Tyler
#1,911 for girls in 2025, 101 births · #219 for boys in 2025, 1,633 births
Given to boys 97.2% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1994 · 30,482 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 36 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 603,970since 1880
Tyler over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,911 | 101 | #219 | 1,633 |
| 2024 | #1,591 | 132 | #191 | 1,915 |
| 2023 | #1,614 | 129 | #177 | 2,073 |
| 2022 | #1,590 | 133 | #163 | 2,268 |
| 2021 | #1,460 | 147 | #157 | 2,444 |
| 2020 | #1,503 | 142 | #130 | 2,801 |
| 2019 | #1,465 | 150 | #127 | 3,024 |
| 2018 | #1,371 | 164 | #119 | 3,341 |
| 2017 | #1,311 | 178 | #105 | 3,788 |
| 2016 | #1,271 | 191 | #91 | 4,515 |
| 2015 | #1,223 | 202 | #81 | 5,175 |
| 2014 | #1,368 | 170 | #72 | 5,851 |
| 2013 | #1,347 | 173 | #63 | 6,660 |
| 2012 | #1,334 | 176 | #50 | 7,706 |
| 2011 | #1,292 | 182 | #38 | 8,851 |
| 2010 | #1,223 | 197 | #34 | 10,458 |
| 2009 | #1,063 | 240 | #28 | 11,551 |
| 2008 | #1,014 | 260 | #28 | 12,709 |
| 2007 | #873 | 320 | #21 | 14,106 |
| 2006 | #734 | 380 | #18 | 15,550 |
| 2005 | #751 | 357 | #16 | 16,989 |
| 2004 | #577 | 491 | #16 | 17,450 |
| 2003 | #599 | 456 | #15 | 18,185 |
| 2002 | #525 | 523 | #14 | 18,266 |
| 2001 | #490 | 569 | #13 | 19,275 |
| 2000 | #415 | 683 | #10 | 21,506 |
| 1999 | #371 | 788 | #10 | 22,669 |
| 1998 | #355 | 810 | #8 | 23,712 |
| 1997 | #363 | 760 | #10 | 24,879 |
| 1996 | #333 | 849 | #7 | 26,956 |
| 1995 | #303 | 917 | #6 | 29,161 |
| 1994 | #266 | 1,054 | #5 | 30,482 |
| 1993 | #238 | 1,182 | #5 | 29,800 |
| 1992 | #282 | 978 | #8 | 28,806 |
| 1991 | #403 | 634 | #16 | 25,209 |
| 1990 | #535 | 445 | #21 | 20,646 |
| 1989 | #726 | 272 | #30 | 15,594 |
| 1988 | #713 | 263 | #33 | 13,349 |
| 1987 | #718 | 252 | #39 | 11,542 |
| 1986 | #837 | 199 | #40 | 10,912 |
| 1985 | #833 | 195 | #43 | 10,211 |
| 1984 | #829 | 190 | #47 | 8,705 |
| 1983 | #1,049 | 132 | #57 | 5,821 |
| 1982 | #1,064 | 135 | #66 | 4,577 |
| 1981 | #1,382 | 89 | #96 | 3,117 |
| 1980 | #1,805 | 60 | #114 | 2,623 |
| 1979 | #1,814 | 59 | #131 | 2,044 |
| 1978 | #1,841 | 54 | #150 | 1,752 |
| 1977 | #2,257 | 40 | #165 | 1,452 |
| 1976 | #2,099 | 41 | #179 | 1,260 |
| 1975 | #2,196 | 38 | #205 | 1,056 |
| 1974 | #2,683 | 27 | #227 | 922 |
| 1973 | #3,122 | 21 | #260 | 748 |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | #250 | 832 |
| 1971 | #3,266 | 20 | #286 | 721 |
| 1970 | #2,856 | 24 | #283 | 749 |
| 1969 | #3,012 | 20 | #357 | 490 |
| 1968 | #3,456 | 15 | #372 | 435 |
| 1967 | #3,340 | 15 | #366 | 420 |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | #418 | 330 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | #450 | 297 |
| 1964 | #3,379 | 15 | #454 | 309 |
| 1963 | #4,896 | 8 | #469 | 282 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #522 | 231 |
| 1961 | — | #558 | 197 | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #585 | 177 |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | #641 | 145 |
| 1958 | — | #640 | 145 | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | #648 | 141 |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #657 | 133 |
| 1955 | — | #676 | 117 | |
| 1954 | — | #666 | 117 | |
| 1953 | — | #707 | 101 | |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #770 | 83 |
| 1951 | — | #833 | 71 | |
| 1950 | — | #771 | 79 | |
| 1949 | — | #814 | 71 | |
| 1948 | — | #824 | 68 | |
| 1947 | — | #842 | 67 | |
| 1946 | — | #925 | 52 | |
| 1945 | — | #986 | 42 | |
| 1944 | — | #991 | 43 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,088 | 39 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,193 | 34 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,004 | 41 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,107 | 35 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,015 | 39 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,125 | 33 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,576 | 19 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,062 | 12 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,326 | 26 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,860 | 15 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,707 | 17 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,426 | 24 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,538 | 21 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,368 | 28 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,731 | 19 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #1,353 | 29 |
| 1927 | — | #1,436 | 27 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,661 | 21 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,628 | 22 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,675 | 22 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,551 | 24 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,222 | 35 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,509 | 25 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,323 | 30 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,264 | 31 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,373 | 27 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,362 | 26 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,304 | 27 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,454 | 22 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,608 | 15 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,497 | 13 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,000 | 21 | |
| 1911 | — | #925 | 13 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,193 | 8 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | #1,113 | 7 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,345 | 5 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | #1,091 | 6 | |
| 1904 | — | #1,205 | 5 | |
| 1903 | — | #1,009 | 6 | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #785 | 11 | |
| 1899 | — | #1,051 | 5 | |
| 1898 | — | #1,121 | 5 | |
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | #982 | 6 | |
| 1895 | — | #1,079 | 5 | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #1,066 | 5 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | #789 | 7 | |
| 1888 | — | #1,031 | 5 | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #971 | 5 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #745 | 7 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Tyler was already there! It came in at #745, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1888, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Tyler is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Montana#2 · 1 in 52
- Nebraska#2 · 1 in 57
- Oklahoma#2 · 1 in 58
- Iowa#2 · 1 in 59
- Missouri#2 · 1 in 59
Best ever in a state: #1 in South Dakota, 1990.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #2 | 282 | 1 in 59 |
| Missouri | #2 | 581 | 1 in 59 |
| Montana | #2 | 77 | 1 in 52 |
| Nebraska | #2 | 178 | 1 in 57 |
| Oklahoma | #2 | 357 | 1 in 58 |
| Kansas | #3 | 239 | 1 in 69 |
| West Virginia | #3 | 190 | 1 in 48 |
| Wisconsin | #3 | 497 | 1 in 59 |
| Maine | #4 | 111 | 1 in 50 |
| Ohio | #4 | 1,208 | 1 in 58 |
| Oregon | #4 | 285 | 1 in 69 |
| Utah | #4 | 277 | 1 in 76 |
| Louisiana | #5 | 399 | 1 in 68 |
| North Dakota | #5 | 61 | 1 in 56 |
| South Dakota | #5 | 65 | 1 in 60 |
| Vermont | #5 | 51 | 1 in 46 |
| Washington | #5 | 482 | 1 in 72 |
| Wyoming | #5 | 32 | 1 in 55 |
| Idaho | #6 | 103 | 1 in 76 |
| Michigan | #6 | 910 | 1 in 65 |
| Pennsylvania | #6 | 1,108 | 1 in 59 |
| Colorado | #7 | 357 | 1 in 80 |
| Minnesota | #7 | 452 | 1 in 65 |
| New Hampshire | #7 | 118 | 1 in 51 |
| Rhode Island | #7 | 104 | 1 in 51 |
| Indiana | #8 | 562 | 1 in 70 |
| Mississippi | #8 | 217 | 1 in 72 |
| Nevada | #8 | 181 | 1 in 68 |
| North Carolina | #8 | 653 | 1 in 79 |
| Florida | #9 | 1,118 | 1 in 80 |
| Tennessee | #9 | 537 | 1 in 68 |
| Alabama | #10 | 391 | 1 in 65 |
| Arkansas | #10 | 203 | 1 in 73 |
| Kentucky | #10 | 383 | 1 in 63 |
| Delaware | #12 | 69 | 1 in 61 |
| Maryland | #13 | 380 | 1 in 76 |
| Arizona | #14 | 401 | 1 in 95 |
| Illinois | #14 | 922 | 1 in 87 |
| Virginia | #14 | 544 | 1 in 75 |
| Alaska | #15 | 43 | 1 in 77 |
| Connecticut | #15 | 273 | 1 in 67 |
| Hawaii | #15 | 60 | 1 in 86 |
| New Mexico | #15 | 112 | 1 in 95 |
| Georgia | #16 | 605 | 1 in 92 |
| New Jersey | #16 | 580 | 1 in 83 |
| Massachusetts | #17 | 473 | 1 in 77 |
| South Carolina | #17 | 249 | 1 in 84 |
| New York | #18 | 1,187 | 1 in 97 |
| Texas | #28 | 1,154 | 1 in 149 |
| California | #30 | 1,655 | 1 in 150 |
| District of Columbia | #39 | 30 | 1 in 162 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Tyler
- 28 spots since 2024 (#191 → #219)
- 89 spots since 2020 (#130 → #219)
- 138 spots since 2015 (#81 → #219)
- Biggest jump: 268 spots in 1911 (#1,193 → #925)
- Biggest drop: 497 spots in 1913 (#1,000 → #1,497)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1994 at #5 (30,482 births)
- Births halved by 2007, 13 yrs later
- Top 10: 9 yrs · run 1992–2000
- Top 100: 36 yrs · run 1981–2016
- Top 1,000: 89 yrs · run 1944–2025
- Highest: 1 in 63 boys born in 1994 were named Tyler (1.6%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,046 boys born in 2025 (0.10%)
- 43.4% of all boys named Tyler (262,320) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 24 | #745 (1880) | #884 |
| 1890s | 26 | #982 (1896) | #1,060 |
| 1900s | 40 | #785 (1900) | #1,091 |
| 1910s | 203 | #925 (1911) | #1,298 |
| 1920s | 254 | #1,222 (1922) | #1,509 |
| 1930s | 234 | #1,015 (1939) | #1,500 |
| 1940s | 492 | #814 (1949) | #977 |
| 1950s | 1,132 | #640 (1958) | #701 |
| 1960s | 3,168 | #357 (1969) | #455 |
| 1970s | 11,536 | #131 (1979) | #214 |
| 1980s | 86,451 | #30 (1989) | #57 |
| 1990s | 262,320 | #5 (1994) | #10 |
| 2000s | 165,587 | #10 (2000) | #18 |
| 2010s | 59,369 | #34 (2010) | #78 |
| 2020s | 13,134 | #130 (2020) | #173 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Tyler in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 2,659 of them was named Tyler, which outranked 97.7% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 91 of them was named Tyler, which outranked 99.9% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.