Kate
#520 for girls in 2025, 576 births · Last seen for boys in 2005 at #11,472
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 299 births
- Debut · girls
- 299 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 7 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 85,987since 1880
Kate over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #520 | 576 | — | |
| 2024 | #533 | 572 | — | |
| 2023 | #478 | 640 | — | |
| 2022 | #456 | 695 | — | |
| 2021 | #414 | 758 | — | |
| 2020 | #411 | 765 | — | |
| 2019 | #323 | 989 | — | |
| 2018 | #285 | 1,163 | — | |
| 2017 | #274 | 1,170 | — | |
| 2016 | #234 | 1,389 | — | |
| 2015 | #222 | 1,477 | — | |
| 2014 | #208 | 1,620 | — | |
| 2013 | #185 | 1,738 | — | |
| 2012 | #192 | 1,643 | — | |
| 2011 | #175 | 1,791 | — | |
| 2010 | #208 | 1,490 | — | |
| 2009 | #159 | 1,989 | — | |
| 2008 | #139 | 2,421 | — | |
| 2007 | #136 | 2,550 | — | |
| 2006 | #142 | 2,441 | — | |
| 2005 | #141 | 2,404 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #147 | 2,218 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #161 | 2,055 | — | |
| 2002 | #193 | 1,667 | — | |
| 2001 | #200 | 1,626 | #8,339 | 7 |
| 2000 | #225 | 1,397 | — | |
| 1999 | #229 | 1,400 | — | |
| 1998 | #272 | 1,139 | — | |
| 1997 | #323 | 894 | — | |
| 1996 | #344 | 811 | — | |
| 1995 | #364 | 718 | — | |
| 1994 | #351 | 752 | — | |
| 1993 | #335 | 785 | — | |
| 1992 | #324 | 839 | — | |
| 1991 | #288 | 979 | — | |
| 1990 | #270 | 1,038 | — | |
| 1989 | #248 | 1,080 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #230 | 1,153 | — | |
| 1987 | #191 | 1,449 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #186 | 1,442 | #3,882 | 11 |
| 1985 | #179 | 1,491 | #5,785 | 6 |
| 1984 | #178 | 1,553 | #6,315 | 5 |
| 1983 | #199 | 1,333 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #202 | 1,341 | — | |
| 1981 | #192 | 1,397 | — | |
| 1980 | #197 | 1,329 | #4,495 | 8 |
| 1979 | #208 | 1,260 | #4,403 | 8 |
| 1978 | #243 | 998 | — | |
| 1977 | #290 | 828 | — | |
| 1976 | #387 | 530 | — | |
| 1975 | #422 | 477 | — | |
| 1974 | #500 | 352 | — | |
| 1973 | #578 | 275 | — | |
| 1972 | #610 | 257 | — | |
| 1971 | #682 | 225 | — | |
| 1970 | #597 | 294 | — | |
| 1969 | #662 | 224 | — | |
| 1968 | #694 | 195 | — | |
| 1967 | #750 | 172 | — | |
| 1966 | #736 | 179 | — | |
| 1965 | #690 | 203 | — | |
| 1964 | #713 | 211 | — | |
| 1963 | #707 | 207 | — | |
| 1962 | #698 | 218 | — | |
| 1961 | #706 | 220 | — | |
| 1960 | #707 | 208 | — | |
| 1959 | #773 | 173 | — | |
| 1958 | #806 | 156 | — | |
| 1957 | #790 | 163 | — | |
| 1956 | #969 | 108 | — | |
| 1955 | #883 | 121 | — | |
| 1954 | #965 | 101 | — | |
| 1953 | #867 | 117 | — | |
| 1952 | #921 | 101 | — | |
| 1951 | #846 | 112 | — | |
| 1950 | #855 | 107 | — | |
| 1949 | #835 | 111 | — | |
| 1948 | #837 | 109 | — | |
| 1947 | #791 | 120 | — | |
| 1946 | #881 | 89 | — | |
| 1945 | #863 | 76 | — | |
| 1944 | #808 | 89 | — | |
| 1943 | #768 | 102 | — | |
| 1942 | #752 | 101 | — | |
| 1941 | #669 | 111 | — | |
| 1940 | #718 | 94 | — | |
| 1939 | #655 | 107 | — | |
| 1938 | #705 | 95 | — | |
| 1937 | #752 | 81 | — | |
| 1936 | #683 | 95 | — | |
| 1935 | #635 | 105 | — | |
| 1934 | #689 | 94 | — | |
| 1933 | #714 | 83 | — | |
| 1932 | #688 | 97 | — | |
| 1931 | #667 | 99 | — | |
| 1930 | #652 | 111 | — | |
| 1929 | #621 | 122 | — | |
| 1928 | #615 | 131 | — | |
| 1927 | #577 | 151 | — | |
| 1926 | #547 | 164 | — | |
| 1925 | #544 | 173 | — | |
| 1924 | #468 | 222 | — | |
| 1923 | #458 | 225 | — | |
| 1922 | #443 | 234 | — | |
| 1921 | #398 | 289 | — | |
| 1920 | #415 | 255 | — | |
| 1919 | #368 | 309 | — | |
| 1918 | #378 | 302 | — | |
| 1917 | #350 | 322 | — | |
| 1916 | #346 | 318 | — | |
| 1915 | #325 | 339 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #296 | 311 | — | |
| 1913 | #297 | 257 | — | |
| 1912 | #281 | 260 | — | |
| 1911 | #264 | 216 | — | |
| 1910 | #270 | 206 | — | |
| 1909 | #265 | 183 | — | |
| 1908 | #251 | 191 | — | |
| 1907 | #254 | 184 | — | |
| 1906 | #223 | 196 | — | |
| 1905 | #234 | 183 | — | |
| 1904 | #207 | 213 | — | |
| 1903 | #208 | 202 | — | |
| 1902 | #200 | 213 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #202 | 196 | — | |
| 1900 | #180 | 297 | — | |
| 1899 | #187 | 219 | — | |
| 1898 | #168 | 297 | — | |
| 1897 | #167 | 267 | — | |
| 1896 | #154 | 303 | — | |
| 1895 | #162 | 262 | — | |
| 1894 | #133 | 328 | — | |
| 1893 | #132 | 323 | — | |
| 1892 | #126 | 345 | — | |
| 1891 | #127 | 305 | — | |
| 1890 | #116 | 352 | — | |
| 1889 | #105 | 362 | — | |
| 1888 | #107 | 360 | — | |
| 1887 | #102 | 331 | — | |
| 1886 | #100 | 335 | — | |
| 1885 | #96 | 309 | — | |
| 1884 | #86 | 344 | — | |
| 1883 | #90 | 294 | — | |
| 1882 | #87 | 293 | — | |
| 1881 | #86 | 267 | — | |
| 1880 | #79 | 299 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Kate was already there! It came in at #79, and was given to 299 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1930–1946, when fewer than 120 girls a year got the name.
Where Kate is popular in 1915
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Tennessee#154 · 1 in 670
- Alabama#161 · 1 in 776
- Virginia#167 · 1 in 958
- South Carolina#174 · 1 in 971
- Georgia#186 · 1 in 967
Best ever in a state: #22 in Utah, 2008.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee | #154 | 32 | 1 in 670 |
| Alabama | #161 | 30 | 1 in 776 |
| Virginia | #167 | 24 | 1 in 958 |
| South Carolina | #174 | 18 | 1 in 971 |
| Georgia | #186 | 30 | 1 in 967 |
| North Carolina | #189 | 27 | 1 in 1,073 |
| New York | #212 | 55 | 1 in 1,665 |
| Mississippi | #216 | 14 | 1 in 1,185 |
| Maryland | #222 | 6 | 1 in 1,998 |
| Florida | #268 | 5 | 1 in 1,679 |
| Kentucky | #290 | 11 | 1 in 2,144 |
| Louisiana | #350 | 7 | 1 in 2,404 |
| Arkansas | #353 | 6 | 1 in 2,581 |
| Michigan | #354 | 7 | 1 in 3,974 |
| Ohio | #373 | 9 | 1 in 5,071 |
| Missouri | #425 | 6 | 1 in 4,404 |
| Illinois | #552 | 6 | 1 in 8,881 |
| Texas | #562 | 10 | 1 in 4,312 |
| Pennsylvania | #613 | 5 | 1 in 17,448 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kate
- 13 spots since 2024 (#533 → #520)
- 109 spots since 2020 (#411 → #520)
- 298 spots since 2015 (#222 → #520)
- Biggest jump: 179 spots in 1957 (#969 → #790)
- Biggest drop: 98 spots in 1954 (#867 → #965)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #79 (299 births)
- Births halved by 1928, 48 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 7 yrs · run 1880–1886
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 304 girls born in 1880 were named Kate (0.33%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,790 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 24.2% of all girls named Kate (20,768) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #79 (1880) → #969 (1956) → #136 (2007)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,194 | #79 (1880) | #94 |
| 1890s | 3,001 | #116 (1890) | #147 |
| 1900s | 2,058 | #180 (1900) | #222 |
| 1910s | 2,840 | #264 (1911) | #318 |
| 1920s | 1,966 | #398 (1921) | #509 |
| 1930s | 967 | #635 (1935) | #684 |
| 1940s | 1,002 | #669 (1941) | #792 |
| 1950s | 1,259 | #773 (1959) | #868 |
| 1960s | 2,037 | #662 (1969) | #706 |
| 1970s | 5,496 | #208 (1979) | #452 |
| 1980s | 13,568 | #178 (1984) | #200 |
| 1990s | 9,355 | #229 (1999) | #310 |
| 2000s | 20,768 | #136 (2007) | #164 |
| 2010s | 14,470 | #175 (2011) | #231 |
| 2020s | 4,006 | #411 (2020) | #469 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kate in 1915
Top girls' names in 1915
Top boys' names in 1915
More about 1915
girls
983,852 girls got a published name in 1915; 1 in 2,902 of them was named Kate, which outranked 93.5% of the 4,967 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
848,575 boys got a published name in 1915; 1 in 169,715 of them was named Kate, which outranked 12.9% of the 4,390 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 565 names at #3,825; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.