Olive
#197 for girls in 2025, 1,597 births · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to girls 99.4% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1893 · 589 births
- Debut · girls
- 224 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 24 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 66,926since 1880
Olive over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #197 | 1,597 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2024 | #170 | 1,789 | — | |
| 2023 | #180 | 1,651 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #158 | 1,836 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #182 | 1,636 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #195 | 1,491 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #213 | 1,435 | — | |
| 2018 | #268 | 1,232 | — | |
| 2017 | #256 | 1,253 | #10,775 | 6 |
| 2016 | #272 | 1,162 | #8,146 | 9 |
| 2015 | #264 | 1,212 | — | |
| 2014 | #281 | 1,152 | — | |
| 2013 | #291 | 1,097 | — | |
| 2012 | #363 | 860 | — | |
| 2011 | #415 | 763 | — | |
| 2010 | #541 | 541 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #588 | 512 | — | |
| 2008 | #805 | 358 | — | |
| 2007 | #988 | 271 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,788 | 116 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,106 | 88 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,033 | 51 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,956 | 51 | — | |
| 2002 | #3,241 | 43 | — | |
| 2001 | #3,549 | 37 | — | |
| 2000 | #3,664 | 35 | — | |
| 1999 | #4,718 | 23 | — | |
| 1998 | #5,583 | 18 | — | |
| 1997 | #6,163 | 15 | — | |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 | — | |
| 1995 | #7,041 | 12 | — | |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | — | |
| 1993 | #5,673 | 16 | — | |
| 1992 | #6,008 | 15 | — | |
| 1991 | #9,336 | 8 | — | |
| 1990 | #6,465 | 13 | — | |
| 1989 | #7,449 | 10 | — | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | — | |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | — | |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | — | |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 | — | |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | — | |
| 1983 | #5,824 | 11 | — | |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | — | |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | — | |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 | — | |
| 1979 | #5,427 | 12 | — | |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | — | |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,141 | 15 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 | — | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,300 | 13 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,136 | 10 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,577 | 17 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,102 | 19 | — | |
| 1968 | #3,315 | 16 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,868 | 19 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,586 | 22 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,538 | 23 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,675 | 22 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,252 | 28 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,917 | 36 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,474 | 24 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,617 | 48 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,720 | 41 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,791 | 37 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,407 | 56 | #3,552 | 6 |
| 1956 | #1,378 | 57 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,423 | 50 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,300 | 58 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,137 | 72 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,055 | 80 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,143 | 67 | — | |
| 1950 | #891 | 99 | — | |
| 1949 | #895 | 97 | — | |
| 1948 | #777 | 122 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #892 | 98 | — | |
| 1946 | #728 | 123 | — | |
| 1945 | #628 | 134 | #2,996 | 6 |
| 1944 | #718 | 110 | — | |
| 1943 | #526 | 203 | #3,538 | 5 |
| 1942 | #554 | 180 | — | |
| 1941 | #485 | 208 | — | |
| 1940 | #528 | 169 | — | |
| 1939 | #438 | 235 | — | |
| 1938 | #439 | 234 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1937 | #407 | 252 | #2,680 | 8 |
| 1936 | #382 | 276 | #2,629 | 8 |
| 1935 | #370 | 294 | — | |
| 1934 | #346 | 327 | #2,973 | 7 |
| 1933 | #317 | 387 | #2,214 | 11 |
| 1932 | #283 | 484 | #3,092 | 7 |
| 1931 | #274 | 514 | #2,207 | 12 |
| 1930 | #277 | 539 | #2,293 | 12 |
| 1929 | #245 | 651 | — | |
| 1928 | #223 | 790 | #2,659 | 10 |
| 1927 | #216 | 879 | #2,523 | 11 |
| 1926 | #213 | 872 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #204 | 975 | #3,408 | 7 |
| 1924 | #198 | 1,058 | — | |
| 1923 | #179 | 1,222 | #3,175 | 8 |
| 1922 | #169 | 1,323 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1921 | #154 | 1,567 | #1,766 | 20 |
| 1920 | #151 | 1,552 | #2,602 | 11 |
| 1919 | #149 | 1,488 | #2,511 | 11 |
| 1918 | #143 | 1,618 | #1,905 | 17 |
| 1917 | #138 | 1,566 | #2,423 | 11 |
| 1916 | #132 | 1,616 | #2,926 | 8 |
| 1915 | #123 | 1,654 | #2,070 | 13 |
| 1914 | #127 | 1,200 | #2,271 | 9 |
| 1913 | #129 | 994 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | #131 | 874 | #1,268 | 14 |
| 1911 | #121 | 699 | #1,387 | 7 |
| 1910 | #125 | 646 | #1,193 | 8 |
| 1909 | #112 | 645 | #1,277 | 6 |
| 1908 | #110 | 648 | — | |
| 1907 | #118 | 568 | — | |
| 1906 | #110 | 561 | #1,111 | 6 |
| 1905 | #107 | 598 | #1,091 | 6 |
| 1904 | #106 | 573 | — | |
| 1903 | #97 | 597 | #1,009 | 6 |
| 1902 | #99 | 593 | — | |
| 1901 | #98 | 539 | — | |
| 1900 | #95 | 705 | #1,050 | 7 |
| 1899 | #98 | 565 | #1,051 | 5 |
| 1898 | #93 | 644 | — | |
| 1897 | #92 | 583 | — | |
| 1896 | #90 | 583 | — | |
| 1895 | #91 | 577 | — | |
| 1894 | #88 | 589 | — | |
| 1893 | #82 | 589 | — | |
| 1892 | #83 | 583 | #861 | 7 |
| 1891 | #85 | 509 | #841 | 6 |
| 1890 | #89 | 491 | — | |
| 1889 | #88 | 464 | #974 | 5 |
| 1888 | #87 | 465 | — | |
| 1887 | #85 | 394 | — | |
| 1886 | #84 | 404 | — | |
| 1885 | #86 | 349 | #936 | 5 |
| 1884 | #83 | 360 | — | |
| 1883 | #90 | 294 | — | |
| 1882 | #88 | 291 | — | |
| 1881 | #100 | 211 | — | |
| 1880 | #95 | 224 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Olive was already there! It came in at #95, and was given to 224 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1986–1988, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.
Where Olive is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Hampshire#50 · 1 in 149
- Vermont#52 · 1 in 171
- Maine#55 · 1 in 204
- Delaware#60 · 1 in 231
- Idaho#67 · 1 in 225
Best ever in a state: #28 in Wyoming, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #50 | 20 | 1 in 149 |
| Vermont | #52 | 14 | 1 in 171 |
| Maine | #55 | 28 | 1 in 204 |
| Delaware | #60 | 7 | 1 in 231 |
| Idaho | #67 | 16 | 1 in 225 |
| South Dakota | #69 | 24 | 1 in 243 |
| Utah | #74 | 17 | 1 in 262 |
| Massachusetts | #83 | 84 | 1 in 396 |
| Montana | #83 | 17 | 1 in 301 |
| Indiana | #89 | 61 | 1 in 389 |
| Pennsylvania | #89 | 207 | 1 in 431 |
| Wisconsin | #92 | 66 | 1 in 356 |
| Connecticut | #93 | 30 | 1 in 436 |
| Kansas | #93 | 37 | 1 in 400 |
| Washington | #95 | 21 | 1 in 399 |
| District of Columbia | #98 | 5 | 1 in 461 |
| Minnesota | #101 | 47 | 1 in 461 |
| Oregon | #102 | 12 | 1 in 405 |
| Ohio | #108 | 90 | 1 in 533 |
| Michigan | #109 | 63 | 1 in 512 |
| West Virginia | #109 | 32 | 1 in 475 |
| Rhode Island | #110 | 10 | 1 in 494 |
| Iowa | #115 | 41 | 1 in 505 |
| Nebraska | #115 | 22 | 1 in 512 |
| New Jersey | #116 | 51 | 1 in 563 |
| California | #117 | 40 | 1 in 489 |
| North Dakota | #123 | 14 | 1 in 536 |
| Colorado | #125 | 12 | 1 in 566 |
| Missouri | #130 | 48 | 1 in 601 |
| Illinois | #133 | 87 | 1 in 666 |
| Maryland | #140 | 15 | 1 in 803 |
| New York | #147 | 125 | 1 in 752 |
| Virginia | #151 | 29 | 1 in 837 |
| Arkansas | #162 | 24 | 1 in 683 |
| Oklahoma | #164 | 24 | 1 in 764 |
| Kentucky | #194 | 23 | 1 in 1,046 |
| Louisiana | #199 | 20 | 1 in 887 |
| Florida | #202 | 8 | 1 in 1,085 |
| South Carolina | #229 | 12 | 1 in 1,602 |
| Tennessee | #246 | 14 | 1 in 1,650 |
| Mississippi | #250 | 12 | 1 in 1,500 |
| North Carolina | #257 | 16 | 1 in 1,908 |
| Georgia | #261 | 16 | 1 in 1,959 |
| Texas | #287 | 30 | 1 in 1,501 |
| Alabama | #346 | 9 | 1 in 2,873 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Olive
- 27 spots since 2024 (#170 → #197)
- 2 spots since 2020 (#195 → #197)
- 67 spots since 2015 (#264 → #197)
- Biggest jump: 800 spots in 2007 (#1,788 → #988)
- Biggest drop: 252 spots in 1951 (#891 → #1,143)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1893 at #82 (589 births)
- Births halved by 1935, 42 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 24 yrs · run 1880–1903
- Top 1,000: 90 yrs · run 1880–1950
- Highest: 1 in 358 girls born in 1886 were named Olive (0.28%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,006 girls born in 2025 (0.10%)
- Its best rank, #82 in 1893, was only 1 in 361 (0.28%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 18.5% of all girls named Olive (12,355) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #82 (1893) → #10,386 (1988) → #158 (2022)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,456 | #83 (1884) | #89 |
| 1890s | 5,713 | #82 (1893) | #89 |
| 1900s | 6,027 | #95 (1900) | #105 |
| 1910s | 12,355 | #121 (1911) | #132 |
| 1920s | 10,889 | #151 (1920) | #195 |
| 1930s | 3,542 | #274 (1931) | #353 |
| 1940s | 1,444 | #485 (1941) | #673 |
| 1950s | 617 | #891 (1950) | #1,325 |
| 1960s | 257 | #1,617 (1960) | #2,534 |
| 1970s | 122 | #3,577 (1970) | #4,980 |
| 1980s | 94 | #5,077 (1985) | #7,217 |
| 1990s | 141 | #4,718 (1999) | #6,730 |
| 2000s | 1,562 | #588 (2009) | #2,272 |
| 2010s | 10,707 | #213 (2019) | #316 |
| 2020s | 10,000 | #158 (2022) | #180 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Olive in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 646 of them was named Olive, which outranked 97.4% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 111,260 of them was named Olive, which outranked 35.5% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).