Julianne
#1,990 for girls in 2025, 96 births
- Peak · girls
- 1985 · 640 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 30,617since 1912
Julianne over time
Rank among girls' names. Julianne has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,990 | 96 |
| 2024 | #1,810 | 111 |
| 2023 | #2,050 | 95 |
| 2022 | #1,710 | 122 |
| 2021 | #1,544 | 136 |
| 2020 | #1,432 | 152 |
| 2019 | #1,319 | 173 |
| 2018 | #1,155 | 210 |
| 2017 | #1,182 | 207 |
| 2016 | #919 | 299 |
| 2015 | #896 | 308 |
| 2014 | #907 | 300 |
| 2013 | #817 | 329 |
| 2012 | #826 | 326 |
| 2011 | #774 | 351 |
| 2010 | #761 | 359 |
| 2009 | #629 | 478 |
| 2008 | #692 | 437 |
| 2007 | #844 | 337 |
| 2006 | #881 | 301 |
| 2005 | #758 | 351 |
| 2004 | #636 | 429 |
| 2003 | #544 | 514 |
| 2002 | #573 | 455 |
| 2001 | #558 | 467 |
| 2000 | #515 | 512 |
| 1999 | #514 | 495 |
| 1998 | #411 | 657 |
| 1997 | #518 | 462 |
| 1996 | #537 | 437 |
| 1995 | #517 | 469 |
| 1994 | #546 | 444 |
| 1993 | #510 | 482 |
| 1992 | #449 | 556 |
| 1991 | #418 | 610 |
| 1990 | #445 | 557 |
| 1989 | #373 | 682 |
| 1988 | #383 | 621 |
| 1987 | #443 | 500 |
| 1986 | #386 | 597 |
| 1985 | #364 | 640 |
| 1984 | #454 | 457 |
| 1983 | #692 | 245 |
| 1982 | #572 | 321 |
| 1981 | #638 | 278 |
| 1980 | #666 | 265 |
| 1979 | #756 | 213 |
| 1978 | #648 | 250 |
| 1977 | #695 | 225 |
| 1976 | #661 | 232 |
| 1975 | #643 | 239 |
| 1974 | #582 | 272 |
| 1973 | #553 | 298 |
| 1972 | #502 | 350 |
| 1971 | #509 | 369 |
| 1970 | #482 | 416 |
| 1969 | #451 | 455 |
| 1968 | #470 | 419 |
| 1967 | #479 | 393 |
| 1966 | #453 | 430 |
| 1965 | #439 | 462 |
| 1964 | #500 | 381 |
| 1963 | #475 | 414 |
| 1962 | #481 | 403 |
| 1961 | #484 | 401 |
| 1960 | #536 | 324 |
| 1959 | #512 | 365 |
| 1958 | #506 | 359 |
| 1957 | #496 | 362 |
| 1956 | #550 | 288 |
| 1955 | #544 | 286 |
| 1954 | #511 | 302 |
| 1953 | #509 | 286 |
| 1952 | #539 | 251 |
| 1951 | #544 | 239 |
| 1950 | #535 | 242 |
| 1949 | #534 | 240 |
| 1948 | #508 | 259 |
| 1947 | #590 | 208 |
| 1946 | #573 | 194 |
| 1945 | #530 | 189 |
| 1944 | #622 | 139 |
| 1943 | #555 | 186 |
| 1942 | #545 | 185 |
| 1941 | #581 | 145 |
| 1940 | #609 | 132 |
| 1939 | #649 | 111 |
| 1938 | #644 | 113 |
| 1937 | #882 | 61 |
| 1936 | #800 | 71 |
| 1935 | #840 | 67 |
| 1934 | #848 | 65 |
| 1933 | #780 | 72 |
| 1932 | #923 | 58 |
| 1931 | #797 | 72 |
| 1930 | #894 | 65 |
| 1929 | #1,339 | 32 |
| 1928 | #1,290 | 35 |
| 1927 | #1,423 | 32 |
| 1926 | #1,279 | 37 |
| 1925 | #1,296 | 37 |
| 1924 | #1,770 | 24 |
| 1923 | #1,327 | 35 |
| 1922 | #1,611 | 27 |
| 1921 | #1,723 | 25 |
| 1920 | #2,172 | 17 |
| 1919 | #2,156 | 16 |
| 1918 | #2,519 | 13 |
| 1917 | #1,431 | 27 |
| 1916 | #1,805 | 19 |
| 1915 | #1,672 | 20 |
| 1914 | #2,638 | 8 |
| 1913 | #1,358 | 18 |
| 1912 | #2,360 | 7 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Julianne! It came in at #2,360, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1912, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Julianne is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#254 · 1 in 1,341
- Minnesota#272 · 1 in 2,105
- Massachusetts#272 · 1 in 2,335
- Wisconsin#279 · 1 in 2,490
- Connecticut#314 · 1 in 2,630
Best ever in a state: #127 in Massachusetts, 1988.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #254 | 5 | 1 in 1,341 |
| Massachusetts | #272 | 22 | 1 in 2,335 |
| Minnesota | #272 | 18 | 1 in 2,105 |
| Wisconsin | #279 | 17 | 1 in 2,490 |
| Connecticut | #314 | 9 | 1 in 2,630 |
| Illinois | #335 | 39 | 1 in 2,638 |
| Nebraska | #344 | 5 | 1 in 2,867 |
| Iowa | #361 | 8 | 1 in 3,420 |
| Michigan | #366 | 24 | 1 in 3,420 |
| Oregon | #394 | 5 | 1 in 3,080 |
| Kansas | #416 | 6 | 1 in 3,307 |
| Pennsylvania | #430 | 23 | 1 in 4,537 |
| New Jersey | #431 | 13 | 1 in 4,389 |
| Indiana | #438 | 11 | 1 in 4,400 |
| Ohio | #457 | 19 | 1 in 5,182 |
| Maryland | #467 | 6 | 1 in 4,881 |
| California | #469 | 45 | 1 in 3,855 |
| New York | #495 | 33 | 1 in 4,951 |
| Washington | #540 | 5 | 1 in 5,549 |
| Missouri | #572 | 6 | 1 in 7,099 |
| Louisiana | #651 | 6 | 1 in 6,342 |
| Florida | #709 | 6 | 1 in 8,201 |
| Texas | #906 | 10 | 1 in 11,056 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Julianne
- 180 spots since 2024 (#1,810 → #1,990)
- 558 spots since 2020 (#1,432 → #1,990)
- 1,094 spots since 2015 (#896 → #1,990)
- Biggest jump: 445 spots in 1930 (#1,339 → #894)
- Biggest drop: 263 spots in 2017 (#919 → #1,182)
- Debuted 1912
- Peaked 1985 at #364 (640 births)
- Births halved by 2006, 21 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 87 yrs · run 1930–2016
- Highest: 1 in 2,689 girls born in 1985 were named Julianne (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 16,742 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 16.9% of all girls named Julianne (5,169) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 128 | #1,358 (1913) | #1,992 |
| 1920s | 301 | #1,279 (1926) | #1,523 |
| 1930s | 755 | #644 (1938) | #806 |
| 1940s | 1,877 | #508 (1948) | #565 |
| 1950s | 2,980 | #496 (1957) | #525 |
| 1960s | 4,082 | #439 (1965) | #477 |
| 1970s | 2,864 | #482 (1970) | #603 |
| 1980s | 4,606 | #364 (1985) | #497 |
| 1990s | 5,169 | #411 (1998) | #487 |
| 2000s | 4,281 | #515 (2000) | #663 |
| 2010s | 2,862 | #761 (2010) | #956 |
| 2020s | 712 | #1,432 (2020) | #1,756 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Julianne in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 4,880 of them was named Julianne, which outranked 93.7% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.