Kaidence
#3,645 for girls in 2025, 41 births · #5,608 for boys in 2025, 16 births
Given to girls 85.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2014 · 306 births
- Debut · girls
- 13 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,345since 2002
Kaidence over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,645 | 41 | #5,608 | 16 |
| 2024 | #4,207 | 34 | #4,701 | 21 |
| 2023 | #3,709 | 41 | #3,474 | 33 |
| 2022 | #3,123 | 52 | #3,617 | 31 |
| 2021 | #2,638 | 65 | #3,121 | 38 |
| 2020 | #2,341 | 75 | #2,689 | 46 |
| 2019 | #1,833 | 111 | #2,897 | 42 |
| 2018 | #1,532 | 142 | #3,373 | 33 |
| 2017 | #1,334 | 174 | #2,951 | 40 |
| 2016 | #1,257 | 194 | #2,726 | 44 |
| 2015 | #1,011 | 265 | #3,085 | 37 |
| 2014 | #887 | 306 | #3,617 | 29 |
| 2013 | #974 | 258 | #3,661 | 28 |
| 2012 | #1,243 | 195 | #4,131 | 24 |
| 2011 | #1,061 | 232 | #4,659 | 20 |
| 2010 | #1,206 | 200 | #6,036 | 14 |
| 2009 | #1,167 | 215 | #7,236 | 11 |
| 2008 | #1,421 | 167 | #7,187 | 11 |
| 2007 | #1,792 | 119 | #7,590 | 10 |
| 2006 | #1,615 | 132 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,553 | 131 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #1,464 | 138 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #3,232 | 45 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | — | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kaidence! It came in at #7,816, and was given to 13 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2002, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.
Where Kaidence is popular in 2015
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#419 · 1 in 1,683
- Mississippi#421 · 1 in 1,604
- Alabama#449 · 1 in 1,967
- South Carolina#572 · 1 in 2,625
- Georgia#617 · 1 in 3,043
Best ever in a state: #296 in Arkansas, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #419 | 10 | 1 in 1,683 |
| Mississippi | #421 | 7 | 1 in 1,604 |
| Alabama | #449 | 10 | 1 in 1,967 |
| South Carolina | #572 | 7 | 1 in 2,625 |
| Georgia | #617 | 16 | 1 in 3,043 |
| Louisiana | #662 | 7 | 1 in 3,041 |
| Michigan | #663 | 12 | 1 in 3,516 |
| Virginia | #672 | 11 | 1 in 3,407 |
| Ohio | #699 | 14 | 1 in 3,770 |
| North Carolina | #711 | 12 | 1 in 3,784 |
| Kentucky | #720 | 5 | 1 in 3,713 |
| Missouri | #741 | 7 | 1 in 3,885 |
| Washington | #765 | 8 | 1 in 3,918 |
| Maryland | #889 | 5 | 1 in 4,820 |
| Tennessee | #919 | 6 | 1 in 5,193 |
| Pennsylvania | #941 | 9 | 1 in 5,866 |
| Texas | #962 | 30 | 1 in 5,656 |
| Florida | #1,052 | 13 | 1 in 6,613 |
| Indiana | #1,072 | 5 | 1 in 6,126 |
| Illinois | #1,290 | 7 | 1 in 8,361 |
| New York | #1,491 | 9 | 1 in 10,147 |
| California | #2,717 | 7 | 1 in 29,334 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kaidence
- 562 spots since 2024 (#4,207 → #3,645)
- 1,304 spots since 2020 (#2,341 → #3,645)
- 2,634 spots since 2015 (#1,011 → #3,645)
- Biggest jump: 269 spots in 2013 (#1,243 → #974)
- Biggest drop: 124 spots in 2015 (#887 → #1,011)
- Debuted 2002
- Peaked 2014 at #887 (306 births)
- Births halved by 2018, 4 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 2013–2014
- Highest: 1 in 5,838 girls born in 2014 were named Kaidence (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 39,202 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 62.1% of all girls named Kaidence (2,077) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 960 | #1,167 (2009) | #2,508 |
| 2010s | 2,077 | #887 (2014) | #1,234 |
| 2020s | 308 | #2,341 (2020) | #3,277 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kaidence in 2015
Top girls' names in 2015
Top boys' names in 2015
More about 2015
girls
1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 6,736 of them was named Kaidence, which outranked 94.7% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,916,743 boys got a published name in 2015; 1 in 51,804 of them was named Kaidence, which outranked 78.1% of the 14,059 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,022Waleed38
- #3,022Yaniel38
- #3,022Zacarias38
- #3,085Kaidence37
- #3,085Aldair37
- #3,085Amarii37
- #3,085Boruch37
- #3,149Abdoulaye36
- #3,149Abdulmalik36
- #3,149Adhvik36
Tied with 63 names at #3,085; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.