Janie

#1,326 for girls in 2025, 168 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
Given to girls 99.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1882 · 134 births
Debut · girls
96 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
75,598
since 1880

Janie over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Janie has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202018peak #133, 1882girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,326168—
2024#1,536139—
2023#1,544138—
2022#1,456152—
2021#1,630128—
2020#1,781111—
2019#1,528141—
2018#1,677124—
2017#1,636132—
2016#1,456158—
2015#1,388170—
2014#1,391165—
2013#1,496148—
2012#1,408163—
2011#1,577138—
2010#1,456155—
2009#1,228203—
2008#1,250201—
2007#1,402170—
2006#1,281186—
2005#1,054226—
2004#1,038223—
2003#1,126195—
2002#946236—
2001#1,001214—
2000#1,014208—
1999#991207—
1998#971210—
1997#858238—
1996#862231—
1995#800248—
1994#730285—
1993#762270—
1992#710304—
1991#671321—
1990#667323—
1989#688294#7,9055
1988#626317—
1987#689268#5,4597
1986#624297—
1985#626299—
1984#589306—
1983#579309—
1982#550335#3,96610
1981#550338—
1980#583316—
1979#558330—
1978#569303—
1977#521353—
1976#498360#3,7249
1975#509351#4,7976
1974#497354#3,8378
1973#468389#5,1015
1972#435441#4,4416
1971#452454#4,9075
1970#456475#4,2306
1969#432498#3,9356
1968#429490—
1967#390554—
1966#372595#2,9868
1965#365620—
1964#347752#3,6016
1963#301940—
1962#299952#3,3057
1961#2841,049#3,6526
1960#2741,082#2,53511
1959#2621,128—
1958#2461,215—
1957#2351,304#3,0248
1956#2151,410—
1955#2091,483#3,8865
1954#2051,492—
1953#1971,578#3,7985
1952#1891,569#3,7345
1951#1761,707—
1950#1641,729—
1949#1651,737—
1948#1761,579#2,7888
1947#1611,845#2,8628
1946#1581,704—
1945#1591,469#2,5748
1944#1861,163#3,1096
1943#1981,065—
1942#212949#2,04213
1941#217797—
1940#213811#2,6718
1939#222758—
1938#218778#2,8687
1937#230706#2,9057
1936#216754—
1935#227744#1,83715
1934#223771#2,5639
1933#229710#3,6425
1932#229704#3,3616
1931#230696#3,7635
1930#229707—
1929#225707#2,9808
1928#234709#3,3577
1927#240729—
1926#256664—
1925#241741#4,1975
1924#243751#3,5057
1923#246699—
1922#250684—
1921#250708#4,3225
1920#235764—
1919#226751—
1918#251656—
1917#246634—
1916#244649—
1915#247571—
1914#244472#3,2645
1913#218471—
1912#221416—
1911#224317—
1910#181377—
1909#193301—
1908#196284—
1907#185295—
1906#187265—
1905#171306—
1904#178272—
1903#179260—
1902#176262—
1901#163278—
1900#167330—
1899#186224—
1898#190235—
1897#174247—
1896#184223—
1895#179220—
1894#165246—
1893#175211—
1892#159242—
1891#164204—
1890#161220—
1889#147226—
1888#153206—
1887#157155—
1886#157149—
1885#144155—
1884#159122—
1883#142135—
1882#133134—
1881#139113—
1880#14696—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Janie was already there! It came in at #146, and was given to 96 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1884, when fewer than 140 girls a year got the name.

Where Janie is popular in 2018

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedMINew York: #1,919 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 14,448 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,469 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 11,145 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedARTennessee: #1,098 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,235 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #1,108 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,430 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedLAMississippi: #560 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,150 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedALGeorgia: #1,165 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,608 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Janie, so not publishedHITexas: #1,182 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 7,567 girlsTXFlorida: #1,770 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 14,181 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#560 · 1 in 2,150
  2. Tennessee#1,098 · 1 in 6,235
  3. North Carolina#1,108 · 1 in 6,430
  4. Georgia#1,165 · 1 in 6,608
  5. Texas#1,182 · 1 in 7,567

Best ever in a state: #36 in South Carolina, 1910.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#56051 in 2,150
Tennessee#1,09851 in 6,235
North Carolina#1,10871 in 6,430
Georgia#1,16571 in 6,608
Texas#1,182211 in 7,567
California#1,469171 in 11,145
Florida#1,77061 in 14,181
New York#1,91961 in 14,448
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Janie
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 210 spots since 2024 (#1,536 → #1,326)
  • 455 spots since 2020 (#1,781 → #1,326)
  • 62 spots since 2015 (#1,388 → #1,326)
  • Biggest jump: 63 spots in 1988 (#689 → #626)
  • Biggest drop: 180 spots in 2003 (#946 → #1,126)
Rise & fade · girls
2 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1882 at #133 (134 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 121 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 121 yrs · run 1880–1999
Share of babies · girls
1 in 789
  • Highest: 1 in 789 girls born in 1889 were named Janie (0.13%)
  • Latest: 1 in 9,567 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
  • Its best rank, #133 in 1882, was only 1 in 805 (0.12%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 19.3% of all girls named Janie (14,615) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,491#133 (1882)#148
1890s2,272#159 (1892)#174
1900s2,853#163 (1901)#180
1910s5,314#181 (1910)#230
1920s7,156#225 (1929)#242
1930s7,328#216 (1936)#225
1940s13,119#158 (1946)#185
1950s14,615#164 (1950)#210
1960s7,532#274 (1960)#349
1970s3,810#435 (1972)#496
1980s3,079#550 (1981)#610
1990s2,637#667 (1990)#802
2000s2,062#946 (2002)#1,134
2010s1,494#1,388 (2015)#1,501
2020s836#1,326 (2025)#1,546

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Janie in 2018

girls
#1,677
124 births · 1 in 13,718 girls

Top girls' names in 2018

  1. #1Emma18,824
  2. #2Olivia18,061
  3. #3Ava15,034
  4. #4Isabella14,575
  5. #5Sophia14,013
  6. #6Charlotte13,038
  7. #7Mia12,742
  8. #8Amelia12,405
  9. #9Harper10,646
  10. #10Evelyn10,433
  11. #1,677Janie124
More about 2018

girls

1,701,074 girls got a published name in 2018; 1 in 13,718 of them was named Janie, which outranked 90.8% of the 18,152 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Janie
  1. #1,672Lidia125
  2. #1,672Raine125
  3. #1,672Tina125
  4. #1,677Janie124
  5. #1,677Daria124
  6. #1,677Ema124
  7. #1,677Kacie124
  8. #1,685Aiza123
  9. #1,685Arwen123
  10. #1,685Constance123

Tied with 7 names at #1,677; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2017
Risers
  1. ↑ 680Meghan#1,387 → #707
  2. ↑ 567Dior#1,360 → #793
  3. ↑ 367Palmer#1,042 → #675
  4. ↑ 361Adalee#1,217 → #856
  5. ↑ 346Oaklynn#888 → #542
Fallers
  1. ↓ 334Audrina#847 → #1,181
  2. ↓ 234Courtney#952 → #1,186
  3. ↓ 232Marjorie#938 → #1,170
  4. ↓ 228Anabelle#969 → #1,197
  5. ↓ 225Angelique#799 → #1,024

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2018 →