Lucious
Last seen for girls in 1915 at #4,274 · #4,139 for boys in 2025, 25 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1884 · 20 births
- Debut · boys
- 10 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,831since 1880
Lucious over time
Rank among boys' names. Lucious has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #4,139 | 25 | |
| 2024 | — | #4,072 | 26 | |
| 2023 | — | #4,456 | 23 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,464 | 33 | |
| 2021 | — | #3,427 | 33 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,811 | 27 | |
| 2019 | — | #3,636 | 30 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,848 | 42 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,715 | 45 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,412 | 53 | |
| 2015 | — | #3,085 | 37 | |
| 2014 | — | #4,866 | 19 | |
| 2013 | — | #4,621 | 20 | |
| 2012 | — | #4,131 | 24 | |
| 2011 | — | #4,983 | 18 | |
| 2010 | — | #4,099 | 24 | |
| 2009 | — | #4,035 | 25 | |
| 2008 | — | #5,067 | 18 | |
| 2007 | — | #3,591 | 29 | |
| 2006 | — | #3,083 | 35 | |
| 2005 | — | #3,091 | 33 | |
| 2004 | — | #8,143 | 8 | |
| 2003 | — | #5,558 | 13 | |
| 2002 | — | #6,522 | 10 | |
| 2001 | — | #5,142 | 14 | |
| 2000 | — | #6,316 | 10 | |
| 1999 | — | #9,912 | 5 | |
| 1998 | — | #5,840 | 10 | |
| 1997 | — | #5,288 | 11 | |
| 1996 | — | #3,678 | 18 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | #3,030 | 23 | |
| 1993 | — | #5,360 | 10 | |
| 1992 | — | #4,872 | 11 | |
| 1991 | — | #3,224 | 19 | |
| 1990 | — | #3,971 | 14 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,809 | 14 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,509 | 23 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,072 | 16 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,684 | 19 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,828 | 17 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,706 | 17 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,341 | 21 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,426 | 20 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,138 | 24 | |
| 1980 | — | #2,284 | 22 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,670 | 34 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,279 | 20 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,008 | 24 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,329 | 19 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,704 | 29 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,129 | 20 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,736 | 26 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,680 | 27 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,705 | 27 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,794 | 24 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,680 | 24 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,614 | 24 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,364 | 31 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,540 | 25 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,669 | 22 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,510 | 27 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,354 | 33 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,279 | 37 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,279 | 38 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,273 | 38 | |
| 1959 | — | #946 | 66 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,091 | 49 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,075 | 50 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,019 | 54 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,033 | 53 | |
| 1954 | — | #851 | 73 | |
| 1953 | — | #939 | 58 | |
| 1952 | — | #915 | 60 | |
| 1951 | — | #857 | 66 | |
| 1950 | — | #885 | 60 | |
| 1949 | — | #793 | 75 | |
| 1948 | — | #891 | 59 | |
| 1947 | — | #916 | 58 | |
| 1946 | — | #878 | 56 | |
| 1945 | — | #817 | 58 | |
| 1944 | — | #898 | 50 | |
| 1943 | — | #908 | 54 | |
| 1942 | — | #970 | 47 | |
| 1941 | — | #918 | 48 | |
| 1940 | — | #952 | 45 | |
| 1939 | — | #867 | 50 | |
| 1938 | — | #860 | 52 | |
| 1937 | — | #793 | 60 | |
| 1936 | — | #893 | 47 | |
| 1935 | — | #881 | 51 | |
| 1934 | — | #853 | 54 | |
| 1933 | — | #895 | 48 | |
| 1932 | — | #812 | 62 | |
| 1931 | — | #997 | 44 | |
| 1930 | — | #841 | 60 | |
| 1929 | — | #826 | 62 | |
| 1928 | — | #826 | 63 | |
| 1927 | — | #825 | 65 | |
| 1926 | — | #731 | 76 | |
| 1925 | — | #835 | 63 | |
| 1924 | — | #859 | 64 | |
| 1923 | — | #769 | 73 | |
| 1922 | — | #780 | 73 | |
| 1921 | — | #981 | 51 | |
| 1920 | — | #947 | 53 | |
| 1919 | — | #766 | 71 | |
| 1918 | — | #796 | 67 | |
| 1917 | — | #765 | 67 | |
| 1916 | — | #797 | 60 | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #791 | 58 |
| 1914 | — | #645 | 61 | |
| 1913 | — | #720 | 41 | |
| 1912 | — | #668 | 40 | |
| 1911 | — | #707 | 20 | |
| 1910 | — | #492 | 32 | |
| 1909 | — | #505 | 26 | |
| 1908 | — | #632 | 17 | |
| 1907 | — | #495 | 22 | |
| 1906 | — | #798 | 10 | |
| 1905 | — | #491 | 21 | |
| 1904 | — | #538 | 17 | |
| 1903 | — | #619 | 13 | |
| 1902 | — | #556 | 15 | |
| 1901 | — | #433 | 19 | |
| 1900 | — | #446 | 26 | |
| 1899 | — | #548 | 13 | |
| 1898 | — | #485 | 18 | |
| 1897 | — | #615 | 12 | |
| 1896 | — | #592 | 13 | |
| 1895 | — | #437 | 20 | |
| 1894 | — | #668 | 10 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #688 | 10 | |
| 1891 | — | #441 | 16 | |
| 1890 | — | #566 | 12 | |
| 1889 | — | #525 | 13 | |
| 1888 | — | #580 | 12 | |
| 1887 | — | #438 | 15 | |
| 1886 | — | #431 | 17 | |
| 1885 | — | #577 | 11 | |
| 1884 | — | #399 | 20 | |
| 1883 | — | #597 | 10 | |
| 1882 | — | #437 | 17 | |
| 1881 | — | #416 | 17 | |
| 1880 | — | #600 | 10 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lucious was already there! It came in at #600, and was given to 10 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1995, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Lucious is popular in 1915
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#209 · 1 in 1,509
- Georgia#210 · 1 in 1,540
- Louisiana#326 · 1 in 2,340
- Texas#488 · 1 in 4,113
Best ever in a state: #122 in Georgia, 1914.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #209 | 10 | 1 in 1,509 |
| Georgia | #210 | 16 | 1 in 1,540 |
| Louisiana | #326 | 6 | 1 in 2,340 |
| Texas | #488 | 9 | 1 in 4,113 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lucious
- 67 spots since 2024 (#4,072 → #4,139)
- 328 spots since 2020 (#3,811 → #4,139)
- 1,054 spots since 2015 (#3,085 → #4,139)
- Biggest jump: 303 spots in 1907 (#798 → #495)
- Biggest drop: 327 spots in 1960 (#946 → #1,273)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1884 at #399 (20 births)
- Births halved by 1892, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 76 yrs · run 1880–1954
- Highest: 1 in 5,604 boys born in 1901 were named Lucious (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 68,323 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #399 in 1884, was only 1 in 5,722 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 13.3% of all boys named Lucious (643) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 142 | #399 (1884) | #500 |
| 1890s | 139 | #437 (1895) | #552 |
| 1900s | 186 | #433 (1901) | #551 |
| 1910s | 517 | #492 (1910) | #715 |
| 1920s | 643 | #731 (1926) | #838 |
| 1930s | 528 | #793 (1937) | #869 |
| 1940s | 550 | #793 (1949) | #894 |
| 1950s | 589 | #851 (1954) | #961 |
| 1960s | 299 | #1,273 (1960) | #1,456 |
| 1970s | 250 | #1,670 (1979) | #1,903 |
| 1980s | 193 | #2,138 (1981) | #2,680 |
| 1990s | 121 | #3,030 (1994) | #5,019 |
| 2000s | 195 | #3,083 (2006) | #5,055 |
| 2010s | 312 | #2,412 (2016) | #3,740 |
| 2020s | 167 | #3,427 (2021) | #3,895 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lucious in 1915
Top girls' names in 1915
Top boys' names in 1915
More about 1915
girls
983,852 girls got a published name in 1915; 1 in 196,770 of them was named Lucious, which outranked 14.0% of the 4,967 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 693 names at #4,274; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
848,575 boys got a published name in 1915; 1 in 14,631 of them was named Lucious, which outranked 82.0% of the 4,390 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #785Myles59
- #785Roberto59
- #785Theadore59
- #791Lucious58
- #791Audrey58
- #791Brady58
- #791Carmelo58
- #804Alec57
- #804Archibald57
- #804Cedric57
Tied with 12 names at #791; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.