Jaziel
#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · #198 for boys in 2025, 1,780 births
Given to boys 98.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2025 · 1,780 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 9,262since 1986
Jaziel over time
Rank among boys' names. Jaziel has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | #198 | 1,780 |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 | #225 | 1,602 |
| 2023 | — | #312 | 1,064 | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #412 | 781 |
| 2021 | #12,206 | 7 | #544 | 540 |
| 2020 | — | #578 | 479 | |
| 2019 | #10,473 | 9 | #646 | 416 |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #678 | 368 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #722 | 332 |
| 2016 | #10,859 | 9 | #826 | 276 |
| 2015 | — | #934 | 226 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,218 | 150 | |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 | #1,352 | 125 |
| 2012 | — | #1,285 | 136 | |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | #1,371 | 122 |
| 2010 | — | #1,481 | 110 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,742 | 88 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,861 | 78 | |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #1,928 | 73 |
| 2006 | — | #1,758 | 79 | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #2,061 | 60 |
| 2004 | — | #1,748 | 72 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,579 | 39 | |
| 2002 | — | #2,504 | 39 | |
| 2001 | — | #2,562 | 37 | |
| 2000 | — | #3,150 | 27 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,031 | 27 | |
| 1998 | — | #3,390 | 22 | |
| 1997 | — | #4,246 | 15 | |
| 1996 | — | #3,406 | 20 | |
| 1995 | — | #4,508 | 13 | |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | — | #6,128 | 8 | |
| 1991 | — | #4,476 | 12 | |
| 1990 | — | #7,178 | 6 | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | #3,705 | 13 | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | #6,721 | 5 | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jaziel! It came in at #6,721, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1986–1987, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaziel is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#90 · 1 in 325
- Arizona#92 · 1 in 356
- California#104 · 1 in 444
- Texas#104 · 1 in 452
- Nevada#123 · 1 in 452
Best ever in a state: #90 in New Mexico, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #90 | 20 | 1 in 325 |
| Arizona | #92 | 92 | 1 in 356 |
| California | #104 | 395 | 1 in 444 |
| Texas | #104 | 387 | 1 in 452 |
| Nevada | #123 | 25 | 1 in 452 |
| Rhode Island | #140 | 8 | 1 in 391 |
| Colorado | #172 | 41 | 1 in 655 |
| Nebraska | #184 | 14 | 1 in 630 |
| Illinois | #186 | 63 | 1 in 787 |
| Maryland | #200 | 29 | 1 in 790 |
| New Jersey | #206 | 46 | 1 in 864 |
| Washington | #213 | 37 | 1 in 886 |
| New York | #217 | 90 | 1 in 938 |
| Kansas | #219 | 18 | 1 in 780 |
| Utah | #225 | 23 | 1 in 855 |
| Idaho | #230 | 11 | 1 in 785 |
| Oklahoma | #232 | 20 | 1 in 884 |
| North Carolina | #233 | 53 | 1 in 971 |
| Massachusetts | #238 | 25 | 1 in 1,081 |
| Oregon | #263 | 16 | 1 in 941 |
| Florida | #271 | 77 | 1 in 1,241 |
| Alabama | #274 | 20 | 1 in 1,076 |
| Virginia | #303 | 27 | 1 in 1,380 |
| Iowa | #310 | 12 | 1 in 1,152 |
| Connecticut | #326 | 9 | 1 in 1,467 |
| Georgia | #343 | 35 | 1 in 1,435 |
| South Carolina | #348 | 15 | 1 in 1,413 |
| Indiana | #350 | 21 | 1 in 1,508 |
| Pennsylvania | #356 | 31 | 1 in 1,686 |
| Tennessee | #388 | 21 | 1 in 1,751 |
| Arkansas | #398 | 8 | 1 in 1,573 |
| Minnesota | #420 | 13 | 1 in 1,885 |
| Missouri | #489 | 12 | 1 in 2,318 |
| Ohio | #513 | 20 | 1 in 2,627 |
| Wisconsin | #523 | 9 | 1 in 2,604 |
| Michigan | #571 | 14 | 1 in 2,871 |
| Kentucky | #708 | 5 | 1 in 4,107 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaziel
- 27 spots since 2024 (#225 → #198)
- 380 spots since 2020 (#578 → #198)
- 736 spots since 2015 (#934 → #198)
- Biggest jump: 284 spots in 2015 (#1,218 → #934)
- Debuted 1986
- Peaked 2025 at #198 (1,780 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 11 yrs · run 2015–2025
- Highest: 1 in 960 boys born in 2025 were named Jaziel (0.10%)
- 67.4% of all boys named Jaziel (6,246) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 18 | #3,705 (1988) | #5,213 |
| 1990s | 145 | #3,031 (1999) | #4,653 |
| 2000s | 592 | #1,742 (2009) | #2,189 |
| 2010s | 2,261 | #646 (2019) | #1,051 |
| 2020s | 6,246 | #198 (2025) | #378 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jaziel in 2025
Top girls' names in 2025
Top boys' names in 2025
More about 2025
girls
1,607,267 girls got a published name in 2025; 1 in 178,585 of them was named Jaziel, which outranked 41.6% of the 17,297 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880).
- #9,457Zuzu10
- #9,457Zyari10
- #9,457Zylie10
- #10,107Jaziel9
- #10,107Aafiya9
- #10,107Aaliah9
- #10,107Aanshi9
- #10,917Aadhyareddy8
- #10,917Aaila8
- #10,917Aairah8
Tied with 809 names at #10,107; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,708,076 boys got a published name in 2025; 1 in 960 of them was named Jaziel, which outranked 98.6% of the 13,930 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.