Marcia

#3,389 for girls in 2025, 45 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1951 · 5,299 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
13 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
133,320
since 1880

Marcia over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201929peak #74, 1951girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,38945—
2024#4,11435—
2023#4,19134—
2022#3,82739—
2021#4,09035—
2020#3,45044—
2019#3,66541—
2018#4,35732—
2017#4,22034—
2016#3,46445—
2015#3,84239—
2014#3,36947—
2013#4,07636—
2012#3,58344—
2011#3,40747—
2010#3,07554—
2009#2,89260—
2008#3,26751—
2007#2,43377—
2006#2,41977—
2005#2,48270—
2004#2,44669—
2003#2,61061—
2002#2,44765—
2001#2,12677—
2000#1,84593—
1999#1,87484—
1998#1,73491—
1997#1,73389—
1996#1,551102—
1995#1,401117—
1994#1,346124—
1993#983188—
1992#1,116159—
1991#965195—
1990#900213—
1989#871212#7,9055
1988#759246—
1987#661284—
1986#666277—
1985#584334—
1984#543350—
1983#532357—
1982#465453—
1981#415530—
1980#414535—
1979#365620—
1978#325706—
1977#328715—
1976#304753#4,9356
1975#295795#5,4645
1974#264957#5,2275
1973#267935—
1972#265995#4,9865
1971#2431,204#3,9637
1970#2441,285#4,7245
1969#2601,112—
1968#2421,144—
1967#2241,308#3,5596
1966#2141,418#3,5376
1965#2121,549—
1964#1901,932#3,6016
1963#1802,157#2,8589
1962#1682,428—
1961#1552,685#2,70610
1960#1562,694#3,0778
1959#1413,091#3,6196
1958#1283,353#3,2757
1957#1263,538#3,5526
1956#1104,069#3,9425
1955#984,412#3,2017
1954#904,744#3,1767
1953#845,062#2,39111
1952#805,210#3,7345
1951#745,299#3,3646
1950#774,955#2,7708
1949#784,651#2,6069
1948#794,640#2,02714
1947#814,472#2,49810
1946#893,946#2,40310
1945#883,206—
1944#893,140—
1943#962,970#3,2316
1942#1052,669#1,94614
1941#1052,430#2,33310
1940#1122,273#2,6718
1939#1092,346#2,4499
1938#1162,169#2,6468
1937#1241,948#2,19711
1936#1381,595#3,5495
1935#1491,339#3,6455
1934#1571,267—
1933#1621,140#2,7388
1932#191951—
1931#215799—
1930#231692—
1929#263584—
1928#281540—
1927#287538—
1926#302487—
1925#315448#3,7416
1924#312460—
1923#292492—
1922#313428—
1921#307451—
1920#347361—
1919#357325—
1918#409256—
1917#445208—
1916#491171—
1915#462178—
1914#478132—
1913#472113—
1912#47999—
1911#49669—
1910#53957—
1909#50954—
1908#46261—
1907#58839—
1906#50946—
1905#57936—
1904#68226—
1903#52238—
1902#59131—
1901#72320—
1900#57636—
1899#64423—
1898#55533—
1897#59426—
1896#59427—
1895#53031—
1894#59724—
1893#41442—
1892#45336—
1891#48328—
1890#57820—
1889#48626—
1888#48626—
1887#52418—
1886#50819—
1885#43823—
1884#44920—
1883#38623—
1882#59610—
1881#47013—
1880#5809—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Marcia was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.

Where Marcia is popular in 1929

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNHWashington: #135 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 702 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #184 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,372 girlsMNIllinois: #210 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 1,542 girlsILWisconsin: #185 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,396 girlsWIMichigan: #144 for girls · 46 births · 1 in 914 girlsMINew York: #148 for girls · 120 births · 1 in 805 girlsNYMassachusetts: #122 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 733 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedSDIowa: #204 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,426 girlsIAIndiana: #170 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 1,122 girlsINOhio: #192 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 1,317 girlsOHPennsylvania: #238 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 2,439 girlsPANew Jersey: #195 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,535 girlsNJConnecticut: #151 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 928 girlsCTCalifornia: #261 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,787 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedUTColorado: #248 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,660 girlsCONebraska: #145 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 707 girlsNEMissouri: #221 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,456 girlsMOKentucky: #423 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,410 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedNMKansas: #200 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,168 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #456 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,979 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #343 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,534 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedHITexas: #916 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 12,064 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Marcia, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Massachusetts#122 · 1 in 733
  2. Washington#135 · 1 in 702
  3. Michigan#144 · 1 in 914
  4. Nebraska#145 · 1 in 707
  5. New York#148 · 1 in 805

Best ever in a state: #31 in Iowa, 1948.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Massachusetts#122431 in 733
Washington#135131 in 702
Michigan#144461 in 914
Nebraska#145151 in 707
New York#1481201 in 805
Connecticut#151121 in 928
Indiana#170221 in 1,122
Minnesota#184141 in 1,372
Wisconsin#185171 in 1,396
Ohio#192391 in 1,317
New Jersey#195191 in 1,535
Kansas#200121 in 1,168
Iowa#204131 in 1,426
Illinois#210371 in 1,542
Missouri#221191 in 1,456
Pennsylvania#238341 in 2,439
Colorado#24851 in 1,660
California#261201 in 1,787
Oklahoma#34391 in 2,534
Kentucky#42361 in 4,410
North Carolina#45661 in 5,979
Texas#91651 in 12,064
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Marcia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 725 spots since 2024 (#4,114 → #3,389)
  • 61 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #3,389)
  • 453 spots since 2015 (#3,842 → #3,389)
  • Biggest jump: 210 spots in 1883 (#596 → #386)
  • Biggest drop: 363 spots in 1994 (#983 → #1,346)
Rise & fade · girls
71 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1951 at #74 (5,299 births)
  • Births halved by 1962, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 13 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 13 yrs · run 1943–1955
  • Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1991
Share of babies · girls
1 in 340
  • Highest: 1 in 340 girls born in 1951 were named Marcia (0.29%)
  • Latest: 1 in 35,717 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 32.8% of all girls named Marcia (43,733) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s187#386 (1883)#492
1890s290#414 (1893)#544
1900s387#462 (1908)#574
1910s1,608#357 (1919)#463
1920s4,789#263 (1929)#302
1930s14,246#109 (1939)#159
1940s34,397#78 (1949)#92
1950s43,733#74 (1951)#101
1960s18,427#155 (1961)#200
1970s8,965#243 (1971)#290
1980s3,578#414 (1980)#591
1990s1,362#900 (1990)#1,360
2000s700#1,845 (2000)#2,497
2010s419#3,075 (2010)#3,706
2020s232#3,389 (2025)#3,844

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Marcia in 1929

girls
#263
584 births · 1 in 1,912 girls

Top girls' names in 1929

  1. #1Mary63,512
  2. #2Betty36,675
  3. #3Dorothy31,476
  4. #4Helen20,983
  5. #5Margaret19,212
  6. #6Doris16,498
  7. #7Barbara16,038
  8. #8Ruth16,021
  9. #9Shirley14,576
  10. #10Patricia13,624
  11. #263Marcia584
More about 1929

girls

1,116,561 girls got a published name in 1929; 1 in 1,912 of them was named Marcia, which outranked 95.0% of the 5,277 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Marcia
  1. #259Suzanne603
  2. #259Veronica603
  3. #262Pat597
  4. #263Marcia584
  5. #263Cleo584
  6. #265Addie583
  7. #265Leola583
  8. #267May579

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1928
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,951Dorla#2,623 → #672
  2. ↑ 797Ingrid#1,738 → #941
  3. ↑ 534Sydell#1,502 → #968
  4. ↑ 521Elenor#1,502 → #981
  5. ↑ 406Jeanine#888 → #482
Fallers
  1. ↓ 937Joline#888 → #1,825
  2. ↓ 259Mafalda#936 → #1,195
  3. ↓ 250Lorelei#994 → #1,244
  4. ↓ 249Ardelle#888 → #1,137
  5. ↓ 234Charmaine#420 → #654

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1929 →