Jaycee
#1,150 for girls in 2025, 201 births · #2,480 for boys in 2025, 54 births
Given to girls 87.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2011 · 568 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,099since 1968
Jaycee over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,150 | 201 | #2,480 | 54 |
| 2024 | #878 | 307 | #2,393 | 58 |
| 2023 | #878 | 306 | #2,480 | 54 |
| 2022 | #1,011 | 258 | #2,191 | 66 |
| 2021 | #896 | 302 | #2,499 | 53 |
| 2020 | #964 | 264 | #2,024 | 70 |
| 2019 | #826 | 329 | #2,993 | 40 |
| 2018 | #856 | 316 | #2,893 | 41 |
| 2017 | #805 | 340 | #2,417 | 53 |
| 2016 | #713 | 399 | #2,066 | 68 |
| 2015 | #650 | 442 | #2,386 | 54 |
| 2014 | #619 | 463 | #2,582 | 47 |
| 2013 | #554 | 528 | #2,562 | 47 |
| 2012 | #547 | 543 | #3,625 | 29 |
| 2011 | #516 | 568 | #3,000 | 38 |
| 2010 | #521 | 572 | #3,531 | 30 |
| 2009 | #620 | 487 | #2,800 | 43 |
| 2008 | #647 | 477 | #3,103 | 37 |
| 2007 | #762 | 384 | #2,684 | 45 |
| 2006 | #773 | 356 | #3,306 | 32 |
| 2005 | #792 | 328 | #3,528 | 27 |
| 2004 | #898 | 270 | #2,953 | 34 |
| 2003 | #857 | 282 | #3,626 | 24 |
| 2002 | #818 | 284 | #2,685 | 35 |
| 2001 | #850 | 269 | #2,429 | 40 |
| 2000 | #852 | 258 | #2,993 | 29 |
| 1999 | #867 | 248 | #2,199 | 42 |
| 1998 | #991 | 203 | #3,708 | 19 |
| 1997 | #1,030 | 186 | #2,680 | 29 |
| 1996 | #1,155 | 157 | #2,679 | 28 |
| 1995 | #1,588 | 95 | #3,100 | 22 |
| 1994 | #1,557 | 99 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #1,565 | 99 | #3,661 | 17 |
| 1992 | #1,622 | 94 | #2,834 | 24 |
| 1991 | #1,677 | 88 | #3,462 | 17 |
| 1990 | #2,900 | 39 | #3,309 | 18 |
| 1989 | #3,330 | 31 | #2,902 | 21 |
| 1988 | #3,690 | 25 | #3,079 | 17 |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | #3,201 | 15 |
| 1986 | #4,724 | 16 | #3,882 | 11 |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 | #3,599 | 12 |
| 1984 | #4,318 | 17 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #4,286 | 17 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 | — | |
| 1980 | #4,978 | 14 | #4,495 | 8 |
| 1979 | #3,333 | 24 | — | |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #3,857 | 9 |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | — | |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #3,837 | 8 |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | #4,054 | 7 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | #4,048 | 5 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #4,038 | 5 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,988 | 5 | |
| 1958 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,552 | 6 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,143 | 7 | |
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | #2,608 | 9 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,370 | 6 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #3,113 | 6 | |
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jaycee! It came in at #7,016, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1968–1969, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jaycee is popular in 2017
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#227 · 1 in 840
- Alabama#260 · 1 in 1,065
- Idaho#270 · 1 in 902
- Oklahoma#332 · 1 in 1,312
- West Virginia#335 · 1 in 1,173
Best ever in a state: #95 in South Dakota, 2009.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #227 | 13 | 1 in 840 |
| Alabama | #260 | 18 | 1 in 1,065 |
| Idaho | #270 | 7 | 1 in 902 |
| Oklahoma | #332 | 12 | 1 in 1,312 |
| West Virginia | #335 | 5 | 1 in 1,173 |
| Kentucky | #337 | 13 | 1 in 1,375 |
| Louisiana | #371 | 14 | 1 in 1,420 |
| Tennessee | #408 | 18 | 1 in 1,700 |
| Missouri | #512 | 11 | 1 in 2,361 |
| Oregon | #564 | 6 | 1 in 2,416 |
| Iowa | #572 | 5 | 1 in 2,491 |
| Texas | #590 | 53 | 1 in 3,016 |
| Wisconsin | #606 | 8 | 1 in 2,823 |
| Ohio | #691 | 14 | 1 in 3,698 |
| Utah | #698 | 5 | 1 in 3,410 |
| Washington | #761 | 8 | 1 in 3,883 |
| Pennsylvania | #768 | 12 | 1 in 4,262 |
| North Carolina | #831 | 10 | 1 in 4,538 |
| Michigan | #908 | 8 | 1 in 5,158 |
| Virginia | #942 | 7 | 1 in 5,147 |
| Arizona | #947 | 6 | 1 in 5,012 |
| Georgia | #959 | 9 | 1 in 5,236 |
| Florida | #997 | 14 | 1 in 6,140 |
| Indiana | #1,042 | 5 | 1 in 6,020 |
| California | #1,353 | 20 | 1 in 9,788 |
| Illinois | #1,400 | 6 | 1 in 9,257 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaycee
- 272 spots since 2024 (#878 → #1,150)
- 186 spots since 2020 (#964 → #1,150)
- 500 spots since 2015 (#650 → #1,150)
- Biggest jump: 133 spots in 2023 (#1,011 → #878)
- Biggest drop: 272 spots in 2025 (#878 → #1,150)
- Debuted 1968
- Peaked 2011 at #516 (568 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 26 yrs · run 1998–2021
- Highest: 1 in 3,097 girls born in 2011 were named Jaycee (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,996 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 40.5% of all girls named Jaycee (4,500) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1987, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5 | #7,016 (1968) | #7,016 |
| 1970s | 89 | #3,333 (1979) | #6,659 |
| 1980s | 164 | #3,330 (1989) | #5,210 |
| 1990s | 1,308 | #867 (1999) | #1,495 |
| 2000s | 3,395 | #620 (2009) | #787 |
| 2010s | 4,500 | #516 (2011) | #661 |
| 2020s | 1,638 | #878 (2024) | #963 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jaycee in 2017
Top girls' names in 2017
Top boys' names in 2017
More about 2017
girls
1,726,461 girls got a published name in 2017; 1 in 5,078 of them was named Jaycee, which outranked 95.6% of the 18,448 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- ↓ 263Julianne#919 → #1,182
- ↓ 243Milania#947 → #1,190
- ↓ 240Wendy#858 → #1,098
- ↓ 238Montserrat#808 → #1,046
- ↓ 224Nathaly#930 → #1,154
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,850,956 boys got a published name in 2017; 1 in 34,924 of them was named Jaycee, which outranked 83.1% of the 14,262 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,388Theodor54
- #2,388Timber54
- #2,388Yannick54
- #2,417Jaycee53
- #2,417Aariz53
- #2,417Acen53
- #2,417Aiven53
- #2,450Alpha52
- #2,450Amaziah52
- #2,450Arius52
Tied with 32 names at #2,417; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.