Lyle

#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · #1,046 for boys in 2025, 211 births
Given to boys 98.3% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1918 · 993 births
Debut · boys
7 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
59,190
since 1880

Lyle over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Lyle has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201990peak #145, 1918boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#14,9425#1,046211
2024—#1,019219
2023#11,1698#1,105192
2022#9,68010#1,052209
2021#11,1468#1,006217
2020—#1,010207
2019#12,4487#927235
2018#15,6825#946220
2017—#993205
2016#14,3316#980208
2015—#1,077183
2014#10,12910#1,110172
2013#10,23510#1,100168
2012—#1,299133
2011—#1,257137
2010—#1,565101
2009—#1,76286
2008—#1,86178
2007—#1,72886
2006—#1,467104
2005#16,4625#1,63583
2004—#1,62979
2003—#1,233117
2002—#1,268107
2001—#1,307100
2000—#1,271102
1999#11,3857#1,30393
1998—#1,24697
1997—#1,045122
1996—#1,037118
1995—#926143
1994—#886149
1993—#834159
1992—#752189
1991—#765179
1990—#633257
1989—#627252
1988—#591248
1987—#567253
1986—#512297
1985—#564246
1984—#542255
1983—#530247
1982#9,2376#574224
1981—#533246
1980—#524268
1979#10,2105#544246
1978#8,5626#539235
1977—#485279
1976—#540221
1975—#508247
1974—#484271
1973—#460287
1972#7,2926#448313
1971#8,3245#406395
1970#5,4139#376465
1969#6,6176#376435
1968—#373434
1967—#389377
1966—#358435
1965—#359454
1964#5,4747#345515
1963—#329575
1962#4,26310#306644
1961#4,5469#302659
1960#5,1687#290731
1959#5,5666#286761
1958#4,1939#276770
1957#4,5368#261838
1956#3,04815#258794
1955#4,3768#246821
1954#3,49011#237889
1953#2,59517#226891
1952#2,58117#222897
1951#2,69415#232815
1950#2,65215#223828
1949#4,2357#219835
1948#2,82813#216864
1947#4,0078#212904
1946#3,03411#200859
1945#3,3888#194766
1944#2,62512#189813
1943#2,25116#185884
1942#3,1949#176890
1941#2,53212#168939
1940#2,73710#173864
1939#2,9229#175834
1938#3,8476#183790
1937#2,44812#167875
1936#2,15314#159910
1935#2,9269#155934
1934#2,08715#154939
1933#2,8689#158916
1932#2,03716#155969
1931#1,68621#157944
1930#1,87519#160947
1929#2,30114#1521,007
1928#2,19416#155999
1927#2,16917#1511,054
1926#1,83022#1521,051
1925#1,84722#1541,012
1924#1,81123#1591,000
1923#1,94420#1531,011
1922#2,29116#1461,055
1921#1,43732#1501,007
1920#1,51129#151967
1919#1,64924#153877
1918#2,10217#145993
1917#1,43127#153855
1916#2,02816#152806
1915#1,88317#159719
1914#1,17527#178495
1913#1,46516#196342
1912#1,42115#180325
1911#1,37212#223128
1910#1,7738#216117
1909—#26272
1908#1,6767#24575
1907#1,5128#23376
1906#1,9515#19593
1905#1,23810#24961
1904—#21574
1903—#22366
1902#1,4387#27248
1901#1,6795#22360
1900#1,7236#29749
1899—#25742
1898#1,1719#23356
1897#1,03710#28839
1896#1,04710#31535
1895—#27940
1894#1,1368#24948
1893#1,1757#32329
1892#1,4505#34829
1891—#29731
1890#1,3385#37622
1889—#43418
1888#1,0367#39822
1887—#40917
1886—#54012
1885—#52113
1884—#54712
1883—#7207
1882—#54012
1881—#7816
1880—#7457
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lyle was already there! It came in at #745, and was given to 7 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.

Where Lyle is popular in 1990

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedNHWashington: #381 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 3,582 boysWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedIDMontana: #178 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 939 boysMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #316 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 3,966 boysMNIllinois: #588 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 6,863 boysILWisconsin: #490 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 6,658 boysWIMichigan: #403 for boys · 17 births · 1 in 4,177 boysMINew York: #862 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 12,622 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedIAIndiana: #394 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 4,502 boysINOhio: #652 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 11,401 boysOHPennsylvania: #788 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 16,456 boysPANew Jersey: #594 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 7,824 boysNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #728 for boys · 28 births · 1 in 10,367 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedUTColorado: #461 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 4,887 boysCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedDEArizona: #406 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 3,419 boysAZNew Mexico: #167 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 816 boysNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #570 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 5,208 boysLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Lyle, so not publishedGAHawaii: #231 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 1,202 boysHITexas: #782 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 10,946 boysTXFlorida: #535 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 5,732 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. New Mexico#167 · 1 in 816
  2. Montana#178 · 1 in 939
  3. Hawaii#231 · 1 in 1,202
  4. Minnesota#316 · 1 in 3,966
  5. Washington#381 · 1 in 3,582

Best ever in a state: #20 in South Dakota, 1928.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#167141 in 816
Montana#17851 in 939
Hawaii#23161 in 1,202
Minnesota#31681 in 3,966
Washington#381101 in 3,582
Indiana#39491 in 4,502
Michigan#403171 in 4,177
Arizona#40691 in 3,419
Colorado#46151 in 4,887
Wisconsin#49051 in 6,658
Florida#535161 in 5,732
Louisiana#57061 in 5,208
Illinois#588131 in 6,863
New Jersey#59471 in 7,824
Ohio#65271 in 11,401
California#728281 in 10,367
Texas#782141 in 10,946
Pennsylvania#78851 in 16,456
New York#862111 in 12,622
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lyle
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 27 spots since 2024 (#1,019 → #1,046)
  • 36 spots since 2020 (#1,010 → #1,046)
  • 31 spots since 2015 (#1,077 → #1,046)
  • Biggest jump: 241 spots in 1882 (#781 → #540)
  • Biggest drop: 180 spots in 1883 (#540 → #720)
Rise & fade · boys
38 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1918 at #145 (993 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 47 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 120 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1880–1995
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,021
  • Highest: 1 in 1,021 boys born in 1918 were named Lyle (0.10%)
  • Latest: 1 in 8,095 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 17.2% of all boys named Lyle (10,163) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s126#398 (1888)#564
1890s371#233 (1898)#297
1900s674#195 (1906)#241
1910s5,657#145 (1918)#176
1920s10,163#146 (1922)#152
1930s9,058#154 (1934)#162
1940s8,618#168 (1941)#193
1950s8,304#222 (1952)#247
1960s5,259#290 (1960)#343
1970s2,959#376 (1970)#479
1980s2,536#512 (1986)#556
1990s1,506#633 (1990)#943
2000s942#1,233 (2003)#1,516
2010s1,762#927 (2019)#1,125
2020s1,255#1,006 (2021)#1,040

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lyle in 1990

boys
#633
257 births · 1 in 7,992 boys

Top boys' names in 1990

  1. #1Michael65,321
  2. #2Christopher52,362
  3. #3Matthew44,826
  4. #4Joshua43,237
  5. #5Daniel33,830
  6. #6David33,748
  7. #7Andrew33,673
  8. #8James32,359
  9. #9Justin30,649
  10. #10Joseph30,137
  11. #633Lyle257
More about 1990

boys

2,054,038 boys got a published name in 1990; 1 in 7,992 of them was named Lyle, which outranked 93.3% of the 9,493 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 19.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lyle
  1. #630Loren261
  2. #631Lester260
  3. #632Darian259
  4. #633Lyle257
  5. #634Jarod255
  6. #635Bradly254
  7. #636Herman252
Biggest movers since 1989
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,636Tevin#4,017 → #381
  2. ↑ 3,283Keenen#4,271 → #988
  3. ↑ 1,325Male#2,027 → #702
  4. ↑ 1,032Denzel#1,476 → #444
  5. ↑ 598Kevon#1,476 → #878
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,130Kiara#956 → #2,086
  2. ↓ 916Rachel#993 → #1,909
  3. ↓ 855Nicole#985 → #1,840
  4. ↓ 746Tiffany#956 → #1,702
  5. ↓ 681Sarah#819 → #1,500

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1990 →