Kelsey
#814 for girls in 2025, 335 births · #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
Given to girls 96.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1992 · 11,713 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 15 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 150,416since 1942
Kelsey over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #814 | 335 | #6,143 | 14 |
| 2024 | #673 | 430 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #663 | 444 | #7,289 | 11 |
| 2022 | #632 | 466 | #4,442 | 23 |
| 2021 | #623 | 477 | #7,089 | 11 |
| 2020 | #525 | 574 | #5,699 | 15 |
| 2019 | #470 | 664 | #5,555 | 16 |
| 2018 | #420 | 740 | #5,320 | 17 |
| 2017 | #396 | 788 | #4,935 | 19 |
| 2016 | #383 | 859 | #7,605 | 10 |
| 2015 | #343 | 955 | #5,058 | 18 |
| 2014 | #328 | 1,017 | #4,702 | 20 |
| 2013 | #304 | 1,049 | #6,603 | 12 |
| 2012 | #267 | 1,214 | #3,807 | 27 |
| 2011 | #254 | 1,266 | #3,994 | 25 |
| 2010 | #233 | 1,349 | #4,848 | 19 |
| 2009 | #212 | 1,521 | #4,160 | 24 |
| 2008 | #195 | 1,716 | #3,344 | 33 |
| 2007 | #201 | 1,699 | #3,025 | 38 |
| 2006 | #185 | 1,898 | #2,542 | 47 |
| 2005 | #173 | 1,960 | #2,803 | 38 |
| 2004 | #148 | 2,198 | #1,748 | 72 |
| 2003 | #130 | 2,569 | #2,470 | 42 |
| 2002 | #118 | 2,883 | #2,092 | 51 |
| 2001 | #100 | 3,267 | #1,659 | 70 |
| 2000 | #88 | 3,669 | #1,768 | 62 |
| 1999 | #72 | 4,400 | #1,320 | 91 |
| 1998 | #56 | 5,551 | #1,231 | 99 |
| 1997 | #57 | 5,573 | #1,198 | 99 |
| 1996 | #36 | 7,655 | #930 | 140 |
| 1995 | #33 | 8,184 | #862 | 157 |
| 1994 | #29 | 9,749 | #827 | 166 |
| 1993 | #24 | 11,380 | #829 | 161 |
| 1992 | #23 | 11,713 | #802 | 169 |
| 1991 | #26 | 11,435 | #747 | 186 |
| 1990 | #32 | 9,494 | #726 | 197 |
| 1989 | #31 | 9,256 | #631 | 250 |
| 1988 | #64 | 5,452 | #649 | 213 |
| 1987 | #67 | 4,574 | #720 | 161 |
| 1986 | #112 | 2,517 | #769 | 140 |
| 1985 | #168 | 1,699 | #805 | 121 |
| 1984 | #177 | 1,555 | #784 | 122 |
| 1983 | #224 | 1,116 | #813 | 115 |
| 1982 | #310 | 791 | #865 | 106 |
| 1981 | #434 | 490 | #890 | 100 |
| 1980 | #601 | 308 | #920 | 94 |
| 1979 | #737 | 222 | #926 | 90 |
| 1978 | #887 | 164 | #945 | 84 |
| 1977 | #959 | 144 | #928 | 84 |
| 1976 | #1,055 | 116 | #832 | 101 |
| 1975 | #1,111 | 105 | #841 | 97 |
| 1974 | #1,239 | 88 | #953 | 73 |
| 1973 | #1,312 | 77 | #941 | 73 |
| 1972 | #1,325 | 76 | #943 | 73 |
| 1971 | #1,456 | 71 | #965 | 71 |
| 1970 | #1,828 | 48 | #940 | 72 |
| 1969 | #1,835 | 45 | #1,280 | 38 |
| 1968 | #2,538 | 24 | #1,217 | 39 |
| 1967 | #2,079 | 32 | #1,573 | 24 |
| 1966 | #3,040 | 17 | #1,613 | 23 |
| 1965 | #3,149 | 16 | #1,918 | 17 |
| 1964 | #2,825 | 20 | #1,655 | 23 |
| 1963 | #2,619 | 22 | #1,902 | 18 |
| 1962 | #2,814 | 19 | #1,757 | 21 |
| 1961 | #2,957 | 18 | #2,148 | 15 |
| 1960 | #3,512 | 13 | #1,772 | 21 |
| 1959 | #3,104 | 15 | #1,588 | 25 |
| 1958 | #2,376 | 23 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1957 | #3,489 | 12 | #1,837 | 19 |
| 1956 | #3,493 | 12 | #1,676 | 22 |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | #2,219 | 13 |
| 1954 | #3,019 | 14 | #1,762 | 19 |
| 1953 | #2,516 | 18 | #2,099 | 14 |
| 1952 | #3,552 | 10 | #2,153 | 13 |
| 1951 | #3,714 | 9 | #1,838 | 17 |
| 1950 | #3,423 | 10 | #2,580 | 9 |
| 1949 | #4,673 | 6 | #1,501 | 24 |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 | #1,703 | 19 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #2,862 | 8 |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 | #1,813 | 16 |
| 1945 | #4,025 | 6 | #2,009 | 12 |
| 1944 | — | #2,080 | 12 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,182 | 12 | |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | #1,946 | 14 |
| 1941 | — | #2,207 | 11 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,671 | 8 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,288 | 10 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,084 | 12 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,828 | 15 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,629 | 8 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,719 | 8 | |
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,368 | 10 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,313 | 11 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,207 | 12 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,889 | 16 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,452 | 11 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,387 | 12 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,703 | 10 | |
| 1926 | — | #2,074 | 15 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,870 | 18 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,229 | 14 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,020 | 16 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,801 | 10 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,152 | 15 | |
| 1920 | — | #3,489 | 7 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,265 | 13 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,073 | 15 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,423 | 11 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,152 | 13 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,621 | 9 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,101 | 10 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,676 | 11 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,619 | 10 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | #1,589 | 5 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | #963 | 5 | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kelsey! It came in at #4,622, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1942–1944, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kelsey is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kentucky#42 · 1 in 185
- Wyoming#54 · 1 in 155
- Mississippi#58 · 1 in 269
- Nebraska#59 · 1 in 252
- West Virginia#61 · 1 in 255
Best ever in a state: #6 in Montana, 1992.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #42 | 104 | 1 in 185 |
| Wyoming | #54 | 8 | 1 in 155 |
| Mississippi | #58 | 42 | 1 in 269 |
| Nebraska | #59 | 33 | 1 in 252 |
| West Virginia | #61 | 28 | 1 in 255 |
| Tennessee | #64 | 94 | 1 in 319 |
| Louisiana | #66 | 70 | 1 in 293 |
| Montana | #66 | 12 | 1 in 229 |
| Arkansas | #71 | 40 | 1 in 296 |
| South Carolina | #73 | 48 | 1 in 344 |
| Missouri | #77 | 82 | 1 in 340 |
| Ohio | #80 | 151 | 1 in 385 |
| Virginia | #80 | 97 | 1 in 368 |
| Iowa | #81 | 41 | 1 in 329 |
| Indiana | #83 | 85 | 1 in 380 |
| Alabama | #85 | 48 | 1 in 406 |
| Oklahoma | #85 | 44 | 1 in 378 |
| Rhode Island | #87 | 13 | 1 in 301 |
| New Hampshire | #90 | 13 | 1 in 349 |
| South Dakota | #90 | 10 | 1 in 295 |
| Kansas | #91 | 36 | 1 in 374 |
| Vermont | #91 | 6 | 1 in 268 |
| Minnesota | #94 | 63 | 1 in 403 |
| North Carolina | #94 | 95 | 1 in 457 |
| Georgia | #95 | 103 | 1 in 470 |
| Michigan | #95 | 114 | 1 in 428 |
| Maine | #96 | 13 | 1 in 339 |
| Idaho | #98 | 17 | 1 in 366 |
| Pennsylvania | #98 | 122 | 1 in 453 |
| Maryland | #100 | 53 | 1 in 448 |
| Massachusetts | #102 | 74 | 1 in 415 |
| Alaska | #104 | 7 | 1 in 326 |
| Delaware | #105 | 8 | 1 in 380 |
| Utah | #109 | 42 | 1 in 419 |
| Illinois | #110 | 137 | 1 in 501 |
| Oregon | #117 | 33 | 1 in 486 |
| Connecticut | #119 | 32 | 1 in 457 |
| New Jersey | #126 | 69 | 1 in 597 |
| Wisconsin | #130 | 44 | 1 in 565 |
| Colorado | #135 | 45 | 1 in 552 |
| Hawaii | #136 | 7 | 1 in 466 |
| Florida | #138 | 118 | 1 in 653 |
| Washington | #142 | 46 | 1 in 618 |
| North Dakota | #149 | 5 | 1 in 463 |
| New York | #150 | 135 | 1 in 718 |
| Texas | #197 | 168 | 1 in 928 |
| Nevada | #205 | 13 | 1 in 785 |
| Arizona | #214 | 36 | 1 in 902 |
| District of Columbia | #229 | 5 | 1 in 697 |
| California | #261 | 166 | 1 in 1,342 |
| New Mexico | #286 | 8 | 1 in 1,041 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kelsey
- 141 spots since 2024 (#673 → #814)
- 289 spots since 2020 (#525 → #814)
- 471 spots since 2015 (#343 → #814)
- Biggest jump: 167 spots in 1981 (#601 → #434)
- Biggest drop: 141 spots in 2025 (#673 → #814)
- Debuted 1942
- Peaked 1992 at #23 (11,713 births)
- Births halved by 1997, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 15 yrs · run 1987–2001
- Top 1,000: 49 yrs · run 1977–2025
- Highest: 1 in 157 girls born in 1992 were named Kelsey (0.64%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,798 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 56.6% of all girls named Kelsey (85,134) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 41 | #3,593 (1948) | #4,152 |
| 1950s | 139 | #2,376 (1958) | #3,153 |
| 1960s | 226 | #1,835 (1969) | #2,737 |
| 1970s | 1,111 | #737 (1979) | #1,191 |
| 1980s | 27,758 | #31 (1989) | #219 |
| 1990s | 85,134 | #23 (1992) | #39 |
| 2000s | 23,380 | #88 (2000) | #155 |
| 2010s | 9,901 | #233 (2010) | #340 |
| 2020s | 2,726 | #525 (2020) | #655 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kelsey in 2002
Top girls' names in 2002
Top boys' names in 2002
More about 2002
girls
1,796,882 girls got a published name in 2002; 1 in 623 of them was named Kelsey, which outranked 99.3% of the 18,086 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,941,514 boys got a published name in 2002; 1 in 38,069 of them was named Kelsey, which outranked 83.2% of the 12,489 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 12.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,068Treston52
- #2,068Treyson52
- #2,068Zuriel52
- #2,092Kelsey51
- #2,092Anwar51
- #2,092Bodhi51
- #2,092Boyd51
- #2,125Aj50
- #2,125Al50
- #2,125Aramis50
Tied with 32 names at #2,092; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.