Nadia
#565 for girls in 2025, 531 births · Last seen for boys in 2009 at #12,491
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 1,923 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 46,556since 1911
Nadia over time
Rank among girls' names. Nadia has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #565 | 531 | — | |
| 2024 | #513 | 600 | — | |
| 2023 | #489 | 625 | — | |
| 2022 | #437 | 720 | — | |
| 2021 | #459 | 684 | — | |
| 2020 | #468 | 658 | — | |
| 2019 | #414 | 756 | — | |
| 2018 | #394 | 779 | — | |
| 2017 | #401 | 783 | — | |
| 2016 | #358 | 915 | — | |
| 2015 | #345 | 953 | — | |
| 2014 | #288 | 1,126 | — | |
| 2013 | #325 | 996 | — | |
| 2012 | #293 | 1,090 | — | |
| 2011 | #270 | 1,182 | — | |
| 2010 | #248 | 1,288 | — | |
| 2009 | #246 | 1,345 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #219 | 1,540 | — | |
| 2007 | #198 | 1,721 | — | |
| 2006 | #188 | 1,870 | — | |
| 2005 | #178 | 1,923 | — | |
| 2004 | #214 | 1,585 | #9,948 | 6 |
| 2003 | #208 | 1,580 | — | |
| 2002 | #216 | 1,499 | — | |
| 2001 | #239 | 1,331 | — | |
| 2000 | #256 | 1,271 | — | |
| 1999 | #330 | 916 | — | |
| 1998 | #319 | 943 | — | |
| 1997 | #333 | 857 | — | |
| 1996 | #356 | 779 | — | |
| 1995 | #389 | 681 | — | |
| 1994 | #462 | 548 | — | |
| 1993 | #437 | 572 | — | |
| 1992 | #425 | 593 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | #433 | 586 | — | |
| 1990 | #395 | 659 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #332 | 761 | #5,165 | 9 |
| 1988 | #332 | 742 | #5,200 | 8 |
| 1987 | #418 | 532 | — | |
| 1986 | #453 | 476 | — | |
| 1985 | #427 | 515 | — | |
| 1984 | #344 | 665 | — | |
| 1983 | #512 | 375 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #472 | 445 | — | |
| 1981 | #452 | 476 | — | |
| 1980 | #409 | 546 | — | |
| 1979 | #372 | 609 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #353 | 610 | — | |
| 1977 | #303 | 790 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #360 | 585 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #1,291 | 86 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,239 | 88 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,312 | 77 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,280 | 80 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,322 | 81 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,452 | 70 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,338 | 72 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,418 | 63 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,659 | 47 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,548 | 52 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,421 | 60 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,559 | 53 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,623 | 49 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,558 | 52 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,921 | 36 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,542 | 52 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,054 | 30 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,606 | 44 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,808 | 36 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,506 | 50 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,733 | 36 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,444 | 48 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,834 | 30 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,746 | 32 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,842 | 28 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,121 | 21 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,845 | 27 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,188 | 20 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,637 | 15 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,597 | 14 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,237 | 15 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,287 | 15 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,151 | 17 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,416 | 14 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,532 | 12 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,417 | 12 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,447 | 12 | — | |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,689 | 10 | — | |
| 1935 | #3,431 | 7 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,697 | 20 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,723 | 20 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,877 | 18 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,421 | 27 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,499 | 27 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,301 | 14 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,381 | 14 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,935 | 20 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,474 | 14 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,647 | 26 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,661 | 13 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,264 | 16 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,387 | 15 | — | |
| 1921 | #3,164 | 10 | — | |
| 1920 | #3,340 | 9 | — | |
| 1919 | #2,384 | 14 | — | |
| 1918 | #3,024 | 10 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,204 | 15 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,581 | 23 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,143 | 14 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,876 | 7 | — | |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 | — | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 | — | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Nadia! It came in at #2,463, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1911–1912, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Nadia is popular in 2004
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Rhode Island#122 · 1 in 437
- Delaware#140 · 1 in 440
- Georgia#155 · 1 in 722
- District of Columbia#161 · 1 in 502
- Virginia#161 · 1 in 725
Best ever in a state: #70 in Rhode Island, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #122 | 9 | 1 in 437 |
| Delaware | #140 | 7 | 1 in 440 |
| Georgia | #155 | 70 | 1 in 722 |
| District of Columbia | #161 | 7 | 1 in 502 |
| Virginia | #161 | 51 | 1 in 725 |
| Michigan | #162 | 64 | 1 in 754 |
| Texas | #163 | 216 | 1 in 737 |
| New Mexico | #168 | 14 | 1 in 583 |
| Illinois | #178 | 85 | 1 in 806 |
| Ohio | #178 | 66 | 1 in 872 |
| California | #179 | 249 | 1 in 919 |
| North Carolina | #179 | 53 | 1 in 839 |
| Wisconsin | #186 | 31 | 1 in 803 |
| Minnesota | #192 | 30 | 1 in 875 |
| Maryland | #196 | 28 | 1 in 875 |
| New Hampshire | #196 | 6 | 1 in 780 |
| Florida | #200 | 84 | 1 in 976 |
| Massachusetts | #203 | 31 | 1 in 945 |
| Oklahoma | #204 | 20 | 1 in 843 |
| Alabama | #212 | 20 | 1 in 968 |
| New York | #218 | 80 | 1 in 1,213 |
| South Carolina | #220 | 18 | 1 in 951 |
| New Jersey | #249 | 32 | 1 in 1,300 |
| Colorado | #251 | 24 | 1 in 1,029 |
| Washington | #252 | 27 | 1 in 1,066 |
| Tennessee | #253 | 26 | 1 in 1,172 |
| Missouri | #255 | 24 | 1 in 1,183 |
| Oregon | #269 | 15 | 1 in 1,060 |
| Arkansas | #278 | 10 | 1 in 1,204 |
| Indiana | #282 | 25 | 1 in 1,301 |
| Louisiana | #282 | 17 | 1 in 1,223 |
| Arizona | #285 | 29 | 1 in 1,187 |
| Pennsylvania | #312 | 36 | 1 in 1,540 |
| Connecticut | #317 | 9 | 1 in 1,595 |
| Iowa | #330 | 9 | 1 in 1,508 |
| Kansas | #333 | 9 | 1 in 1,505 |
| Nevada | #334 | 9 | 1 in 1,201 |
| Idaho | #337 | 5 | 1 in 1,292 |
| Nebraska | #382 | 5 | 1 in 1,678 |
| Utah | #469 | 8 | 1 in 2,283 |
| Mississippi | #517 | 5 | 1 in 2,344 |
| Kentucky | #550 | 7 | 1 in 2,782 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Nadia
- 52 spots since 2024 (#513 → #565)
- 97 spots since 2020 (#468 → #565)
- 220 spots since 2015 (#345 → #565)
- Biggest jump: 931 spots in 1976 (#1,291 → #360)
- Biggest drop: 83 spots in 1985 (#344 → #427)
- Debuted 1911
- Peaked 2005 at #178 (1,923 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 50 yrs · run 1976–2025
- Highest: 1 in 961 girls born in 2005 were named Nadia (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,027 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 33.6% of all girls named Nadia (15,665) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 97 | #1,581 (1916) | #2,355 |
| 1920s | 151 | #1,647 (1925) | #2,455 |
| 1930s | 166 | #1,421 (1931) | #2,152 |
| 1940s | 157 | #1,845 (1949) | #2,410 |
| 1950s | 355 | #1,444 (1954) | #1,769 |
| 1960s | 536 | #1,338 (1969) | #1,559 |
| 1970s | 3,076 | #303 (1977) | #928 |
| 1980s | 5,533 | #332 (1989) | #415 |
| 1990s | 7,134 | #319 (1998) | #388 |
| 2000s | 15,665 | #178 (2005) | #216 |
| 2010s | 9,868 | #248 (2010) | #334 |
| 2020s | 3,818 | #437 (2022) | #489 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Nadia in 2004
Top girls' names in 2004
Top boys' names in 2004
More about 2004
girls
1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 1,159 of them was named Nadia, which outranked 98.9% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,984,979 boys got a published name in 2004; 1 in 330,830 of them was named Nadia, which outranked 24.8% of the 13,228 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #8,927Zohar7
- #8,927Zy7
- #8,927Zyshawn7
- #9,948Nadia6
- #9,948Aadon6
- #9,948Aalim6
- #9,948Aamari6
- #11,356Aadin5
- #11,356Aareon5
- #11,356Aaronjosh5
Tied with 1,407 names at #9,948; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.