Joshua
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #11,122 · #66 for boys in 2025, 4,773 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2002 · 25,998 births
- Debut · boys
- 57 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 55 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,248,929since 1880
Joshua over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #66 | 4,773 | |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | #57 | 5,268 |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #60 | 5,070 |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | #60 | 5,197 |
| 2021 | — | #58 | 5,531 | |
| 2020 | #10,250 | 9 | #53 | 6,015 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | #48 | 6,631 |
| 2018 | — | #40 | 7,446 | |
| 2017 | #8,776 | 12 | #38 | 8,353 |
| 2016 | #6,663 | 18 | #35 | 9,258 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #33 | 9,850 |
| 2014 | #7,302 | 16 | #25 | 10,929 |
| 2013 | #8,580 | 13 | #21 | 11,861 |
| 2012 | #6,872 | 18 | #17 | 12,681 |
| 2011 | #5,358 | 25 | #14 | 13,797 |
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | #11 | 15,467 |
| 2009 | #5,709 | 24 | #6 | 17,671 |
| 2008 | #5,574 | 25 | #4 | 19,231 |
| 2007 | #3,983 | 39 | #4 | 20,669 |
| 2006 | #4,576 | 31 | #3 | 22,336 |
| 2005 | #3,461 | 43 | #3 | 23,261 |
| 2004 | #1,614 | 120 | #3 | 24,214 |
| 2003 | #3,232 | 45 | #3 | 25,106 |
| 2002 | #3,103 | 46 | #3 | 25,998 |
| 2001 | #2,963 | 48 | #4 | 26,024 |
| 2000 | #2,708 | 54 | #4 | 27,543 |
| 1999 | #2,368 | 62 | #4 | 27,265 |
| 1998 | #2,651 | 51 | #4 | 28,095 |
| 1997 | #2,229 | 61 | #5 | 28,289 |
| 1996 | #1,915 | 75 | #5 | 29,175 |
| 1995 | #2,155 | 62 | #5 | 30,720 |
| 1994 | #1,841 | 77 | #4 | 31,374 |
| 1993 | #1,419 | 114 | #4 | 33,590 |
| 1992 | #1,357 | 122 | #4 | 36,221 |
| 1991 | #1,219 | 141 | #4 | 41,226 |
| 1990 | #1,066 | 166 | #4 | 43,237 |
| 1989 | #885 | 208 | #4 | 44,100 |
| 1988 | #652 | 297 | #4 | 42,653 |
| 1987 | #678 | 272 | #4 | 40,002 |
| 1986 | #616 | 307 | #4 | 37,542 |
| 1985 | #657 | 276 | #4 | 42,194 |
| 1984 | #655 | 266 | #4 | 40,266 |
| 1983 | #718 | 232 | #5 | 36,687 |
| 1982 | #720 | 241 | #7 | 38,004 |
| 1981 | #700 | 240 | #6 | 39,024 |
| 1980 | #747 | 222 | #7 | 36,052 |
| 1979 | #762 | 211 | #9 | 31,120 |
| 1978 | #981 | 141 | #12 | 25,204 |
| 1977 | #1,127 | 113 | #14 | 22,068 |
| 1976 | #1,191 | 95 | #18 | 16,845 |
| 1975 | #1,241 | 92 | #26 | 14,567 |
| 1974 | #1,532 | 63 | #29 | 11,599 |
| 1973 | #2,094 | 38 | #42 | 8,057 |
| 1972 | #3,062 | 21 | #59 | 5,033 |
| 1971 | #3,652 | 17 | #80 | 3,650 |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | #150 | 2,175 |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | #197 | 1,321 |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #271 | 731 |
| 1967 | — | #314 | 563 | |
| 1966 | — | #340 | 486 | |
| 1965 | — | #352 | 461 | |
| 1964 | — | #407 | 389 | |
| 1963 | — | #416 | 372 | |
| 1962 | — | #436 | 335 | |
| 1961 | — | #423 | 354 | |
| 1960 | — | #454 | 314 | |
| 1959 | — | #440 | 328 | |
| 1958 | — | #477 | 276 | |
| 1957 | — | #467 | 273 | |
| 1956 | — | #491 | 239 | |
| 1955 | — | #471 | 245 | |
| 1954 | — | #524 | 193 | |
| 1953 | — | #551 | 164 | |
| 1952 | — | #523 | 178 | |
| 1951 | — | #530 | 165 | |
| 1950 | — | #537 | 160 | |
| 1949 | — | #490 | 183 | |
| 1948 | — | #587 | 129 | |
| 1947 | — | #568 | 141 | |
| 1946 | — | #608 | 113 | |
| 1945 | — | #612 | 97 | |
| 1944 | — | #601 | 104 | |
| 1943 | — | #655 | 95 | |
| 1942 | — | #591 | 111 | |
| 1941 | — | #628 | 93 | |
| 1940 | — | #626 | 90 | |
| 1939 | — | #569 | 101 | |
| 1938 | — | #724 | 71 | |
| 1937 | — | #605 | 92 | |
| 1936 | — | #573 | 101 | |
| 1935 | — | #663 | 80 | |
| 1934 | — | #574 | 106 | |
| 1933 | — | #569 | 102 | |
| 1932 | — | #560 | 111 | |
| 1931 | — | #611 | 94 | |
| 1930 | — | #645 | 90 | |
| 1929 | — | #729 | 74 | |
| 1928 | — | #562 | 118 | |
| 1927 | — | #569 | 117 | |
| 1926 | — | #612 | 105 | |
| 1925 | — | #605 | 109 | |
| 1924 | — | #594 | 114 | |
| 1923 | — | #539 | 129 | |
| 1922 | — | #571 | 124 | |
| 1921 | — | #562 | 125 | |
| 1920 | — | #542 | 128 | |
| 1919 | — | #503 | 139 | |
| 1918 | — | #552 | 118 | |
| 1917 | — | #522 | 122 | |
| 1916 | — | #581 | 99 | |
| 1915 | — | #472 | 136 | |
| 1914 | — | #528 | 87 | |
| 1913 | — | #492 | 78 | |
| 1912 | — | #507 | 60 | |
| 1911 | — | #446 | 43 | |
| 1910 | — | #396 | 44 | |
| 1909 | — | #487 | 28 | |
| 1908 | — | #452 | 29 | |
| 1907 | — | #457 | 26 | |
| 1906 | — | #424 | 27 | |
| 1905 | — | #549 | 18 | |
| 1904 | — | #492 | 19 | |
| 1903 | — | #451 | 21 | |
| 1902 | — | #521 | 17 | |
| 1901 | — | #399 | 22 | |
| 1900 | — | #365 | 36 | |
| 1899 | — | #376 | 24 | |
| 1898 | — | #298 | 39 | |
| 1897 | — | #346 | 29 | |
| 1896 | — | #352 | 30 | |
| 1895 | — | #340 | 29 | |
| 1894 | — | #376 | 24 | |
| 1893 | — | #371 | 23 | |
| 1892 | — | #284 | 41 | |
| 1891 | — | #349 | 24 | |
| 1890 | — | #358 | 24 | |
| 1889 | — | #294 | 33 | |
| 1888 | — | #245 | 50 | |
| 1887 | — | #247 | 41 | |
| 1886 | — | #228 | 55 | |
| 1885 | — | #251 | 43 | |
| 1884 | — | #265 | 41 | |
| 1883 | — | #202 | 55 | |
| 1882 | — | #235 | 50 | |
| 1881 | — | #244 | 40 | |
| 1880 | — | #211 | 57 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Joshua was already there! It came in at #211, and was given to 57 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1905, when fewer than 23 boys a year got the name.
Where Joshua is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#1 · 1 in 40
- Louisiana#1 · 1 in 58
- Maryland#2 · 1 in 52
- Florida#2 · 1 in 56
- New Mexico#2 · 1 in 58
Best ever in a state: #1 in Montana, 1980.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #1 | 131 | 1 in 40 |
| Louisiana | #1 | 473 | 1 in 58 |
| Florida | #2 | 1,592 | 1 in 56 |
| Idaho | #2 | 114 | 1 in 69 |
| Maryland | #2 | 554 | 1 in 52 |
| Michigan | #2 | 1,016 | 1 in 58 |
| New Mexico | #2 | 185 | 1 in 58 |
| Oregon | #2 | 298 | 1 in 66 |
| Utah | #2 | 346 | 1 in 61 |
| Alabama | #3 | 503 | 1 in 50 |
| Colorado | #3 | 425 | 1 in 67 |
| Maine | #3 | 114 | 1 in 48 |
| Nebraska | #3 | 163 | 1 in 62 |
| Nevada | #3 | 201 | 1 in 62 |
| North Carolina | #3 | 1,011 | 1 in 51 |
| Oklahoma | #3 | 348 | 1 in 59 |
| Texas | #3 | 2,454 | 1 in 70 |
| Washington | #3 | 507 | 1 in 68 |
| Alaska | #4 | 58 | 1 in 57 |
| Arkansas | #4 | 239 | 1 in 62 |
| Delaware | #4 | 95 | 1 in 44 |
| Kansas | #4 | 238 | 1 in 69 |
| South Carolina | #4 | 400 | 1 in 52 |
| Tennessee | #4 | 665 | 1 in 55 |
| Georgia | #5 | 905 | 1 in 61 |
| Missouri | #5 | 518 | 1 in 66 |
| West Virginia | #5 | 176 | 1 in 52 |
| Arizona | #6 | 492 | 1 in 77 |
| Indiana | #6 | 586 | 1 in 67 |
| Virginia | #6 | 728 | 1 in 56 |
| Wisconsin | #6 | 446 | 1 in 66 |
| California | #7 | 3,356 | 1 in 74 |
| District of Columbia | #7 | 82 | 1 in 59 |
| Illinois | #7 | 1,101 | 1 in 73 |
| Mississippi | #7 | 257 | 1 in 61 |
| Ohio | #7 | 1,086 | 1 in 65 |
| Pennsylvania | #7 | 1,080 | 1 in 61 |
| Connecticut | #8 | 322 | 1 in 56 |
| Kentucky | #8 | 422 | 1 in 57 |
| Wyoming | #8 | 30 | 1 in 58 |
| New Hampshire | #9 | 113 | 1 in 53 |
| Montana | #10 | 52 | 1 in 77 |
| New York | #10 | 1,640 | 1 in 70 |
| New Jersey | #11 | 709 | 1 in 68 |
| Minnesota | #12 | 403 | 1 in 73 |
| Massachusetts | #13 | 533 | 1 in 68 |
| South Dakota | #13 | 50 | 1 in 78 |
| Vermont | #14 | 37 | 1 in 64 |
| Rhode Island | #18 | 77 | 1 in 68 |
| Iowa | #22 | 172 | 1 in 97 |
| North Dakota | #22 | 40 | 1 in 86 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Joshua
- 9 spots since 2024 (#57 → #66)
- 13 spots since 2020 (#53 → #66)
- 33 spots since 2015 (#33 → #66)
- Biggest jump: 155 spots in 1939 (#724 → #569)
- Biggest drop: 167 spots in 1929 (#562 → #729)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2002 at #3 (25,998 births)
- Births halved by 2012, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: 31 yrs · run 1979–2009
- Top 100: 55 yrs · run 1971–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 44 boys born in 1985 were named Joshua (2.3%)
- Latest: 1 in 358 boys born in 2025 (0.28%)
- Its best rank, #3 in 2002, was only 1 in 75 (1.3%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 31.7% of all boys named Joshua (396,524) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 465 | #202 (1883) | #242 |
| 1890s | 287 | #284 (1892) | #345 |
| 1900s | 243 | #365 (1900) | #460 |
| 1910s | 926 | #396 (1910) | #500 |
| 1920s | 1,143 | #539 (1923) | #589 |
| 1930s | 948 | #560 (1932) | #609 |
| 1940s | 1,156 | #490 (1949) | #597 |
| 1950s | 2,221 | #440 (1959) | #501 |
| 1960s | 5,326 | #197 (1969) | #361 |
| 1970s | 140,318 | #9 (1979) | #44 |
| 1980s | 396,524 | #4 (1989) | #5 |
| 1990s | 329,192 | #4 (1990) | #4 |
| 2000s | 232,053 | #3 (2002) | #4 |
| 2010s | 106,273 | #11 (2010) | #28 |
| 2020s | 31,854 | #53 (2020) | #59 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Joshua in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 33,630 of them was named Joshua, which outranked 84.7% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,672Uma55
- #2,672Yanely55
- #2,672Zahria55
- #2,708Joshua54
- #2,708Afton54
- #2,708Alaura54
- #2,708Aleyah54
- #2,740Alexyss53
- #2,740Alianna53
- #2,740Alona53
Tied with 31 names at #2,708; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 71 of them was named Joshua, which outranked 100.0% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.