1947#451327#77179
1946#418337#81964
1945#479226#67180
1944#674122#78264
1943#605154#73278
1942#679120#87656
1941#80281#97143
1940#82774#99442
1939#89162#97642
1938#83072#99241
1937#90458#1,11934
1936#97949#87349
1935#98449#84455
1934#95552#95644
1933#98549#93745
1932#83068#1,00443
1931#83068#98345
1930#98356#1,15137
1929#1,06447#1,07841
1928#97458#1,05743
1927#1,02356#1,14539
1926#83677#93153
1925#97658#1,22534
1924#1,05854#1,22335
1923#87171#1,10142
1922#93263#1,10741
1921#95560#1,19936
1920#90864#1,34829
1919#82373#1,13937
1918#89464#1,17235
1917#1,05445#1,29128
1916#91555#1,09635
1915#85059#1,08235
1914#1,03433#1,15325
1913#88136#1,14620
1912#86034#1,41712
1911#1,17115#98212
1910#1,11016#1,1938
1909#77327#89311
1908#1,04415—
1907#99015—
1906#91716#1,2535
1905#76123#8369
1904#1,09211#8109
1903#1,2049—
1902#90315—
1901#72320—
1900#83320#1,1626
1899#87814—
1898#1,04711—
1897#1,0949#1,0575
1896#1,2138#9826
1895#1,05310—
1894#1,0619—
1893#1,0239—
1892#95810—
1891#83911—
1890#79112—
1889——
1888#1,2765—
1887#1,1475—
1886——
1885——
1884#1,0245—
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1884

The first year at least five girls were named Jamie! It came in at #1,024, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1884–1889, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Jamie is popular in 1948

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNHWashington: #264 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,066 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #372 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,325 girlsMNIllinois: #348 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 3,990 girlsILWisconsin: #411 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,188 girlsWIMichigan: #376 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 4,635 girlsMINew York: #473 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 6,732 girlsNYMassachusetts: #333 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,745 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedSDIowa: #360 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,440 girlsIAIndiana: #374 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,563 girlsINOhio: #375 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 4,723 girlsOHPennsylvania: #457 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 7,415 girlsPANew Jersey: #406 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,127 girlsNJConnecticut: #266 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,963 girlsCTCalifornia: #333 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 2,786 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNEMissouri: #292 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,778 girlsMOKentucky: #321 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,157 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedWVVirginia: #486 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,119 girlsVAMaryland: #379 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,508 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedARTennessee: #259 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 2,000 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #444 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,589 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #338 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,750 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #344 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,090 girlsOKLouisiana: #449 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,615 girlsLAMississippi: #264 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,681 girlsMSAlabama: #315 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,525 girlsALGeorgia: #384 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,829 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedHITexas: #374 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 2,772 girlsTXFlorida: #412 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,826 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Tennessee#259 · 1 in 2,000
  2. Mississippi#264 · 1 in 1,681
  3. Washington#264 · 1 in 2,066
  4. Connecticut#266 · 1 in 2,963
  5. Missouri#292 · 1 in 2,778

Best ever in a state: #2 in Wyoming, 1977.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Tennessee#259191 in 2,000
Mississippi#264171 in 1,681
Washington#264121 in 2,066
Connecticut#26661 in 2,963
Missouri#292141 in 2,778
Alabama#315151 in 2,525
Kentucky#321111 in 3,157
California#333401 in 2,786
Massachusetts#33381 in 5,745
South Carolina#338101 in 2,750
Oklahoma#34471 in 3,090
Illinois#348211 in 3,990
Iowa#36061 in 4,440
Minnesota#37261 in 5,325
Indiana#37491 in 4,563
Texas#374331 in 2,772
Ohio#375181 in 4,723
Michigan#376151 in 4,635
Maryland#37951 in 4,508
Georgia#384111 in 3,829
New Jersey#40671 in 6,127
Wisconsin#41151 in 7,188
Florida#41271 in 3,826
North Carolina#44491 in 5,589
Louisiana#44971 in 4,615
Pennsylvania#457141 in 7,415
New York#473211 in 6,732
Virginia#48651 in 7,119
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Maine———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Jamie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 139 spots since 2024 (#718 → #857)
  • 150 spots since 2020 (#707 → #857)
  • 359 spots since 2015 (#498 → #857)
  • Biggest jump: 331 spots in 1905 (#1,092 → #761)
  • Biggest drop: 337 spots in 1910 (#773 → #1,110)
Rise & fade · girls
93 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1884
  • Peaked 1977 at #18 (12,895 births)
  • Births halved by 1991, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 23 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 23 yrs · run 1974–1996
  • Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1930–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 117
  • Highest: 1 in 117 girls born in 1976 were named Jamie (0.86%)
  • Latest: 1 in 5,086 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
  • Its best rank, #18 in 1977, was only 1 in 119 (0.84%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1980s
  • 35.6% of all girls named Jamie (96,556) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2021
  • Mostly girls until 2020, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s15#1,024 (1884)#1,149
1890s103#791 (1890)#996
1900s171#723 (1901)#924
1910s430#823 (1919)#959
1920s608#836 (1926)#960
1930s583#830 (1938)#917
1940s2,228#398 (1949)#574
1950s10,174#196 (1959)#273
1960s25,694#120 (1968)#149
1970s67,845#18 (1977)#70
1980s96,556#24 (1980)#34
1990s41,441#55 (1990)#89
2000s16,504#155 (2000)#213
2010s6,309#377 (2010)#502
2020s2,275#696 (2021)#749

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Jamie in 1948

girls
#404
386 births · 1 in 4,399 girls
boys
#666
103 births · 1 in 17,035 boys

Top girls' names in 1948

  1. #1Linda96,220
  2. #2Mary68,597
  3. #3Barbara46,826
  4. #4Patricia46,140
  5. #5Susan35,988
  6. #6Sandra31,063
  7. #7Nancy29,411
  8. #8Carol28,977
  9. #9Sharon26,143
  10. #10Kathleen23,257
  11. #404Jamie386

Top boys' names in 1948

  1. #1James88,605
  2. #2Robert85,478
  3. #3John82,834
  4. #4William61,972
  5. #5David56,627
  6. #6Michael52,566
  7. #7Richard50,970
  8. #8Thomas43,780
  9. #9Charles38,676
  10. #10Ronald33,527
  11. #666Jamie103
More about 1948

girls

1,697,908 girls got a published name in 1948; 1 in 4,399 of them was named Jamie, which outranked 93.3% of the 6,040 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 25.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jamie
  1. #401Earlene396
  2. #402Jeanie392
  3. #403Leah387
  4. #404Jamie386
  5. #404Muriel386
  6. #404Rosanne386
  7. #407April383
  8. #408Lupe376
  9. #409Isabel374

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1947
Risers
  1. ↑ 555Shawn#1,510 → #955
  2. ↑ 549Regena#1,488 → #939
  3. ↑ 491Regenia#1,255 → #764
  4. ↑ 460Mickie#1,228 → #768
  5. ↑ 413Shirleen#1,377 → #964
Fallers
  1. ↓ 408Michaele#859 → #1,267
  2. ↓ 358Marge#969 → #1,327
  3. ↓ 334Ilona#875 → #1,209
  4. ↓ 282Trudi#875 → #1,157
  5. ↓ 248Marylyn#909 → #1,157

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,754,618 boys got a published name in 1948; 1 in 17,035 of them was named Jamie, which outranked 84.1% of the 4,199 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jamie
  1. #663Damon104
  2. #663Lyman104
  3. #663Saul104
  4. #666Jamie103
  5. #666Danial103
  6. #666Otha103
  7. #669Coleman102
  8. #669Milo102
  9. #671Bud101

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1947
Risers
  1. ↑ 514Arnulfo#1,316 → #802
  2. ↑ 422Lucio#1,394 → #972
  3. ↑ 377Isidro#1,190 → #813
  4. ↑ 363Shawn#923 → #560
  5. ↑ 331Aurelio#1,233 → #902
Fallers
  1. ↓ 400Marshal#1,000 → #1,400
  2. ↓ 390Robby#906 → #1,296
  3. ↓ 333Frances#923 → #1,256
  4. ↓ 324Deane#836 → #1,160
  5. ↓ 321Lenwood#975 → #1,296

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1948 →