Juliana
#256 for girls in 2025, 1,203 births · Last seen for boys in 2012 at #10,770
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 2,128 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 67,748since 1881
Juliana over time
Rank among girls' names. Juliana has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #256 | 1,203 | — | |
| 2024 | #251 | 1,270 | — | |
| 2023 | #251 | 1,244 | — | |
| 2022 | #219 | 1,364 | — | |
| 2021 | #209 | 1,434 | — | |
| 2020 | #189 | 1,524 | — | |
| 2019 | #175 | 1,654 | — | |
| 2018 | #152 | 1,853 | — | |
| 2017 | #147 | 2,003 | — | |
| 2016 | #163 | 1,952 | — | |
| 2015 | #168 | 1,905 | — | |
| 2014 | #159 | 2,062 | — | |
| 2013 | #150 | 2,097 | — | |
| 2012 | #147 | 2,219 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #147 | 2,130 | — | |
| 2010 | #146 | 2,128 | — | |
| 2009 | #151 | 2,075 | — | |
| 2008 | #157 | 2,150 | — | |
| 2007 | #162 | 2,224 | — | |
| 2006 | #162 | 2,184 | — | |
| 2005 | #176 | 1,948 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #164 | 2,031 | — | |
| 2003 | #157 | 2,129 | — | |
| 2002 | #171 | 1,926 | — | |
| 2001 | #155 | 2,076 | — | |
| 2000 | #241 | 1,319 | — | |
| 1999 | #268 | 1,187 | — | |
| 1998 | #289 | 1,037 | — | |
| 1997 | #310 | 942 | — | |
| 1996 | #339 | 824 | — | |
| 1995 | #370 | 706 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #394 | 642 | — | |
| 1993 | #440 | 567 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #438 | 574 | — | |
| 1991 | #399 | 639 | — | |
| 1990 | #426 | 596 | — | |
| 1989 | #431 | 572 | — | |
| 1988 | #498 | 452 | — | |
| 1987 | #474 | 456 | — | |
| 1986 | #497 | 430 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #425 | 517 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #593 | 303 | — | |
| 1983 | #553 | 334 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #485 | 425 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #635 | 280 | — | |
| 1980 | #772 | 213 | — | |
| 1979 | #833 | 187 | — | |
| 1978 | #883 | 166 | — | |
| 1977 | #872 | 165 | — | |
| 1976 | #861 | 158 | — | |
| 1975 | #849 | 157 | — | |
| 1974 | #950 | 130 | — | |
| 1973 | #862 | 149 | — | |
| 1972 | #804 | 168 | — | |
| 1971 | #753 | 194 | — | |
| 1970 | #795 | 176 | — | |
| 1969 | #766 | 175 | — | |
| 1968 | #834 | 149 | — | |
| 1967 | #770 | 163 | — | |
| 1966 | #736 | 179 | — | |
| 1965 | #672 | 215 | — | |
| 1964 | #698 | 219 | — | |
| 1963 | #724 | 200 | — | |
| 1962 | #631 | 256 | — | |
| 1961 | #708 | 217 | — | |
| 1960 | #761 | 179 | — | |
| 1959 | #815 | 158 | — | |
| 1958 | #813 | 153 | — | |
| 1957 | #731 | 187 | — | |
| 1956 | #692 | 192 | — | |
| 1955 | #737 | 166 | — | |
| 1954 | #760 | 150 | — | |
| 1953 | #758 | 145 | — | |
| 1952 | #739 | 144 | — | |
| 1951 | #779 | 129 | — | |
| 1950 | #858 | 106 | — | |
| 1949 | #765 | 127 | — | |
| 1948 | #720 | 137 | — | |
| 1947 | #898 | 97 | — | |
| 1946 | #961 | 75 | — | |
| 1945 | #984 | 61 | — | |
| 1944 | #812 | 88 | — | |
| 1943 | #838 | 86 | — | |
| 1942 | #780 | 95 | — | |
| 1941 | #735 | 93 | — | |
| 1940 | #702 | 98 | — | |
| 1939 | #811 | 72 | — | |
| 1938 | #737 | 87 | — | |
| 1937 | #891 | 60 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,022 | 46 | — | |
| 1935 | #974 | 50 | — | |
| 1934 | #993 | 48 | — | |
| 1933 | #887 | 58 | — | |
| 1932 | #933 | 57 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,092 | 42 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,031 | 51 | — | |
| 1929 | #951 | 57 | — | |
| 1928 | #936 | 63 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,071 | 51 | — | |
| 1926 | #931 | 64 | — | |
| 1925 | #932 | 64 | — | |
| 1924 | #941 | 65 | — | |
| 1923 | #941 | 61 | — | |
| 1922 | #969 | 59 | — | |
| 1921 | #914 | 66 | — | |
| 1920 | #939 | 60 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,177 | 40 | — | |
| 1918 | #921 | 60 | — | |
| 1917 | #964 | 52 | — | |
| 1916 | #788 | 75 | — | |
| 1915 | #979 | 46 | — | |
| 1914 | #788 | 54 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,067 | 26 | — | |
| 1912 | #795 | 39 | — | |
| 1911 | #958 | 21 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,171 | 15 | — | |
| 1909 | #773 | 27 | — | |
| 1908 | #912 | 19 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,142 | 12 | — | |
| 1906 | #965 | 15 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,298 | 9 | — | |
| 1904 | #965 | 14 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,007 | 11 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,319 | 9 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,700 | 5 | — | |
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,123 | 9 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,175 | 7 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,017 | 9 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1890 | #940 | 9 | — | |
| 1889 | #757 | 12 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | #860 | 8 | — | |
| 1886 | #778 | 9 | — | |
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | — | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Juliana! It came in at #830, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1885, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Juliana is popular in 1985
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#178 · 1 in 991
- New Mexico#292 · 1 in 1,372
- New Jersey#310 · 1 in 2,127
- Connecticut#329 · 1 in 2,433
- Texas#330 · 1 in 2,020
Best ever in a state: #21 in Rhode Island, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #178 | 204 | 1 in 991 |
| New Mexico | #292 | 7 | 1 in 1,372 |
| New Jersey | #310 | 19 | 1 in 2,127 |
| Connecticut | #329 | 7 | 1 in 2,433 |
| Texas | #330 | 66 | 1 in 2,020 |
| New York | #353 | 47 | 1 in 2,274 |
| Arizona | #382 | 10 | 1 in 2,300 |
| Maryland | #447 | 7 | 1 in 3,445 |
| Wisconsin | #451 | 7 | 1 in 4,378 |
| Pennsylvania | #531 | 14 | 1 in 4,939 |
| Ohio | #533 | 13 | 1 in 5,315 |
| Florida | #536 | 16 | 1 in 4,079 |
| Massachusetts | #575 | 6 | 1 in 5,832 |
| Virginia | #609 | 6 | 1 in 5,492 |
| Michigan | #638 | 9 | 1 in 6,362 |
| Louisiana | #680 | 6 | 1 in 5,014 |
| Illinois | #720 | 11 | 1 in 6,636 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Juliana
- 5 spots since 2024 (#251 → #256)
- 67 spots since 2020 (#189 → #256)
- 88 spots since 2015 (#168 → #256)
- Biggest jump: 379 spots in 1889 (#1,136 → #757)
- Biggest drop: 398 spots in 1910 (#773 → #1,171)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 2010 at #146 (2,128 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 119 yrs · run 1937–2025
- Highest: 1 in 794 girls born in 2012 were named Juliana (0.13%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,336 girls born in 2025 (0.07%)
- Its best rank, #146 in 2010, was only 1 in 835 (0.12%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 29.6% of all girls named Juliana (20,062) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 45 | #757 (1889) | #901 |
| 1890s | 74 | #940 (1890) | #1,148 |
| 1900s | 131 | #773 (1909) | #1,118 |
| 1910s | 428 | #788 (1916) | #961 |
| 1920s | 610 | #914 (1921) | #953 |
| 1930s | 571 | #737 (1938) | #937 |
| 1940s | 957 | #702 (1940) | #820 |
| 1950s | 1,530 | #692 (1956) | #768 |
| 1960s | 1,952 | #631 (1962) | #730 |
| 1970s | 1,650 | #753 (1971) | #846 |
| 1980s | 3,982 | #425 (1985) | #536 |
| 1990s | 7,714 | #268 (1999) | #367 |
| 2000s | 20,062 | #151 (2009) | #170 |
| 2010s | 20,003 | #146 (2010) | #155 |
| 2020s | 8,039 | #189 (2020) | #229 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Juliana in 1985
Top girls' names in 1985
Top boys' names in 1985
More about 1985
girls
1,720,828 girls got a published name in 1985; 1 in 3,328 of them was named Juliana, which outranked 96.6% of the 12,505 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,848,210 boys got a published name in 1985; 1 in 205,357 of them was named Juliana, which outranked 42.9% of the 7,586 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #4,052Zacheriah10
- #4,052Zebedee10
- #4,052Zeeshan10
- #4,333Juliana9
- #4,333Aakash9
- #4,333Aaryn9
- #4,333Abelino9
- #4,698Abdulla8
- #4,698Abrahan8
- #4,698Adrin8
Tied with 364 names at #4,333; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.