Jo
#3,975 for girls in 2025, 36 births · #8,910 for boys in 2025, 8 births
Given to girls 99.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1947 · 6,724 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 26 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 179,057since 1881
Jo over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,975 | 36 | #8,910 | 8 |
| 2024 | #4,207 | 34 | #7,257 | 11 |
| 2023 | #3,386 | 47 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #4,041 | 36 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,614 | 42 | — | |
| 2020 | #4,005 | 35 | #8,739 | 8 |
| 2019 | #4,162 | 34 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,739 | 40 | #10,760 | 6 |
| 2017 | #3,769 | 40 | #8,140 | 9 |
| 2016 | #4,250 | 34 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #4,981 | 27 | — | |
| 2014 | #6,713 | 18 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #7,748 | 15 | — | |
| 2012 | #6,872 | 18 | #7,050 | 11 |
| 2011 | #8,196 | 14 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #7,066 | 18 | — | |
| 2008 | #7,408 | 17 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #7,092 | 18 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #5,383 | 25 | #9,585 | 7 |
| 2005 | #6,820 | 17 | — | |
| 2004 | #6,489 | 18 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #4,418 | 29 | #6,258 | 11 |
| 2002 | #4,280 | 29 | #5,725 | 12 |
| 2001 | #4,321 | 28 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #4,791 | 24 | #5,040 | 14 |
| 1999 | #2,935 | 45 | #6,042 | 10 |
| 1998 | #2,614 | 52 | #6,843 | 8 |
| 1997 | #2,309 | 58 | #9,265 | 5 |
| 1996 | #2,760 | 44 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #2,282 | 58 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #2,124 | 64 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #2,195 | 60 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #1,965 | 70 | #4,872 | 11 |
| 1991 | #1,913 | 73 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #1,716 | 85 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #1,574 | 89 | #4,017 | 13 |
| 1988 | #1,300 | 111 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #1,128 | 132 | #2,838 | 18 |
| 1986 | #1,249 | 109 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #925 | 171 | #2,427 | 21 |
| 1984 | #766 | 210 | #3,107 | 14 |
| 1983 | #770 | 207 | #2,408 | 20 |
| 1982 | #664 | 267 | #2,518 | 19 |
| 1981 | #547 | 340 | #2,496 | 19 |
| 1980 | #540 | 349 | #2,729 | 17 |
| 1979 | #589 | 306 | #2,568 | 18 |
| 1978 | #549 | 323 | #2,205 | 21 |
| 1977 | #507 | 365 | #2,458 | 18 |
| 1976 | #461 | 417 | #2,946 | 13 |
| 1975 | #391 | 520 | #2,902 | 13 |
| 1974 | #366 | 587 | #3,318 | 10 |
| 1973 | #332 | 665 | #2,405 | 16 |
| 1972 | #324 | 722 | #2,080 | 19 |
| 1971 | #299 | 910 | #1,987 | 21 |
| 1970 | #272 | 1,103 | #1,658 | 27 |
| 1969 | #251 | 1,164 | #1,810 | 21 |
| 1968 | #226 | 1,325 | #2,907 | 9 |
| 1967 | #214 | 1,409 | #2,242 | 13 |
| 1966 | #200 | 1,590 | #1,963 | 16 |
| 1965 | #183 | 1,852 | #2,366 | 12 |
| 1964 | #184 | 2,052 | #1,655 | 23 |
| 1963 | #177 | 2,190 | #1,744 | 21 |
| 1962 | #167 | 2,449 | #1,454 | 29 |
| 1961 | #152 | 2,795 | #1,731 | 22 |
| 1960 | #134 | 3,371 | #1,242 | 40 |
| 1959 | #115 | 4,052 | #1,522 | 27 |
| 1958 | #91 | 5,226 | #1,766 | 20 |
| 1957 | #83 | 5,718 | #1,300 | 36 |
| 1956 | #69 | 6,953 | #1,418 | 30 |
| 1955 | #58 | 7,656 | #1,313 | 33 |
| 1954 | #53 | 8,052 | #1,525 | 25 |
| 1953 | #54 | 7,513 | #1,551 | 24 |
| 1952 | #55 | 7,092 | #1,268 | 34 |
| 1951 | #67 | 6,001 | #1,519 | 24 |
| 1950 | #64 | 5,676 | #1,289 | 31 |
| 1949 | #60 | 5,802 | #1,322 | 30 |
| 1948 | #56 | 5,986 | #1,231 | 34 |
| 1947 | #51 | 6,724 | #1,336 | 30 |
| 1946 | #53 | 5,828 | #1,692 | 18 |
| 1945 | #60 | 4,224 | #1,163 | 32 |
| 1944 | #61 | 4,226 | #1,483 | 21 |
| 1943 | #63 | 4,300 | #1,240 | 31 |
| 1942 | #65 | 4,175 | #1,496 | 22 |
| 1941 | #66 | 3,757 | #1,169 | 32 |
| 1940 | #72 | 3,427 | #1,397 | 23 |
| 1939 | #70 | 3,524 | #1,458 | 21 |
| 1938 | #78 | 3,172 | #1,247 | 28 |
| 1937 | #73 | 3,226 | #1,233 | 29 |
| 1936 | #72 | 3,292 | #1,417 | 22 |
| 1935 | #73 | 3,296 | #1,123 | 34 |
| 1934 | #75 | 3,257 | #1,173 | 32 |
| 1933 | #90 | 2,541 | #1,330 | 25 |
| 1932 | #103 | 2,388 | #1,716 | 18 |
| 1931 | #116 | 2,086 | #1,170 | 34 |
| 1930 | #131 | 1,871 | #1,190 | 35 |
| 1929 | #140 | 1,593 | #1,378 | 27 |
| 1928 | #179 | 1,168 | #1,647 | 21 |
| 1927 | #203 | 974 | #1,959 | 17 |
| 1926 | #222 | 815 | #2,436 | 12 |
| 1925 | #264 | 635 | #2,193 | 14 |
| 1924 | #285 | 534 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1923 | #334 | 385 | #2,224 | 14 |
| 1922 | #376 | 302 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1921 | #417 | 259 | #2,986 | 9 |
| 1920 | #444 | 231 | #1,505 | 25 |
| 1919 | #437 | 227 | #2,511 | 11 |
| 1918 | #479 | 199 | #2,073 | 15 |
| 1917 | #561 | 145 | #3,217 | 7 |
| 1916 | #538 | 152 | #2,389 | 11 |
| 1915 | #570 | 128 | #2,458 | 10 |
| 1914 | #550 | 103 | #3,264 | 5 |
| 1913 | #538 | 89 | #1,945 | 9 |
| 1912 | #591 | 68 | — | |
| 1911 | #676 | 41 | #1,537 | 6 |
| 1910 | #672 | 40 | — | |
| 1909 | #608 | 41 | — | |
| 1908 | #546 | 46 | — | |
| 1907 | #649 | 33 | — | |
| 1906 | #611 | 34 | — | |
| 1905 | #600 | 34 | — | |
| 1904 | #682 | 26 | — | |
| 1903 | #607 | 29 | — | |
| 1902 | #667 | 25 | — | |
| 1901 | #747 | 19 | — | |
| 1900 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1899 | #791 | 17 | — | |
| 1898 | #821 | 17 | — | |
| 1897 | #786 | 16 | — | |
| 1896 | #707 | 20 | — | |
| 1895 | #986 | 11 | — | |
| 1894 | #782 | 15 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 | — | |
| 1892 | #830 | 13 | — | |
| 1891 | #695 | 15 | — | |
| 1890 | #1,099 | 7 | — | |
| 1889 | #802 | 11 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,036 | 7 | — | |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1886 | #606 | 14 | — | |
| 1885 | #658 | 11 | — | |
| 1884 | #851 | 7 | — | |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1881
The first year at least five girls were named Jo! It came in at #830, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1882, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jo is popular in 1956
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Jersey#35 · 1 in 166
- Wyoming#43 · 1 in 147
- New York#43 · 1 in 202
- Rhode Island#44 · 1 in 171
- Louisiana#44 · 1 in 188
Best ever in a state: #16 in Texas, 1935.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #35 | 331 | 1 in 166 |
| New York | #43 | 814 | 1 in 202 |
| Wyoming | #43 | 20 | 1 in 147 |
| Louisiana | #44 | 210 | 1 in 188 |
| Mississippi | #44 | 141 | 1 in 190 |
| Rhode Island | #44 | 49 | 1 in 171 |
| New Mexico | #47 | 57 | 1 in 193 |
| Florida | #48 | 194 | 1 in 222 |
| North Carolina | #49 | 226 | 1 in 229 |
| Utah | #49 | 60 | 1 in 176 |
| Alabama | #51 | 175 | 1 in 209 |
| Arkansas | #51 | 92 | 1 in 205 |
| South Carolina | #51 | 131 | 1 in 221 |
| Maryland | #52 | 126 | 1 in 234 |
| Massachusetts | #52 | 222 | 1 in 234 |
| Georgia | #53 | 206 | 1 in 227 |
| Arizona | #54 | 57 | 1 in 227 |
| Oklahoma | #54 | 98 | 1 in 227 |
| Texas | #54 | 440 | 1 in 261 |
| Idaho | #56 | 30 | 1 in 209 |
| District of Columbia | #58 | 55 | 1 in 246 |
| Virginia | #58 | 163 | 1 in 254 |
| Delaware | #60 | 19 | 1 in 234 |
| West Virginia | #60 | 79 | 1 in 252 |
| Connecticut | #61 | 92 | 1 in 256 |
| Indiana | #64 | 197 | 1 in 256 |
| Kentucky | #65 | 128 | 1 in 262 |
| Tennessee | #65 | 134 | 1 in 287 |
| Illinois | #66 | 372 | 1 in 282 |
| Kansas | #71 | 79 | 1 in 279 |
| South Dakota | #74 | 26 | 1 in 287 |
| Missouri | #76 | 145 | 1 in 309 |
| Pennsylvania | #77 | 343 | 1 in 338 |
| Montana | #79 | 23 | 1 in 298 |
| Ohio | #80 | 337 | 1 in 319 |
| Nevada | #81 | 8 | 1 in 261 |
| New Hampshire | #88 | 17 | 1 in 315 |
| Oregon | #90 | 42 | 1 in 384 |
| Vermont | #90 | 11 | 1 in 316 |
| Nebraska | #94 | 34 | 1 in 425 |
| Colorado | #95 | 50 | 1 in 375 |
| Michigan | #95 | 249 | 1 in 377 |
| California | #101 | 381 | 1 in 411 |
| Iowa | #104 | 64 | 1 in 442 |
| Washington | #107 | 60 | 1 in 477 |
| Maine | #125 | 18 | 1 in 538 |
| Wisconsin | #127 | 67 | 1 in 626 |
| Alaska | #130 | 6 | 1 in 450 |
| Minnesota | #138 | 55 | 1 in 674 |
| Hawaii | #145 | 12 | 1 in 524 |
| North Dakota | #175 | 8 | 1 in 841 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jo
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 232 spots since 2024 (#4,207 → #3,975)
- 30 spots since 2020 (#4,005 → #3,975)
- 1,006 spots since 2015 (#4,981 → #3,975)
- Biggest jump: 404 spots in 1891 (#1,099 → #695)
- Biggest drop: 541 spots in 1887 (#606 → #1,147)
Rise & fade · girls
66 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1947 at #51 (6,724 births)
- Births halved by 1961, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 26 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 26 yrs · run 1933–1958
- Top 1,000: 100 yrs · run 1894–1985
Share of babies · girls
1 in 241
- Highest: 1 in 241 girls born in 1954 were named Jo (0.41%)
- Latest: 1 in 44,646 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #51 in 1947, was only 1 in 264 (0.38%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
- 35.7% of all girls named Jo (63,939) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 69 | #606 (1886) | #823 |
| 1890s | 140 | #695 (1891) | #852 |
| 1900s | 311 | #546 (1908) | #646 |
| 1910s | 1,192 | #437 (1919) | #561 |
| 1920s | 6,896 | #140 (1929) | #286 |
| 1930s | 28,653 | #70 (1939) | #88 |
| 1940s | 48,449 | #51 (1947) | #61 |
| 1950s | 63,939 | #53 (1954) | #71 |
| 1960s | 20,197 | #134 (1960) | #189 |
| 1970s | 5,918 | #272 (1970) | #409 |
| 1980s | 1,985 | #540 (1980) | #946 |
| 1990s | 609 | #1,716 (1990) | #2,281 |
| 2000s | 223 | #4,280 (2002) | #5,807 |
| 2010s | 246 | #3,739 (2018) | #6,539 |
| 2020s | 230 | #3,386 (2023) | #3,871 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jo in 1956
girls
#69
6,953 births · 1 in 289 girls
boys
#1,418
30 births · 1 in 70,510 boys
Top girls' names in 1956
Top boys' names in 1956
More about 1956
girls
2,007,703 girls got a published name in 1956; 1 in 289 of them was named Jo, which outranked 99.0% of the 6,891 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jo
Biggest movers since 1955
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,115,302 boys got a published name in 1956; 1 in 70,510 of them was named Jo, which outranked 68.2% of the 4,455 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jo
- #1,385Vinson31
- #1,385Walt31
- #1,385Wayland31
- #1,418Jo30
- #1,418Addison30
- #1,418Anastacio30
- #1,418Armond30
- #1,443Adalberto29
- #1,443Adrain29
- #1,443Alfonza29
Tied with 24 names at #1,418; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Biggest movers since 1955
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.