Mamie
#6,116 for girls in 2025, 19 births · Last seen for boys in 1944 at #3,430
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1888 · 917 births
- Debut · girls
- 436 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 33 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 77,907since 1880
Mamie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,116 | 19 | — | |
| 2024 | #6,394 | 18 | — | |
| 2023 | #5,248 | 24 | — | |
| 2022 | #5,793 | 21 | — | |
| 2021 | #6,414 | 18 | — | |
| 2020 | #5,168 | 24 | — | |
| 2019 | #5,449 | 23 | — | |
| 2018 | #6,010 | 20 | — | |
| 2017 | #5,517 | 23 | — | |
| 2016 | #5,796 | 22 | — | |
| 2015 | #5,833 | 22 | — | |
| 2014 | #5,163 | 26 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,486 | 24 | — | |
| 2012 | #6,341 | 20 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,543 | 24 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,247 | 26 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,805 | 30 | — | |
| 2008 | #5,434 | 26 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,092 | 18 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,356 | 20 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,195 | 33 | — | |
| 2004 | #8,716 | 12 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 | — | |
| 2002 | #4,906 | 24 | — | |
| 2001 | #4,209 | 29 | — | |
| 2000 | #3,334 | 40 | — | |
| 1999 | #4,088 | 28 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,573 | 33 | — | |
| 1997 | #4,007 | 27 | — | |
| 1996 | #4,059 | 26 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,788 | 43 | — | |
| 1994 | #4,016 | 26 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,290 | 34 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,091 | 37 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,935 | 39 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,022 | 37 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,338 | 50 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,700 | 39 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,065 | 53 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,564 | 38 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,100 | 50 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,866 | 57 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,927 | 53 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,510 | 79 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,830 | 60 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,502 | 79 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,338 | 92 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,332 | 90 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,877 | 53 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,373 | 78 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,365 | 78 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,278 | 84 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,231 | 85 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,254 | 82 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,237 | 90 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,285 | 84 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,066 | 106 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,013 | 105 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,046 | 97 | — | |
| 1966 | #859 | 136 | — | |
| 1965 | #835 | 142 | — | |
| 1964 | #768 | 182 | — | |
| 1963 | #780 | 176 | — | |
| 1962 | #716 | 208 | — | |
| 1961 | #651 | 247 | — | |
| 1960 | #641 | 247 | — | |
| 1959 | #614 | 261 | — | |
| 1958 | #584 | 291 | — | |
| 1957 | #571 | 287 | — | |
| 1956 | #494 | 360 | — | |
| 1955 | #507 | 332 | — | |
| 1954 | #459 | 370 | — | |
| 1953 | #420 | 422 | — | |
| 1952 | #428 | 403 | — | |
| 1951 | #417 | 398 | — | |
| 1950 | #372 | 464 | — | |
| 1949 | #364 | 466 | — | |
| 1948 | #345 | 503 | — | |
| 1947 | #336 | 563 | — | |
| 1946 | #316 | 548 | — | |
| 1945 | #294 | 540 | — | |
| 1944 | #285 | 578 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | #280 | 632 | — | |
| 1942 | #275 | 635 | — | |
| 1941 | #256 | 624 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #245 | 676 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #238 | 680 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #242 | 677 | — | |
| 1937 | #227 | 713 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #234 | 700 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | #220 | 774 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #204 | 864 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | #201 | 863 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #188 | 970 | #3,361 | 6 |
| 1931 | #191 | 947 | #2,328 | 11 |
| 1930 | #187 | 1,028 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #176 | 1,150 | #2,980 | 8 |
| 1928 | #178 | 1,178 | #4,151 | 5 |
| 1927 | #164 | 1,354 | #2,523 | 11 |
| 1926 | #167 | 1,367 | #3,385 | 7 |
| 1925 | #160 | 1,502 | #2,936 | 9 |
| 1924 | #156 | 1,626 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1923 | #154 | 1,605 | #2,772 | 10 |
| 1922 | #147 | 1,689 | #3,252 | 8 |
| 1921 | #150 | 1,627 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #142 | 1,708 | #3,815 | 6 |
| 1919 | #132 | 1,793 | #3,391 | 7 |
| 1918 | #137 | 1,708 | — | |
| 1917 | #130 | 1,689 | #2,956 | 8 |
| 1916 | #129 | 1,653 | #2,926 | 8 |
| 1915 | #124 | 1,629 | #3,392 | 6 |
| 1914 | #115 | 1,386 | #3,264 | 5 |
| 1913 | #106 | 1,245 | — | |
| 1912 | #95 | 1,273 | — | |
| 1911 | #89 | 1,095 | — | |
| 1910 | #85 | 1,079 | — | |
| 1909 | #84 | 974 | #1,440 | 5 |
| 1908 | #79 | 1,028 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #75 | 1,059 | — | |
| 1906 | #73 | 1,002 | #1,253 | 5 |
| 1905 | #70 | 1,068 | #1,233 | 5 |
| 1904 | #67 | 1,041 | — | |
| 1903 | #68 | 990 | #1,009 | 6 |
| 1902 | #60 | 1,127 | #1,013 | 6 |
| 1901 | #60 | 992 | — | |
| 1900 | #59 | 1,337 | — | |
| 1899 | #64 | 966 | — | |
| 1898 | #63 | 1,084 | #804 | 8 |
| 1897 | #59 | 1,006 | — | |
| 1896 | #58 | 1,081 | #982 | 6 |
| 1895 | #59 | 1,119 | #872 | 7 |
| 1894 | #59 | 1,043 | — | |
| 1893 | #59 | 1,011 | — | |
| 1892 | #58 | 978 | #956 | 6 |
| 1891 | #61 | 830 | — | |
| 1890 | #54 | 967 | — | |
| 1889 | #57 | 883 | — | |
| 1888 | #53 | 917 | #1,031 | 5 |
| 1887 | #57 | 716 | #819 | 6 |
| 1886 | #55 | 712 | — | |
| 1885 | #62 | 606 | — | |
| 1884 | #57 | 609 | — | |
| 1883 | #58 | 531 | — | |
| 1882 | #60 | 508 | — | |
| 1881 | #66 | 412 | — | |
| 1880 | #58 | 436 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Mamie was already there! It came in at #58, and was given to 436 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2003–2004, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.
Where Mamie is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Georgia#33 · 1 in 143
- South Carolina#40 · 1 in 148
- Florida#46 · 1 in 170
- Alabama#50 · 1 in 185
- Mississippi#51 · 1 in 205
Best ever in a state: #15 in Georgia, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #33 | 219 | 1 in 143 |
| South Carolina | #40 | 130 | 1 in 148 |
| Florida | #46 | 51 | 1 in 170 |
| Alabama | #50 | 140 | 1 in 185 |
| Mississippi | #51 | 88 | 1 in 205 |
| North Carolina | #58 | 151 | 1 in 202 |
| Tennessee | #62 | 92 | 1 in 251 |
| Virginia | #62 | 97 | 1 in 250 |
| Arkansas | #79 | 55 | 1 in 298 |
| Louisiana | #82 | 63 | 1 in 281 |
| Texas | #93 | 110 | 1 in 409 |
| Oklahoma | #104 | 47 | 1 in 390 |
| Maryland | #110 | 20 | 1 in 602 |
| Kentucky | #136 | 41 | 1 in 587 |
| West Virginia | #140 | 23 | 1 in 660 |
| New Mexico | #166 | 5 | 1 in 599 |
| Missouri | #184 | 26 | 1 in 1,109 |
| California | #192 | 18 | 1 in 1,086 |
| Pennsylvania | #206 | 46 | 1 in 1,941 |
| Colorado | #215 | 5 | 1 in 1,359 |
| New York | #221 | 54 | 1 in 1,740 |
| Michigan | #223 | 19 | 1 in 1,698 |
| Illinois | #224 | 32 | 1 in 1,810 |
| New Jersey | #229 | 12 | 1 in 2,392 |
| Kansas | #242 | 9 | 1 in 1,644 |
| Ohio | #254 | 19 | 1 in 2,525 |
| Indiana | #255 | 11 | 1 in 2,155 |
| Wisconsin | #259 | 10 | 1 in 2,353 |
| Iowa | #277 | 9 | 1 in 2,300 |
| Minnesota | #348 | 7 | 1 in 3,093 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mamie
- 278 spots since 2024 (#6,394 → #6,116)
- 948 spots since 2020 (#5,168 → #6,116)
- 283 spots since 2015 (#5,833 → #6,116)
- Biggest jump: 13 spots in 1956 (#507 → #494)
- Biggest drop: 187 spots in 1967 (#859 → #1,046)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1888 at #53 (917 births)
- Births halved by 1951, 63 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 33 yrs · run 1880–1912
- Top 1,000: 87 yrs · run 1880–1966
- Highest: 1 in 195 girls born in 1888 were named Mamie (0.51%)
- Latest: 1 in 84,593 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 19.0% of all girls named Mamie (14,806) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6,330 | #53 (1888) | #58 |
| 1890s | 10,085 | #54 (1890) | #59 |
| 1900s | 10,618 | #59 (1900) | #70 |
| 1910s | 14,550 | #85 (1910) | #114 |
| 1920s | 14,806 | #142 (1920) | #159 |
| 1930s | 8,216 | #187 (1930) | #213 |
| 1940s | 5,765 | #245 (1940) | #300 |
| 1950s | 3,588 | #372 (1950) | #487 |
| 1960s | 1,646 | #641 (1960) | #838 |
| 1970s | 816 | #1,231 (1973) | #1,357 |
| 1980s | 558 | #1,502 (1980) | #2,040 |
| 1990s | 330 | #2,788 (1995) | #3,487 |
| 2000s | 245 | #3,334 (2000) | #5,705 |
| 2010s | 230 | #5,163 (2014) | #5,639 |
| 2020s | 124 | #5,168 (2020) | #5,856 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mamie in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 632 of them was named Mamie, which outranked 97.5% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 111,260 of them was named Mamie, which outranked 35.5% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).