Jaziel
- #10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births
- #198 for boys in 2025, 1,780 births
- Given to boys 98.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2025 · 1,780 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 9,262since 1986
Jaziel over time
Rank among boys' names. Jaziel has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | #198 | 1,780 |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 | #225 | 1,602 |
| 2023 | — | #312 | 1,064 | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #412 | 781 |
| 2021 | #12,206 | 7 | #544 | 540 |
| 2020 | — | #578 | 479 | |
| 2019 | #10,473 | 9 | #646 | 416 |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #678 | 368 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #722 | 332 |
| 2016 | #10,859 | 9 | #826 | 276 |
| 2015 | — | #934 | 226 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,218 | 150 | |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 | #1,352 | 125 |
| 2012 | — | #1,285 | 136 | |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | #1,371 | 122 |
| 2010 | — | #1,481 | 110 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,742 | 88 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,861 | 78 | |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #1,928 | 73 |
| 2006 | — | #1,758 | 79 | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #2,061 | 60 |
| 2004 | — | #1,748 | 72 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,579 | 39 | |
| 2002 | — | #2,504 | 39 | |
| 2001 | — | #2,562 | 37 | |
| 2000 | — | #3,150 | 27 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,031 | 27 | |
| 1998 | — | #3,390 | 22 | |
| 1997 | — | #4,246 | 15 | |
| 1996 | — | #3,406 | 20 | |
| 1995 | — | #4,508 | 13 | |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | — | #6,128 | 8 | |
| 1991 | — | #4,476 | 12 | |
| 1990 | — | #7,178 | 6 | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | #3,705 | 13 | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | #6,721 | 5 | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jaziel! It came in at #6,721, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1986–1987, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaziel is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#90 · 1 in 325
- Arizona#92 · 1 in 356
- California#104 · 1 in 444
- Texas#104 · 1 in 452
- Nevada#123 · 1 in 452
Best ever in a state: #90 in New Mexico, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #90 | 20 | 1 in 325 |
| Arizona | #92 | 92 | 1 in 356 |
| California | #104 | 395 | 1 in 444 |
| Texas | #104 | 387 | 1 in 452 |
| Nevada | #123 | 25 | 1 in 452 |
| Rhode Island | #140 | 8 | 1 in 391 |
| Colorado | #172 | 41 | 1 in 655 |
| Nebraska | #184 | 14 | 1 in 630 |
| Illinois | #186 | 63 | 1 in 787 |
| Maryland | #200 | 29 | 1 in 790 |
| New Jersey | #206 | 46 | 1 in 864 |
| Washington | #213 | 37 | 1 in 886 |
| New York | #217 | 90 | 1 in 938 |
| Kansas | #219 | 18 | 1 in 780 |
| Utah | #225 | 23 | 1 in 855 |
| Idaho | #230 | 11 | 1 in 785 |
| Oklahoma | #232 | 20 | 1 in 884 |
| North Carolina | #233 | 53 | 1 in 971 |
| Massachusetts | #238 | 25 | 1 in 1,081 |
| Oregon | #263 | 16 | 1 in 941 |
| Florida | #271 | 77 | 1 in 1,241 |
| Alabama | #274 | 20 | 1 in 1,076 |
| Virginia | #303 | 27 | 1 in 1,380 |
| Iowa | #310 | 12 | 1 in 1,152 |
| Connecticut | #326 | 9 | 1 in 1,467 |
| Georgia | #343 | 35 | 1 in 1,435 |
| South Carolina | #348 | 15 | 1 in 1,413 |
| Indiana | #350 | 21 | 1 in 1,508 |
| Pennsylvania | #356 | 31 | 1 in 1,686 |
| Tennessee | #388 | 21 | 1 in 1,751 |
| Arkansas | #398 | 8 | 1 in 1,573 |
| Minnesota | #420 | 13 | 1 in 1,885 |
| Missouri | #489 | 12 | 1 in 2,318 |
| Ohio | #513 | 20 | 1 in 2,627 |
| Wisconsin | #523 | 9 | 1 in 2,604 |
| Michigan | #571 | 14 | 1 in 2,871 |
| Kentucky | #708 | 5 | 1 in 4,107 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaziel
- 380 spots since 2020 (#578 → #198)
- Biggest jump: 284 spots in 2015
- Debuted 1986
- Peaked 2025 at #198 (1,780 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 11 yrs · run 2015–2025
- Highest: 1 in 960 boys born in 2025 were named Jaziel (0.10%)
- 67.4% of all boys named Jaziel (6,246) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 18 | #3,705 (1988) | #5,213 |
| 1990s | 145 | #3,031 (1999) | #4,653 |
| 2000s | 592 | #1,742 (2009) | #2,189 |
| 2010s | 2,261 | #646 (2019) | #1,051 |
| 2020s | 6,246 | #198 (2025) | #378 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaziel ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: