Jayleen
#1,098 for girls in 2025, 218 births · Last seen for boys in 2015 at #9,568
Given to girls 98.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2013 · 793 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 13,048since 1954
Jayleen over time
Rank among girls' names. Jayleen has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,098 | 218 | — | |
| 2024 | #978 | 265 | — | |
| 2023 | #790 | 356 | — | |
| 2022 | #611 | 488 | — | |
| 2021 | #565 | 541 | — | |
| 2020 | #549 | 543 | — | |
| 2019 | #561 | 546 | — | |
| 2018 | #506 | 613 | — | |
| 2017 | #470 | 662 | — | |
| 2016 | #445 | 722 | — | |
| 2015 | #425 | 750 | #9,568 | 7 |
| 2014 | #415 | 770 | — | |
| 2013 | #390 | 793 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #409 | 764 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #394 | 802 | — | |
| 2010 | #455 | 679 | #7,591 | 10 |
| 2009 | #553 | 552 | #5,102 | 18 |
| 2008 | #613 | 498 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #774 | 373 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #838 | 320 | #7,998 | 9 |
| 2005 | #958 | 257 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #948 | 254 | #5,492 | 14 |
| 2003 | #1,203 | 177 | #5,877 | 12 |
| 2002 | #1,318 | 148 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #1,253 | 157 | #6,013 | 11 |
| 2000 | #1,602 | 110 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #1,580 | 106 | #3,986 | 18 |
| 1998 | #1,657 | 97 | #6,843 | 8 |
| 1997 | #2,283 | 59 | #6,618 | 8 |
| 1996 | #2,630 | 47 | #7,136 | 7 |
| 1995 | #4,348 | 23 | #5,928 | 9 |
| 1994 | #3,234 | 35 | #7,770 | 6 |
| 1993 | #5,206 | 18 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,968 | 26 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,004 | 19 | — | |
| 1990 | #6,131 | 14 | — | |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | — | |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 | — | |
| 1987 | #6,335 | 11 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | — | |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | — | |
| 1984 | #4,737 | 15 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | — | |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 | — | |
| 1980 | #4,743 | 15 | — | |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | — | |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,892 | 8 | — | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | — | |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | — | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,879 | 12 | — | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | #5,148 | 6 | — | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jayleen! It came in at #5,148, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1955–1958, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jayleen is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Rhode Island#164 · 1 in 541
- California#261 · 1 in 1,233
- New York#289 · 1 in 1,426
- Connecticut#296 · 1 in 1,301
- New Jersey#359 · 1 in 1,786
Best ever in a state: #110 in California, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #164 | 6 | 1 in 541 |
| California | #261 | 186 | 1 in 1,233 |
| New York | #289 | 67 | 1 in 1,426 |
| Connecticut | #296 | 10 | 1 in 1,301 |
| New Jersey | #359 | 22 | 1 in 1,786 |
| Florida | #450 | 36 | 1 in 2,391 |
| Massachusetts | #472 | 11 | 1 in 2,475 |
| Texas | #493 | 65 | 1 in 2,580 |
| Arizona | #591 | 13 | 1 in 2,807 |
| Washington | #697 | 9 | 1 in 3,572 |
| Colorado | #721 | 7 | 1 in 3,500 |
| Illinois | #752 | 16 | 1 in 4,139 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,091 | 7 | 1 in 7,906 |
| Georgia | #1,568 | 5 | 1 in 10,564 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jayleen
- 120 spots since 2024 (#978 → #1,098)
- 549 spots since 2020 (#549 → #1,098)
- 673 spots since 2015 (#425 → #1,098)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 2004 (#1,203 → #948)
- Biggest drop: 188 spots in 2024 (#790 → #978)
- Debuted 1954
- Peaked 2013 at #390 (793 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 21 yrs · run 2004–2024
- Highest: 1 in 2,193 girls born in 2011 were named Jayleen (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,373 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #390 in 2013, was only 1 in 2,213 (0.05%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 54.4% of all girls named Jayleen (7,101) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 21 | #4,031 (1959) | #5,044 |
| 1960s | 49 | #3,879 (1964) | #5,644 |
| 1970s | 61 | #5,543 (1971) | #7,530 |
| 1980s | 115 | #4,737 (1984) | #6,099 |
| 1990s | 444 | #1,580 (1999) | #3,604 |
| 2000s | 2,846 | #553 (2009) | #1,006 |
| 2010s | 7,101 | #390 (2013) | #447 |
| 2020s | 2,411 | #549 (2020) | #765 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jayleen in 2008
Top girls' names in 2008
Top boys' names in 2008
More about 2008
girls
1,890,938 girls got a published name in 2008; 1 in 3,797 of them was named Jayleen, which outranked 97.0% of the 20,482 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
2,040,150 boys got a published name in 2008; 1 in 408,030 of them was named Jayleen, which outranked 14.2% of the 14,625 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).