Nora
#20 for girls in 2025, 6,380 births · #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 6,380 births
- Debut · girls
- 471 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 39 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 193,138since 1880
Nora over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #20 | 6,380 | #10,695 | 6 |
| 2024 | #22 | 6,148 | — | |
| 2023 | #24 | 6,027 | — | |
| 2022 | #28 | 6,148 | — | |
| 2021 | #27 | 6,281 | — | |
| 2020 | #30 | 5,583 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #29 | 5,936 | — | |
| 2018 | #30 | 5,837 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #29 | 6,067 | — | |
| 2016 | #36 | 5,593 | — | |
| 2015 | #41 | 5,330 | — | |
| 2014 | #49 | 4,741 | #12,108 | 5 |
| 2013 | #83 | 3,508 | — | |
| 2012 | #108 | 2,890 | — | |
| 2011 | #137 | 2,235 | — | |
| 2010 | #159 | 1,939 | — | |
| 2009 | #198 | 1,670 | — | |
| 2008 | #216 | 1,560 | — | |
| 2007 | #242 | 1,474 | — | |
| 2006 | #245 | 1,385 | — | |
| 2005 | #276 | 1,197 | — | |
| 2004 | #306 | 1,043 | — | |
| 2003 | #367 | 830 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #471 | 601 | — | |
| 2001 | #448 | 622 | — | |
| 2000 | #500 | 540 | — | |
| 1999 | #455 | 584 | — | |
| 1998 | #476 | 540 | — | |
| 1997 | #451 | 563 | — | |
| 1996 | #449 | 557 | — | |
| 1995 | #463 | 545 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #474 | 530 | — | |
| 1993 | #478 | 526 | — | |
| 1992 | #470 | 524 | — | |
| 1991 | #444 | 575 | — | |
| 1990 | #431 | 588 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #415 | 596 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #397 | 606 | — | |
| 1987 | #414 | 538 | #4,968 | 8 |
| 1986 | #445 | 485 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #412 | 541 | #5,785 | 6 |
| 1984 | #391 | 559 | — | |
| 1983 | #414 | 521 | #4,499 | 8 |
| 1982 | #406 | 564 | — | |
| 1981 | #405 | 551 | #5,468 | 6 |
| 1980 | #400 | 571 | #4,134 | 9 |
| 1979 | #404 | 536 | — | |
| 1978 | #366 | 584 | — | |
| 1977 | #402 | 517 | — | |
| 1976 | #396 | 517 | — | |
| 1975 | #377 | 552 | — | |
| 1974 | #366 | 587 | — | |
| 1973 | #369 | 573 | — | |
| 1972 | #364 | 604 | — | |
| 1971 | #375 | 624 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #365 | 676 | — | |
| 1969 | #336 | 709 | — | |
| 1968 | #329 | 696 | #3,365 | 7 |
| 1967 | #325 | 727 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | #299 | 850 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | #302 | 881 | #2,982 | 8 |
| 1964 | #279 | 1,050 | #2,854 | 9 |
| 1963 | #278 | 1,067 | #3,318 | 7 |
| 1962 | #274 | 1,076 | — | |
| 1961 | #272 | 1,120 | #2,900 | 9 |
| 1960 | #237 | 1,345 | #2,535 | 11 |
| 1959 | #241 | 1,276 | #2,821 | 9 |
| 1958 | #253 | 1,178 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #250 | 1,162 | #3,552 | 6 |
| 1956 | #244 | 1,170 | #2,969 | 8 |
| 1955 | #255 | 1,047 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #237 | 1,161 | — | |
| 1953 | #238 | 1,148 | #2,531 | 10 |
| 1952 | #234 | 1,122 | #2,875 | 8 |
| 1951 | #223 | 1,160 | #2,495 | 10 |
| 1950 | #225 | 1,116 | — | |
| 1949 | #218 | 1,198 | #2,802 | 8 |
| 1948 | #225 | 1,086 | — | |
| 1947 | #225 | 1,096 | #2,251 | 12 |
| 1946 | #229 | 970 | #3,525 | 5 |
| 1945 | #228 | 833 | #2,009 | 12 |
| 1944 | #225 | 841 | — | |
| 1943 | #230 | 856 | #2,732 | 8 |
| 1942 | #228 | 837 | #2,145 | 12 |
| 1941 | #209 | 845 | #2,207 | 11 |
| 1940 | #209 | 843 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #204 | 859 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #203 | 857 | #2,084 | 12 |
| 1937 | #202 | 842 | #1,913 | 14 |
| 1936 | #210 | 791 | #2,301 | 10 |
| 1935 | #192 | 910 | #2,127 | 12 |
| 1934 | #200 | 888 | #2,022 | 13 |
| 1933 | #193 | 891 | #2,093 | 12 |
| 1932 | #189 | 969 | #1,995 | 14 |
| 1931 | #202 | 904 | #2,207 | 12 |
| 1930 | #190 | 1,015 | #2,444 | 11 |
| 1929 | #193 | 1,016 | #2,002 | 15 |
| 1928 | #190 | 1,082 | #2,843 | 9 |
| 1927 | #189 | 1,078 | #2,193 | 14 |
| 1926 | #176 | 1,203 | #2,566 | 11 |
| 1925 | #171 | 1,317 | #2,936 | 9 |
| 1924 | #172 | 1,335 | #2,473 | 12 |
| 1923 | #180 | 1,221 | #2,772 | 10 |
| 1922 | #180 | 1,219 | #2,040 | 16 |
| 1921 | #167 | 1,350 | #3,214 | 8 |
| 1920 | #157 | 1,477 | #1,966 | 17 |
| 1919 | #161 | 1,372 | #2,385 | 12 |
| 1918 | #161 | 1,382 | #3,096 | 8 |
| 1917 | #154 | 1,360 | #1,900 | 16 |
| 1916 | #154 | 1,314 | #2,259 | 12 |
| 1915 | #144 | 1,293 | #2,458 | 10 |
| 1914 | #143 | 1,038 | #1,868 | 12 |
| 1913 | #135 | 890 | #2,092 | 8 |
| 1912 | #129 | 882 | #1,353 | 13 |
| 1911 | #116 | 779 | #1,190 | 9 |
| 1910 | #111 | 753 | #1,045 | 10 |
| 1909 | #107 | 670 | #1,083 | 8 |
| 1908 | #110 | 648 | — | |
| 1907 | #104 | 676 | #1,094 | 7 |
| 1906 | #101 | 644 | #798 | 10 |
| 1905 | #92 | 742 | #741 | 11 |
| 1904 | #93 | 698 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #87 | 724 | #1,009 | 6 |
| 1902 | #86 | 724 | #862 | 8 |
| 1901 | #81 | 727 | — | |
| 1900 | #83 | 919 | #902 | 9 |
| 1899 | #80 | 709 | — | |
| 1898 | #74 | 868 | #1,121 | 5 |
| 1897 | #71 | 812 | #852 | 7 |
| 1896 | #71 | 844 | — | |
| 1895 | #70 | 846 | #978 | 6 |
| 1894 | #68 | 854 | #857 | 7 |
| 1893 | #67 | 825 | #907 | 6 |
| 1892 | #63 | 899 | #861 | 7 |
| 1891 | #63 | 801 | — | |
| 1890 | #63 | 835 | #994 | 5 |
| 1889 | #60 | 831 | — | |
| 1888 | #61 | 832 | #815 | 7 |
| 1887 | #56 | 735 | #679 | 8 |
| 1886 | #56 | 708 | #694 | 8 |
| 1885 | #56 | 670 | #700 | 8 |
| 1884 | #56 | 648 | — | |
| 1883 | #55 | 589 | — | |
| 1882 | #58 | 539 | — | |
| 1881 | #55 | 498 | — | |
| 1880 | #55 | 471 | #909 | 5 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Nora was already there! It came in at #55, and was given to 471 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 680 girls a year got the name.
Where Nora is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Alaska#121 · 1 in 385
- Texas#124 · 1 in 532
- New Mexico#207 · 1 in 887
- Connecticut#225 · 1 in 1,315
- Illinois#233 · 1 in 1,513
Best ever in a state: #3 in Vermont, 2021.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | #121 | 7 | 1 in 385 |
| Texas | #124 | 208 | 1 in 532 |
| New Mexico | #207 | 13 | 1 in 887 |
| Connecticut | #225 | 18 | 1 in 1,315 |
| Illinois | #233 | 68 | 1 in 1,513 |
| Arizona | #241 | 14 | 1 in 1,102 |
| New York | #249 | 115 | 1 in 1,421 |
| North Carolina | #256 | 27 | 1 in 1,766 |
| New Jersey | #266 | 30 | 1 in 1,902 |
| Kentucky | #268 | 18 | 1 in 1,712 |
| Massachusetts | #270 | 23 | 1 in 2,233 |
| Virginia | #272 | 22 | 1 in 1,829 |
| Indiana | #280 | 25 | 1 in 1,936 |
| Maine | #282 | 5 | 1 in 1,984 |
| Ohio | #284 | 45 | 1 in 2,188 |
| Pennsylvania | #284 | 49 | 1 in 2,129 |
| Georgia | #292 | 23 | 1 in 1,899 |
| Michigan | #292 | 37 | 1 in 2,218 |
| West Virginia | #294 | 8 | 1 in 2,015 |
| Oregon | #295 | 9 | 1 in 1,711 |
| Florida | #297 | 26 | 1 in 1,892 |
| Hawaii | #299 | 5 | 1 in 1,272 |
| Maryland | #301 | 13 | 1 in 2,253 |
| Minnesota | #301 | 15 | 1 in 2,526 |
| Washington | #301 | 15 | 1 in 1,850 |
| California | #304 | 96 | 1 in 1,807 |
| Arkansas | #318 | 8 | 1 in 2,204 |
| Colorado | #324 | 10 | 1 in 1,918 |
| Mississippi | #324 | 12 | 1 in 2,059 |
| Iowa | #325 | 10 | 1 in 2,736 |
| South Carolina | #336 | 11 | 1 in 2,307 |
| Tennessee | #338 | 13 | 1 in 2,738 |
| Alabama | #359 | 13 | 1 in 2,565 |
| District of Columbia | #372 | 5 | 1 in 2,613 |
| Louisiana | #372 | 16 | 1 in 2,378 |
| Missouri | #417 | 11 | 1 in 3,872 |
| Wisconsin | #485 | 6 | 1 in 7,056 |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Nora
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 2 spots since 2024 (#22 → #20)
- 10 spots since 2020 (#30 → #20)
- 21 spots since 2015 (#41 → #20)
- Biggest jump: 104 spots in 2003 (#471 → #367)
- Biggest drop: 45 spots in 2000 (#455 → #500)
Rise & fade · girls
145 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2025 at #20 (6,380 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 39 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 39 yrs · run 1880–1905
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 185
- Highest: 1 in 185 girls born in 1881 were named Nora (0.54%)
- Latest: 1 in 252 girls born in 2025 (0.40%)
- Its best rank, #20 in 2025, was only 1 in 252 (0.40%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 22.8% of all girls named Nora (44,076) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #55 (1883) → #500 (2000) → #20 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6,521 | #55 (1883) | #57 |
| 1890s | 8,293 | #63 (1892) | #69 |
| 1900s | 7,172 | #81 (1901) | #94 |
| 1910s | 11,063 | #111 (1910) | #141 |
| 1920s | 12,298 | #157 (1920) | #178 |
| 1930s | 8,926 | #189 (1932) | #199 |
| 1940s | 9,405 | #209 (1941) | #223 |
| 1950s | 11,540 | #223 (1951) | #240 |
| 1960s | 9,521 | #237 (1960) | #293 |
| 1970s | 5,770 | #364 (1972) | #378 |
| 1980s | 5,532 | #391 (1984) | #410 |
| 1990s | 5,532 | #431 (1990) | #459 |
| 2000s | 10,922 | #198 (2009) | #327 |
| 2010s | 44,076 | #29 (2017) | #70 |
| 2020s | 36,567 | #20 (2025) | #25 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Nora in 1962
girls
#274
1,076 births · 1 in 1,828 girls
Top girls' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 1,828 of them was named Nora, which outranked 96.4% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Nora
Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.