Mackenzie
#228 for girls in 2025, 1,343 births · #1,668 for boys in 2025, 99 births
Given to girls 94.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2001 · 6,934 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 23 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 141,274since 1973
Mackenzie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #228 | 1,343 | #1,668 | 99 |
| 2024 | #200 | 1,524 | #1,862 | 86 |
| 2023 | #167 | 1,744 | #1,817 | 88 |
| 2022 | #142 | 2,036 | #2,039 | 74 |
| 2021 | #123 | 2,277 | #2,225 | 63 |
| 2020 | #119 | 2,297 | #2,658 | 47 |
| 2019 | #111 | 2,591 | #2,736 | 46 |
| 2018 | #106 | 2,827 | #3,240 | 35 |
| 2017 | #100 | 2,962 | #3,249 | 35 |
| 2016 | #85 | 3,410 | #3,776 | 28 |
| 2015 | #73 | 3,869 | #3,591 | 30 |
| 2014 | #69 | 4,160 | #3,532 | 30 |
| 2013 | #62 | 4,024 | #2,763 | 42 |
| 2012 | #71 | 3,764 | #3,625 | 29 |
| 2011 | #68 | 3,799 | #3,994 | 25 |
| 2010 | #68 | 3,883 | #3,181 | 35 |
| 2009 | #77 | 3,902 | #2,753 | 44 |
| 2008 | #65 | 4,474 | #3,057 | 38 |
| 2007 | #65 | 4,628 | #2,372 | 54 |
| 2006 | #53 | 5,205 | #1,943 | 69 |
| 2005 | #51 | 5,199 | #1,659 | 81 |
| 2004 | #44 | 5,728 | #1,367 | 106 |
| 2003 | #45 | 5,865 | #1,529 | 84 |
| 2002 | #42 | 6,268 | #1,079 | 139 |
| 2001 | #40 | 6,934 | #912 | 171 |
| 2000 | #43 | 6,350 | #697 | 252 |
| 1999 | #52 | 5,426 | #630 | 285 |
| 1998 | #64 | 4,890 | #625 | 292 |
| 1997 | #71 | 4,491 | #526 | 380 |
| 1996 | #75 | 4,597 | #470 | 465 |
| 1995 | #88 | 3,963 | #398 | 579 |
| 1994 | #102 | 3,196 | #366 | 648 |
| 1993 | #113 | 2,897 | #401 | 575 |
| 1992 | #125 | 2,673 | #411 | 548 |
| 1991 | #198 | 1,494 | #495 | 398 |
| 1990 | #247 | 1,151 | #524 | 355 |
| 1989 | #307 | 855 | #531 | 327 |
| 1988 | #321 | 774 | #571 | 261 |
| 1987 | #341 | 711 | #607 | 223 |
| 1986 | #439 | 490 | #738 | 151 |
| 1985 | #482 | 433 | #889 | 104 |
| 1984 | #555 | 337 | #1,000 | 79 |
| 1983 | #635 | 271 | #1,347 | 48 |
| 1982 | #693 | 254 | #1,539 | 40 |
| 1981 | #700 | 240 | #1,396 | 46 |
| 1980 | #721 | 232 | #1,410 | 45 |
| 1979 | #864 | 179 | #1,510 | 39 |
| 1978 | #694 | 229 | #1,616 | 34 |
| 1977 | #666 | 237 | #1,268 | 49 |
| 1976 | #837 | 165 | #1,427 | 39 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #2,751 | 14 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Mackenzie! It came in at #7,435, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1973–1974, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Mackenzie is popular in 1999
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Hampshire#23 · 1 in 101
- Indiana#28 · 1 in 154
- Alaska#29 · 1 in 118
- Idaho#29 · 1 in 139
- Missouri#29 · 1 in 157
Best ever in a state: #6 in Wyoming, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #23 | 47 | 1 in 101 |
| Indiana | #28 | 215 | 1 in 154 |
| Alaska | #29 | 20 | 1 in 118 |
| Idaho | #29 | 43 | 1 in 139 |
| Missouri | #29 | 186 | 1 in 157 |
| Iowa | #30 | 92 | 1 in 149 |
| South Dakota | #30 | 24 | 1 in 127 |
| Michigan | #31 | 301 | 1 in 170 |
| Maine | #32 | 35 | 1 in 126 |
| Ohio | #32 | 357 | 1 in 172 |
| Rhode Island | #32 | 30 | 1 in 138 |
| Montana | #34 | 20 | 1 in 139 |
| Wyoming | #34 | 12 | 1 in 100 |
| Washington | #39 | 141 | 1 in 207 |
| Minnesota | #40 | 131 | 1 in 191 |
| Oklahoma | #40 | 88 | 1 in 190 |
| Pennsylvania | #40 | 308 | 1 in 188 |
| Wisconsin | #40 | 142 | 1 in 178 |
| North Carolina | #43 | 185 | 1 in 230 |
| West Virginia | #43 | 43 | 1 in 169 |
| Nebraska | #44 | 41 | 1 in 195 |
| South Carolina | #44 | 84 | 1 in 202 |
| Colorado | #45 | 106 | 1 in 218 |
| Kansas | #45 | 63 | 1 in 208 |
| Massachusetts | #53 | 128 | 1 in 245 |
| Vermont | #54 | 11 | 1 in 162 |
| Illinois | #55 | 241 | 1 in 290 |
| Tennessee | #55 | 114 | 1 in 269 |
| Alabama | #56 | 80 | 1 in 264 |
| Connecticut | #56 | 67 | 1 in 229 |
| Kentucky | #56 | 81 | 1 in 248 |
| Virginia | #56 | 129 | 1 in 266 |
| Florida | #61 | 235 | 1 in 318 |
| North Dakota | #63 | 13 | 1 in 201 |
| Georgia | #64 | 150 | 1 in 305 |
| Oregon | #67 | 59 | 1 in 276 |
| Maryland | #71 | 75 | 1 in 319 |
| Arizona | #72 | 86 | 1 in 354 |
| New York | #74 | 252 | 1 in 396 |
| Arkansas | #75 | 38 | 1 in 310 |
| New Jersey | #75 | 117 | 1 in 355 |
| Delaware | #76 | 12 | 1 in 259 |
| Nevada | #84 | 27 | 1 in 342 |
| Utah | #88 | 46 | 1 in 361 |
| Texas | #97 | 339 | 1 in 434 |
| District of Columbia | #103 | 10 | 1 in 342 |
| New Mexico | #104 | 23 | 1 in 353 |
| Mississippi | #134 | 20 | 1 in 590 |
| Louisiana | #148 | 35 | 1 in 630 |
| California | #150 | 320 | 1 in 685 |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mackenzie
- 28 spots since 2024 (#200 → #228)
- 109 spots since 2020 (#119 → #228)
- 155 spots since 2015 (#73 → #228)
- Biggest jump: 3,533 spots in 1976 (#4,370 → #837)
- Biggest drop: 170 spots in 1979 (#694 → #864)
- Debuted 1973
- Peaked 2001 at #40 (6,934 births)
- Births halved by 2016, 15 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 23 yrs · run 1995–2017
- Top 1,000: 50 yrs · run 1976–2025
- Highest: 1 in 260 girls born in 2001 were named Mackenzie (0.39%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,197 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
- 38.6% of all girls named Mackenzie (54,553) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1974, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 836 | #666 (1977) | #3,221 |
| 1980s | 4,597 | #307 (1989) | #519 |
| 1990s | 34,778 | #52 (1999) | #114 |
| 2000s | 54,553 | #40 (2001) | #53 |
| 2010s | 35,289 | #62 (2013) | #81 |
| 2020s | 11,221 | #119 (2020) | #163 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mackenzie in 1999
Top girls' names in 1999
Top boys' names in 1999
More about 1999
girls
1,773,823 girls got a published name in 1999; 1 in 327 of them was named Mackenzie, which outranked 99.7% of the 16,947 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,920,150 boys got a published name in 1999; 1 in 6,737 of them was named Mackenzie, which outranked 94.6% of the 11,614 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 14.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.