Miranda

#654 for girls in 2025, 437 births · Last seen for boys in 2021 at #12,146
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1995 · 5,978 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
9 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
114,979
since 1881

Miranda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201962peak #57, 1995girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#654437—
2024#623479—
2023#571520—
2022#546563—
2021#587513#12,1465
2020#542556—
2019#446698—
2018#367861—
2017#344939—
2016#2771,138—
2015#2791,135—
2014#2391,353—
2013#2451,302—
2012#2131,475—
2011#2001,570—
2010#1741,779#12,2315
2009#1821,813—
2008#1622,066—
2007#1542,272#12,3675
2006#1392,500—
2005#1452,358#7,09610
2004#1282,613#8,9277
2003#1582,118—
2002#1472,272—
2001#1282,684#8,3397
2000#1123,043—
1999#943,433—
1998#804,143#6,8438
1997#704,590#6,1009
1996#764,568—
1995#575,978#7,7926
1994#615,456#6,3728
1993#893,581#7,6386
1992#893,695—
1991#903,820#6,5197
1990#1122,961#7,1786
1989#1302,326#5,1659
1988#1441,976#5,7517
1987#1401,977#4,5739
1986#1372,036#5,3327
1985#1282,267#4,6988
1984#1142,480#5,5616
1983#1182,479#4,4998
1982#1172,520#5,6196
1981#1282,239#4,1539
1980#1282,416#4,4958
1979#1741,593#4,8427
1978#1831,415—
1977#2221,121—
1976#2311,044#4,0128
1975#274882—
1974#275934#3,8378
1973#520325—
1972#537310—
1971#608280—
1970#712216—
1969#682213—
1968#642229—
1967#763166—
1966#778159—
1965#846139—
1964#1,032109—
1963#843154—
1962#1,008113—
1961#920137—
1960#1,039107—
1959#860142—
1958#973113—
1957#795161—
1956#1,14182—
1955#1,17572—
1954#1,12377—
1953#1,35851—
1952#1,71333—
1951#1,61135—
1950#1,76429—
1949#2,34018—
1948#1,95324—
1947#2,53016—
1946#2,09420—
1945#4,0256—
1944#2,62512—
1943#2,15117—
1942#2,21416—
1941#1,81020—
1940#3,2088—
1939#3,7826—
1938#3,8476—
1937#3,8006—
1936#2,8579—
1935——
1934#2,9239—
1933——
1932——
1931——
1930#4,0476—
1929#3,6827—
1928——
1927#2,69912—
1926#3,8737—
1925#2,61713—
1924#4,0027—
1923#3,12510—
1922#4,0117—
1921#3,16410—
1920#2,46314—
1919#2,81311—
1918#2,82211—
1917#2,10016—
1916#2,24614—
1915#3,7956—
1914#2,6388—
1913#3,1875—
1912#2,3607—
1911——
1910#2,1406—
1909#1,4719—
1908——
1907——
1906#1,5537—
1905#1,6966—
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900#1,00814—
1899#1,03410—
1898#1,3797—
1897#1,1678—
1896#1,4166—
1895#1,4266—
1894#1,4855—
1893——
1892#95810—
1891#1,2136—
1890#1,2106—
1889#80211—
1888#1,0367—
1887#73310—
1886#8977—
1885#9216—
1884#7938—
1883#7547—
1882#9085—
1881#5829—
1880——
First appearance
1881

The first year at least five girls were named Miranda! It came in at #582, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1893–1894, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Miranda is popular in 1962

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedMNIllinois: #967 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 17,146 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedWIMichigan: #710 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 11,725 girlsMINew York: #690 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 9,610 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,433 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 28,913 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedMOKentucky: #530 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,163 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #607 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,947 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #372 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,820 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #713 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,610 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedMSAlabama: #542 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,558 girlsALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Miranda, so not publishedTXFlorida: #709 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 8,201 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. South Carolina#372 · 1 in 2,820
  2. Kentucky#530 · 1 in 6,163
  3. Alabama#542 · 1 in 5,558
  4. North Carolina#607 · 1 in 7,947
  5. New York#690 · 1 in 9,610

Best ever in a state: #18 in South Dakota, 1995.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#37291 in 2,820
Kentucky#53051 in 6,163
Alabama#54261 in 5,558
North Carolina#60761 in 7,947
New York#690171 in 9,610
Florida#70961 in 8,201
Michigan#71071 in 11,725
Louisiana#71351 in 7,610
Illinois#96761 in 17,146
California#1,43361 in 28,913
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Miranda
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 31 spots since 2024 (#623 → #654)
  • 112 spots since 2020 (#542 → #654)
  • 375 spots since 2015 (#279 → #654)
  • Biggest jump: 346 spots in 1957 (#1,141 → #795)
  • Biggest drop: 408 spots in 1890 (#802 → #1,210)
Rise & fade · girls
114 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1881
  • Peaked 1995 at #57 (5,978 births)
  • Births halved by 2001, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 9 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 9 yrs · run 1991–1999
  • Top 1,000: 75 yrs · run 1965–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 294
  • Highest: 1 in 294 girls born in 1995 were named Miranda (0.34%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,678 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 36.7% of all girls named Miranda (42,225) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s70#582 (1881)#825
1890s64#958 (1892)#1,254
1900s36#1,008 (1900)#1,432
1910s84#2,100 (1917)#2,678
1920s87#2,463 (1920)#3,293
1930s42#2,857 (1936)#3,543
1940s157#1,810 (1941)#2,495
1950s795#795 (1957)#1,251
1960s1,526#642 (1968)#855
1970s8,120#174 (1979)#374
1980s22,716#114 (1984)#128
1990s42,225#57 (1995)#82
2000s23,739#112 (2000)#146
2010s12,250#174 (2010)#278
2020s3,068#542 (2020)#587

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Miranda in 1962

girls
#1,008
113 births · 1 in 17,404 girls

Top girls' names in 1962

  1. #1Lisa46,069
  2. #2Mary43,502
  3. #3Susan35,752
  4. #4Karen35,184
  5. #5Linda31,461
  6. #6Patricia26,532
  7. #7Donna25,719
  8. #8Cynthia24,025
  9. #9Deborah22,889
  10. #10Sandra22,420
  11. #1,008Miranda113
More about 1962

girls

1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 17,404 of them was named Miranda, which outranked 86.7% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Miranda
  1. #1,001Loren115
  2. #1,006Rhea114
  3. #1,006Thomas114
  4. #1,008Miranda113
  5. #1,008Delois113
  6. #1,008Gilda113
  7. #1,008Iva113
  8. #1,014Charleen112
  9. #1,014Cinda112
  10. #1,014Elissa112

Tied with 5 names at #1,008; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,281Tiffany#2,070 → #789
  2. ↑ 879Whitney#1,627 → #748
  3. ↑ 541Zina#1,533 → #992
  4. ↑ 414Glynis#1,406 → #992
  5. ↑ 408Lolita#978 → #570
Fallers
  1. ↓ 300Fern#821 → #1,121
  2. ↓ 259Jacklyn#815 → #1,074
  3. ↓ 255Dorthy#929 → #1,184
  4. ↓ 224Laurene#943 → #1,167
  5. ↓ 215Jimmie#911 → #1,126

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1962 →