Mackenzie
#228 for girls in 2025, 1,343 births · #1,668 for boys in 2025, 99 births
Given to girls 94.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2001 · 6,934 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 23 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 141,274since 1973
Mackenzie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #228 | 1,343 | #1,668 | 99 |
| 2024 | #200 | 1,524 | #1,862 | 86 |
| 2023 | #167 | 1,744 | #1,817 | 88 |
| 2022 | #142 | 2,036 | #2,039 | 74 |
| 2021 | #123 | 2,277 | #2,225 | 63 |
| 2020 | #119 | 2,297 | #2,658 | 47 |
| 2019 | #111 | 2,591 | #2,736 | 46 |
| 2018 | #106 | 2,827 | #3,240 | 35 |
| 2017 | #100 | 2,962 | #3,249 | 35 |
| 2016 | #85 | 3,410 | #3,776 | 28 |
| 2015 | #73 | 3,869 | #3,591 | 30 |
| 2014 | #69 | 4,160 | #3,532 | 30 |
| 2013 | #62 | 4,024 | #2,763 | 42 |
| 2012 | #71 | 3,764 | #3,625 | 29 |
| 2011 | #68 | 3,799 | #3,994 | 25 |
| 2010 | #68 | 3,883 | #3,181 | 35 |
| 2009 | #77 | 3,902 | #2,753 | 44 |
| 2008 | #65 | 4,474 | #3,057 | 38 |
| 2007 | #65 | 4,628 | #2,372 | 54 |
| 2006 | #53 | 5,205 | #1,943 | 69 |
| 2005 | #51 | 5,199 | #1,659 | 81 |
| 2004 | #44 | 5,728 | #1,367 | 106 |
| 2003 | #45 | 5,865 | #1,529 | 84 |
| 2002 | #42 | 6,268 | #1,079 | 139 |
| 2001 | #40 | 6,934 | #912 | 171 |
| 2000 | #43 | 6,350 | #697 | 252 |
| 1999 | #52 | 5,426 | #630 | 285 |
| 1998 | #64 | 4,890 | #625 | 292 |
| 1997 | #71 | 4,491 | #526 | 380 |
| 1996 | #75 | 4,597 | #470 | 465 |
| 1995 | #88 | 3,963 | #398 | 579 |
| 1994 | #102 | 3,196 | #366 | 648 |
| 1993 | #113 | 2,897 | #401 | 575 |
| 1992 | #125 | 2,673 | #411 | 548 |
| 1991 | #198 | 1,494 | #495 | 398 |
| 1990 | #247 | 1,151 | #524 | 355 |
| 1989 | #307 | 855 | #531 | 327 |
| 1988 | #321 | 774 | #571 | 261 |
| 1987 | #341 | 711 | #607 | 223 |
| 1986 | #439 | 490 | #738 | 151 |
| 1985 | #482 | 433 | #889 | 104 |
| 1984 | #555 | 337 | #1,000 | 79 |
| 1983 | #635 | 271 | #1,347 | 48 |
| 1982 | #693 | 254 | #1,539 | 40 |
| 1981 | #700 | 240 | #1,396 | 46 |
| 1980 | #721 | 232 | #1,410 | 45 |
| 1979 | #864 | 179 | #1,510 | 39 |
| 1978 | #694 | 229 | #1,616 | 34 |
| 1977 | #666 | 237 | #1,268 | 49 |
| 1976 | #837 | 165 | #1,427 | 39 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #2,751 | 14 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Mackenzie! It came in at #7,435, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1973–1974, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Mackenzie is popular in 2018
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Hampshire#46 · 1 in 170
- Maine#47 · 1 in 180
- New Jersey#48 · 1 in 272
- Rhode Island#53 · 1 in 199
- Massachusetts#55 · 1 in 265
Best ever in a state: #6 in Wyoming, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #46 | 21 | 1 in 170 |
| Maine | #47 | 19 | 1 in 180 |
| New Jersey | #48 | 132 | 1 in 272 |
| Rhode Island | #53 | 14 | 1 in 199 |
| Massachusetts | #55 | 93 | 1 in 265 |
| Connecticut | #56 | 44 | 1 in 263 |
| Montana | #62 | 13 | 1 in 210 |
| Pennsylvania | #62 | 154 | 1 in 327 |
| Michigan | #68 | 111 | 1 in 363 |
| Maryland | #71 | 67 | 1 in 348 |
| New York | #73 | 203 | 1 in 427 |
| Virginia | #81 | 91 | 1 in 395 |
| Ohio | #82 | 120 | 1 in 425 |
| Illinois | #85 | 124 | 1 in 432 |
| North Carolina | #85 | 107 | 1 in 421 |
| District of Columbia | #86 | 11 | 1 in 276 |
| Wisconsin | #90 | 56 | 1 in 397 |
| Alaska | #91 | 8 | 1 in 256 |
| Missouri | #99 | 58 | 1 in 457 |
| Florida | #101 | 166 | 1 in 513 |
| West Virginia | #105 | 15 | 1 in 375 |
| Mississippi | #110 | 23 | 1 in 467 |
| Nebraska | #111 | 18 | 1 in 416 |
| Nevada | #112 | 23 | 1 in 462 |
| Colorado | #113 | 46 | 1 in 484 |
| Indiana | #113 | 56 | 1 in 531 |
| Delaware | #118 | 7 | 1 in 355 |
| Arizona | #123 | 51 | 1 in 576 |
| Hawaii | #124 | 8 | 1 in 361 |
| North Dakota | #126 | 8 | 1 in 373 |
| Washington | #128 | 51 | 1 in 596 |
| Tennessee | #130 | 53 | 1 in 588 |
| Texas | #131 | 237 | 1 in 671 |
| Georgia | #134 | 73 | 1 in 634 |
| South Carolina | #135 | 31 | 1 in 570 |
| California | #141 | 267 | 1 in 710 |
| South Dakota | #143 | 7 | 1 in 437 |
| Minnesota | #145 | 38 | 1 in 618 |
| Louisiana | #148 | 32 | 1 in 612 |
| Arkansas | #158 | 18 | 1 in 612 |
| Kansas | #166 | 20 | 1 in 603 |
| Alabama | #167 | 27 | 1 in 693 |
| New Mexico | #169 | 10 | 1 in 582 |
| Iowa | #172 | 19 | 1 in 646 |
| Oregon | #179 | 20 | 1 in 700 |
| Idaho | #209 | 9 | 1 in 666 |
| Kentucky | #250 | 19 | 1 in 934 |
| Oklahoma | #260 | 16 | 1 in 978 |
| Utah | #527 | 7 | 1 in 2,384 |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mackenzie
- 28 spots since 2024 (#200 → #228)
- 109 spots since 2020 (#119 → #228)
- 155 spots since 2015 (#73 → #228)
- Biggest jump: 3,533 spots in 1976 (#4,370 → #837)
- Biggest drop: 170 spots in 1979 (#694 → #864)
- Debuted 1973
- Peaked 2001 at #40 (6,934 births)
- Births halved by 2016, 15 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 23 yrs · run 1995–2017
- Top 1,000: 50 yrs · run 1976–2025
- Highest: 1 in 260 girls born in 2001 were named Mackenzie (0.39%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,197 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
- 38.6% of all girls named Mackenzie (54,553) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1974, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 836 | #666 (1977) | #3,221 |
| 1980s | 4,597 | #307 (1989) | #519 |
| 1990s | 34,778 | #52 (1999) | #114 |
| 2000s | 54,553 | #40 (2001) | #53 |
| 2010s | 35,289 | #62 (2013) | #81 |
| 2020s | 11,221 | #119 (2020) | #163 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mackenzie in 2018
Top girls' names in 2018
Top boys' names in 2018
More about 2018
girls
1,701,074 girls got a published name in 2018; 1 in 602 of them was named Mackenzie, which outranked 99.4% of the 18,152 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,816,158 boys got a published name in 2018; 1 in 51,890 of them was named Mackenzie, which outranked 77.1% of the 14,118 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,171Yadier36
- #3,171Yanis36
- #3,171Zein36
- #3,240Mackenzie35
- #3,240Abdoulaye35
- #3,240Able35
- #3,240Abrar35
- #3,301Aero34
- #3,301Aiven34
- #3,301Alakai34
Tied with 60 names at #3,240; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.