Julie
#872 for girls in 2025, 308 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #8,927
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1971 · 15,322 births
- Debut · girls
- 22 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 41 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 511,253since 1880
Julie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #872 | 308 | — | |
| 2024 | #762 | 369 | — | |
| 2023 | #704 | 403 | — | |
| 2022 | #715 | 409 | — | |
| 2021 | #655 | 456 | — | |
| 2020 | #614 | 475 | — | |
| 2019 | #628 | 477 | — | |
| 2018 | #592 | 517 | — | |
| 2017 | #518 | 604 | — | |
| 2016 | #481 | 650 | — | |
| 2015 | #454 | 698 | — | |
| 2014 | #411 | 782 | — | |
| 2013 | #402 | 763 | — | |
| 2012 | #384 | 819 | — | |
| 2011 | #395 | 799 | — | |
| 2010 | #387 | 823 | — | |
| 2009 | #353 | 920 | — | |
| 2008 | #335 | 994 | — | |
| 2007 | #304 | 1,120 | — | |
| 2006 | #298 | 1,112 | — | |
| 2005 | #283 | 1,181 | — | |
| 2004 | #261 | 1,239 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #242 | 1,352 | — | |
| 2002 | #218 | 1,469 | — | |
| 2001 | #225 | 1,414 | — | |
| 2000 | #190 | 1,677 | #10,349 | 5 |
| 1999 | #178 | 1,758 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #168 | 1,807 | — | |
| 1997 | #163 | 1,865 | — | |
| 1996 | #150 | 2,139 | #5,982 | 9 |
| 1995 | #141 | 2,276 | — | |
| 1994 | #129 | 2,456 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #119 | 2,735 | #5,002 | 11 |
| 1992 | #106 | 3,170 | #4,327 | 13 |
| 1991 | #98 | 3,571 | #6,519 | 7 |
| 1990 | #93 | 3,657 | #3,779 | 15 |
| 1989 | #78 | 3,942 | #2,784 | 22 |
| 1988 | #71 | 4,462 | #2,305 | 26 |
| 1987 | #65 | 4,737 | #2,272 | 25 |
| 1986 | #58 | 5,016 | #2,684 | 19 |
| 1985 | #55 | 5,761 | #2,019 | 28 |
| 1984 | #52 | 5,942 | #1,885 | 29 |
| 1983 | #46 | 6,653 | #2,140 | 24 |
| 1982 | #41 | 7,696 | #2,341 | 21 |
| 1981 | #37 | 8,567 | #1,695 | 34 |
| 1980 | #32 | 8,906 | #1,475 | 42 |
| 1979 | #29 | 9,254 | #1,407 | 44 |
| 1978 | #26 | 9,794 | #1,508 | 38 |
| 1977 | #22 | 10,204 | #1,252 | 50 |
| 1976 | #21 | 10,839 | #1,677 | 31 |
| 1975 | #18 | 11,141 | #1,146 | 54 |
| 1974 | #14 | 11,360 | #1,091 | 57 |
| 1973 | #12 | 12,785 | #1,201 | 47 |
| 1972 | #12 | 14,062 | #1,069 | 57 |
| 1971 | #10 | 15,322 | #1,165 | 49 |
| 1970 | #11 | 17,158 | #1,192 | 48 |
| 1969 | #12 | 17,739 | #1,050 | 54 |
| 1968 | #16 | 15,750 | #1,282 | 35 |
| 1967 | #16 | 15,547 | #1,165 | 41 |
| 1966 | #13 | 16,331 | #1,100 | 45 |
| 1965 | #14 | 16,987 | #1,094 | 46 |
| 1964 | #17 | 17,283 | #1,189 | 42 |
| 1963 | #22 | 16,304 | #1,485 | 28 |
| 1962 | #22 | 17,090 | #1,454 | 29 |
| 1961 | #23 | 17,040 | #1,303 | 37 |
| 1960 | #28 | 16,079 | #1,400 | 32 |
| 1959 | #26 | 16,211 | #1,522 | 27 |
| 1958 | #23 | 18,215 | #1,345 | 33 |
| 1957 | #28 | 13,631 | #1,487 | 28 |
| 1956 | #48 | 8,574 | #1,765 | 20 |
| 1955 | #67 | 6,788 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #70 | 6,275 | #2,743 | 9 |
| 1953 | #74 | 5,668 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #85 | 4,497 | #2,680 | 9 |
| 1951 | #99 | 3,686 | #3,714 | 5 |
| 1950 | #111 | 3,144 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1949 | #113 | 2,848 | #2,453 | 10 |
| 1948 | #117 | 2,794 | #2,608 | 9 |
| 1947 | #124 | 2,735 | — | |
| 1946 | #128 | 2,169 | — | |
| 1945 | #155 | 1,511 | — | |
| 1944 | #162 | 1,480 | — | |
| 1943 | #156 | 1,624 | — | |
| 1942 | #157 | 1,566 | #2,712 | 8 |
| 1941 | #168 | 1,268 | #2,083 | 12 |
| 1940 | #180 | 1,040 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #232 | 710 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #257 | 600 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #286 | 461 | — | |
| 1936 | #284 | 452 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #335 | 355 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #342 | 346 | — | |
| 1933 | #381 | 287 | #3,004 | 7 |
| 1932 | #401 | 266 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #420 | 237 | #3,390 | 6 |
| 1930 | #422 | 247 | #3,022 | 8 |
| 1929 | #449 | 217 | — | |
| 1928 | #478 | 204 | — | |
| 1927 | #494 | 199 | — | |
| 1926 | #480 | 207 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #466 | 218 | — | |
| 1924 | #503 | 197 | #3,260 | 8 |
| 1923 | #472 | 212 | — | |
| 1922 | #497 | 195 | — | |
| 1921 | #496 | 199 | — | |
| 1920 | #483 | 201 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #500 | 182 | #2,877 | 9 |
| 1918 | #469 | 202 | — | |
| 1917 | #494 | 177 | #2,956 | 8 |
| 1916 | #464 | 188 | — | |
| 1915 | #467 | 173 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #421 | 161 | #2,101 | 10 |
| 1913 | #457 | 119 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | #521 | 86 | #2,045 | 7 |
| 1911 | #483 | 73 | — | |
| 1910 | #472 | 72 | — | |
| 1909 | #500 | 56 | — | |
| 1908 | #448 | 65 | — | |
| 1907 | #486 | 54 | — | |
| 1906 | #499 | 48 | — | |
| 1905 | #447 | 57 | — | |
| 1904 | #463 | 50 | — | |
| 1903 | #514 | 39 | — | |
| 1902 | #467 | 44 | — | |
| 1901 | #530 | 33 | — | |
| 1900 | #516 | 43 | — | |
| 1899 | #507 | 34 | — | |
| 1898 | #527 | 35 | — | |
| 1897 | #449 | 43 | — | |
| 1896 | #514 | 33 | — | |
| 1895 | #547 | 29 | — | |
| 1894 | #475 | 35 | — | |
| 1893 | #464 | 33 | — | |
| 1892 | #453 | 36 | — | |
| 1891 | #457 | 31 | — | |
| 1890 | #483 | 29 | — | |
| 1889 | #405 | 36 | — | |
| 1888 | #486 | 26 | — | |
| 1887 | #512 | 19 | — | |
| 1886 | #451 | 23 | — | |
| 1885 | #484 | 19 | — | |
| 1884 | #358 | 31 | — | |
| 1883 | #375 | 24 | — | |
| 1882 | #377 | 22 | — | |
| 1881 | #346 | 22 | — | |
| 1880 | #342 | 22 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Julie was already there! It came in at #342, and was given to 22 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1885–1888, when fewer than 27 girls a year got the name.
Where Julie is popular in 1963
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Minnesota#3 · 1 in 42
- Utah#3 · 1 in 49
- Iowa#4 · 1 in 38
- Wisconsin#5 · 1 in 48
- South Dakota#5 · 1 in 50
Best ever in a state: #1 in Idaho, 1958.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | #3 | 853 | 1 in 42 |
| Utah | #3 | 204 | 1 in 49 |
| Iowa | #4 | 670 | 1 in 38 |
| Nebraska | #5 | 273 | 1 in 51 |
| Oregon | #5 | 250 | 1 in 57 |
| South Dakota | #5 | 131 | 1 in 50 |
| Washington | #5 | 413 | 1 in 62 |
| Wisconsin | #5 | 851 | 1 in 48 |
| Idaho | #7 | 95 | 1 in 58 |
| North Dakota | #7 | 101 | 1 in 57 |
| California | #8 | 2,057 | 1 in 85 |
| Indiana | #8 | 684 | 1 in 69 |
| Kansas | #8 | 269 | 1 in 69 |
| Michigan | #8 | 1,166 | 1 in 69 |
| Montana | #10 | 76 | 1 in 75 |
| Colorado | #11 | 238 | 1 in 79 |
| Illinois | #11 | 1,236 | 1 in 80 |
| Wyoming | #11 | 34 | 1 in 74 |
| Ohio | #15 | 1,026 | 1 in 93 |
| Arizona | #17 | 143 | 1 in 105 |
| Missouri | #17 | 448 | 1 in 92 |
| Vermont | #17 | 43 | 1 in 76 |
| Nevada | #18 | 38 | 1 in 80 |
| Alaska | #21 | 27 | 1 in 100 |
| Maine | #21 | 102 | 1 in 91 |
| Oklahoma | #26 | 175 | 1 in 115 |
| New Mexico | #33 | 71 | 1 in 155 |
| New Hampshire | #34 | 45 | 1 in 121 |
| Florida | #35 | 301 | 1 in 161 |
| Louisiana | #37 | 218 | 1 in 166 |
| Massachusetts | #37 | 379 | 1 in 137 |
| Texas | #37 | 611 | 1 in 175 |
| Rhode Island | #40 | 50 | 1 in 155 |
| Hawaii | #42 | 35 | 1 in 174 |
| Georgia | #43 | 231 | 1 in 189 |
| District of Columbia | #46 | 70 | 1 in 183 |
| Kentucky | #46 | 163 | 1 in 185 |
| New York | #49 | 767 | 1 in 213 |
| West Virginia | #50 | 79 | 1 in 192 |
| Maryland | #51 | 154 | 1 in 194 |
| Virginia | #52 | 180 | 1 in 221 |
| Connecticut | #57 | 106 | 1 in 229 |
| Pennsylvania | #57 | 437 | 1 in 233 |
| Tennessee | #59 | 145 | 1 in 240 |
| South Carolina | #61 | 100 | 1 in 247 |
| North Carolina | #67 | 174 | 1 in 266 |
| Alabama | #73 | 111 | 1 in 289 |
| Delaware | #85 | 14 | 1 in 314 |
| Arkansas | #87 | 54 | 1 in 324 |
| New Jersey | #89 | 149 | 1 in 386 |
| Mississippi | #101 | 57 | 1 in 415 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Julie
- 110 spots since 2024 (#762 → #872)
- 258 spots since 2020 (#614 → #872)
- 418 spots since 2015 (#454 → #872)
- Biggest jump: 81 spots in 1889 (#486 → #405)
- Biggest drop: 126 spots in 1885 (#358 → #484)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1971 at #10 (15,322 births)
- Births halved by 1983, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: 1 yr · 1971
- Top 100: 41 yrs · run 1951–1991
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 95 girls born in 1969 were named Julie (1.1%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,218 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #10 in 1971, was only 1 in 109 (0.92%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 32.5% of all girls named Julie (166,150) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 244 | #342 (1880) | #414 |
| 1890s | 338 | #449 (1897) | #488 |
| 1900s | 489 | #447 (1905) | #487 |
| 1910s | 1,433 | #421 (1914) | #475 |
| 1920s | 2,049 | #449 (1929) | #482 |
| 1930s | 3,961 | #232 (1939) | #336 |
| 1940s | 19,035 | #113 (1949) | #146 |
| 1950s | 86,689 | #23 (1958) | #63 |
| 1960s | 166,150 | #12 (1969) | #18 |
| 1970s | 121,919 | #10 (1971) | #18 |
| 1980s | 61,682 | #32 (1980) | #54 |
| 1990s | 25,434 | #93 (1990) | #135 |
| 2000s | 12,478 | #190 (2000) | #271 |
| 2010s | 6,932 | #384 (2012) | #465 |
| 2020s | 2,420 | #614 (2020) | #720 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Julie in 1963
Top girls' names in 1963
Top boys' names in 1963
More about 1963
girls
1,927,507 girls got a published name in 1963; 1 in 118 of them was named Julie, which outranked 99.7% of the 7,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,031,078 boys got a published name in 1963; 1 in 72,539 of them was named Julie, which outranked 67.9% of the 4,621 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,455Silvester29
- #1,455Tate29
- #1,455Therman29
- #1,485Julie28
- #1,485Amado28
- #1,485Aundra28
- #1,485Barrie28
- #1,513Aloysius27
- #1,513Cassius27
- #1,513Christy27
Tied with 27 names at #1,485; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.