Oaklee
- #535 for girls in 2025, 565 births
- #2,006 for boys in 2025, 75 births
- Given to girls 84.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 687 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,576since 1999
Oaklee over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #535 | 565 | #2,006 | 75 |
| 2024 | #515 | 598 | #1,938 | 81 |
| 2023 | #445 | 687 | #1,608 | 108 |
| 2022 | #465 | 682 | #1,504 | 120 |
| 2021 | #487 | 645 | #1,658 | 100 |
| 2020 | #623 | 470 | #1,922 | 76 |
| 2019 | #756 | 371 | #1,790 | 86 |
| 2018 | #856 | 316 | #1,856 | 81 |
| 2017 | #942 | 280 | #2,154 | 63 |
| 2016 | #1,197 | 208 | #2,518 | 50 |
| 2015 | #1,454 | 158 | #2,528 | 49 |
| 2014 | #1,876 | 107 | #2,847 | 41 |
| 2013 | #1,834 | 110 | #3,661 | 28 |
| 2012 | #2,401 | 77 | #4,686 | 20 |
| 2011 | #2,695 | 65 | #4,509 | 21 |
| 2010 | #3,203 | 51 | #6,698 | 12 |
| 2009 | #3,409 | 48 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #4,006 | 39 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,840 | 18 | — | |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,077 | 16 | — | |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | — | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | — | |
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1999
The first year at least five girls were named Oaklee! It came in at #12,688, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1999–2000, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Oaklee is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Wyoming#79 · 1 in 162
- West Virginia#116 · 1 in 390
- Utah#119 · 1 in 474
- Kentucky#160 · 1 in 616
- Montana#168 · 1 in 471
Best ever in a state: #28 in Wyoming, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #79 | 5 | 1 in 162 |
| West Virginia | #116 | 13 | 1 in 390 |
| Utah | #119 | 36 | 1 in 474 |
| Kentucky | #160 | 28 | 1 in 616 |
| Montana | #168 | 6 | 1 in 471 |
| Idaho | #193 | 11 | 1 in 651 |
| North Dakota | #195 | 5 | 1 in 540 |
| Oklahoma | #196 | 20 | 1 in 739 |
| Arkansas | #198 | 15 | 1 in 706 |
| Missouri | #256 | 24 | 1 in 1,012 |
| Mississippi | #341 | 8 | 1 in 1,113 |
| Indiana | #359 | 19 | 1 in 1,469 |
| Louisiana | #369 | 12 | 1 in 1,364 |
| Tennessee | #375 | 21 | 1 in 1,527 |
| Arizona | #388 | 17 | 1 in 1,660 |
| Iowa | #390 | 8 | 1 in 1,472 |
| Wisconsin | #391 | 13 | 1 in 1,558 |
| Minnesota | #422 | 12 | 1 in 1,790 |
| Alabama | #436 | 11 | 1 in 1,665 |
| Colorado | #456 | 12 | 1 in 1,944 |
| Michigan | #484 | 17 | 1 in 2,102 |
| Pennsylvania | #487 | 21 | 1 in 2,223 |
| Ohio | #504 | 21 | 1 in 2,251 |
| Oregon | #548 | 6 | 1 in 2,175 |
| Texas | #559 | 56 | 1 in 2,867 |
| Kansas | #578 | 5 | 1 in 2,362 |
| Washington | #617 | 10 | 1 in 2,886 |
| North Carolina | #684 | 14 | 1 in 3,320 |
| South Carolina | #688 | 6 | 1 in 3,048 |
| Virginia | #758 | 9 | 1 in 3,749 |
| Florida | #768 | 21 | 1 in 4,132 |
| Georgia | #796 | 12 | 1 in 3,767 |
| Illinois | #797 | 11 | 1 in 4,030 |
| New York | #1,165 | 12 | 1 in 6,527 |
| California | #1,276 | 19 | 1 in 8,512 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Oaklee
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 20 spots since 2024 (#515 → #535)
- 88 spots since 2020 (#623 → #535)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 2017
- Biggest drop: 70 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · girls
24 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1999
- Peaked 2023 at #445 (687 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 9 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,336
- Highest: 1 in 2,336 girls born in 2023 were named Oaklee (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,845 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 65.4% of all girls named Oaklee (3,647) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 | #12,688 (1999) | #12,688 |
| 2000s | 180 | #3,409 (2009) | #8,762 |
| 2010s | 1,743 | #756 (2019) | #1,721 |
| 2020s | 3,647 | #445 (2023) | #512 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Oaklee ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: